Join the Cyber Forum: Threat Intel on May 12, 2026 to learn how AI is reshaping threat defense.Join the Virtual Cyber Forum: Threat IntelRegister Now
Experiencing a Breach?Blog
Get StartedContact Us
SentinelOne
  • Platform
    Platform Overview
    • Singularity Platform
      Welcome to Integrated Enterprise Security
    • AI for Security
      Leading the Way in AI-Powered Security Solutions
    • Securing AI
      Accelerate AI Adoption with Secure AI Tools, Apps, and Agents.
    • How It Works
      The Singularity XDR Difference
    • Singularity Marketplace
      One-Click Integrations to Unlock the Power of XDR
    • Pricing & Packaging
      Comparisons and Guidance at a Glance
    Data & AI
    • Purple AI
      Accelerate SecOps with Generative AI
    • Singularity Hyperautomation
      Easily Automate Security Processes
    • AI-SIEM
      The AI SIEM for the Autonomous SOC
    • AI Data Pipelines
      Security Data Pipeline for AI SIEM and Data Optimization
    • Singularity Data Lake
      AI-Powered, Unified Data Lake
    • Singularity Data Lake for Log Analytics
      Seamlessly Ingest Data from On-Prem, Cloud or Hybrid Environments
    Endpoint Security
    • Singularity Endpoint
      Autonomous Prevention, Detection, and Response
    • Singularity XDR
      Native & Open Protection, Detection, and Response
    • Singularity RemoteOps Forensics
      Orchestrate Forensics at Scale
    • Singularity Threat Intelligence
      Comprehensive Adversary Intelligence
    • Singularity Vulnerability Management
      Application & OS Vulnerability Management
    • Singularity Identity
      Identity Threat Detection and Response
    Cloud Security
    • Singularity Cloud Security
      Block Attacks with an AI-Powered CNAPP
    • Singularity Cloud Native Security
      Secure Cloud and Development Resources
    • Singularity Cloud Workload Security
      Real-Time Cloud Workload Protection Platform
    • Singularity Cloud Data Security
      AI-Powered Threat Detection for Cloud Storage
    • Singularity Cloud Security Posture Management
      Detect and Remediate Cloud Misconfigurations
    Securing AI
    • Prompt Security
      Secure AI Tools Across Your Enterprise
  • Why SentinelOne?
    Why SentinelOne?
    • Why SentinelOne?
      Cybersecurity Built for What’s Next
    • Our Customers
      Trusted by the World’s Leading Enterprises
    • Industry Recognition
      Tested and Proven by the Experts
    • About Us
      The Industry Leader in Autonomous Cybersecurity
    Compare SentinelOne
    • Arctic Wolf
    • Broadcom
    • CrowdStrike
    • Cybereason
    • Microsoft
    • Palo Alto Networks
    • Sophos
    • Splunk
    • Trellix
    • Trend Micro
    • Wiz
    Verticals
    • Energy
    • Federal Government
    • Finance
    • Healthcare
    • Higher Education
    • K-12 Education
    • Manufacturing
    • Retail
    • State and Local Government
  • Services
    Managed Services
    • Managed Services Overview
      Wayfinder Threat Detection & Response
    • Threat Hunting
      World-Class Expertise and Threat Intelligence
    • Managed Detection & Response
      24/7/365 Expert MDR Across Your Entire Environment
    • Incident Readiness & Response
      DFIR, Breach Readiness, & Compromise Assessments
    Support, Deployment, & Health
    • Technical Account Management
      Customer Success with Personalized Service
    • SentinelOne GO
      Guided Onboarding & Deployment Advisory
    • SentinelOne University
      Live and On-Demand Training
    • Services Overview
      Comprehensive Solutions for Seamless Security Operations
    • SentinelOne Community
      Community Login
  • Partners
    Our Network
    • MSSP Partners
      Succeed Faster with SentinelOne
    • Singularity Marketplace
      Extend the Power of S1 Technology
    • Cyber Risk Partners
      Enlist Pro Response and Advisory Teams
    • Technology Alliances
      Integrated, Enterprise-Scale Solutions
    • SentinelOne for AWS
      Hosted in AWS Regions Around the World
    • Channel Partners
      Deliver the Right Solutions, Together
    • SentinelOne for Google Cloud
      Unified, Autonomous Security Giving Defenders the Advantage at Global Scale
    • Partner Locator
      Your Go-to Source for Our Top Partners in Your Region
    Partner Portal→
  • Resources
    Resource Center
    • Case Studies
    • Data Sheets
    • eBooks
    • Reports
    • Videos
    • Webinars
    • Whitepapers
    • Events
    View All Resources→
    Blog
    • Feature Spotlight
    • For CISO/CIO
    • From the Front Lines
    • Identity
    • Cloud
    • macOS
    • SentinelOne Blog
    Blog→
    Tech Resources
    • SentinelLABS
    • Ransomware Anthology
    • Cybersecurity 101
  • About
    About SentinelOne
    • About SentinelOne
      The Industry Leader in Cybersecurity
    • Investor Relations
      Financial Information & Events
    • SentinelLABS
      Threat Research for the Modern Threat Hunter
    • Careers
      The Latest Job Opportunities
    • Press & News
      Company Announcements
    • Cybersecurity Blog
      The Latest Cybersecurity Threats, News, & More
    • FAQ
      Get Answers to Our Most Frequently Asked Questions
    • DataSet
      The Live Data Platform
    • S Foundation
      Securing a Safer Future for All
    • S Ventures
      Investing in the Next Generation of Security, Data and AI
  • Pricing
Get StartedContact Us
CVE Vulnerability Database
Vulnerability Database/CVE-2026-32606

CVE-2026-32606: IncusOS Privilege Escalation Vulnerability

CVE-2026-32606 is a privilege escalation vulnerability in IncusOS that allows attackers with physical access to bypass LUKS encryption and access sensitive data. This article covers technical details, affected versions, impact, and mitigation.

Published: March 20, 2026

CVE-2026-32606 Overview

CVE-2026-32606 is a Secure Boot Bypass vulnerability affecting IncusOS, an immutable operating system image designed for running Incus containerization workloads. The vulnerability exists in the default configuration of systemd-cryptenroll as used by IncusOS through mkosi, which allows an attacker with physical access to the machine to access encrypted data without requiring any interaction by the system owner or tampering with Secure Boot state or the kernel (UKI) boot image.

The flaw stems from the TPM policy configuration that releases the LUKS encryption key based solely on expected PCR7 and PCR11 values. This default PCR11 policy critically allows the TPM to release the key to the booted system rather than restricting it to the initrd portion of the signed kernel image.

Critical Impact

An attacker with physical access can extract the immutable LUKS volume master key, enabling unauthorized decryption, data exfiltration, and system tampering without leaving forensic traces.

Affected Products

  • IncusOS versions prior to 202603142010 (2026/03/14 20:10 UTC)
  • Systems using systemd-cryptenroll with default mkosi TPM configuration
  • Environments relying on TPM-based LUKS encryption with PCR7/PCR11 binding only

Discovery Timeline

  • 2026-03-14 - IncusOS version 202603142010 released with PCR15 binding fix
  • 2026-03-18 - CVE-2026-32606 published to NVD
  • 2026-03-18 - Last updated in NVD database

Technical Details for CVE-2026-32606

Vulnerability Analysis

This vulnerability represents a fundamental weakness in TPM-based disk encryption implementations that rely solely on PCR7 and PCR11 measurements for key release policies. The attack exploits the fact that the initrd component of the UKI selects the root disk based on GPT partition identifiers, making it trivial for an attacker to substitute the legitimate encrypted root partition with a malicious one they control.

When the system boots with the attacker's substituted root partition, it maintains identical TPM state because the bootloader and kernel image (UKI) remain unmodified with Secure Boot enabled. The system prompts for a recovery key—which the attacker has predefined on their malicious partition—and proceeds to boot using the attacker-controlled root filesystem.

Once booted, the attacker can place a systemd unit file within their malicious root partition that executes automatically on system startup. This unit runs in an environment where the TPM will release the encryption key for the original root disk, allowing complete extraction of the LUKS volume key.

Root Cause

The root cause is classified as CWE-522 (Insufficiently Protected Credentials). The TPM policy binding configuration in systemd-cryptenroll as deployed by IncusOS did not include PCR15 in its measurement requirements. PCR15 is specifically designed to be extended when a root LUKS volume is successfully opened in the initrd, creating a state that cannot be reset without a full system reboot.

Without PCR15 binding, the TPM releases encryption keys based solely on:

  • PCR7: Secure Boot policy measurements
  • PCR11: Unified Kernel Image (UKI) measurements

This configuration fails to differentiate between legitimate initrd key retrieval and post-boot key retrieval attempts from a potentially compromised userspace.

Attack Vector

The attack requires physical access to the target system and follows this exploitation chain:

  1. Partition Substitution: The attacker removes or modifies the original encrypted root partition and replaces it with a malicious partition using matching GPT partition identifiers
  2. Recovery Key Setup: The attacker configures their malicious partition with a known recovery key
  3. System Boot: The victim system boots normally—Secure Boot validates the UKI, TPM state remains pristine
  4. Recovery Key Entry: The system prompts for recovery key (original partition missing); attacker provides their predefined key
  5. Malicious Code Execution: A pre-configured systemd unit on the attacker's root partition executes with TPM in a valid state
  6. Key Extraction: The malicious unit retrieves the LUKS encryption key from the TPM and extracts the volume master key
  7. Cover Tracks: Attacker restores original partition configuration, leaving no forensic evidence

The fix introduces PCR15 binding logic that ensures the TPM only releases encryption keys during the initrd phase. The security patch adds verification for PCR15 binding:

go
// Check if the root and swap partitions include a binding on PCR15. If not, update the LUKS bindings before proceeding.
// This is required to counter the attack described at https://oddlama.org/blog/bypassing-disk-encryption-with-tpm2-unlock/.
//
// Binding to exact values of PCRs 4+7 and a PCR11 policy are insufficient when an attacker has physical access to the system
// and can create a malicious root partition. Because the system will boot with an unmodified UKI and SecureBoot/TPM state,
// after the system exits the initrd IncusOS will behave like it's a first boot, but more critically the TPM will be in a
// known "good" state and happily release its encryption key used by LUKS allowing the attacker to trivially extract the
// LUKS volume key. They can then undo their malicious changes to the disk, and IncusOS wlll have no idea an attack occurred
// while the attacker now can decrypt the LUKS volumes at any time to exfiltrate data, mess with the system, etc.
//
// We add a binding to an empty PCR15. This PCR is extended when a root LUKS volume is successfully opened in the initrd, so the
// only time the TPM state could automatically unlock things for us is at the beginning of the initrd. After that point, PCR15
// will have a different value which cannot be reset, rendering the attack impossible.
//
// Performing the check and PCR binding update here catches both fresh installs as well as existing deployments. In either case,
// the TPM state will allow a single re-bind, after which it will only work in the initrd. At some point after September 2026
// we can move this logic into the recovery key generation block above so only fresh installs are inspected. systemd v259 did
// add a TPM2PCRs= option to systemd-repart which would also make life easier.
luksVolumes, err := util.GetLUKSVolumePartitions(ctx)
if err != nil {
	return err
}

isBoundPCR15, err := storage.LUKSBoundToPCR(ctx, luksVolumes["root"], 15)
if err != nil {
	return err
}

Source: GitHub Commit for Incus OS

Detection Methods for CVE-2026-32606

Indicators of Compromise

  • Unexpected system recovery key prompts during boot sequences
  • Evidence of GPT partition table modifications or partition UUID changes
  • Unusual systemd unit files in the root filesystem that were not part of the original deployment
  • TPM event log entries indicating key release events outside of expected initrd execution context
  • Physical tampering indicators on server hardware or storage devices

Detection Strategies

  • Monitor TPM event logs for anomalous key release patterns, particularly those occurring after the initrd phase completes
  • Implement hardware intrusion detection systems that alert on physical access to servers
  • Configure centralized logging for boot events and compare against known-good baseline boot sequences
  • Audit LUKS key slot configurations to verify PCR15 binding is present on all encrypted volumes

Monitoring Recommendations

  • Enable TPM attestation logging and forward events to SIEM for correlation analysis
  • Implement boot integrity monitoring that validates partition UUIDs and GPT structures against known configurations
  • Deploy physical security monitoring with tamper-evident seals on server chassis
  • Configure alerts for any recovery key usage events, as these may indicate compromise attempts

How to Mitigate CVE-2026-32606

Immediate Actions Required

  • Update IncusOS to version 202603142010 or later, which includes the PCR15 binding logic and automatically updates TPM policies on boot
  • If physical compromise is suspected, perform a complete system wipe and reinstallation to rotate the LUKS volume key
  • Audit all IncusOS deployments to verify they are running the patched version
  • Review physical security controls for systems running IncusOS with TPM-based encryption

Patch Information

The fix is included in IncusOS version 202603142010 (2026/03/14 20:10 UTC). The patch adds PCR15 binding to the TPM policy, ensuring that LUKS encryption keys can only be retrieved during the initrd phase of boot. Upon first boot after updating, the system automatically rebinds LUKS keys to include PCR15, preventing the attack vector from being exploited.

For detailed technical information, refer to the GitHub Security Advisory GHSA-wj2j-qwcf-cfcc and the GitHub Pull Request for Incus OS.

Additional technical background on this class of TPM encryption bypass is available in the Oddlama Blog on Disk Encryption.

Workarounds

  • There are no known workarounds other than updating to a patched version
  • Implement strict physical access controls to limit exposure while awaiting patching
  • Consider temporarily disabling automatic TPM-based unlocking and requiring manual key entry for critical systems
  • Monitor for and immediately investigate any unexpected recovery key prompts
bash
# Verify IncusOS version includes PCR15 fix
incus-osd --version

# Check if LUKS volumes are bound to PCR15 (post-patch)
systemd-cryptenroll --tpm2-device=auto --tpm2-pcrs=? /dev/disk/by-partlabel/root

# After updating, verify automatic TPM policy rebinding occurred by checking journal
journalctl -u incus-osd | grep -i "PCR15"

Disclaimer: This content was generated using AI. While we strive for accuracy, please verify critical information with official sources.

  • Vulnerability Details
  • TypePrivilege Escalation

  • Vendor/TechIncusos

  • SeverityHIGH

  • CVSS Score7.6

  • EPSS Probability0.01%

  • Known ExploitedNo
  • CVSS Vector
  • CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
  • Impact Assessment
  • ConfidentialityLow
  • IntegrityNone
  • AvailabilityHigh
  • CWE References
  • CWE-522
  • Technical References
  • Linux Containers Forum Discussion

  • GitHub Commit for Incus OS

  • GitHub Pull Request for Incus OS

  • GitHub Security Advisory GHSA-wj2j-qwcf-cfcc

  • Oddlama Blog on Disk Encryption
  • Latest CVEs
  • CVE-2025-49454: TinySalt Path Traversal Vulnerability

  • CVE-2025-48261: MultiVendorX Information Disclosure Flaw

  • CVE-2025-32119: CardGate WooCommerce SQL Injection Flaw

  • CVE-2025-26879: s2Member Plugin Reflected XSS Vulnerability
Default Legacy - Prefooter | Experience the World’s Most Advanced Cybersecurity Platform

Experience the World’s Most Advanced Cybersecurity Platform

See how our intelligent, autonomous cybersecurity platform can protect your organization now and into the future.

Try SentinelOne
  • Get Started
  • Get a Demo
  • Product Tour
  • Why SentinelOne
  • Pricing & Packaging
  • FAQ
  • Contact
  • Contact Us
  • Customer Support
  • SentinelOne Status
  • Language
  • Platform
  • Singularity Platform
  • Singularity Endpoint
  • Singularity Cloud
  • Singularity AI-SIEM
  • Singularity Identity
  • Singularity Marketplace
  • Purple AI
  • Services
  • Wayfinder TDR
  • SentinelOne GO
  • Technical Account Management
  • Support Services
  • Verticals
  • Energy
  • Federal Government
  • Finance
  • Healthcare
  • Higher Education
  • K-12 Education
  • Manufacturing
  • Retail
  • State and Local Government
  • Cybersecurity for SMB
  • Resources
  • Blog
  • Labs
  • Case Studies
  • Videos
  • Product Tours
  • Events
  • Cybersecurity 101
  • eBooks
  • Webinars
  • Whitepapers
  • Press
  • News
  • Ransomware Anthology
  • Company
  • About Us
  • Our Customers
  • Careers
  • Partners
  • Legal & Compliance
  • Security & Compliance
  • Investor Relations
  • S Foundation
  • S Ventures

©2026 SentinelOne, All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Notice Terms of Use

English