The SentinelOne Annual Threat Report - A Defenders Guide from the FrontlinesThe SentinelOne Annual Threat ReportGet the Report
Experiencing a Breach?Blog
Get StartedContact Us
SentinelOne
  • Platform
    Platform Overview
    • Singularity Platform
      Welcome to Integrated Enterprise Security
    • AI for Security
      Leading the Way in AI-Powered Security Solutions
    • Securing AI
      Accelerate AI Adoption with Secure AI Tools, Apps, and Agents.
    • How It Works
      The Singularity XDR Difference
    • Singularity Marketplace
      One-Click Integrations to Unlock the Power of XDR
    • Pricing & Packaging
      Comparisons and Guidance at a Glance
    Data & AI
    • Purple AI
      Accelerate SecOps with Generative AI
    • Singularity Hyperautomation
      Easily Automate Security Processes
    • AI-SIEM
      The AI SIEM for the Autonomous SOC
    • AI Data Pipelines
      Security Data Pipeline for AI SIEM and Data Optimization
    • Singularity Data Lake
      AI-Powered, Unified Data Lake
    • Singularity Data Lake for Log Analytics
      Seamlessly Ingest Data from On-Prem, Cloud or Hybrid Environments
    Endpoint Security
    • Singularity Endpoint
      Autonomous Prevention, Detection, and Response
    • Singularity XDR
      Native & Open Protection, Detection, and Response
    • Singularity RemoteOps Forensics
      Orchestrate Forensics at Scale
    • Singularity Threat Intelligence
      Comprehensive Adversary Intelligence
    • Singularity Vulnerability Management
      Application & OS Vulnerability Management
    • Singularity Identity
      Identity Threat Detection and Response
    Cloud Security
    • Singularity Cloud Security
      Block Attacks with an AI-Powered CNAPP
    • Singularity Cloud Native Security
      Secure Cloud and Development Resources
    • Singularity Cloud Workload Security
      Real-Time Cloud Workload Protection Platform
    • Singularity Cloud Data Security
      AI-Powered Threat Detection for Cloud Storage
    • Singularity Cloud Security Posture Management
      Detect and Remediate Cloud Misconfigurations
    Securing AI
    • Prompt Security
      Secure AI Tools Across Your Enterprise
  • Why SentinelOne?
    Why SentinelOne?
    • Why SentinelOne?
      Cybersecurity Built for What’s Next
    • Our Customers
      Trusted by the World’s Leading Enterprises
    • Industry Recognition
      Tested and Proven by the Experts
    • About Us
      The Industry Leader in Autonomous Cybersecurity
    Compare SentinelOne
    • Arctic Wolf
    • Broadcom
    • CrowdStrike
    • Cybereason
    • Microsoft
    • Palo Alto Networks
    • Sophos
    • Splunk
    • Trellix
    • Trend Micro
    • Wiz
    Verticals
    • Energy
    • Federal Government
    • Finance
    • Healthcare
    • Higher Education
    • K-12 Education
    • Manufacturing
    • Retail
    • State and Local Government
  • Services
    Managed Services
    • Managed Services Overview
      Wayfinder Threat Detection & Response
    • Threat Hunting
      World-Class Expertise and Threat Intelligence
    • Managed Detection & Response
      24/7/365 Expert MDR Across Your Entire Environment
    • Incident Readiness & Response
      DFIR, Breach Readiness, & Compromise Assessments
    Support, Deployment, & Health
    • Technical Account Management
      Customer Success with Personalized Service
    • SentinelOne GO
      Guided Onboarding & Deployment Advisory
    • SentinelOne University
      Live and On-Demand Training
    • Services Overview
      Comprehensive Solutions for Seamless Security Operations
    • SentinelOne Community
      Community Login
  • Partners
    Our Network
    • MSSP Partners
      Succeed Faster with SentinelOne
    • Singularity Marketplace
      Extend the Power of S1 Technology
    • Cyber Risk Partners
      Enlist Pro Response and Advisory Teams
    • Technology Alliances
      Integrated, Enterprise-Scale Solutions
    • SentinelOne for AWS
      Hosted in AWS Regions Around the World
    • Channel Partners
      Deliver the Right Solutions, Together
    • SentinelOne for Google Cloud
      Unified, Autonomous Security Giving Defenders the Advantage at Global Scale
    • Partner Locator
      Your Go-to Source for Our Top Partners in Your Region
    Partner Portal→
  • Resources
    Resource Center
    • Case Studies
    • Data Sheets
    • eBooks
    • Reports
    • Videos
    • Webinars
    • Whitepapers
    • Events
    View All Resources→
    Blog
    • Feature Spotlight
    • For CISO/CIO
    • From the Front Lines
    • Identity
    • Cloud
    • macOS
    • SentinelOne Blog
    Blog→
    Tech Resources
    • SentinelLABS
    • Ransomware Anthology
    • Cybersecurity 101
  • About
    About SentinelOne
    • About SentinelOne
      The Industry Leader in Cybersecurity
    • Investor Relations
      Financial Information & Events
    • SentinelLABS
      Threat Research for the Modern Threat Hunter
    • Careers
      The Latest Job Opportunities
    • Press & News
      Company Announcements
    • Cybersecurity Blog
      The Latest Cybersecurity Threats, News, & More
    • FAQ
      Get Answers to Our Most Frequently Asked Questions
    • DataSet
      The Live Data Platform
    • S Foundation
      Securing a Safer Future for All
    • S Ventures
      Investing in the Next Generation of Security, Data and AI
  • Pricing
Get StartedContact Us
CVE Vulnerability Database
Vulnerability Database/CVE-2026-43489

CVE-2026-43489: Linux Kernel Use-After-Free Vulnerability

CVE-2026-43489 is a use-after-free flaw in the Linux kernel's liveupdate luo_file component that causes memory corruption on failed retrieve attempts. This article covers technical details, affected systems, and mitigation.

Published: May 17, 2026

CVE-2026-43489 Overview

CVE-2026-43489 is a Linux kernel vulnerability in the liveupdate (LUO) subsystem. The flaw resides in the luo_file retrieve tracking logic, where failed retrieve() attempts are not recorded. When luo_retrieve_file() returns an error, the retrieved boolean in struct luo_file is never updated. Userspace can then reissue the LIVEUPDATE_SESSION_RETRIEVE_FD ioctl, triggering retries against partially freed or inconsistent serialized state. The finish() callback at session close compounds the problem by assuming retrieve was never attempted. Affected file handlers such as memfd can invoke kho_restore_folio() on folios already restored, producing kernel warnings and unstable state.

Critical Impact

Repeated ioctl calls after a failed retrieve operate on freed or inconsistent kernel data structures, leading to warnings, undefined behavior, and potential local denial of service.

Affected Products

  • Linux kernel branches containing the liveupdate (LUO) subsystem with luo_file retrieve logic
  • Stable kernel trees referenced by commits 1d3ad69484dc and f85b1c6af5bc
  • Distributions shipping kernels with the LUO LIVEUPDATE_SESSION_RETRIEVE_FD ioctl interface

Discovery Timeline

  • 2026-05-13 - CVE-2026-43489 published to NVD
  • 2026-05-13 - Last updated in NVD database

Technical Details for CVE-2026-43489

Vulnerability Analysis

The Linux kernel liveupdate (LUO) subsystem tracks successful retrieval attempts on a LUO file to prevent duplicate retrievals. Repeated retrievals are dangerous because retrieved files have their serialized data structures freed, leaving the file in a state inconsistent with what the retrieve code expects. The retrieved boolean in struct luo_file exists specifically to enforce single-retrieve semantics and to inform the finish() callback what cleanup remains.

The defect appears on the error path. When luo_retrieve_file() fails partway through, it returns the error immediately without recording that retrieve was attempted. Userspace receives an errored LIVEUPDATE_SESSION_RETRIEVE_FD ioctl but faces no barrier against retrying. A retry walks into structures that may already be partially freed.

The memfd handler illustrates the impact. If memfd restores 8 of 10 folios and fails on the 9th, a retry calls kho_restore_folio() again on the first folio, which is an invalid operation and emits a warning. The finish() callback inherits the same broken assumption, attempting to access or free structures that may no longer exist [CWE-754: Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions].

Root Cause

The root cause is incomplete state tracking on the error path of luo_retrieve_file(). The original boolean encoded only two states: not attempted, or succeeded. It could not represent a failed attempt, leaving the retry and finish paths blind to partial work already performed.

Attack Vector

A local user with permission to invoke the LIVEUPDATE_SESSION_RETRIEVE_FD ioctl can trigger the condition by issuing the ioctl, inducing a retrieve failure, and reissuing the call. The vulnerability requires local access to the LUO interface and is constrained to environments where liveupdate is enabled. The fix converts the boolean to an integer encoding three states: 0 for not attempted, positive for success, and negative carrying the prior error code returned directly on retry and passed to finish().

No public exploit code is available. See the kernel commit details and the follow-up commit for the patch.

Detection Methods for CVE-2026-43489

Indicators of Compromise

  • Kernel warnings or WARN_ON traces referencing kho_restore_folio() after a failed liveupdate session
  • Repeated LIVEUPDATE_SESSION_RETRIEVE_FD ioctl calls from the same process following an error return
  • Unexpected liveupdate session close failures or finish() callback errors in dmesg

Detection Strategies

  • Audit dmesg and kernel ring buffer logs for warnings emitted by kho_restore_folio() and the luo_file code paths
  • Correlate process-level ioctl usage against liveupdate session identifiers to flag retry patterns after failures
  • Inventory kernel versions across the fleet and identify hosts running pre-patch builds containing the LUO subsystem

Monitoring Recommendations

  • Forward kernel logs to a central SIEM and alert on warning-level entries from liveupdate or memfd restore functions
  • Track ioctl call frequencies per session via eBPF or audit subsystem instrumentation
  • Monitor session lifecycle metrics for abnormal finish() failures or premature termination

How to Mitigate CVE-2026-43489

Immediate Actions Required

  • Apply the upstream kernel patches referenced by commits 1d3ad69484dc and f85b1c6af5bc and reboot affected hosts
  • Restrict access to the LIVEUPDATE_SESSION_RETRIEVE_FD ioctl to trusted system components and privileged users
  • Disable the liveupdate subsystem on hosts that do not require it until patches are deployed

Patch Information

The fix changes the retrieved field in struct luo_file from a boolean to an integer. A value of 0 means retrieve was never attempted, a positive value means it succeeded, and a negative value stores the error code from a failed attempt. Subsequent retry calls return the stored error directly, and finish() uses the value to decide which cleanup is safe. Apply vendor kernel updates from your distribution that incorporate the upstream commits.

Workarounds

  • Block userspace processes from issuing repeated LIVEUPDATE_SESSION_RETRIEVE_FD ioctls through seccomp filters or LSM policy
  • Avoid invoking liveupdate flows on workloads until patched kernels are rolled out
  • Reboot or recreate sessions immediately after any retrieve failure to avoid leaving the kernel in an inconsistent state
bash
# Verify the running kernel version and identify the LUO commit
uname -r
# Confirm patch presence via distribution package manager (example: Debian/Ubuntu)
apt-cache policy linux-image-$(uname -r)
# Restrict ioctl access via auditd rule
auditctl -a always,exit -F arch=b64 -S ioctl -F key=luo_retrieve

Disclaimer: This content was generated using AI. While we strive for accuracy, please verify critical information with official sources.

  • Vulnerability Details
  • TypeUse After Free

  • Vendor/TechLinux Kernel

  • SeverityNONE

  • CVSS ScoreN/A

  • EPSS Probability0.02%

  • Known ExploitedNo
  • Impact Assessment
  • ConfidentialityNone
  • IntegrityNone
  • AvailabilityNone
  • Technical References
  • Kernel Git Commit Details

  • Kernel Git Commit Update
  • Related CVEs
  • CVE-2026-43328: Linux Kernel Use-After-Free Vulnerability

  • CVE-2026-43500: Linux Kernel Use-After-Free Vulnerability

  • CVE-2026-43333: Linux Kernel Use-After-Free Vulnerability

  • CVE-2026-43335: Linux Kernel Use-After-Free Vulnerability
Default Legacy - Prefooter | Experience the World’s Most Advanced Cybersecurity Platform

Experience the Most Advanced Cybersecurity Platform

See how the world’s most intelligent, autonomous cybersecurity platform can protect your organization today and into the future.

Try SentinelOne
  • Get Started
  • Get a Demo
  • Product Tour
  • Why SentinelOne
  • Pricing & Packaging
  • FAQ
  • Contact
  • Contact Us
  • Customer Support
  • SentinelOne Status
  • Language
  • Platform
  • Singularity Platform
  • Singularity Endpoint
  • Singularity Cloud
  • Singularity AI-SIEM
  • Singularity Identity
  • Singularity Marketplace
  • Purple AI
  • Services
  • Wayfinder TDR
  • SentinelOne GO
  • Technical Account Management
  • Support Services
  • Verticals
  • Energy
  • Federal Government
  • Finance
  • Healthcare
  • Higher Education
  • K-12 Education
  • Manufacturing
  • Retail
  • State and Local Government
  • Cybersecurity for SMB
  • Resources
  • Blog
  • Labs
  • Case Studies
  • Videos
  • Product Tours
  • Events
  • Cybersecurity 101
  • eBooks
  • Webinars
  • Whitepapers
  • Press
  • News
  • Ransomware Anthology
  • Company
  • About Us
  • Our Customers
  • Careers
  • Partners
  • Legal & Compliance
  • Security & Compliance
  • Investor Relations
  • S Foundation
  • S Ventures

©2026 SentinelOne, All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Notice Terms of Use

English