Join the Cyber Forum: Threat Intel on May 12, 2026 to learn how AI is reshaping threat defense.Join the Virtual Cyber Forum: Threat IntelRegister Now
Experiencing a Breach?Blog
Get StartedContact Us
SentinelOne
  • Platform
    Platform Overview
    • Singularity Platform
      Welcome to Integrated Enterprise Security
    • AI for Security
      Leading the Way in AI-Powered Security Solutions
    • Securing AI
      Accelerate AI Adoption with Secure AI Tools, Apps, and Agents.
    • How It Works
      The Singularity XDR Difference
    • Singularity Marketplace
      One-Click Integrations to Unlock the Power of XDR
    • Pricing & Packaging
      Comparisons and Guidance at a Glance
    Data & AI
    • Purple AI
      Accelerate SecOps with Generative AI
    • Singularity Hyperautomation
      Easily Automate Security Processes
    • AI-SIEM
      The AI SIEM for the Autonomous SOC
    • AI Data Pipelines
      Security Data Pipeline for AI SIEM and Data Optimization
    • Singularity Data Lake
      AI-Powered, Unified Data Lake
    • Singularity Data Lake for Log Analytics
      Seamlessly Ingest Data from On-Prem, Cloud or Hybrid Environments
    Endpoint Security
    • Singularity Endpoint
      Autonomous Prevention, Detection, and Response
    • Singularity XDR
      Native & Open Protection, Detection, and Response
    • Singularity RemoteOps Forensics
      Orchestrate Forensics at Scale
    • Singularity Threat Intelligence
      Comprehensive Adversary Intelligence
    • Singularity Vulnerability Management
      Application & OS Vulnerability Management
    • Singularity Identity
      Identity Threat Detection and Response
    Cloud Security
    • Singularity Cloud Security
      Block Attacks with an AI-Powered CNAPP
    • Singularity Cloud Native Security
      Secure Cloud and Development Resources
    • Singularity Cloud Workload Security
      Real-Time Cloud Workload Protection Platform
    • Singularity Cloud Data Security
      AI-Powered Threat Detection for Cloud Storage
    • Singularity Cloud Security Posture Management
      Detect and Remediate Cloud Misconfigurations
    Securing AI
    • Prompt Security
      Secure AI Tools Across Your Enterprise
  • Why SentinelOne?
    Why SentinelOne?
    • Why SentinelOne?
      Cybersecurity Built for What’s Next
    • Our Customers
      Trusted by the World’s Leading Enterprises
    • Industry Recognition
      Tested and Proven by the Experts
    • About Us
      The Industry Leader in Autonomous Cybersecurity
    Compare SentinelOne
    • Arctic Wolf
    • Broadcom
    • CrowdStrike
    • Cybereason
    • Microsoft
    • Palo Alto Networks
    • Sophos
    • Splunk
    • Trellix
    • Trend Micro
    • Wiz
    Verticals
    • Energy
    • Federal Government
    • Finance
    • Healthcare
    • Higher Education
    • K-12 Education
    • Manufacturing
    • Retail
    • State and Local Government
  • Services
    Managed Services
    • Managed Services Overview
      Wayfinder Threat Detection & Response
    • Threat Hunting
      World-Class Expertise and Threat Intelligence
    • Managed Detection & Response
      24/7/365 Expert MDR Across Your Entire Environment
    • Incident Readiness & Response
      DFIR, Breach Readiness, & Compromise Assessments
    Support, Deployment, & Health
    • Technical Account Management
      Customer Success with Personalized Service
    • SentinelOne GO
      Guided Onboarding & Deployment Advisory
    • SentinelOne University
      Live and On-Demand Training
    • Services Overview
      Comprehensive Solutions for Seamless Security Operations
    • SentinelOne Community
      Community Login
  • Partners
    Our Network
    • MSSP Partners
      Succeed Faster with SentinelOne
    • Singularity Marketplace
      Extend the Power of S1 Technology
    • Cyber Risk Partners
      Enlist Pro Response and Advisory Teams
    • Technology Alliances
      Integrated, Enterprise-Scale Solutions
    • SentinelOne for AWS
      Hosted in AWS Regions Around the World
    • Channel Partners
      Deliver the Right Solutions, Together
    • SentinelOne for Google Cloud
      Unified, Autonomous Security Giving Defenders the Advantage at Global Scale
    • Partner Locator
      Your Go-to Source for Our Top Partners in Your Region
    Partner Portal→
  • Resources
    Resource Center
    • Case Studies
    • Data Sheets
    • eBooks
    • Reports
    • Videos
    • Webinars
    • Whitepapers
    • Events
    View All Resources→
    Blog
    • Feature Spotlight
    • For CISO/CIO
    • From the Front Lines
    • Identity
    • Cloud
    • macOS
    • SentinelOne Blog
    Blog→
    Tech Resources
    • SentinelLABS
    • Ransomware Anthology
    • Cybersecurity 101
  • About
    About SentinelOne
    • About SentinelOne
      The Industry Leader in Cybersecurity
    • Investor Relations
      Financial Information & Events
    • SentinelLABS
      Threat Research for the Modern Threat Hunter
    • Careers
      The Latest Job Opportunities
    • Press & News
      Company Announcements
    • Cybersecurity Blog
      The Latest Cybersecurity Threats, News, & More
    • FAQ
      Get Answers to Our Most Frequently Asked Questions
    • DataSet
      The Live Data Platform
    • S Foundation
      Securing a Safer Future for All
    • S Ventures
      Investing in the Next Generation of Security, Data and AI
  • Pricing
Get StartedContact Us
CVE Vulnerability Database
Vulnerability Database/CVE-2026-40337

CVE-2026-40337: Sentry Kernel DoS Vulnerability

CVE-2026-40337 is a denial of service flaw in Sentry kernel that enables tasks with DEV or IO capability to manipulate IRQ lines, creating DoS and covert channels. This article covers technical details, affected versions, and patches.

Published: April 23, 2026

CVE-2026-40337 Overview

CVE-2026-40337 is a vulnerability affecting the Sentry kernel, a high security level micro-kernel implementation designed for high security embedded systems. The vulnerability exists in the __sys_int_* syscall family, where tasks with DEV or IO capability can improperly interact with another task's IRQ line. This improper access control can lead to denial of service conditions and enable covert-channels between the vulnerable task and external entities.

Critical Impact

Tasks with elevated device capabilities can manipulate IRQ lines belonging to other tasks, potentially causing system instability and enabling unauthorized communication channels in high-security embedded environments.

Affected Products

  • Sentry kernel versions prior to 0.4.7
  • Embedded systems utilizing Sentry kernel with DEV or IO capability tasks
  • High security embedded deployments running vulnerable kernel versions

Discovery Timeline

  • 2026-04-18 - CVE CVE-2026-40337 published to NVD
  • 2026-04-20 - Last updated in NVD database

Technical Details for CVE-2026-40337

Vulnerability Analysis

The vulnerability stems from CWE-283 (Unverified Ownership), where the Sentry kernel fails to properly verify that the task invoking interrupt-related syscalls actually owns the target IRQ line. The __sys_int_* syscall family, which includes functions for acknowledging, enabling, and disabling interrupts, does not validate that the calling task is the legitimate owner of the specified interrupt before performing operations on it.

In a properly secured micro-kernel architecture, hardware interrupt lines should be strictly isolated between tasks to maintain security boundaries. However, prior to version 0.4.7, any task possessing either the DEV (device) or IO (input/output) capability could invoke these syscalls to interact with IRQ lines assigned to other tasks. This breaks the fundamental isolation guarantees expected from a security-focused micro-kernel.

The impact manifests in two primary ways: first, a malicious or compromised task can disable or manipulate interrupt handlers belonging to other tasks, causing denial of service. Second, the ability to acknowledge interrupts belonging to other tasks creates a potential covert channel that could be exploited to exfiltrate data or coordinate between processes that should be isolated.

Root Cause

The root cause is missing ownership verification in the interrupt-related syscall handlers. The kernel code retrieved the owner of the specified IRQ but did not compare it against the currently executing task before allowing the operation to proceed. This allowed any task with sufficient capability flags to perform interrupt operations on IRQ lines they did not own.

Attack Vector

The attack requires local access and high privileges (DEV or IO capability). An attacker controlling a task with device or IO capabilities can craft syscalls targeting IRQ numbers assigned to other tasks. By disabling another task's interrupt handler, the attacker can prevent that task from responding to hardware events, causing denial of service. Alternatively, by manipulating interrupt acknowledgment, the attacker can establish timing-based covert channels between isolated security domains.

c
         /* user interrupt with no owning task. Should not happen as the kernel do not hold any IRQ */
         panic(PANIC_KERNEL_INVALID_MANAGER_RESPONSE);
     }
+    if (unlikely(owner != current)) {
+        /* device associated IRQ is not owned by the current task */
+        mgr_task_set_sysreturn(current, STATUS_DENIED);
+        goto end;
+    }
     /* push the inth event into the task input events queue */
-    if (unlikely(mgr_interrupt_acknowledge_irq(IRQn) == K_STATUS_OKAY)) {
+    if (unlikely(mgr_interrupt_acknowledge_irq(IRQn) != K_STATUS_OKAY)) {
         /* should not rise while IRQ ownership has been checked! see dts file */
         panic(PANIC_KERNEL_INVALID_MANAGER_RESPONSE);
     }

Source: GitHub Commit Update

Detection Methods for CVE-2026-40337

Indicators of Compromise

  • Unexpected STATUS_DENIED return values from interrupt-related syscalls in task logs
  • System instability or unresponsive hardware components due to disabled interrupt handlers
  • Unusual patterns in interrupt acknowledgment timing that could indicate covert channel activity
  • Tasks attempting to access IRQ numbers outside their assigned range

Detection Strategies

  • Monitor syscall activity for tasks with DEV or IO capabilities, flagging attempts to interact with IRQs not assigned to them
  • Implement kernel-level auditing for all __sys_int_* syscall invocations with cross-reference to IRQ ownership tables
  • Deploy behavioral analysis to detect anomalous interrupt manipulation patterns
  • Enable verbose kernel logging to capture interrupt-related operations for forensic analysis

Monitoring Recommendations

  • Establish baseline interrupt handling patterns for each task and alert on deviations
  • Monitor system stability metrics that could indicate DoS conditions from interrupt manipulation
  • Track capability assignments and audit tasks holding DEV or IO privileges
  • Implement real-time alerting for repeated failed interrupt operations that return STATUS_DENIED

How to Mitigate CVE-2026-40337

Immediate Actions Required

  • Upgrade Sentry kernel to version 0.4.7 or later immediately
  • Audit all tasks currently configured with DEV or IO capabilities
  • Reduce the number of tasks with DEV and IO capabilities to the minimum necessary
  • Review system configuration to consolidate device access to a single trusted task where possible

Patch Information

A security patch is available in Sentry kernel version 0.4.7. The fix adds proper ownership verification in the interrupt syscall handlers, ensuring that only the task that owns a specific IRQ can perform operations on it. The patch modifies multiple syscall gate files including sysgate_int_acknowledge.c and sysgate_int_disable.c to check that the owner matches current before allowing the operation. If ownership verification fails, the syscall now returns STATUS_DENIED instead of proceeding with the operation. For detailed patch information, see the GitHub Security Advisory GHSA-5hgv-rg2f-79pg and the associated pull request.

Workarounds

  • Reduce tasks that have the DEV and IO capability to a single task, eliminating the possibility of cross-task IRQ manipulation
  • Implement strict capability assignment policies limiting DEV and IO to only essential tasks
  • Consider architectural changes to consolidate all device interactions through a single trusted driver task
  • Deploy additional monitoring and access controls at the application layer to detect abuse
bash
# Configuration example
# Review and restrict capability assignments in your Sentry kernel configuration
# Limit DEV and IO capabilities to essential tasks only

# Example: Audit current capability assignments
# Check your device tree source (dts) files for capability configurations
# Ensure only one task holds DEV/IO capabilities where possible

# After patching, verify the fix is active:
# Check kernel version is 0.4.7 or later
# Monitor for STATUS_DENIED returns indicating the ownership check is working

Disclaimer: This content was generated using AI. While we strive for accuracy, please verify critical information with official sources.

  • Vulnerability Details
  • TypeDOS

  • Vendor/TechSentry

  • SeverityMEDIUM

  • CVSS Score5.1

  • EPSS Probability0.01%

  • Known ExploitedNo
  • CVSS Vector
  • CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:H
  • Impact Assessment
  • ConfidentialityLow
  • IntegrityNone
  • AvailabilityHigh
  • CWE References
  • CWE-283
  • Technical References
  • GitHub Commit Update

  • GitHub Pull Request #108

  • GitHub Security Advisory GHSA-5hgv-rg2f-79pg
  • Related CVEs
  • CVE-2026-26004: Sentry IDOR Auth Bypass Vulnerability

  • CVE-2026-27197: Sentry SAML SSO Auth Bypass Vulnerability

  • CVE-2025-22146: Sentry SAML SSO Auth Bypass Vulnerability

  • CVE-2023-46729: Sentry JavaScript SDK SSRF Vulnerability
Default Legacy - Prefooter | Experience the World’s Most Advanced Cybersecurity Platform

Experience the World’s Most Advanced Cybersecurity Platform

See how our intelligent, autonomous cybersecurity platform can protect your organization now and into the future.

Try SentinelOne
  • Get Started
  • Get a Demo
  • Product Tour
  • Why SentinelOne
  • Pricing & Packaging
  • FAQ
  • Contact
  • Contact Us
  • Customer Support
  • SentinelOne Status
  • Language
  • Platform
  • Singularity Platform
  • Singularity Endpoint
  • Singularity Cloud
  • Singularity AI-SIEM
  • Singularity Identity
  • Singularity Marketplace
  • Purple AI
  • Services
  • Wayfinder TDR
  • SentinelOne GO
  • Technical Account Management
  • Support Services
  • Verticals
  • Energy
  • Federal Government
  • Finance
  • Healthcare
  • Higher Education
  • K-12 Education
  • Manufacturing
  • Retail
  • State and Local Government
  • Cybersecurity for SMB
  • Resources
  • Blog
  • Labs
  • Case Studies
  • Videos
  • Product Tours
  • Events
  • Cybersecurity 101
  • eBooks
  • Webinars
  • Whitepapers
  • Press
  • News
  • Ransomware Anthology
  • Company
  • About Us
  • Our Customers
  • Careers
  • Partners
  • Legal & Compliance
  • Security & Compliance
  • Investor Relations
  • S Foundation
  • S Ventures

©2026 SentinelOne, All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Notice Terms of Use

English