Join the Cyber Forum: Threat Intel on May 12, 2026 to learn how AI is reshaping threat defense.Join the Virtual Cyber Forum: Threat IntelRegister Now
Experiencing a Breach?Blog
Get StartedContact Us
SentinelOne
  • Platform
    Platform Overview
    • Singularity Platform
      Welcome to Integrated Enterprise Security
    • AI for Security
      Leading the Way in AI-Powered Security Solutions
    • Securing AI
      Accelerate AI Adoption with Secure AI Tools, Apps, and Agents.
    • How It Works
      The Singularity XDR Difference
    • Singularity Marketplace
      One-Click Integrations to Unlock the Power of XDR
    • Pricing & Packaging
      Comparisons and Guidance at a Glance
    Data & AI
    • Purple AI
      Accelerate SecOps with Generative AI
    • Singularity Hyperautomation
      Easily Automate Security Processes
    • AI-SIEM
      The AI SIEM for the Autonomous SOC
    • AI Data Pipelines
      Security Data Pipeline for AI SIEM and Data Optimization
    • Singularity Data Lake
      AI-Powered, Unified Data Lake
    • Singularity Data Lake for Log Analytics
      Seamlessly Ingest Data from On-Prem, Cloud or Hybrid Environments
    Endpoint Security
    • Singularity Endpoint
      Autonomous Prevention, Detection, and Response
    • Singularity XDR
      Native & Open Protection, Detection, and Response
    • Singularity RemoteOps Forensics
      Orchestrate Forensics at Scale
    • Singularity Threat Intelligence
      Comprehensive Adversary Intelligence
    • Singularity Vulnerability Management
      Application & OS Vulnerability Management
    • Singularity Identity
      Identity Threat Detection and Response
    Cloud Security
    • Singularity Cloud Security
      Block Attacks with an AI-Powered CNAPP
    • Singularity Cloud Native Security
      Secure Cloud and Development Resources
    • Singularity Cloud Workload Security
      Real-Time Cloud Workload Protection Platform
    • Singularity Cloud Data Security
      AI-Powered Threat Detection for Cloud Storage
    • Singularity Cloud Security Posture Management
      Detect and Remediate Cloud Misconfigurations
    Securing AI
    • Prompt Security
      Secure AI Tools Across Your Enterprise
  • Why SentinelOne?
    Why SentinelOne?
    • Why SentinelOne?
      Cybersecurity Built for What’s Next
    • Our Customers
      Trusted by the World’s Leading Enterprises
    • Industry Recognition
      Tested and Proven by the Experts
    • About Us
      The Industry Leader in Autonomous Cybersecurity
    Compare SentinelOne
    • Arctic Wolf
    • Broadcom
    • CrowdStrike
    • Cybereason
    • Microsoft
    • Palo Alto Networks
    • Sophos
    • Splunk
    • Trellix
    • Trend Micro
    • Wiz
    Verticals
    • Energy
    • Federal Government
    • Finance
    • Healthcare
    • Higher Education
    • K-12 Education
    • Manufacturing
    • Retail
    • State and Local Government
  • Services
    Managed Services
    • Managed Services Overview
      Wayfinder Threat Detection & Response
    • Threat Hunting
      World-Class Expertise and Threat Intelligence
    • Managed Detection & Response
      24/7/365 Expert MDR Across Your Entire Environment
    • Incident Readiness & Response
      DFIR, Breach Readiness, & Compromise Assessments
    Support, Deployment, & Health
    • Technical Account Management
      Customer Success with Personalized Service
    • SentinelOne GO
      Guided Onboarding & Deployment Advisory
    • SentinelOne University
      Live and On-Demand Training
    • Services Overview
      Comprehensive Solutions for Seamless Security Operations
    • SentinelOne Community
      Community Login
  • Partners
    Our Network
    • MSSP Partners
      Succeed Faster with SentinelOne
    • Singularity Marketplace
      Extend the Power of S1 Technology
    • Cyber Risk Partners
      Enlist Pro Response and Advisory Teams
    • Technology Alliances
      Integrated, Enterprise-Scale Solutions
    • SentinelOne for AWS
      Hosted in AWS Regions Around the World
    • Channel Partners
      Deliver the Right Solutions, Together
    • SentinelOne for Google Cloud
      Unified, Autonomous Security Giving Defenders the Advantage at Global Scale
    • Partner Locator
      Your Go-to Source for Our Top Partners in Your Region
    Partner Portal→
  • Resources
    Resource Center
    • Case Studies
    • Data Sheets
    • eBooks
    • Reports
    • Videos
    • Webinars
    • Whitepapers
    • Events
    View All Resources→
    Blog
    • Feature Spotlight
    • For CISO/CIO
    • From the Front Lines
    • Identity
    • Cloud
    • macOS
    • SentinelOne Blog
    Blog→
    Tech Resources
    • SentinelLABS
    • Ransomware Anthology
    • Cybersecurity 101
  • About
    About SentinelOne
    • About SentinelOne
      The Industry Leader in Cybersecurity
    • Investor Relations
      Financial Information & Events
    • SentinelLABS
      Threat Research for the Modern Threat Hunter
    • Careers
      The Latest Job Opportunities
    • Press & News
      Company Announcements
    • Cybersecurity Blog
      The Latest Cybersecurity Threats, News, & More
    • FAQ
      Get Answers to Our Most Frequently Asked Questions
    • DataSet
      The Live Data Platform
    • S Foundation
      Securing a Safer Future for All
    • S Ventures
      Investing in the Next Generation of Security, Data and AI
  • Pricing
Get StartedContact Us
CVE Vulnerability Database
Vulnerability Database/CVE-2025-4575

CVE-2025-4575: OpenSSL Auth Bypass Vulnerability

CVE-2025-4575 is an authentication bypass flaw in OpenSSL 3.5 where the -addreject option incorrectly adds trusted uses instead of rejected uses. This article covers technical details, affected versions, and mitigations.

Updated: January 22, 2026

CVE-2025-4575 Overview

CVE-2025-4575 is a Certificate Validation Bypass vulnerability affecting OpenSSL 3.5, specifically the openssl x509 command-line application. A copy and paste error during code refactoring causes the -addreject option to incorrectly add a trusted use instead of a rejected use for a certificate. This logic inversion means that when administrators attempt to explicitly reject a certificate for specific purposes, it is instead marked as trusted for those purposes.

Critical Impact

When users intend to make a trusted certificate rejected for a particular use, it will instead be marked as trusted for that use, potentially allowing unintended certificate trust relationships.

Affected Products

  • OpenSSL 3.5.0
  • openssl x509 command-line application
  • Trusted certificate format users utilizing the -addreject option

Discovery Timeline

  • May 22, 2025 - CVE-2025-4575 published to NVD
  • October 23, 2025 - Last updated in NVD database

Technical Details for CVE-2025-4575

Vulnerability Analysis

This vulnerability stems from an Improper Certificate Validation issue (CWE-295) introduced during minor code refactoring in OpenSSL 3.5. The flaw specifically affects the -addreject option in the openssl x509 command-line utility. When a user attempts to mark a certificate as rejected for a particular use case (such as CMS signature verification), the certificate is instead added to the trust list rather than the rejection list.

For example, if an administrator has a trusted CA certificate that should only authenticate TLS servers but wants to explicitly reject it for CMS signature verification purposes, using the -addreject option will result in the CA certificate being trusted for CMS signature verification instead of being rejected. This directly contradicts the administrator's security intent and could allow certificates to be used in ways that were explicitly meant to be prohibited.

The vulnerability only affects users who work with the trusted certificate format and specifically use the openssl x509 command-line application to add rejected uses. The FIPS modules across all supported versions (3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1, and 3.0) are not affected. Additionally, OpenSSL versions 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1, 3.0, 1.1.1, and 1.0.2 are not affected by this issue.

Root Cause

The root cause is a simple copy and paste error introduced during code refactoring. In the apps/x509.c file, when processing the -addreject option, the code incorrectly pushes the ASN1 object to the trust stack instead of the reject stack. This single-line error inverts the intended behavior of the -addreject option.

Attack Vector

The attack vector is network-based, though exploitation requires specific conditions. An attacker cannot directly exploit this vulnerability remotely. Instead, the vulnerability manifests when system administrators or security teams inadvertently misconfigure certificate trust due to the buggy -addreject option behavior. The resulting misconfigured trust relationships could then be leveraged in subsequent attacks where certificates are trusted for purposes they should have been explicitly rejected for, such as improper signature verification or authentication scenarios.

c
// Patch showing the fix in apps/x509.c
// The -addreject option was incorrectly pushing to trust instead of reject

                            prog, opt_arg());
                 goto opthelp;
             }
-            if (!sk_ASN1_OBJECT_push(trust, objtmp))
+            if (!sk_ASN1_OBJECT_push(reject, objtmp))
                 goto end;
             trustout = 1;
             break;

Source: GitHub OpenSSL Commit

Detection Methods for CVE-2025-4575

Indicators of Compromise

  • Certificates that should be rejected for specific uses appearing in trust lists
  • Unexpected certificate trust relationships in systems where -addreject was used
  • CMS signature verification succeeding for certificates that were intended to be rejected

Detection Strategies

  • Audit all certificates processed with the openssl x509 -addreject option on OpenSSL 3.5.0 systems
  • Review certificate trust stores for any entries that were expected to be in rejection lists
  • Compare current certificate trust configurations against documented security policies and intended configurations

Monitoring Recommendations

  • Monitor for usage of openssl x509 -addreject command in system logs and administrative scripts
  • Implement certificate trust validation checks as part of security auditing procedures
  • Review any automated certificate management scripts that may use the affected -addreject option

How to Mitigate CVE-2025-4575

Immediate Actions Required

  • Identify all systems running OpenSSL version 3.5.0
  • Audit any certificates that were processed using the -addreject option
  • Re-process affected certificates after applying the security patch to correct trust relationships
  • Review and revalidate certificate trust configurations on affected systems

Patch Information

OpenSSL has released a security patch to address this vulnerability. The fix corrects the logic error by properly pushing ASN1 objects to the reject stack instead of the trust stack when the -addreject option is used. The patch is available via commit e96d22446e633d117e6c9904cb15b4693e956eaa. Administrators should update to the patched version and then re-run any -addreject operations that were performed with the vulnerable version. For detailed patch information, refer to the OpenSSL Security Advisory and the GitHub commit.

Workarounds

  • Avoid using the -addreject option on OpenSSL 3.5.0 until the patch is applied
  • Use alternative certificate management methods or older unaffected OpenSSL versions (3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1, 3.0) for reject operations
  • Manually verify certificate trust configurations after any -addreject operations
  • Consider downgrading to OpenSSL 3.4 or earlier for certificate trust management tasks until the patch can be deployed
bash
# Verify your OpenSSL version
openssl version

# If running 3.5.0, check for certificates processed with -addreject
# Review certificate trust settings after patching
openssl x509 -in certificate.pem -trustout -text | grep -A5 "Trusted Uses\|Rejected Uses"

Disclaimer: This content was generated using AI. While we strive for accuracy, please verify critical information with official sources.

  • Vulnerability Details
  • TypeAuth Bypass

  • Vendor/TechOpenssl

  • SeverityMEDIUM

  • CVSS Score6.5

  • EPSS Probability0.02%

  • Known ExploitedNo
  • CVSS Vector
  • CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
  • Impact Assessment
  • ConfidentialityLow
  • IntegrityNone
  • AvailabilityLow
  • CWE References
  • CWE-295
  • Technical References
  • Openwall OSS-Security Post
  • Vendor Resources
  • GitHub OpenSSL Commit

  • OpenSSL Security Advisory
  • Related CVEs
  • CVE-2023-0465: OpenSSL Auth Bypass Vulnerability

  • CVE-2024-12797: OpenSSL RPK Authentication Bypass Flaw

  • CVE-2021-3450: OpenSSL CA Certificate Bypass Vulnerability

  • CVE-2026-28389: OpenSSL CMS DoS Vulnerability
Default Legacy - Prefooter | Experience the World’s Most Advanced Cybersecurity Platform

Experience the World’s Most Advanced Cybersecurity Platform

See how our intelligent, autonomous cybersecurity platform can protect your organization now and into the future.

Try SentinelOne
  • Get Started
  • Get a Demo
  • Product Tour
  • Why SentinelOne
  • Pricing & Packaging
  • FAQ
  • Contact
  • Contact Us
  • Customer Support
  • SentinelOne Status
  • Language
  • Platform
  • Singularity Platform
  • Singularity Endpoint
  • Singularity Cloud
  • Singularity AI-SIEM
  • Singularity Identity
  • Singularity Marketplace
  • Purple AI
  • Services
  • Wayfinder TDR
  • SentinelOne GO
  • Technical Account Management
  • Support Services
  • Verticals
  • Energy
  • Federal Government
  • Finance
  • Healthcare
  • Higher Education
  • K-12 Education
  • Manufacturing
  • Retail
  • State and Local Government
  • Cybersecurity for SMB
  • Resources
  • Blog
  • Labs
  • Case Studies
  • Videos
  • Product Tours
  • Events
  • Cybersecurity 101
  • eBooks
  • Webinars
  • Whitepapers
  • Press
  • News
  • Ransomware Anthology
  • Company
  • About Us
  • Our Customers
  • Careers
  • Partners
  • Legal & Compliance
  • Security & Compliance
  • Investor Relations
  • S Foundation
  • S Ventures

©2026 SentinelOne, All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Notice Terms of Use

English