A Leader in the 2026 Gartner® Magic Quadrant™ for Endpoint Protection. Six years running.Six years. Gartner® Magic Quadrant™ Leader.Find Out Why
Experiencing a Breach?Blog
Get StartedContact Us
SentinelOne
  • Platform
    Platform Overview
    • Singularity Platform
      Welcome to Integrated Enterprise Security
    • AI for Security
      Leading the Way in AI-Powered Security Solutions
    • Securing AI
      Accelerate AI Adoption with Secure AI Tools, Apps, and Agents.
    • How It Works
      The Singularity XDR Difference
    • Singularity Marketplace
      One-Click Integrations to Unlock the Power of XDR
    • Pricing & Packaging
      Comparisons and Guidance at a Glance
    Data & AI
    • Purple AI
      Accelerate SecOps with Generative AI
    • Singularity Hyperautomation
      Easily Automate Security Processes
    • AI-SIEM
      The AI SIEM for the Autonomous SOC
    • AI Data Pipelines
      Security Data Pipeline for AI SIEM and Data Optimization
    • Singularity Data Lake
      AI-Powered, Unified Data Lake
    • Singularity Data Lake for Log Analytics
      Seamlessly Ingest Data from On-Prem, Cloud or Hybrid Environments
    Endpoint Security
    • Singularity Endpoint
      Autonomous Prevention, Detection, and Response
    • Singularity XDR
      Native & Open Protection, Detection, and Response
    • Singularity RemoteOps Forensics
      Orchestrate Forensics at Scale
    • Singularity Threat Intelligence
      Comprehensive Adversary Intelligence
    • Singularity Vulnerability Management
      Application & OS Vulnerability Management
    • Singularity Identity
      Identity Threat Detection and Response
    Cloud Security
    • Singularity Cloud Security
      Block Attacks with an AI-Powered CNAPP
    • Singularity Cloud Native Security
      Secure Cloud and Development Resources
    • Singularity Cloud Workload Security
      Real-Time Cloud Workload Protection Platform
    • Singularity Cloud Data Security
      AI-Powered Threat Detection for Cloud Storage
    • Singularity Cloud Security Posture Management
      Detect and Remediate Cloud Misconfigurations
    Securing AI
    • Prompt Security
      Secure AI Tools Across Your Enterprise
  • Why SentinelOne?
    Why SentinelOne?
    • Why SentinelOne?
      Cybersecurity Built for What’s Next
    • Our Customers
      Trusted by the World’s Leading Enterprises
    • Industry Recognition
      Tested and Proven by the Experts
    • About Us
      The Industry Leader in Autonomous Cybersecurity
    Compare SentinelOne
    • Arctic Wolf
    • Broadcom
    • CrowdStrike
    • Cybereason
    • Microsoft
    • Palo Alto Networks
    • Sophos
    • Splunk
    • Trellix
    • Trend Micro
    • Wiz
    Verticals
    • Energy
    • Federal Government
    • Finance
    • Healthcare
    • Higher Education
    • K-12 Education
    • Manufacturing
    • Retail
    • State and Local Government
  • Services
    Managed Services
    • Managed Services Overview
      Wayfinder Threat Detection & Response
    • Threat Hunting
      World-Class Expertise and Threat Intelligence
    • Managed Detection & Response
      24/7/365 Expert MDR Across Your Entire Environment
    • Incident Readiness & Response
      DFIR, Breach Readiness, & Compromise Assessments
    Support, Deployment, & Health
    • Technical Account Management
      Customer Success with Personalized Service
    • SentinelOne GO
      Guided Onboarding & Deployment Advisory
    • SentinelOne University
      Live and On-Demand Training
    • Services Overview
      Comprehensive Solutions for Seamless Security Operations
    • SentinelOne Community
      Community Login
  • Partners
    Our Network
    • MSSP Partners
      Succeed Faster with SentinelOne
    • Singularity Marketplace
      Extend the Power of S1 Technology
    • Cyber Risk Partners
      Enlist Pro Response and Advisory Teams
    • Technology Alliances
      Integrated, Enterprise-Scale Solutions
    • SentinelOne for AWS
      Hosted in AWS Regions Around the World
    • Channel Partners
      Deliver the Right Solutions, Together
    • SentinelOne for Google Cloud
      Unified, Autonomous Security Giving Defenders the Advantage at Global Scale
    • Partner Locator
      Your Go-to Source for Our Top Partners in Your Region
    Partner Portal→
  • Resources
    Resource Center
    • Case Studies
    • Data Sheets
    • eBooks
    • Reports
    • Videos
    • Webinars
    • Whitepapers
    • Events
    View All Resources→
    Blog
    • Feature Spotlight
    • For CISO/CIO
    • From the Front Lines
    • Identity
    • Cloud
    • macOS
    • SentinelOne Blog
    Blog→
    Tech Resources
    • SentinelLABS
    • Ransomware Anthology
    • Cybersecurity 101
  • About
    About SentinelOne
    • About SentinelOne
      The Industry Leader in Cybersecurity
    • Investor Relations
      Financial Information & Events
    • SentinelLABS
      Threat Research for the Modern Threat Hunter
    • Careers
      The Latest Job Opportunities
    • Press & News
      Company Announcements
    • Cybersecurity Blog
      The Latest Cybersecurity Threats, News, & More
    • FAQ
      Get Answers to Our Most Frequently Asked Questions
    • DataSet
      The Live Data Platform
    • S Foundation
      Securing a Safer Future for All
    • S Ventures
      Investing in the Next Generation of Security, Data and AI
  • Pricing
Get StartedContact Us
CVE Vulnerability Database
Vulnerability Database/CVE-2026-45919

CVE-2026-45919: Linux Kernel Scheduler DoS Vulnerability

CVE-2026-45919 is a denial-of-service flaw in the Linux kernel's RT scheduler that causes CPU hardlockup through infinite self-IPI loops. This article covers the technical details, affected versions, and mitigation strategies.

Published: May 28, 2026

CVE-2026-45919 Overview

CVE-2026-45919 is a Linux kernel vulnerability in the real-time (RT) scheduler's load-balancing logic. The flaw lives in rto_next_cpu() within kernel/sched/rt.c, where the initiating CPU is not excluded from the overload search. When an overloaded CPU hosts a CPU-bound RT task, a non-CPU-bound RT task, and a CFS task stuck in kernel space, it can queue irq_work to itself and send repeated self-IPIs. The resulting infinite self-interrupt loop produces a CPU hardlockup. The maintainers have resolved the issue by filtering the initiating CPU in rto_next_cpu().

Critical Impact

A local condition involving concurrent RT load balancing can drive a CPU into an infinite self-IPI loop, triggering a hardlockup and denial of service on affected Linux systems.

Affected Products

  • Linux kernel (mainline) prior to the fix in rto_next_cpu()
  • Stable Linux kernel branches receiving the backports referenced by the kernel.org commits
  • Linux distributions shipping affected stable kernels with HAVE_RT_PUSH_IPI enabled

Discovery Timeline

  • 2026-05-27 - CVE-2026-45919 published to NVD
  • 2026-05-27 - Last updated in NVD database

Technical Details for CVE-2026-45919

Vulnerability Analysis

The defect resides in the RT scheduler's push/pull load-balancing path. When other CPUs transition from RT to non-RT tasks, RT load balancing fires. With HAVE_RT_PUSH_IPI enabled, those CPUs call tell_cpu_to_push() and send IPIs to an overloaded CPU to drive rto_push_irq_work_func.

During push_rt_task on the overloaded CPU, if next_task->prio < rq->donor->prio, resched_curr() sets NEED_RESCHED. After the push completes, the CPU calls rto_next_cpu() to find the next overloaded CPU. In a scenario where only one CPU is overloaded, that call should return -1.

Root Cause

Multiple CPUs invoking tell_cpu_to_push() increment rd->rto_loop_next atomically. Even when rd->rto_cpu is set to -1, the mismatch between rd->rto_loop and rd->rto_loop_next forces rto_next_cpu() to restart its search from -1. The still-overloaded CPU (satisfying rt_nr_migratory && rt_nr_total > 1) is reselected. It queues irq_work to itself and sends self-IPIs repeatedly. This is a denial-of-service condition rooted in a scheduler race [CWE-362-class behavior] producing continuous self-interrupts and a hardlockup.

Attack Vector

The condition is local and requires specific scheduling pressure: a CPU-bound RT task, a non-CPU-bound RT task, and a CFS task stuck in kernel space on the same CPU, combined with other CPUs running pull_rt_task(). The trigger sequence flows as follows: CPU1 and CPU2 issue pull_rt_task and tell_cpu_to_push, sending IPIs to CPU0. CPU0 runs rto_push_irq_work_func and push_rt_task, calls resched_curr(rq), then rto_next_cpu. While CPU0 processes, CPU2 increments rto_loop_next via atomic_inc. Because rd->rto_loop != next, CPU0 re-enters rto_next_cpu, queues irq_work_queue_on to itself, and re-enters rto_push_irq_work_func, looping indefinitely.

No verified public exploit code is available. See the upstream patches at Kernel Git Commit 16ca9f3117e and Kernel Git Commit 94894c9c47 for technical details of the fix.

Detection Methods for CVE-2026-45919

Indicators of Compromise

  • Kernel watchdog or NMI hardlockup messages naming a single CPU stuck servicing interrupts
  • Sustained 100% system-time utilization on one CPU with elevated irq_work activity in /proc/interrupts
  • High counts of sched_rt push/pull events under tracefs (sched_switch, irq_work_entry) with the same CPU as both source and destination

Detection Strategies

  • Trace rto_push_irq_work_func and rto_next_cpu invocations with ftrace or perf to identify recursive self-queueing on a single CPU
  • Monitor /proc/interrupts for an abnormal growth in IPI counters on a single CPU paired with kernel softlockup or hardlockup warnings
  • Correlate scheduler tracepoints (sched:sched_switch, irq_work:irq_work_entry) against RT task placement to spot overload patterns matching the trigger scenario

Monitoring Recommendations

  • Enable kernel.hardlockup_panic and kernel.softlockup_panic in lab fleets to fail fast and capture crash dumps for triage
  • Collect kernel logs centrally and alert on watchdog: Watchdog detected hard LOCKUP on cpu messages
  • Track running kernel versions across the fleet and flag hosts still on pre-patch stable branches referenced by the kernel.org commits

How to Mitigate CVE-2026-45919

Immediate Actions Required

  • Identify hosts running affected stable Linux kernel branches with HAVE_RT_PUSH_IPI enabled and prioritize them for patching
  • Apply the upstream fix that filters the initiating CPU in rto_next_cpu() from your distribution vendor as it becomes available
  • Validate RT workload configurations and avoid pinning combinations of CPU-bound RT, non-CPU-bound RT, and long-running CFS kernel work to the same CPU until patched

Patch Information

The fix has been merged into mainline and backported across stable trees. Reference the commits at Kernel Git Commit 3b3c672a66d, Kernel Git Commit 52aeb1e07e, Kernel Git Commit 8ad5577b2d, Kernel Git Commit 9f25edc5a2, Kernel Git Commit a6a7340373, and Kernel Git Commit d57d074627. The change modifies rto_next_cpu() to skip the currently executing CPU during the overload search, eliminating the self-IPI loop.

Workarounds

  • Redistribute RT workloads using taskset, cgroups, or sched_setaffinity() so that the triggering combination does not coexist on one CPU
  • Disable or reconfigure RT push IPI behavior in controlled environments where the kernel build options permit
  • Reduce RT priority pressure by tuning sched_rt_runtime_us and sched_rt_period_us to limit RT bandwidth on suspect hosts
bash
# Identify running kernel and check for the fix
uname -r

# Inspect IPI counters per CPU to spot anomalies
grep -E 'IPI|RES|CAL' /proc/interrupts

# Enable hardlockup panic for faster fault capture (test systems only)
sysctl -w kernel.hardlockup_panic=1
sysctl -w kernel.softlockup_panic=1

# Constrain an RT workload to a dedicated CPU set
taskset -cp 2,3 <pid>

Disclaimer: This content was generated using AI. While we strive for accuracy, please verify critical information with official sources.

  • Vulnerability Details
  • TypeDOS

  • Vendor/TechLinux

  • SeverityNONE

  • CVSS ScoreN/A

  • Known ExploitedNo
  • Impact Assessment
  • ConfidentialityNone
  • IntegrityNone
  • AvailabilityNone
  • Technical References
  • Kernel Git Commit - 16ca9f3117e

  • Kernel Git Commit - 3b3c672a66d

  • Kernel Git Commit - 52aeb1e07e

  • Kernel Git Commit - 8ad5577b2d

  • Kernel Git Commit - 94894c9c47

  • Kernel Git Commit - 9f25edc5a2

  • Kernel Git Commit - a6a7340373

  • Kernel Git Commit - d57d074627
  • Related CVEs
  • CVE-2026-46015: Linux Kernel TCP Listener DOS Vulnerability

  • CVE-2026-45913: Linux Kernel Bridge MDB DoS Vulnerability

  • CVE-2026-43286: Linux Kernel DOS Vulnerability

  • CVE-2026-43060: Linux Kernel Netfilter DoS Vulnerability
Default Legacy - Prefooter | Experience the World’s Most Advanced Cybersecurity Platform

Experience the Most Advanced Cybersecurity Platform

See how the world’s most intelligent, autonomous cybersecurity platform can protect your organization today and into the future.

Try SentinelOne
  • Get Started
  • Get a Demo
  • Product Tour
  • Why SentinelOne
  • Pricing & Packaging
  • FAQ
  • Contact
  • Contact Us
  • Customer Support
  • SentinelOne Status
  • Language
  • Platform
  • Singularity Platform
  • Singularity Endpoint
  • Singularity Cloud
  • Singularity AI-SIEM
  • Singularity Identity
  • Singularity Marketplace
  • Purple AI
  • Services
  • Wayfinder TDR
  • SentinelOne GO
  • Technical Account Management
  • Support Services
  • Verticals
  • Energy
  • Federal Government
  • Finance
  • Healthcare
  • Higher Education
  • K-12 Education
  • Manufacturing
  • Retail
  • State and Local Government
  • Cybersecurity for SMB
  • Resources
  • Blog
  • Labs
  • Case Studies
  • Videos
  • Product Tours
  • Events
  • Cybersecurity 101
  • eBooks
  • Webinars
  • Whitepapers
  • Press
  • News
  • Ransomware Anthology
  • Company
  • About Us
  • Our Customers
  • Careers
  • Partners
  • Legal & Compliance
  • Security & Compliance
  • Investor Relations
  • S Foundation
  • S Ventures

©2026 SentinelOne, All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Notice Terms of Use

English