The SentinelOne Annual Threat Report - A Defenders Guide from the FrontlinesThe SentinelOne Annual Threat ReportGet the Report
Experiencing a Breach?Blog
Get StartedContact Us
SentinelOne
  • Platform
    Platform Overview
    • Singularity Platform
      Welcome to Integrated Enterprise Security
    • AI for Security
      Leading the Way in AI-Powered Security Solutions
    • Securing AI
      Accelerate AI Adoption with Secure AI Tools, Apps, and Agents.
    • How It Works
      The Singularity XDR Difference
    • Singularity Marketplace
      One-Click Integrations to Unlock the Power of XDR
    • Pricing & Packaging
      Comparisons and Guidance at a Glance
    Data & AI
    • Purple AI
      Accelerate SecOps with Generative AI
    • Singularity Hyperautomation
      Easily Automate Security Processes
    • AI-SIEM
      The AI SIEM for the Autonomous SOC
    • AI Data Pipelines
      Security Data Pipeline for AI SIEM and Data Optimization
    • Singularity Data Lake
      AI-Powered, Unified Data Lake
    • Singularity Data Lake for Log Analytics
      Seamlessly Ingest Data from On-Prem, Cloud or Hybrid Environments
    Endpoint Security
    • Singularity Endpoint
      Autonomous Prevention, Detection, and Response
    • Singularity XDR
      Native & Open Protection, Detection, and Response
    • Singularity RemoteOps Forensics
      Orchestrate Forensics at Scale
    • Singularity Threat Intelligence
      Comprehensive Adversary Intelligence
    • Singularity Vulnerability Management
      Application & OS Vulnerability Management
    • Singularity Identity
      Identity Threat Detection and Response
    Cloud Security
    • Singularity Cloud Security
      Block Attacks with an AI-Powered CNAPP
    • Singularity Cloud Native Security
      Secure Cloud and Development Resources
    • Singularity Cloud Workload Security
      Real-Time Cloud Workload Protection Platform
    • Singularity Cloud Data Security
      AI-Powered Threat Detection for Cloud Storage
    • Singularity Cloud Security Posture Management
      Detect and Remediate Cloud Misconfigurations
    Securing AI
    • Prompt Security
      Secure AI Tools Across Your Enterprise
  • Why SentinelOne?
    Why SentinelOne?
    • Why SentinelOne?
      Cybersecurity Built for What’s Next
    • Our Customers
      Trusted by the World’s Leading Enterprises
    • Industry Recognition
      Tested and Proven by the Experts
    • About Us
      The Industry Leader in Autonomous Cybersecurity
    Compare SentinelOne
    • Arctic Wolf
    • Broadcom
    • CrowdStrike
    • Cybereason
    • Microsoft
    • Palo Alto Networks
    • Sophos
    • Splunk
    • Trellix
    • Trend Micro
    • Wiz
    Verticals
    • Energy
    • Federal Government
    • Finance
    • Healthcare
    • Higher Education
    • K-12 Education
    • Manufacturing
    • Retail
    • State and Local Government
  • Services
    Managed Services
    • Managed Services Overview
      Wayfinder Threat Detection & Response
    • Threat Hunting
      World-Class Expertise and Threat Intelligence
    • Managed Detection & Response
      24/7/365 Expert MDR Across Your Entire Environment
    • Incident Readiness & Response
      DFIR, Breach Readiness, & Compromise Assessments
    Support, Deployment, & Health
    • Technical Account Management
      Customer Success with Personalized Service
    • SentinelOne GO
      Guided Onboarding & Deployment Advisory
    • SentinelOne University
      Live and On-Demand Training
    • Services Overview
      Comprehensive Solutions for Seamless Security Operations
    • SentinelOne Community
      Community Login
  • Partners
    Our Network
    • MSSP Partners
      Succeed Faster with SentinelOne
    • Singularity Marketplace
      Extend the Power of S1 Technology
    • Cyber Risk Partners
      Enlist Pro Response and Advisory Teams
    • Technology Alliances
      Integrated, Enterprise-Scale Solutions
    • SentinelOne for AWS
      Hosted in AWS Regions Around the World
    • Channel Partners
      Deliver the Right Solutions, Together
    • SentinelOne for Google Cloud
      Unified, Autonomous Security Giving Defenders the Advantage at Global Scale
    • Partner Locator
      Your Go-to Source for Our Top Partners in Your Region
    Partner Portal→
  • Resources
    Resource Center
    • Case Studies
    • Data Sheets
    • eBooks
    • Reports
    • Videos
    • Webinars
    • Whitepapers
    • Events
    View All Resources→
    Blog
    • Feature Spotlight
    • For CISO/CIO
    • From the Front Lines
    • Identity
    • Cloud
    • macOS
    • SentinelOne Blog
    Blog→
    Tech Resources
    • SentinelLABS
    • Ransomware Anthology
    • Cybersecurity 101
  • About
    About SentinelOne
    • About SentinelOne
      The Industry Leader in Cybersecurity
    • Investor Relations
      Financial Information & Events
    • SentinelLABS
      Threat Research for the Modern Threat Hunter
    • Careers
      The Latest Job Opportunities
    • Press & News
      Company Announcements
    • Cybersecurity Blog
      The Latest Cybersecurity Threats, News, & More
    • FAQ
      Get Answers to Our Most Frequently Asked Questions
    • DataSet
      The Live Data Platform
    • S Foundation
      Securing a Safer Future for All
    • S Ventures
      Investing in the Next Generation of Security, Data and AI
  • Pricing
Get StartedContact Us
CVE Vulnerability Database
Vulnerability Database/CVE-2026-33055

CVE-2026-33055: Alexcrichton Tar-rs Parsing Vulnerability

CVE-2026-33055 is a tar archive parsing vulnerability in Alexcrichton Tar-rs that causes inconsistent file interpretation across different parsers. This article covers the technical details, affected versions, and mitigation.

Published: March 27, 2026

CVE-2026-33055 Overview

CVE-2026-33055 is a Type Confusion vulnerability in tar-rs, a popular tar archive reading/writing library for Rust. The vulnerability exists in versions 0.4.44 and below, where conditional logic incorrectly skips the PAX size header when the base header size is nonzero. This parsing inconsistency can lead to different interpretations of archive contents across various tar parsers, potentially enabling attackers to craft malicious archives that appear differently when unpacked by different tools.

Critical Impact

Attackers can create specially crafted tar archives that are interpreted differently by tar-rs compared to other parsers (like Go's archive/tar), potentially leading to file content manipulation or security control bypass when archives are processed by multiple systems.

Affected Products

  • alexcrichton tar-rs versions 0.4.44 and below
  • Applications using the Rust tar crate for archive parsing
  • Systems relying on consistent archive interpretation across multiple parsers

Discovery Timeline

  • 2026-03-20 - CVE CVE-2026-33055 published to NVD
  • 2026-03-23 - Last updated in NVD database

Technical Details for CVE-2026-33055

Vulnerability Analysis

The tar-rs library implements conditional logic that skips PAX (Portable Archive eXchange) size headers when the base header already contains a nonzero size value. This behavior deviates from how other major tar implementations handle the same scenario. Standard-compliant parsers, including Go's archive/tar, unconditionally use the PAX size override when present, regardless of the base header value.

This parsing discrepancy creates a Type Confusion scenario (CWE-843) where the same archive data is interpreted differently depending on which parser processes it. The vulnerability is related to CVE-2025-62518, which addressed the inverse issue in the astral-tokio-tar project.

Root Cause

The root cause lies in the non-standard conditional logic within the tar-rs header parsing routine. When processing tar archives, the library checks if the base header size is nonzero before deciding whether to apply the PAX size override. According to proper PAX header semantics, the PAX size should always take precedence when present, but tar-rs incorrectly prioritizes the base header value in certain conditions.

Attack Vector

An attacker can exploit this vulnerability via network-delivered malicious tar archives. The attack requires user interaction to download and process the crafted archive. The exploitation scenario involves:

  1. Creating a specially crafted tar archive with conflicting base header and PAX size values
  2. Distributing the archive to targets using tar-rs for extraction
  3. The archive contents will be interpreted differently by tar-rs versus other standard tar parsers

This inconsistency can be weaponized in supply chain attacks where archives pass through multiple processing stages using different tar implementations, or in security scanning scenarios where a scanner using one parser might see different file contents than the actual extraction tool.

The vulnerability manifests when tar-rs encounters an archive entry with both a nonzero base header size and a PAX size extension. Instead of unconditionally honoring the PAX size override as specified in the PAX standard, tar-rs conditionally skips it. For technical implementation details, see the GitHub Security Advisory.

Detection Methods for CVE-2026-33055

Indicators of Compromise

  • Tar archives containing PAX extended headers with size values that differ from their corresponding base header sizes
  • Unexpected file size discrepancies when the same archive is extracted by different tools
  • Log entries indicating archive extraction anomalies or file truncation issues

Detection Strategies

  • Implement dependency scanning to identify applications using tar-rs versions 0.4.44 and below
  • Monitor for tar archives with conflicting base header and PAX size values using archive analysis tools
  • Cross-reference archive contents when processed by multiple systems to detect parsing inconsistencies
  • Use software composition analysis (SCA) tools to flag vulnerable tar-rs dependencies in Rust projects

Monitoring Recommendations

  • Enable verbose logging for archive extraction operations in applications using tar-rs
  • Implement file integrity monitoring for directories where tar archives are regularly extracted
  • Monitor Cargo.lock files in CI/CD pipelines for vulnerable tar crate versions
  • Set up alerts for dependency updates to ensure timely patching of the tar-rs library

How to Mitigate CVE-2026-33055

Immediate Actions Required

  • Upgrade tar-rs to version 0.4.45 or later immediately
  • Audit applications using the tar crate to identify all affected deployments
  • Review any archives processed by affected systems for potential manipulation
  • Implement input validation for tar archives from untrusted sources

Patch Information

The vulnerability has been fixed in tar-rs version 0.4.45. The patch corrects the PAX size header handling to unconditionally honor PAX size overrides, aligning with the behavior of other standard tar implementations. The fix is available via the GitHub commit.

To update the dependency in your Rust project, modify your Cargo.toml to require the patched version.

Workarounds

  • Validate tar archives using a standard-compliant parser before processing with tar-rs
  • Implement additional integrity checks comparing archive contents across multiple parser implementations
  • Restrict archive processing to trusted sources only until the patch can be applied
  • Consider temporarily switching to an alternative tar parsing library that correctly handles PAX headers
bash
# Update tar-rs dependency to patched version
cargo update -p tar --precise 0.4.45

# Verify the installed version
cargo tree -p tar

# Audit for vulnerable dependencies
cargo audit

Disclaimer: This content was generated using AI. While we strive for accuracy, please verify critical information with official sources.

  • Vulnerability Details
  • TypeOther

  • Vendor/TechTar Rs

  • SeverityMEDIUM

  • CVSS Score5.1

  • EPSS Probability0.01%

  • Known ExploitedNo
  • CVSS Vector
  • CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
  • Impact Assessment
  • ConfidentialityLow
  • IntegrityLow
  • AvailabilityNone
  • CWE References
  • CWE-843
  • Technical References
  • CVE Record for CVE-2025-62518
  • Vendor Resources
  • GitHub Commit Reference

  • GitHub Security Advisory
  • Latest CVEs
  • CVE-2026-40322: SiYuan Knowledge Management RCE Vulnerability

  • CVE-2026-40318: SiYuan Path Traversal Vulnerability

  • CVE-2026-40259: SiYuan Auth Bypass Vulnerability

  • CVE-2026-40255: AdonisJS HTTP Server CSRF Vulnerability
Default Legacy - Prefooter | Experience the World’s Most Advanced Cybersecurity Platform

Experience the World’s Most Advanced Cybersecurity Platform

See how our intelligent, autonomous cybersecurity platform can protect your organization now and into the future.

Try SentinelOne
  • Get Started
  • Get a Demo
  • Product Tour
  • Why SentinelOne
  • Pricing & Packaging
  • FAQ
  • Contact
  • Contact Us
  • Customer Support
  • SentinelOne Status
  • Language
  • Platform
  • Singularity Platform
  • Singularity Endpoint
  • Singularity Cloud
  • Singularity AI-SIEM
  • Singularity Identity
  • Singularity Marketplace
  • Purple AI
  • Services
  • Wayfinder TDR
  • SentinelOne GO
  • Technical Account Management
  • Support Services
  • Verticals
  • Energy
  • Federal Government
  • Finance
  • Healthcare
  • Higher Education
  • K-12 Education
  • Manufacturing
  • Retail
  • State and Local Government
  • Cybersecurity for SMB
  • Resources
  • Blog
  • Labs
  • Case Studies
  • Videos
  • Product Tours
  • Events
  • Cybersecurity 101
  • eBooks
  • Webinars
  • Whitepapers
  • Press
  • News
  • Ransomware Anthology
  • Company
  • About Us
  • Our Customers
  • Careers
  • Partners
  • Legal & Compliance
  • Security & Compliance
  • Investor Relations
  • S Foundation
  • S Ventures

©2026 SentinelOne, All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Notice Terms of Use

English