3 Reasons Why Teams
Trust SentinelOne Vs. Carbon Black

MITRE ATT&CK:
See How VMware Carbon Black Stacks Up

In the 2022 MITRE Engenuity ATT&CK Evaluation—the most trusted 3rd party performance test in the industry—SentinelOne achieved record-breaking results, delivering 100% protection across operating systems with the fastest threat containment and with the most analytic detections 3 years running. The SentinelOne Singularity platform consolidated the 109-step campaign into just 9 console alerts out-of-the-box, providing 99% visibility and automatically providing analysts with the context & correlation they need without extensive setup.

VMware Carbon Black’s performance again questions its ability to protect today’s enterprises. At this year’s evaluation, VMware Carbon Black could only provide analytic detections for 57 of 109 substeps, and they missed one protection test completely.

Designed to Maximize Your Time

In today’s threat landscape, every second counts. SentinelOne makes it easy for any team to get started and become experts with a single, fast-to-deploy agent, automatic attack reconstruction using Storyline™ technology, and 1-click or auto-remediation & rollback. Endpoints are equipped with static and behavioral AI to make decisions and act in real time.

VMware Carbon Black, in contrast, delays your responsiveness to malicious activity by requiring extensive tuning & configuration across multiple consoles and agents, overly complex queries for threat hunting, heavy manual correlation of alerts, and manual re-imaging for “remediation.”

Protection from What You Know,

and What You Don’t

Prevention and detection solutions that focus on “known bad” only see half the picture. While SentinelOne leverages both static and behavioral AI engines to detect anomalous activity & modern attacks with or without cloud connectivity, VMware Carbon Black depends heavily on cloud access and file signatures sourced from third parties to identify attacks.

This outdated approach leaves behind gaps in your coverage and visibility, increasing potential dwell time and exposure to zero-day threats.

“SentinelOne was playing against some very well established players in the field, and it was a lot more compelling than what the rest was bringing to the table.”

Comparing SentinelOne Vs. Carbon Black

Platform Capabilities

Feature parity across operating systems: Includes legacy and modern versions of Windows, macOS, and Linux	Reduced feature set for macOS and Linux: Limited signatures and rules
Comprehensive cloud workload security: Protects cloud VMs, Docker, and Kubernetes; supports 3x as many Linux distributions with Dev-Ops friendly agent (operates in user space)	Limited, unstable protection: Focuses primarily on vSphere integration, supports fewer Linux distros with sensor that runs as a kernel module
Cloud connectivity optional: Best-in-class EPP + EDR, even when offline	Cloud-dependent: Detections and convictions rely heavily on cloud access
USB & Bluetooth Device Control and Firewall Control: Available across all platforms	Device control limited to USB storage, Windows OS
	No firewall control

Automation & Recovery

Real-time, machine-powered attack reconstruction: Events are automatically reconstructed into an easily navigable Storyline, focused & contextualized alerts for analysts means faster MTTR	Disconnected security events resulting in alert fatigue: Requires heavy manual correlation & reconstruction, as noted in the MITRE evaluation
Fully automated recovery: Autonomous & 1-click remediation and patented rollback	Manual, scripted “remediation”: Just restores endpoints to pre-infected state

EDR Quality & Coverage

Static & behavioral-based detection: Equipped to handle unknown threats and modern TTPs, including fileless and in-memory attacks	Traditional, signature-based approach: Misses fileless, advanced attacks, rudimentary AI capabilities
MITRE ATT&CK mapping: Integrates with MITRE Framework for easier, more intuitive investigation	No MITRE ATT&CK Framework mapping, complex query languages
Richest detections in 2022 MITRE ATT&CK® evaluation: SentinelOne outperformed VMware Carbon Black with 108 out of 109 analytic detections. Carbon Black's performance resulted in analytic detections for only 57 out of 109 substeps and 19 misses.	19x more misses: Carbon Black missed 19 detections compared to SentinelOne's 1 miss out of 109 substeps
Accessible upgrades up to 365 days for EDR data retention	Data retention limited to 180 days: Customers report frequent outages & API data restrictions

Value-Adding Services

Global portfolio of support & managed security services: Includes 24x7 Vigilance Respond MDR & Vigilance Respond Pro MDR+DFIR staffed by in-house experts, operations span North American, EMEA, and APAC regions

Outsourced approach to basic MDR: Alert management and triage conducted by 3rd party vendors, no incident response capabilities

SentinelOne
Vs Carbon Black

Get a Personalized Demo

3 Reasons Why Teams
Trust SentinelOne Vs. Carbon Black

MITRE ATT&CK:
See How VMware Carbon Black Stacks Up

Designed to Maximize Your Time

Protection from What You Know,

and What You Don’t

Hear from Our Customers

Comparing SentinelOne Vs. Carbon Black

SentinelOne Vs. Carbon Black:
MITRE Engenuity ATT&CK Evaluations

The World’s Leading and Largest Enterprises Trust SentinelOne

Purpose Built to Prevent Tomorrow’s Threats.

Today.

SentinelOne Vs Carbon Black

Get a Personalized Demo

3 Reasons Why Teams Trust SentinelOne Vs. Carbon Black

MITRE ATT&CK:See How VMware Carbon Black Stacks Up

Designed to Maximize Your Time

Protection from What You Know,

and What You Don’t

Hear from Our Customers

Comparing SentinelOne Vs. Carbon Black

SentinelOne Vs. Carbon Black: MITRE Engenuity ATT&CK Evaluations

The World’s Leading and Largest Enterprises Trust SentinelOne

Purpose Built to Prevent Tomorrow’s Threats.

Today.

SentinelOne
Vs Carbon Black

3 Reasons Why Teams
Trust SentinelOne Vs. Carbon Black

MITRE ATT&CK:
See How VMware Carbon Black Stacks Up

SentinelOne Vs. Carbon Black:
MITRE Engenuity ATT&CK Evaluations