The SentinelOne Annual Threat Report - A Defenders Guide from the FrontlinesThe SentinelOne Annual Threat ReportGet the Report
Experiencing a Breach?Blog
Get StartedContact Us
SentinelOne
  • Platform
    Platform Overview
    • Singularity Platform
      Welcome to Integrated Enterprise Security
    • AI for Security
      Leading the Way in AI-Powered Security Solutions
    • Securing AI
      Accelerate AI Adoption with Secure AI Tools, Apps, and Agents.
    • How It Works
      The Singularity XDR Difference
    • Singularity Marketplace
      One-Click Integrations to Unlock the Power of XDR
    • Pricing & Packaging
      Comparisons and Guidance at a Glance
    Data & AI
    • Purple AI
      Accelerate SecOps with Generative AI
    • Singularity Hyperautomation
      Easily Automate Security Processes
    • AI-SIEM
      The AI SIEM for the Autonomous SOC
    • Singularity Data Lake
      AI-Powered, Unified Data Lake
    • Singularity Data Lake for Log Analytics
      Seamlessly Ingest Data from On-Prem, Cloud or Hybrid Environments
    Endpoint Security
    • Singularity Endpoint
      Autonomous Prevention, Detection, and Response
    • Singularity XDR
      Native & Open Protection, Detection, and Response
    • Singularity RemoteOps Forensics
      Orchestrate Forensics at Scale
    • Singularity Threat Intelligence
      Comprehensive Adversary Intelligence
    • Singularity Vulnerability Management
      Application & OS Vulnerability Management
    • Singularity Identity
      Identity Threat Detection and Response
    Cloud Security
    • Singularity Cloud Security
      Block Attacks with an AI-Powered CNAPP
    • Singularity Cloud Native Security
      Secure Cloud and Development Resources
    • Singularity Cloud Workload Security
      Real-Time Cloud Workload Protection Platform
    • Singularity Cloud Data Security
      AI-Powered Threat Detection for Cloud Storage
    • Singularity Cloud Security Posture Management
      Detect and Remediate Cloud Misconfigurations
    Securing AI
    • Prompt Security
      Secure AI Tools Across Your Enterprise
  • Why SentinelOne?
    Why SentinelOne?
    • Why SentinelOne?
      Cybersecurity Built for What’s Next
    • Our Customers
      Trusted by the World’s Leading Enterprises
    • Industry Recognition
      Tested and Proven by the Experts
    • About Us
      The Industry Leader in Autonomous Cybersecurity
    Compare SentinelOne
    • Arctic Wolf
    • Broadcom
    • CrowdStrike
    • Cybereason
    • Microsoft
    • Palo Alto Networks
    • Sophos
    • Splunk
    • Trellix
    • Trend Micro
    • Wiz
    Verticals
    • Energy
    • Federal Government
    • Finance
    • Healthcare
    • Higher Education
    • K-12 Education
    • Manufacturing
    • Retail
    • State and Local Government
  • Services
    Managed Services
    • Managed Services Overview
      Wayfinder Threat Detection & Response
    • Threat Hunting
      World-Class Expertise and Threat Intelligence
    • Managed Detection & Response
      24/7/365 Expert MDR Across Your Entire Environment
    • Incident Readiness & Response
      DFIR, Breach Readiness, & Compromise Assessments
    Support, Deployment, & Health
    • Technical Account Management
      Customer Success with Personalized Service
    • SentinelOne GO
      Guided Onboarding & Deployment Advisory
    • SentinelOne University
      Live and On-Demand Training
    • Services Overview
      Comprehensive Solutions for Seamless Security Operations
    • SentinelOne Community
      Community Login
  • Partners
    Our Network
    • MSSP Partners
      Succeed Faster with SentinelOne
    • Singularity Marketplace
      Extend the Power of S1 Technology
    • Cyber Risk Partners
      Enlist Pro Response and Advisory Teams
    • Technology Alliances
      Integrated, Enterprise-Scale Solutions
    • SentinelOne for AWS
      Hosted in AWS Regions Around the World
    • Channel Partners
      Deliver the Right Solutions, Together
    • SentinelOne for Google Cloud
      Unified, Autonomous Security Giving Defenders the Advantage at Global Scale
    • Partner Locator
      Your Go-to Source for Our Top Partners in Your Region
    Partner Portal→
  • Resources
    Resource Center
    • Case Studies
    • Data Sheets
    • eBooks
    • Reports
    • Videos
    • Webinars
    • Whitepapers
    • Events
    View All Resources→
    Blog
    • Feature Spotlight
    • For CISO/CIO
    • From the Front Lines
    • Identity
    • Cloud
    • macOS
    • SentinelOne Blog
    Blog→
    Tech Resources
    • SentinelLABS
    • Ransomware Anthology
    • Cybersecurity 101
  • About
    About SentinelOne
    • About SentinelOne
      The Industry Leader in Cybersecurity
    • Investor Relations
      Financial Information & Events
    • SentinelLABS
      Threat Research for the Modern Threat Hunter
    • Careers
      The Latest Job Opportunities
    • Press & News
      Company Announcements
    • Cybersecurity Blog
      The Latest Cybersecurity Threats, News, & More
    • FAQ
      Get Answers to Our Most Frequently Asked Questions
    • DataSet
      The Live Data Platform
    • S Foundation
      Securing a Safer Future for All
    • S Ventures
      Investing in the Next Generation of Security, Data and AI
  • Pricing
Get StartedContact Us
CVE Vulnerability Database
Vulnerability Database/CVE-2023-50868

CVE-2023-50868: ISC BIND DNSSEC DoS Vulnerability

CVE-2023-50868 is a denial of service vulnerability in ISC BIND that exploits DNSSEC NSEC3 responses to cause excessive CPU consumption. This article covers the technical details, affected versions, and mitigation strategies.

Published: February 11, 2026

CVE-2023-50868 Overview

CVE-2023-50868 is a denial of service vulnerability in the DNS protocol's DNSSEC implementation, specifically affecting the Closest Encloser Proof aspect as defined in RFC 5155. When RFC 9276 guidance is not followed, remote attackers can exploit NSEC3 processing to cause excessive CPU consumption through SHA-1 hash computations. This vulnerability, commonly referred to as the "NSEC3" issue, allows attackers to leverage random subdomain attacks against DNSSEC-validating resolvers, potentially rendering critical DNS infrastructure unavailable.

The vulnerability stems from the RFC 5155 specification which implies that an algorithm must perform thousands of iterations of a hash function in certain situations. Attackers can craft malicious DNSSEC responses that force DNS resolvers to perform computationally expensive operations, leading to resource exhaustion and service degradation.

Critical Impact

Remote attackers can cause denial of service against DNS resolvers by triggering excessive CPU consumption through crafted DNSSEC responses, potentially disrupting DNS resolution services for entire networks.

Affected Products

  • ISC BIND (multiple versions)
  • PowerDNS Recursor
  • Fedora 38 and 39
  • Debian Linux 10.0 and 11.0
  • Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.0, 7.0, 8.0, 8.2, and 8.4
  • NetApp Active IQ Unified Manager
  • NetApp HCI Compute Node and Bootstrap OS
  • NetApp H300S, H410C, H410S, H500S, H700S storage systems

Discovery Timeline

  • February 14, 2024 - CVE-2023-50868 published to NVD
  • December 23, 2025 - Last updated in NVD database

Technical Details for CVE-2023-50868

Vulnerability Analysis

This vulnerability exploits a design flaw in the NSEC3 (Next Secure version 3) mechanism used by DNSSEC to provide authenticated denial of existence for DNS records. NSEC3 was designed to prevent zone enumeration by using hashed owner names, but the RFC 5155 specification allows for a high number of hash iterations that can be weaponized against resolvers.

When a DNSSEC-validating resolver receives a response containing NSEC3 records, it must compute hash chains to verify the Closest Encloser Proof. The vulnerability allows attackers to force resolvers to perform thousands of SHA-1 hash iterations per query by crafting responses with high iteration counts. In a random subdomain attack scenario, the attacker queries for non-existent subdomains, causing the resolver to repeatedly process computationally expensive NSEC3 proofs.

The attack is particularly effective because it requires minimal resources from the attacker while consuming significant CPU cycles on the target resolver. A sustained attack can lead to complete service degradation, affecting all DNS resolution services provided by the compromised resolver.

Root Cause

The root cause lies in the RFC 5155 specification which permits NSEC3 records to specify iteration counts without reasonable upper bounds. The specification was designed to increase the computational cost of offline dictionary attacks against hashed zone contents, but this same mechanism can be turned against resolvers. When RFC 9276 guidance (which recommends limiting iterations) is not implemented, resolvers are vulnerable to attacks that exploit high iteration values. The lack of mandatory limits in the original specification combined with missing input validation in affected DNS software creates the exploitable condition.

Attack Vector

The attack is conducted over the network without requiring authentication or user interaction. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability by:

  1. Setting up or compromising a malicious authoritative DNS server
  2. Configuring NSEC3 zones with extremely high iteration counts
  3. Sending DNS queries for random non-existent subdomains to target resolvers
  4. Forcing the resolver to query the malicious authoritative server
  5. The malicious server responds with NSEC3 records requiring expensive hash computations
  6. The target resolver's CPU becomes saturated processing the Closest Encloser Proofs

The attack can be amplified by using multiple query sources or targeting resolvers that serve large user populations. Since DNS is a fundamental infrastructure service, the impact can cascade to affect all services dependent on DNS resolution.

Detection Methods for CVE-2023-50868

Indicators of Compromise

  • Unusual spikes in CPU utilization on DNS resolver servers correlated with DNSSEC validation operations
  • High volume of DNS queries for random or non-existent subdomains targeting specific domains
  • NSEC3 responses with abnormally high iteration counts (typically above 100-150 iterations)
  • DNS resolution timeouts or failures affecting multiple clients simultaneously

Detection Strategies

  • Monitor DNS server CPU metrics and correlate with DNSSEC validation activity to identify potential exploitation
  • Implement logging for NSEC3 iteration counts in DNS responses and alert on values exceeding recommended thresholds
  • Deploy network-based detection for patterns consistent with random subdomain attacks (high query volume for unique subdomains)
  • Analyze DNS query logs for suspicious patterns of queries to domains known to use high NSEC3 iteration counts

Monitoring Recommendations

  • Configure alerting thresholds for DNS resolver CPU utilization exceeding baseline by significant margins
  • Implement DNSSEC validation statistics monitoring to track computational overhead
  • Monitor query response times to detect degradation in DNS resolution performance
  • Track the ratio of NXDOMAIN responses to identify potential random subdomain attack campaigns

How to Mitigate CVE-2023-50868

Immediate Actions Required

  • Update all affected DNS software to patched versions immediately, prioritizing internet-facing resolvers
  • Review and implement RFC 9276 guidance which recommends limiting NSEC3 iterations to reasonable values
  • Configure DNS resolver software to cap maximum acceptable NSEC3 iteration counts
  • Monitor DNS infrastructure for signs of active exploitation while patches are being deployed

Patch Information

Multiple vendors have released security updates to address this vulnerability. ISC has published a security release for BIND (see ISC BIND Security Release for details). PowerDNS has released patches documented in their Security Advisory 2024-01. NLnet Labs has released Unbound 1.19.1 to address this issue (see Unbound Release Announcement). Additional patches are available from Red Hat, Debian, Fedora, and NetApp.

Workarounds

  • Limit NSEC3 iteration processing by configuring maximum iteration thresholds in resolver software where supported
  • Consider temporarily disabling DNSSEC validation on critical resolvers if under active attack (understanding the security trade-offs)
  • Implement rate limiting on DNS queries to reduce the impact of random subdomain attacks
  • Deploy DNS traffic analysis tools to identify and block malicious query patterns before they reach resolvers
bash
# Example BIND configuration to limit NSEC3 iterations (where supported)
# Add to named.conf options block
options {
    # Limit the maximum number of NSEC3 iterations for validation
    max-recursion-queries 75;
    # Enable query logging for analysis
    querylog yes;
};

Disclaimer: This content was generated using AI. While we strive for accuracy, please verify critical information with official sources.

  • Vulnerability Details
  • TypeDOS

  • Vendor/TechIsc Bind

  • SeverityHIGH

  • CVSS Score7.5

  • EPSS Probability13.77%

  • Known ExploitedNo
  • CVSS Vector
  • CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
  • Impact Assessment
  • ConfidentialityLow
  • IntegrityNone
  • AvailabilityHigh
  • CWE References
  • CWE-400
  • Technical References
  • Openwall Security List Update

  • Openwall Security List Update

  • SUSE Bug Report

  • IETF RFC Document

  • Knot Resolver Release Notes

  • ISC Knowledge Base CVE

  • DNSMasq Discussion

  • NLnet Labs Closure Announcement
  • Vendor Resources
  • Red Hat CVE Advisory

  • PowerDNS Security Advisory

  • Debian LTS Announcement

  • Debian LTS Announcement

  • Fedora Package Announcement

  • Fedora Package Announcement

  • Fedora Package Announcement

  • Fedora Package Announcement

  • Fedora Package Announcement

  • Fedora Package Announcement

  • Fedora Package Announcement

  • Fedora Package Announcement

  • Fedora Package Announcement

  • Fedora Package Announcement

  • NetApp Security Advisory

  • ISC BIND Security Release

  • Debian LTS Announcement

  • Debian LTS Announcement

  • Fedora Package Announcement

  • Fedora Package Announcement

  • Fedora Package Announcement
  • Related CVEs
  • CVE-2023-3341: ISC BIND Denial of Service Vulnerability

  • CVE-2022-38177: ISC BIND DOS Vulnerability

  • CVE-2023-4408: Netapp Ontap DoS Vulnerability

  • CVE-2023-5680: ISC BIND DoS Vulnerability
Experience the World’s Most Advanced Cybersecurity Platform

Experience the World’s Most Advanced Cybersecurity Platform

See how our intelligent, autonomous cybersecurity platform can protect your organization now and into the future.

Try SentinelOne
  • Get Started
  • Get a Demo
  • Product Tour
  • Why SentinelOne
  • Pricing & Packaging
  • FAQ
  • Contact
  • Contact Us
  • Customer Support
  • SentinelOne Status
  • Language
  • Platform
  • Singularity Platform
  • Singularity Endpoint
  • Singularity Cloud
  • Singularity AI-SIEM
  • Singularity Identity
  • Singularity Marketplace
  • Purple AI
  • Services
  • Wayfinder TDR
  • SentinelOne GO
  • Technical Account Management
  • Support Services
  • Verticals
  • Energy
  • Federal Government
  • Finance
  • Healthcare
  • Higher Education
  • K-12 Education
  • Manufacturing
  • Retail
  • State and Local Government
  • Cybersecurity for SMB
  • Resources
  • Blog
  • Labs
  • Case Studies
  • Videos
  • Product Tours
  • Events
  • Cybersecurity 101
  • eBooks
  • Webinars
  • Whitepapers
  • Press
  • News
  • Ransomware Anthology
  • Company
  • About Us
  • Our Customers
  • Careers
  • Partners
  • Legal & Compliance
  • Security & Compliance
  • Investor Relations
  • S Foundation
  • S Ventures

©2026 SentinelOne, All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Notice Terms of Use

English