The SentinelOne Annual Threat Report - A Defenders Guide from the FrontlinesThe SentinelOne Annual Threat ReportGet the Report
Experiencing a Breach?Blog
Get StartedContact Us
SentinelOne
  • Platform
    Platform Overview
    • Singularity Platform
      Welcome to Integrated Enterprise Security
    • AI for Security
      Leading the Way in AI-Powered Security Solutions
    • Securing AI
      Accelerate AI Adoption with Secure AI Tools, Apps, and Agents.
    • How It Works
      The Singularity XDR Difference
    • Singularity Marketplace
      One-Click Integrations to Unlock the Power of XDR
    • Pricing & Packaging
      Comparisons and Guidance at a Glance
    Data & AI
    • Purple AI
      Accelerate SecOps with Generative AI
    • Singularity Hyperautomation
      Easily Automate Security Processes
    • AI-SIEM
      The AI SIEM for the Autonomous SOC
    • AI Data Pipelines
      Security Data Pipeline for AI SIEM and Data Optimization
    • Singularity Data Lake
      AI-Powered, Unified Data Lake
    • Singularity Data Lake for Log Analytics
      Seamlessly Ingest Data from On-Prem, Cloud or Hybrid Environments
    Endpoint Security
    • Singularity Endpoint
      Autonomous Prevention, Detection, and Response
    • Singularity XDR
      Native & Open Protection, Detection, and Response
    • Singularity RemoteOps Forensics
      Orchestrate Forensics at Scale
    • Singularity Threat Intelligence
      Comprehensive Adversary Intelligence
    • Singularity Vulnerability Management
      Application & OS Vulnerability Management
    • Singularity Identity
      Identity Threat Detection and Response
    Cloud Security
    • Singularity Cloud Security
      Block Attacks with an AI-Powered CNAPP
    • Singularity Cloud Native Security
      Secure Cloud and Development Resources
    • Singularity Cloud Workload Security
      Real-Time Cloud Workload Protection Platform
    • Singularity Cloud Data Security
      AI-Powered Threat Detection for Cloud Storage
    • Singularity Cloud Security Posture Management
      Detect and Remediate Cloud Misconfigurations
    Securing AI
    • Prompt Security
      Secure AI Tools Across Your Enterprise
  • Why SentinelOne?
    Why SentinelOne?
    • Why SentinelOne?
      Cybersecurity Built for What’s Next
    • Our Customers
      Trusted by the World’s Leading Enterprises
    • Industry Recognition
      Tested and Proven by the Experts
    • About Us
      The Industry Leader in Autonomous Cybersecurity
    Compare SentinelOne
    • Arctic Wolf
    • Broadcom
    • CrowdStrike
    • Cybereason
    • Microsoft
    • Palo Alto Networks
    • Sophos
    • Splunk
    • Trellix
    • Trend Micro
    • Wiz
    Verticals
    • Energy
    • Federal Government
    • Finance
    • Healthcare
    • Higher Education
    • K-12 Education
    • Manufacturing
    • Retail
    • State and Local Government
  • Services
    Managed Services
    • Managed Services Overview
      Wayfinder Threat Detection & Response
    • Threat Hunting
      World-Class Expertise and Threat Intelligence
    • Managed Detection & Response
      24/7/365 Expert MDR Across Your Entire Environment
    • Incident Readiness & Response
      DFIR, Breach Readiness, & Compromise Assessments
    Support, Deployment, & Health
    • Technical Account Management
      Customer Success with Personalized Service
    • SentinelOne GO
      Guided Onboarding & Deployment Advisory
    • SentinelOne University
      Live and On-Demand Training
    • Services Overview
      Comprehensive Solutions for Seamless Security Operations
    • SentinelOne Community
      Community Login
  • Partners
    Our Network
    • MSSP Partners
      Succeed Faster with SentinelOne
    • Singularity Marketplace
      Extend the Power of S1 Technology
    • Cyber Risk Partners
      Enlist Pro Response and Advisory Teams
    • Technology Alliances
      Integrated, Enterprise-Scale Solutions
    • SentinelOne for AWS
      Hosted in AWS Regions Around the World
    • Channel Partners
      Deliver the Right Solutions, Together
    • SentinelOne for Google Cloud
      Unified, Autonomous Security Giving Defenders the Advantage at Global Scale
    • Partner Locator
      Your Go-to Source for Our Top Partners in Your Region
    Partner Portal→
  • Resources
    Resource Center
    • Case Studies
    • Data Sheets
    • eBooks
    • Reports
    • Videos
    • Webinars
    • Whitepapers
    • Events
    View All Resources→
    Blog
    • Feature Spotlight
    • For CISO/CIO
    • From the Front Lines
    • Identity
    • Cloud
    • macOS
    • SentinelOne Blog
    Blog→
    Tech Resources
    • SentinelLABS
    • Ransomware Anthology
    • Cybersecurity 101
  • About
    About SentinelOne
    • About SentinelOne
      The Industry Leader in Cybersecurity
    • Investor Relations
      Financial Information & Events
    • SentinelLABS
      Threat Research for the Modern Threat Hunter
    • Careers
      The Latest Job Opportunities
    • Press & News
      Company Announcements
    • Cybersecurity Blog
      The Latest Cybersecurity Threats, News, & More
    • FAQ
      Get Answers to Our Most Frequently Asked Questions
    • DataSet
      The Live Data Platform
    • S Foundation
      Securing a Safer Future for All
    • S Ventures
      Investing in the Next Generation of Security, Data and AI
  • Pricing
Get StartedContact Us
CVE Vulnerability Database
Vulnerability Database/CVE-2026-35375

CVE-2026-35375: uutils coreutils Filename Corruption Flaw

CVE-2026-35375 is a logic error in uutils coreutils split utility that corrupts output filenames when handling non-UTF-8 inputs. This article covers the technical details, affected versions, impact, and mitigation strategies.

Published: April 23, 2026

CVE-2026-35375 Overview

A logic error in the split utility of uutils coreutils causes the corruption of output filenames when provided with non-UTF-8 prefix or suffix inputs. The implementation utilizes to_string_lossy() when constructing chunk filenames, which automatically rewrites invalid byte sequences into the UTF-8 replacement character (U+FFFD). This behavior diverges from GNU split, which preserves raw pathname bytes intact. In environments utilizing non-UTF-8 encodings, this vulnerability leads to the creation of files with incorrect names, potentially causing filename collisions, broken automation, or the misdirection of output data.

Critical Impact

Filename corruption in non-UTF-8 environments can lead to data misdirection, filename collisions, and broken automation pipelines relying on predictable output paths.

Affected Products

  • uutils coreutils versions prior to 0.8.0

Discovery Timeline

  • 2026-04-22 - CVE CVE-2026-35375 published to NVD
  • 2026-04-22 - Last updated in NVD database

Technical Details for CVE-2026-35375

Vulnerability Analysis

This vulnerability stems from improper Unicode encoding handling in the uutils coreutils implementation of the split utility. The core issue relates to CWE-176 (Improper Handling of Unicode Encoding), where the application fails to preserve raw byte sequences when constructing output filenames.

When a user provides a prefix or suffix containing non-UTF-8 byte sequences to the split command, the utility internally converts these values using Rust's to_string_lossy() method. This method is designed for safe string conversion but replaces any invalid UTF-8 sequences with the Unicode replacement character (U+FFFD, displayed as �). While this prevents crashes from invalid UTF-8, it fundamentally alters the intended filename.

The practical impact manifests in systems using legacy encodings (such as ISO-8859-1, Shift-JIS, or other non-UTF-8 character sets) where filenames may contain bytes that are valid in those encodings but invalid in UTF-8. Automation scripts expecting specific output filenames will fail, and multiple split operations could create filename collisions if different non-UTF-8 prefixes are normalized to the same replacement character sequence.

Root Cause

The root cause is the use of to_string_lossy() for filename construction in the split utility, which performs lossy UTF-8 conversion rather than preserving raw bytes. This design choice prioritizes UTF-8 string safety over filename fidelity, diverging from the POSIX-compatible behavior of GNU coreutils which treats filenames as raw byte sequences without encoding assumptions.

Attack Vector

The vulnerability requires local access and can be triggered by invoking the split command with prefix or suffix arguments containing non-UTF-8 byte sequences. An attacker with local privileges could exploit this to:

  1. Cause automation scripts to fail by making output filenames unpredictable
  2. Create filename collisions that could overwrite existing files
  3. Misdirect output data to unexpected file paths

The attack surface is limited to local command execution, requiring the attacker to have the ability to run commands or influence command-line arguments passed to the split utility.

Detection Methods for CVE-2026-35375

Indicators of Compromise

  • Presence of files containing the UTF-8 replacement character (�) in unexpected locations
  • Split output files with names that do not match expected prefix/suffix patterns
  • Automation or script failures related to missing or incorrectly named split output files
  • File collision warnings when running split operations with non-ASCII prefixes

Detection Strategies

  • Audit systems for uutils coreutils installations and verify version numbers are 0.8.0 or later
  • Review automation scripts that utilize the split command with dynamic or user-supplied prefix/suffix arguments
  • Implement file integrity monitoring on directories where split operations write output files
  • Search for anomalous filenames containing U+FFFD replacement characters in split output directories

Monitoring Recommendations

  • Monitor for unexpected file creation patterns in directories used by split operations
  • Configure alerts for script failures in pipelines that depend on predictable split output filenames
  • Track uutils coreutils version deployments across infrastructure to identify unpatched systems
  • Review logs for split command invocations with non-ASCII arguments in multi-language environments

How to Mitigate CVE-2026-35375

Immediate Actions Required

  • Upgrade uutils coreutils to version 0.8.0 or later which addresses this filename handling issue
  • Audit scripts and automation that use the split command with non-ASCII prefix or suffix values
  • Temporarily switch to GNU coreutils split if non-UTF-8 filename preservation is critical for operations
  • Validate that split output filenames match expected patterns before downstream processing

Patch Information

The vulnerability has been addressed in uutils coreutils version 0.8.0. The fix modifies the filename construction logic to properly handle non-UTF-8 byte sequences. For detailed information about the patch, see the GitHub Pull Request #11397. The patched version is available from the GitHub Release 0.8.0.

Workarounds

  • Use GNU coreutils split instead of uutils coreutils in environments requiring non-UTF-8 filename support
  • Ensure all prefix and suffix arguments to split are valid UTF-8 strings
  • Implement wrapper scripts that validate prefix/suffix arguments for UTF-8 compliance before passing to split
  • Pre-process filenames to encode non-UTF-8 sequences in a reversible format (such as URL encoding) before use with split
bash
# Workaround: Validate UTF-8 compliance of prefix before using split
PREFIX="your_prefix_here"
if echo "$PREFIX" | iconv -f UTF-8 -t UTF-8 > /dev/null 2>&1; then
    split -d --additional-suffix=.txt "$PREFIX" inputfile
else
    echo "Warning: Non-UTF-8 prefix detected, using GNU split instead"
    /usr/bin/split -d --additional-suffix=.txt "$PREFIX" inputfile
fi

Disclaimer: This content was generated using AI. While we strive for accuracy, please verify critical information with official sources.

  • Vulnerability Details
  • TypeOther

  • Vendor/TechUutils Coreutils

  • SeverityLOW

  • CVSS Score3.3

  • EPSS Probability0.01%

  • Known ExploitedNo
  • CVSS Vector
  • CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
  • Impact Assessment
  • ConfidentialityLow
  • IntegrityNone
  • AvailabilityNone
  • CWE References
  • CWE-176
  • Technical References
  • GitHub Pull Request

  • GitHub Release 0.8.0
  • Related CVEs
  • CVE-2026-35374: uutils coreutils TOCTOU Vulnerability

  • CVE-2026-35377: uutils coreutils env Utility DoS Flaw

  • CVE-2026-35381: uutils coreutils Information Disclosure

  • CVE-2026-35378: uutils coreutils expr Utility DOS Flaw
Default Legacy - Prefooter | Experience the World’s Most Advanced Cybersecurity Platform

Experience the World’s Most Advanced Cybersecurity Platform

See how our intelligent, autonomous cybersecurity platform can protect your organization now and into the future.

Try SentinelOne
  • Get Started
  • Get a Demo
  • Product Tour
  • Why SentinelOne
  • Pricing & Packaging
  • FAQ
  • Contact
  • Contact Us
  • Customer Support
  • SentinelOne Status
  • Language
  • Platform
  • Singularity Platform
  • Singularity Endpoint
  • Singularity Cloud
  • Singularity AI-SIEM
  • Singularity Identity
  • Singularity Marketplace
  • Purple AI
  • Services
  • Wayfinder TDR
  • SentinelOne GO
  • Technical Account Management
  • Support Services
  • Verticals
  • Energy
  • Federal Government
  • Finance
  • Healthcare
  • Higher Education
  • K-12 Education
  • Manufacturing
  • Retail
  • State and Local Government
  • Cybersecurity for SMB
  • Resources
  • Blog
  • Labs
  • Case Studies
  • Videos
  • Product Tours
  • Events
  • Cybersecurity 101
  • eBooks
  • Webinars
  • Whitepapers
  • Press
  • News
  • Ransomware Anthology
  • Company
  • About Us
  • Our Customers
  • Careers
  • Partners
  • Legal & Compliance
  • Security & Compliance
  • Investor Relations
  • S Foundation
  • S Ventures

©2026 SentinelOne, All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Notice Terms of Use

English