The SentinelOne Annual Threat Report - A Defenders Guide from the FrontlinesThe SentinelOne Annual Threat ReportGet the Report
Experiencing a Breach?Blog
Get StartedContact Us
SentinelOne
  • Platform
    Platform Overview
    • Singularity Platform
      Welcome to Integrated Enterprise Security
    • AI for Security
      Leading the Way in AI-Powered Security Solutions
    • Securing AI
      Accelerate AI Adoption with Secure AI Tools, Apps, and Agents.
    • How It Works
      The Singularity XDR Difference
    • Singularity Marketplace
      One-Click Integrations to Unlock the Power of XDR
    • Pricing & Packaging
      Comparisons and Guidance at a Glance
    Data & AI
    • Purple AI
      Accelerate SecOps with Generative AI
    • Singularity Hyperautomation
      Easily Automate Security Processes
    • AI-SIEM
      The AI SIEM for the Autonomous SOC
    • AI Data Pipelines
      Security Data Pipeline for AI SIEM and Data Optimization
    • Singularity Data Lake
      AI-Powered, Unified Data Lake
    • Singularity Data Lake for Log Analytics
      Seamlessly Ingest Data from On-Prem, Cloud or Hybrid Environments
    Endpoint Security
    • Singularity Endpoint
      Autonomous Prevention, Detection, and Response
    • Singularity XDR
      Native & Open Protection, Detection, and Response
    • Singularity RemoteOps Forensics
      Orchestrate Forensics at Scale
    • Singularity Threat Intelligence
      Comprehensive Adversary Intelligence
    • Singularity Vulnerability Management
      Application & OS Vulnerability Management
    • Singularity Identity
      Identity Threat Detection and Response
    Cloud Security
    • Singularity Cloud Security
      Block Attacks with an AI-Powered CNAPP
    • Singularity Cloud Native Security
      Secure Cloud and Development Resources
    • Singularity Cloud Workload Security
      Real-Time Cloud Workload Protection Platform
    • Singularity Cloud Data Security
      AI-Powered Threat Detection for Cloud Storage
    • Singularity Cloud Security Posture Management
      Detect and Remediate Cloud Misconfigurations
    Securing AI
    • Prompt Security
      Secure AI Tools Across Your Enterprise
  • Why SentinelOne?
    Why SentinelOne?
    • Why SentinelOne?
      Cybersecurity Built for What’s Next
    • Our Customers
      Trusted by the World’s Leading Enterprises
    • Industry Recognition
      Tested and Proven by the Experts
    • About Us
      The Industry Leader in Autonomous Cybersecurity
    Compare SentinelOne
    • Arctic Wolf
    • Broadcom
    • CrowdStrike
    • Cybereason
    • Microsoft
    • Palo Alto Networks
    • Sophos
    • Splunk
    • Trellix
    • Trend Micro
    • Wiz
    Verticals
    • Energy
    • Federal Government
    • Finance
    • Healthcare
    • Higher Education
    • K-12 Education
    • Manufacturing
    • Retail
    • State and Local Government
  • Services
    Managed Services
    • Managed Services Overview
      Wayfinder Threat Detection & Response
    • Threat Hunting
      World-Class Expertise and Threat Intelligence
    • Managed Detection & Response
      24/7/365 Expert MDR Across Your Entire Environment
    • Incident Readiness & Response
      DFIR, Breach Readiness, & Compromise Assessments
    Support, Deployment, & Health
    • Technical Account Management
      Customer Success with Personalized Service
    • SentinelOne GO
      Guided Onboarding & Deployment Advisory
    • SentinelOne University
      Live and On-Demand Training
    • Services Overview
      Comprehensive Solutions for Seamless Security Operations
    • SentinelOne Community
      Community Login
  • Partners
    Our Network
    • MSSP Partners
      Succeed Faster with SentinelOne
    • Singularity Marketplace
      Extend the Power of S1 Technology
    • Cyber Risk Partners
      Enlist Pro Response and Advisory Teams
    • Technology Alliances
      Integrated, Enterprise-Scale Solutions
    • SentinelOne for AWS
      Hosted in AWS Regions Around the World
    • Channel Partners
      Deliver the Right Solutions, Together
    • SentinelOne for Google Cloud
      Unified, Autonomous Security Giving Defenders the Advantage at Global Scale
    • Partner Locator
      Your Go-to Source for Our Top Partners in Your Region
    Partner Portal→
  • Resources
    Resource Center
    • Case Studies
    • Data Sheets
    • eBooks
    • Reports
    • Videos
    • Webinars
    • Whitepapers
    • Events
    View All Resources→
    Blog
    • Feature Spotlight
    • For CISO/CIO
    • From the Front Lines
    • Identity
    • Cloud
    • macOS
    • SentinelOne Blog
    Blog→
    Tech Resources
    • SentinelLABS
    • Ransomware Anthology
    • Cybersecurity 101
  • About
    About SentinelOne
    • About SentinelOne
      The Industry Leader in Cybersecurity
    • Investor Relations
      Financial Information & Events
    • SentinelLABS
      Threat Research for the Modern Threat Hunter
    • Careers
      The Latest Job Opportunities
    • Press & News
      Company Announcements
    • Cybersecurity Blog
      The Latest Cybersecurity Threats, News, & More
    • FAQ
      Get Answers to Our Most Frequently Asked Questions
    • DataSet
      The Live Data Platform
    • S Foundation
      Securing a Safer Future for All
    • S Ventures
      Investing in the Next Generation of Security, Data and AI
  • Pricing
Get StartedContact Us
CVE Vulnerability Database
Vulnerability Database/CVE-2026-40880

CVE-2026-40880: ZEBRA Zcash Node Consensus Split Vulnerability

CVE-2026-40880 is a consensus split vulnerability in ZEBRA Zcash node caused by a transaction verification cache logic error. Malicious miners can exploit this to create network splits. Learn about technical details, affected versions, impact, and mitigation.

Published: April 23, 2026

CVE-2026-40880 Overview

CVE-2026-40880 is a logic error vulnerability in Zebra, a Zcash node implementation written entirely in Rust. The vulnerability exists in Zebra's transaction verification cache and could allow a malicious miner to induce a consensus split within the Zcash network. By exploiting this flaw, an attacker with mining capabilities can cause vulnerable Zebra nodes to accept an invalid block, effectively fragmenting the blockchain consensus.

Critical Impact

A malicious miner can exploit the transaction verification cache logic to induce a consensus split, causing vulnerable Zebra nodes to diverge from the main Zcash network and accept invalid blocks.

Affected Products

  • zebrad versions prior to 4.3.1
  • zebra-consensus versions prior to 5.0.2
  • Zcash network nodes running vulnerable Zebra versions

Discovery Timeline

  • 2026-04-21 - CVE CVE-2026-40880 published to NVD
  • 2026-04-22 - Last updated in NVD database

Technical Details for CVE-2026-40880

Vulnerability Analysis

This vulnerability stems from a logic error in Zebra's transaction verification cache mechanism (CWE-1025: Comparison Using Wrong Factors). The transaction verification cache is designed to improve performance by caching the results of transaction validation checks. However, the caching logic fails to properly account for height-dependent transaction validity rules.

In the Zcash protocol, certain transactions may be valid at one block height but invalid at another due to consensus rules that change based on network height. The vulnerability occurs because the cache incorrectly reuses validation results across block heights where the validity constraints differ.

The attack requires network access and low privileges (mining capability), but involves precise timing and coordination (represented by the "Present" attack complexity modifier). The impact is significant: while there is no direct confidentiality breach, the integrity and availability of both the vulnerable system and downstream systems are severely affected. A consensus split can lead to double-spend opportunities, network fragmentation, and loss of trust in transaction finality.

Root Cause

The root cause is a comparison logic error in the transaction verification cache that fails to properly factor block height into cache key generation or validation result lookups. When a transaction's validity is cached at height H+1, the cache does not invalidate or re-evaluate this cached result when the same transaction appears in a block at a different height (H+2) where different consensus rules may apply.

This is classified as CWE-1025 (Comparison Using Wrong Factors), indicating that the cache comparison mechanism uses insufficient factors to determine whether a cached validation result can be safely reused.

Attack Vector

The attack is network-based and requires the attacker to have mining capabilities within the Zcash network. The attack sequence involves:

  1. The attacker crafts a transaction that passes validation rules at height H+1 but fails validation at height H+2 due to consensus rule differences between these heights
  2. The attacker submits this transaction to vulnerable Zebra nodes, causing them to cache a "valid" result
  3. The attacker then mines a block at height H+2 containing this transaction
  4. Vulnerable Zebra nodes retrieve the cached "valid" result and accept the invalid block
  5. This causes the vulnerable nodes to diverge from honest nodes that correctly reject the block, creating a consensus split

The attack exploits the fundamental assumption that transaction validity is height-independent, which is not always true in Zcash's consensus model. For detailed technical information, see the GitHub Security Advisory.

Detection Methods for CVE-2026-40880

Indicators of Compromise

  • Zebra nodes reporting different chain tips than other network nodes
  • Unexpected block rejections or acceptances logged with height-related validation messages
  • Network partitioning alerts indicating consensus divergence among Zcash nodes
  • Transaction verification cache hits for transactions that should require re-validation

Detection Strategies

  • Monitor Zebra node logs for discrepancies between cached and freshly computed transaction validation results
  • Implement chain tip monitoring to detect if local nodes diverge from network consensus
  • Deploy network health checks that compare block hashes across multiple Zebra and Zcashd nodes
  • Set up alerts for unusual mining patterns or blocks containing transactions with height-sensitive characteristics

Monitoring Recommendations

  • Enable verbose logging on Zebra nodes to capture transaction cache behavior
  • Implement cross-node consensus monitoring comparing chain state across multiple node implementations
  • Monitor for unusual network partitioning events in Zcash network telemetry
  • Track zebrad and zebra-consensus version deployments across infrastructure

How to Mitigate CVE-2026-40880

Immediate Actions Required

  • Upgrade zebrad to version 4.3.1 or later immediately
  • Upgrade zebra-consensus to version 5.0.2 or later immediately
  • Audit current chain state to ensure nodes have not diverged from network consensus
  • Consider temporarily running parallel Zcashd nodes for consensus verification until patches are applied

Patch Information

The vulnerability is fixed in zebrad version 4.3.1 and zebra-consensus version 5.0.2. The fix addresses the transaction verification cache logic to properly account for height-dependent validation rules, ensuring that cached results are not incorrectly reused across block heights where consensus rules differ.

For complete patch details and security advisory information, refer to the GitHub Security Advisory.

Workarounds

  • Disable or bypass the transaction verification cache if the software allows configuration of this feature
  • Run Zebra nodes behind a trusted Zcashd node that can validate consensus before forwarding blocks
  • Implement additional consensus checks comparing chain state with known-good reference nodes
  • Temporarily reduce reliance on affected Zebra nodes for critical transaction processing until patched versions are deployed

Disclaimer: This content was generated using AI. While we strive for accuracy, please verify critical information with official sources.

  • Vulnerability Details
  • TypeOther

  • Vendor/TechZebra

  • SeverityHIGH

  • CVSS Score7.2

  • EPSS Probability0.04%

  • Known ExploitedNo
  • CVSS Vector
  • CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
  • Impact Assessment
  • ConfidentialityLow
  • IntegrityNone
  • AvailabilityHigh
  • CWE References
  • CWE-1025
  • Technical References
  • GitHub Security Advisory
  • Related CVEs
  • CVE-2026-40881: ZEBRA Zcash Node DOS Vulnerability

  • CVE-2026-34202: ZEBRA Zcash Node DoS Vulnerability

  • CVE-2026-34377: Zebra Zcash Node Privilege Escalation Flaw
Default Legacy - Prefooter | Experience the World’s Most Advanced Cybersecurity Platform

Experience the World’s Most Advanced Cybersecurity Platform

See how our intelligent, autonomous cybersecurity platform can protect your organization now and into the future.

Try SentinelOne
  • Get Started
  • Get a Demo
  • Product Tour
  • Why SentinelOne
  • Pricing & Packaging
  • FAQ
  • Contact
  • Contact Us
  • Customer Support
  • SentinelOne Status
  • Language
  • Platform
  • Singularity Platform
  • Singularity Endpoint
  • Singularity Cloud
  • Singularity AI-SIEM
  • Singularity Identity
  • Singularity Marketplace
  • Purple AI
  • Services
  • Wayfinder TDR
  • SentinelOne GO
  • Technical Account Management
  • Support Services
  • Verticals
  • Energy
  • Federal Government
  • Finance
  • Healthcare
  • Higher Education
  • K-12 Education
  • Manufacturing
  • Retail
  • State and Local Government
  • Cybersecurity for SMB
  • Resources
  • Blog
  • Labs
  • Case Studies
  • Videos
  • Product Tours
  • Events
  • Cybersecurity 101
  • eBooks
  • Webinars
  • Whitepapers
  • Press
  • News
  • Ransomware Anthology
  • Company
  • About Us
  • Our Customers
  • Careers
  • Partners
  • Legal & Compliance
  • Security & Compliance
  • Investor Relations
  • S Foundation
  • S Ventures

©2026 SentinelOne, All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Notice Terms of Use

English