The SentinelOne Annual Threat Report - A Defenders Guide from the FrontlinesThe SentinelOne Annual Threat ReportGet the Report
Experiencing a Breach?Blog
Get StartedContact Us
SentinelOne
  • Platform
    Platform Overview
    • Singularity Platform
      Welcome to Integrated Enterprise Security
    • AI for Security
      Leading the Way in AI-Powered Security Solutions
    • Securing AI
      Accelerate AI Adoption with Secure AI Tools, Apps, and Agents.
    • How It Works
      The Singularity XDR Difference
    • Singularity Marketplace
      One-Click Integrations to Unlock the Power of XDR
    • Pricing & Packaging
      Comparisons and Guidance at a Glance
    Data & AI
    • Purple AI
      Accelerate SecOps with Generative AI
    • Singularity Hyperautomation
      Easily Automate Security Processes
    • AI-SIEM
      The AI SIEM for the Autonomous SOC
    • AI Data Pipelines
      Security Data Pipeline for AI SIEM and Data Optimization
    • Singularity Data Lake
      AI-Powered, Unified Data Lake
    • Singularity Data Lake for Log Analytics
      Seamlessly Ingest Data from On-Prem, Cloud or Hybrid Environments
    Endpoint Security
    • Singularity Endpoint
      Autonomous Prevention, Detection, and Response
    • Singularity XDR
      Native & Open Protection, Detection, and Response
    • Singularity RemoteOps Forensics
      Orchestrate Forensics at Scale
    • Singularity Threat Intelligence
      Comprehensive Adversary Intelligence
    • Singularity Vulnerability Management
      Application & OS Vulnerability Management
    • Singularity Identity
      Identity Threat Detection and Response
    Cloud Security
    • Singularity Cloud Security
      Block Attacks with an AI-Powered CNAPP
    • Singularity Cloud Native Security
      Secure Cloud and Development Resources
    • Singularity Cloud Workload Security
      Real-Time Cloud Workload Protection Platform
    • Singularity Cloud Data Security
      AI-Powered Threat Detection for Cloud Storage
    • Singularity Cloud Security Posture Management
      Detect and Remediate Cloud Misconfigurations
    Securing AI
    • Prompt Security
      Secure AI Tools Across Your Enterprise
  • Why SentinelOne?
    Why SentinelOne?
    • Why SentinelOne?
      Cybersecurity Built for What’s Next
    • Our Customers
      Trusted by the World’s Leading Enterprises
    • Industry Recognition
      Tested and Proven by the Experts
    • About Us
      The Industry Leader in Autonomous Cybersecurity
    Compare SentinelOne
    • Arctic Wolf
    • Broadcom
    • CrowdStrike
    • Cybereason
    • Microsoft
    • Palo Alto Networks
    • Sophos
    • Splunk
    • Trellix
    • Trend Micro
    • Wiz
    Verticals
    • Energy
    • Federal Government
    • Finance
    • Healthcare
    • Higher Education
    • K-12 Education
    • Manufacturing
    • Retail
    • State and Local Government
  • Services
    Managed Services
    • Managed Services Overview
      Wayfinder Threat Detection & Response
    • Threat Hunting
      World-Class Expertise and Threat Intelligence
    • Managed Detection & Response
      24/7/365 Expert MDR Across Your Entire Environment
    • Incident Readiness & Response
      DFIR, Breach Readiness, & Compromise Assessments
    Support, Deployment, & Health
    • Technical Account Management
      Customer Success with Personalized Service
    • SentinelOne GO
      Guided Onboarding & Deployment Advisory
    • SentinelOne University
      Live and On-Demand Training
    • Services Overview
      Comprehensive Solutions for Seamless Security Operations
    • SentinelOne Community
      Community Login
  • Partners
    Our Network
    • MSSP Partners
      Succeed Faster with SentinelOne
    • Singularity Marketplace
      Extend the Power of S1 Technology
    • Cyber Risk Partners
      Enlist Pro Response and Advisory Teams
    • Technology Alliances
      Integrated, Enterprise-Scale Solutions
    • SentinelOne for AWS
      Hosted in AWS Regions Around the World
    • Channel Partners
      Deliver the Right Solutions, Together
    • SentinelOne for Google Cloud
      Unified, Autonomous Security Giving Defenders the Advantage at Global Scale
    • Partner Locator
      Your Go-to Source for Our Top Partners in Your Region
    Partner Portal→
  • Resources
    Resource Center
    • Case Studies
    • Data Sheets
    • eBooks
    • Reports
    • Videos
    • Webinars
    • Whitepapers
    • Events
    View All Resources→
    Blog
    • Feature Spotlight
    • For CISO/CIO
    • From the Front Lines
    • Identity
    • Cloud
    • macOS
    • SentinelOne Blog
    Blog→
    Tech Resources
    • SentinelLABS
    • Ransomware Anthology
    • Cybersecurity 101
  • About
    About SentinelOne
    • About SentinelOne
      The Industry Leader in Cybersecurity
    • Investor Relations
      Financial Information & Events
    • SentinelLABS
      Threat Research for the Modern Threat Hunter
    • Careers
      The Latest Job Opportunities
    • Press & News
      Company Announcements
    • Cybersecurity Blog
      The Latest Cybersecurity Threats, News, & More
    • FAQ
      Get Answers to Our Most Frequently Asked Questions
    • DataSet
      The Live Data Platform
    • S Foundation
      Securing a Safer Future for All
    • S Ventures
      Investing in the Next Generation of Security, Data and AI
  • Pricing
Get StartedContact Us
CVE Vulnerability Database
Vulnerability Database/CVE-2026-42584

CVE-2026-42584: Netty Information Disclosure Vulnerability

CVE-2026-42584 is an information disclosure vulnerability in Netty's HttpClientCodec that causes response mispairing in pipelined requests. This article covers the technical details, affected versions, and mitigation.

Published: May 14, 2026

CVE-2026-42584 Overview

CVE-2026-42584 is an HTTP request smuggling vulnerability in Netty, an asynchronous event-driven network application framework widely used in Java applications. The flaw resides in HttpClientCodec, which incorrectly pairs inbound responses with outbound requests when 1xx informational responses are involved. When a client pipelines a GET followed by a HEAD request, a server response sequence of 103, 200 with body, then 200 for HEAD causes the codec to associate HEAD with the first 200. The HEAD rule then skips the body read, leaving GET entity bytes on the wire and parsing the next response from the wrong offset. The issue is fixed in versions 4.2.13.Final and 4.1.133.Final.

Critical Impact

Response desynchronization in pipelined HTTP traffic allows attackers to corrupt response parsing, potentially exposing one user's response data to another or enabling cache poisoning.

Affected Products

  • Netty versions prior to 4.2.13.Final (4.2.x branch)
  • Netty versions prior to 4.1.133.Final (4.1.x branch)
  • Applications using HttpClientCodec with HTTP pipelining enabled

Discovery Timeline

  • 2026-05-13 - CVE CVE-2026-42584 published to NVD
  • 2026-05-13 - Last updated in NVD database

Technical Details for CVE-2026-42584

Vulnerability Analysis

The vulnerability is classified as [CWE-444] Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests, commonly known as HTTP request/response smuggling. Netty's HttpClientCodec maintains an internal queue that tracks outstanding outbound HTTP method requests. When responses arrive, the codec calls queue.poll() once per response to determine how to parse the body, including for 1xx informational responses such as 103 Early Hints.

This pairing logic is incorrect. 1xx responses are non-terminal and must not consume an entry from the request queue. The queue poll causes subsequent terminal responses to be paired with the wrong outbound request method.

Root Cause

The root cause lies in HttpClientCodec's response-to-request pairing logic. The codec treats every inbound response, including 1xx informational responses, as a terminal response for queue accounting purposes. Per RFC 9110, 1xx responses are interim and a single request can receive multiple 1xx responses before a final response.

When a client pipelines GET then HEAD and the server sends 103, then 200 with a GET body, then 200 for HEAD, the queue pairs the first terminal 200 with HEAD instead of GET. The HEAD-response rule then skips reading the message body, leaving the actual GET entity bytes unread on the stream.

Attack Vector

An attacker controlling a malicious or compromised server, or a man-in-the-middle on cleartext HTTP, can craft response sequences that desynchronize the parser. After desynchronization, body bytes intended for one response become the headers of the next parsed response. This enables response smuggling, where attacker-controlled content can be interpreted as headers or status lines of subsequent responses, potentially poisoning client-side caches or leaking response data across logical request boundaries.

The vulnerability requires HTTP pipelining and is triggered by 1xx interim responses such as 103 Early Hints mixed with HEAD requests in the pipeline.

No verified public proof-of-concept code is available. Refer to the GitHub Security Advisory GHSA-57rv-r2g8-2cj3 for technical details.

Detection Methods for CVE-2026-42584

Indicators of Compromise

  • Unexpected response parsing errors or malformed header exceptions in Netty client logs after receiving 103 Early Hints responses.
  • Mismatched Content-Length or chunked encoding errors logged by HttpObjectDecoder following pipelined requests.
  • Application logs showing response body content appearing where headers are expected.

Detection Strategies

  • Inventory Java applications and dependencies for vulnerable Netty versions using software composition analysis tools that scan pom.xml, build.gradle, and uber-JARs.
  • Inspect network captures for HTTP 103 responses sent to clients that pipeline HEAD requests, which is the trigger pattern.
  • Enable verbose logging on HttpClientCodec and review for unusual decode state transitions or pairing anomalies.

Monitoring Recommendations

  • Monitor outbound HTTP client connections from Netty-based services for protocol errors and unexpected connection resets.
  • Track exception stack traces originating from io.netty.handler.codec.http.HttpClientCodec and HttpObjectDecoder classes.
  • Alert on dependency drift where Netty versions remain below 4.1.133.Final or 4.2.13.Final after the patch window.

How to Mitigate CVE-2026-42584

Immediate Actions Required

  • Upgrade Netty to 4.2.13.Final or 4.1.133.Final depending on which branch is in use.
  • Identify all transitive Netty dependencies in build artifacts, including shaded and relocated copies inside fat JARs.
  • Restart all services that load Netty classes after upgrading to ensure the patched code is active.

Patch Information

The vulnerability is fixed in Netty 4.2.13.Final and 4.1.133.Final. The patch corrects HttpClientCodec so that 1xx informational responses no longer consume an entry from the request queue, restoring correct response-to-request pairing. See the GitHub Security Advisory GHSA-57rv-r2g8-2cj3 for the official patch details.

Workarounds

  • Disable HTTP pipelining in Netty-based clients where feasible, since the vulnerability requires multiple in-flight requests on one connection.
  • Avoid mixing HEAD requests with other methods on pipelined connections until the upgrade is applied.
  • Restrict client traffic to trusted servers that do not emit 103 Early Hints responses, reducing exposure to the trigger condition.
bash
# Maven dependency upgrade example
mvn versions:use-dep-version -Dincludes=io.netty:netty-codec-http -DdepVersion=4.1.133.Final -DforceVersion=true

# Gradle dependency override example
# In build.gradle:
# implementation('io.netty:netty-codec-http:4.1.133.Final')

# Verify resolved version
mvn dependency:tree | grep netty-codec-http

Disclaimer: This content was generated using AI. While we strive for accuracy, please verify critical information with official sources.

  • Vulnerability Details
  • TypeInformation Disclosure

  • Vendor/TechNetty

  • SeverityHIGH

  • CVSS Score7.3

  • Known ExploitedNo
  • CVSS Vector
  • CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
  • Impact Assessment
  • ConfidentialityLow
  • IntegrityNone
  • AvailabilityLow
  • CWE References
  • CWE-444
  • Technical References
  • GitHub Security Advisory
  • Related CVEs
  • CVE-2022-24823: Netty HTTP Codec Information Disclosure

  • CVE-2021-21290: Netty Information Disclosure Vulnerability

  • CVE-2026-42582: Netty Buffer Overflow Vulnerability

  • CVE-2026-44248: Netty MQTT Decoder DoS Vulnerability
Default Legacy - Prefooter | Experience the World’s Most Advanced Cybersecurity Platform

Experience the Most Advanced Cybersecurity Platform

See how the world’s most intelligent, autonomous cybersecurity platform can protect your organization today and into the future.

Try SentinelOne
  • Get Started
  • Get a Demo
  • Product Tour
  • Why SentinelOne
  • Pricing & Packaging
  • FAQ
  • Contact
  • Contact Us
  • Customer Support
  • SentinelOne Status
  • Language
  • Platform
  • Singularity Platform
  • Singularity Endpoint
  • Singularity Cloud
  • Singularity AI-SIEM
  • Singularity Identity
  • Singularity Marketplace
  • Purple AI
  • Services
  • Wayfinder TDR
  • SentinelOne GO
  • Technical Account Management
  • Support Services
  • Verticals
  • Energy
  • Federal Government
  • Finance
  • Healthcare
  • Higher Education
  • K-12 Education
  • Manufacturing
  • Retail
  • State and Local Government
  • Cybersecurity for SMB
  • Resources
  • Blog
  • Labs
  • Case Studies
  • Videos
  • Product Tours
  • Events
  • Cybersecurity 101
  • eBooks
  • Webinars
  • Whitepapers
  • Press
  • News
  • Ransomware Anthology
  • Company
  • About Us
  • Our Customers
  • Careers
  • Partners
  • Legal & Compliance
  • Security & Compliance
  • Investor Relations
  • S Foundation
  • S Ventures

©2026 SentinelOne, All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Notice Terms of Use

English