A Leader in the 2026 Gartner® Magic Quadrant™ for Endpoint Protection. Six years running.Six years. Gartner® Magic Quadrant™ Leader.Find Out Why
Experiencing a Breach?Blog
Get StartedContact Us
SentinelOne
  • Platform
    Platform Overview
    • Singularity Platform
      Welcome to Integrated Enterprise Security
    • AI for Security
      Leading the Way in AI-Powered Security Solutions
    • Securing AI
      Accelerate AI Adoption with Secure AI Tools, Apps, and Agents.
    • How It Works
      The Singularity XDR Difference
    • Singularity Marketplace
      One-Click Integrations to Unlock the Power of XDR
    • Pricing & Packaging
      Comparisons and Guidance at a Glance
    Data & AI
    • Purple AI
      Accelerate SecOps with Generative AI
    • Singularity Hyperautomation
      Easily Automate Security Processes
    • AI-SIEM
      The AI SIEM for the Autonomous SOC
    • AI Data Pipelines
      Security Data Pipeline for AI SIEM and Data Optimization
    • Singularity Data Lake
      AI-Powered, Unified Data Lake
    • Singularity Data Lake for Log Analytics
      Seamlessly Ingest Data from On-Prem, Cloud or Hybrid Environments
    Endpoint Security
    • Singularity Endpoint
      Autonomous Prevention, Detection, and Response
    • Singularity XDR
      Native & Open Protection, Detection, and Response
    • Singularity RemoteOps Forensics
      Orchestrate Forensics at Scale
    • Singularity Threat Intelligence
      Comprehensive Adversary Intelligence
    • Singularity Vulnerability Management
      Application & OS Vulnerability Management
    • Singularity Identity
      Identity Threat Detection and Response
    Cloud Security
    • Singularity Cloud Security
      Block Attacks with an AI-Powered CNAPP
    • Singularity Cloud Native Security
      Secure Cloud and Development Resources
    • Singularity Cloud Workload Security
      Real-Time Cloud Workload Protection Platform
    • Singularity Cloud Data Security
      AI-Powered Threat Detection for Cloud Storage
    • Singularity Cloud Security Posture Management
      Detect and Remediate Cloud Misconfigurations
    Securing AI
    • Prompt Security
      Secure AI Tools Across Your Enterprise
  • Why SentinelOne?
    Why SentinelOne?
    • Why SentinelOne?
      Cybersecurity Built for What’s Next
    • Our Customers
      Trusted by the World’s Leading Enterprises
    • Industry Recognition
      Tested and Proven by the Experts
    • About Us
      The Industry Leader in Autonomous Cybersecurity
    Compare SentinelOne
    • Arctic Wolf
    • Broadcom
    • CrowdStrike
    • Cybereason
    • Microsoft
    • Palo Alto Networks
    • Sophos
    • Splunk
    • Trellix
    • Trend Micro
    • Wiz
    Verticals
    • Energy
    • Federal Government
    • Finance
    • Healthcare
    • Higher Education
    • K-12 Education
    • Manufacturing
    • Retail
    • State and Local Government
  • Services
    Managed Services
    • Managed Services Overview
      Wayfinder Threat Detection & Response
    • Threat Hunting
      World-Class Expertise and Threat Intelligence
    • Managed Detection & Response
      24/7/365 Expert MDR Across Your Entire Environment
    • Incident Readiness & Response
      DFIR, Breach Readiness, & Compromise Assessments
    Support, Deployment, & Health
    • Technical Account Management
      Customer Success with Personalized Service
    • SentinelOne GO
      Guided Onboarding & Deployment Advisory
    • SentinelOne University
      Live and On-Demand Training
    • Services Overview
      Comprehensive Solutions for Seamless Security Operations
    • SentinelOne Community
      Community Login
  • Partners
    Our Network
    • MSSP Partners
      Succeed Faster with SentinelOne
    • Singularity Marketplace
      Extend the Power of S1 Technology
    • Cyber Risk Partners
      Enlist Pro Response and Advisory Teams
    • Technology Alliances
      Integrated, Enterprise-Scale Solutions
    • SentinelOne for AWS
      Hosted in AWS Regions Around the World
    • Channel Partners
      Deliver the Right Solutions, Together
    • SentinelOne for Google Cloud
      Unified, Autonomous Security Giving Defenders the Advantage at Global Scale
    • Partner Locator
      Your Go-to Source for Our Top Partners in Your Region
    Partner Portal→
  • Resources
    Resource Center
    • Case Studies
    • Data Sheets
    • eBooks
    • Reports
    • Videos
    • Webinars
    • Whitepapers
    • Events
    View All Resources→
    Blog
    • Feature Spotlight
    • For CISO/CIO
    • From the Front Lines
    • Identity
    • Cloud
    • macOS
    • SentinelOne Blog
    Blog→
    Tech Resources
    • SentinelLABS
    • Ransomware Anthology
    • Cybersecurity 101
  • About
    About SentinelOne
    • About SentinelOne
      The Industry Leader in Cybersecurity
    • Investor Relations
      Financial Information & Events
    • SentinelLABS
      Threat Research for the Modern Threat Hunter
    • Careers
      The Latest Job Opportunities
    • Press & News
      Company Announcements
    • Cybersecurity Blog
      The Latest Cybersecurity Threats, News, & More
    • FAQ
      Get Answers to Our Most Frequently Asked Questions
    • DataSet
      The Live Data Platform
    • S Foundation
      Securing a Safer Future for All
    • S Ventures
      Investing in the Next Generation of Security, Data and AI
  • Pricing
Get StartedContact Us
CVE Vulnerability Database
Vulnerability Database/CVE-2023-3341

CVE-2023-3341: ISC BIND DNS Server DoS Vulnerability

CVE-2023-3341 is a denial of service flaw in ISC BIND that exploits recursive packet parsing to exhaust stack memory. This post covers technical details, affected versions, impact, and mitigation strategies.

Updated: May 15, 2026

CVE-2023-3341 Overview

CVE-2023-3341 is a stack exhaustion denial-of-service vulnerability in the Internet Systems Consortium (ISC) BIND 9 DNS server. The code that processes control channel messages sent to named calls certain functions recursively during packet parsing. Recursion depth is limited only by the maximum accepted packet size, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to exhaust available stack memory and terminate the named process. Because each incoming control channel message is fully parsed before authentication, exploitation does not require a valid Remote Name Daemon Control (RNDC) key. Only network access to the configured control channel TCP port is required, classifying this as both an out-of-bounds write [CWE-787] and an uncontrolled recursion [CWE-1325] flaw.

Critical Impact

Remote, unauthenticated attackers with network access to the named control channel port can crash the DNS server, disrupting name resolution for all dependent services.

Affected Products

  • ISC BIND 9 versions 9.2.0 through 9.16.43, 9.18.0 through 9.18.18, and 9.19.0 through 9.19.16
  • ISC BIND Supported Preview Edition versions 9.9.3-S1 through 9.16.43-S1 and 9.18.0-S1 through 9.18.18-S1
  • Fedora 37 and 38, Debian Linux 10 and 11, and NetApp products bundling BIND

Discovery Timeline

  • 2023-09-20 - CVE-2023-3341 published to the National Vulnerability Database (NVD)
  • 2023-09-20 - ISC publishes CVE-2023-3341 Documentation and an Openwall OSS Security Discussion
  • 2023-10-13 - NetApp publishes NetApp Security Advisory
  • 2024-01 - Debian publishes Debian LTS Security Announcement
  • 2025-12-02 - Last updated in the NVD database

Technical Details for CVE-2023-3341

Vulnerability Analysis

The BIND 9 named daemon exposes a control channel used by the rndc administrative utility. Messages received on this channel are parsed by recursive functions in the control channel handling code. The parser does not enforce a maximum recursion depth. An attacker can craft a deeply nested control message that forces named to recurse until the thread stack is exhausted, triggering a process abort and a denial-of-service condition for DNS resolution.

Root Cause

The defect resides in the packet-parsing code paths for control channel messages. The parser invokes itself recursively for each nested element in the incoming message, with recursion bounded only by the maximum accepted packet size rather than by an explicit depth limit. This pattern matches CWE-1325, improperly controlled sequential memory allocation, where untrusted input dictates stack growth.

Attack Vector

Exploitation requires only TCP connectivity to the port on which the control channel listens, typically TCP 953 on the loopback interface but frequently exposed to management networks. Because authentication occurs after full packet parsing, the attacker does not need a valid RNDC key or HMAC shared secret. A single malformed message of sufficient size is enough to terminate the named process. Restart-on-failure configurations may absorb individual crashes, but sustained traffic can keep the resolver offline.

No verified public proof-of-concept code is available. See the ISC CVE-2023-3341 Documentation for vendor-provided technical details.

Detection Methods for CVE-2023-3341

Indicators of Compromise

  • Unexpected termination or repeated restarts of the named process with stack overflow or segmentation fault entries in syslog or systemd journal output
  • Inbound TCP connections to the BIND control channel port (default 953) from hosts other than authorized management stations
  • Abnormally large or malformed messages logged by the BIND control channel listener prior to a crash

Detection Strategies

  • Monitor BIND log channels for named exit, assertion, or fatal errors correlated in time with control channel traffic
  • Alert on TCP flows to port 953 originating outside the configured controls ACL
  • Track DNS service availability metrics and trigger investigations when resolver downtime coincides with inbound control channel activity

Monitoring Recommendations

  • Forward named logs and host process telemetry to a centralized logging or SIEM platform for correlation with network flow data
  • Baseline normal control channel traffic patterns and flag deviations in source IP, packet size, or frequency
  • Verify host integrity and patch level for BIND across all DNS servers, including hidden primaries and Supported Preview Edition deployments

How to Mitigate CVE-2023-3341

Immediate Actions Required

  • Upgrade BIND 9 to a patched release: 9.16.44, 9.18.19, 9.19.17, or the corresponding Supported Preview Edition builds 9.16.44-S1 and 9.18.19-S1
  • Restrict the controls statement in named.conf so the control channel listens only on loopback or trusted management interfaces
  • Apply distribution updates referenced in the Debian Security Advisory DSA-5504 and the Fedora package announcements

Patch Information

ISC released fixed versions concurrently with the advisory. Operators running ISC BIND should upgrade to 9.16.44, 9.18.19, or 9.19.17. Subscribers to the Supported Preview Edition should move to 9.16.44-S1 or 9.18.19-S1. Distribution-specific packages are available through the Fedora Package Announcement and the Debian LTS Security Announcement. NetApp customers should consult the NetApp Security Advisory for product-specific guidance.

Workarounds

  • Bind the control channel to 127.0.0.1 and use firewall rules to block external access to TCP port 953
  • Disable the control channel entirely by removing or commenting the controls statement when rndc administration is not required
  • Enforce network segmentation so only designated management hosts can reach DNS server administrative ports

Disclaimer: This content was generated using AI. While we strive for accuracy, please verify critical information with official sources.

  • Vulnerability Details
  • TypeDOS

  • Vendor/TechIsc Bind

  • SeverityHIGH

  • CVSS Score7.5

  • EPSS Probability0.25%

  • Known ExploitedNo
  • CVSS Vector
  • CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
  • Impact Assessment
  • ConfidentialityLow
  • IntegrityNone
  • AvailabilityHigh
  • CWE References
  • CWE-787

  • CWE-1325
  • Technical References
  • Debian LTS Security Announcement

  • Fedora Package Announcement

  • Fedora Package Announcement

  • Fedora Package Announcement

  • NetApp Security Advisory

  • Debian Security Advisory DSA-5504
  • Vendor Resources
  • Openwall OSS Security Discussion

  • ISC CVE-2023-3341 Documentation
  • Related CVEs
  • CVE-2023-50868: ISC BIND DNSSEC DoS Vulnerability

  • CVE-2022-38177: ISC BIND DOS Vulnerability

  • CVE-2023-4408: Netapp Ontap DoS Vulnerability

  • CVE-2023-5680: ISC BIND DoS Vulnerability
Default Legacy - Prefooter | Experience the World’s Most Advanced Cybersecurity Platform

Experience the Most Advanced Cybersecurity Platform

See how the world’s most intelligent, autonomous cybersecurity platform can protect your organization today and into the future.

Try SentinelOne
  • Get Started
  • Get a Demo
  • Product Tour
  • Why SentinelOne
  • Pricing & Packaging
  • FAQ
  • Contact
  • Contact Us
  • Customer Support
  • SentinelOne Status
  • Language
  • Platform
  • Singularity Platform
  • Singularity Endpoint
  • Singularity Cloud
  • Singularity AI-SIEM
  • Singularity Identity
  • Singularity Marketplace
  • Purple AI
  • Services
  • Wayfinder TDR
  • SentinelOne GO
  • Technical Account Management
  • Support Services
  • Verticals
  • Energy
  • Federal Government
  • Finance
  • Healthcare
  • Higher Education
  • K-12 Education
  • Manufacturing
  • Retail
  • State and Local Government
  • Cybersecurity for SMB
  • Resources
  • Blog
  • Labs
  • Case Studies
  • Videos
  • Product Tours
  • Events
  • Cybersecurity 101
  • eBooks
  • Webinars
  • Whitepapers
  • Press
  • News
  • Ransomware Anthology
  • Company
  • About Us
  • Our Customers
  • Careers
  • Partners
  • Legal & Compliance
  • Security & Compliance
  • Investor Relations
  • S Foundation
  • S Ventures

©2026 SentinelOne, All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Notice Terms of Use

English