Join the Cyber Forum: Threat Intel on May 12, 2026 to learn how AI is reshaping threat defense.Join the Virtual Cyber Forum: Threat IntelRegister Now
Experiencing a Breach?Blog
Get StartedContact Us
SentinelOne
  • Platform
    Platform Overview
    • Singularity Platform
      Welcome to Integrated Enterprise Security
    • AI for Security
      Leading the Way in AI-Powered Security Solutions
    • Securing AI
      Accelerate AI Adoption with Secure AI Tools, Apps, and Agents.
    • How It Works
      The Singularity XDR Difference
    • Singularity Marketplace
      One-Click Integrations to Unlock the Power of XDR
    • Pricing & Packaging
      Comparisons and Guidance at a Glance
    Data & AI
    • Purple AI
      Accelerate SecOps with Generative AI
    • Singularity Hyperautomation
      Easily Automate Security Processes
    • AI-SIEM
      The AI SIEM for the Autonomous SOC
    • AI Data Pipelines
      Security Data Pipeline for AI SIEM and Data Optimization
    • Singularity Data Lake
      AI-Powered, Unified Data Lake
    • Singularity Data Lake for Log Analytics
      Seamlessly Ingest Data from On-Prem, Cloud or Hybrid Environments
    Endpoint Security
    • Singularity Endpoint
      Autonomous Prevention, Detection, and Response
    • Singularity XDR
      Native & Open Protection, Detection, and Response
    • Singularity RemoteOps Forensics
      Orchestrate Forensics at Scale
    • Singularity Threat Intelligence
      Comprehensive Adversary Intelligence
    • Singularity Vulnerability Management
      Application & OS Vulnerability Management
    • Singularity Identity
      Identity Threat Detection and Response
    Cloud Security
    • Singularity Cloud Security
      Block Attacks with an AI-Powered CNAPP
    • Singularity Cloud Native Security
      Secure Cloud and Development Resources
    • Singularity Cloud Workload Security
      Real-Time Cloud Workload Protection Platform
    • Singularity Cloud Data Security
      AI-Powered Threat Detection for Cloud Storage
    • Singularity Cloud Security Posture Management
      Detect and Remediate Cloud Misconfigurations
    Securing AI
    • Prompt Security
      Secure AI Tools Across Your Enterprise
  • Why SentinelOne?
    Why SentinelOne?
    • Why SentinelOne?
      Cybersecurity Built for What’s Next
    • Our Customers
      Trusted by the World’s Leading Enterprises
    • Industry Recognition
      Tested and Proven by the Experts
    • About Us
      The Industry Leader in Autonomous Cybersecurity
    Compare SentinelOne
    • Arctic Wolf
    • Broadcom
    • CrowdStrike
    • Cybereason
    • Microsoft
    • Palo Alto Networks
    • Sophos
    • Splunk
    • Trellix
    • Trend Micro
    • Wiz
    Verticals
    • Energy
    • Federal Government
    • Finance
    • Healthcare
    • Higher Education
    • K-12 Education
    • Manufacturing
    • Retail
    • State and Local Government
  • Services
    Managed Services
    • Managed Services Overview
      Wayfinder Threat Detection & Response
    • Threat Hunting
      World-Class Expertise and Threat Intelligence
    • Managed Detection & Response
      24/7/365 Expert MDR Across Your Entire Environment
    • Incident Readiness & Response
      DFIR, Breach Readiness, & Compromise Assessments
    Support, Deployment, & Health
    • Technical Account Management
      Customer Success with Personalized Service
    • SentinelOne GO
      Guided Onboarding & Deployment Advisory
    • SentinelOne University
      Live and On-Demand Training
    • Services Overview
      Comprehensive Solutions for Seamless Security Operations
    • SentinelOne Community
      Community Login
  • Partners
    Our Network
    • MSSP Partners
      Succeed Faster with SentinelOne
    • Singularity Marketplace
      Extend the Power of S1 Technology
    • Cyber Risk Partners
      Enlist Pro Response and Advisory Teams
    • Technology Alliances
      Integrated, Enterprise-Scale Solutions
    • SentinelOne for AWS
      Hosted in AWS Regions Around the World
    • Channel Partners
      Deliver the Right Solutions, Together
    • SentinelOne for Google Cloud
      Unified, Autonomous Security Giving Defenders the Advantage at Global Scale
    • Partner Locator
      Your Go-to Source for Our Top Partners in Your Region
    Partner Portal→
  • Resources
    Resource Center
    • Case Studies
    • Data Sheets
    • eBooks
    • Reports
    • Videos
    • Webinars
    • Whitepapers
    • Events
    View All Resources→
    Blog
    • Feature Spotlight
    • For CISO/CIO
    • From the Front Lines
    • Identity
    • Cloud
    • macOS
    • SentinelOne Blog
    Blog→
    Tech Resources
    • SentinelLABS
    • Ransomware Anthology
    • Cybersecurity 101
  • About
    About SentinelOne
    • About SentinelOne
      The Industry Leader in Cybersecurity
    • Investor Relations
      Financial Information & Events
    • SentinelLABS
      Threat Research for the Modern Threat Hunter
    • Careers
      The Latest Job Opportunities
    • Press & News
      Company Announcements
    • Cybersecurity Blog
      The Latest Cybersecurity Threats, News, & More
    • FAQ
      Get Answers to Our Most Frequently Asked Questions
    • DataSet
      The Live Data Platform
    • S Foundation
      Securing a Safer Future for All
    • S Ventures
      Investing in the Next Generation of Security, Data and AI
  • Pricing
Get StartedContact Us
CVE Vulnerability Database
Vulnerability Database/CVE-2026-31420

CVE-2026-31420: Linux Kernel Bridge MRP DoS Vulnerability

CVE-2026-31420 is a denial of service flaw in Linux kernel bridge MRP that allows zero test intervals to trigger OOM panic through tight loop execution. This article covers technical details, affected versions, and mitigations.

Published: April 17, 2026

CVE-2026-31420 Overview

A resource exhaustion vulnerability has been discovered in the Linux kernel's bridge MRP (Media Redundancy Protocol) subsystem. The functions br_mrp_start_test() and br_mrp_start_in_test() accept user-supplied interval values from netlink without proper validation. When an interval of zero is provided, the delayed work handlers reschedule themselves with zero delay, creating a tight loop that exhausts all system memory and triggers a kernel panic via OOM deadlock.

Critical Impact

This vulnerability allows local attackers to cause a complete denial of service by triggering an out-of-memory condition through malicious netlink messages, resulting in kernel panic and system crash.

Affected Products

  • Linux kernel with bridge MRP subsystem enabled
  • Systems utilizing MRP (Media Redundancy Protocol) for network bridging
  • Industrial network configurations using MRP ring topologies

Discovery Timeline

  • 2026-04-13 - CVE CVE-2026-31420 published to NVD
  • 2026-04-13 - Last updated in NVD database

Technical Details for CVE-2026-31420

Vulnerability Analysis

The vulnerability exists in the Linux kernel's bridge MRP implementation, specifically within the test interval handling logic. When br_mrp_start_test() or br_mrp_start_in_test() receives a zero value for the test interval parameter via netlink, the call to usecs_to_jiffies(0) returns 0. This causes the delayed work handlers (br_mrp_test_work_expired and br_mrp_in_test_work_expired) to reschedule themselves immediately with no delay.

The result is a tight loop executing on system_percpu_wq that continuously allocates and transmits MRP test frames at maximum rate. This rapid allocation pattern quickly exhausts available system memory, leading to an OOM (Out-of-Memory) condition and subsequent kernel panic through deadlock.

The same zero-interval vulnerability affects br_mrp_start_in_test_parse() for interconnect test frames, expanding the attack surface.

Root Cause

The root cause is insufficient input validation at the netlink attribute parsing layer. The nla_policy tables for IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_START_TEST_INTERVAL and IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_START_IN_TEST_INTERVAL did not enforce a minimum value constraint, allowing zero to be accepted as a valid interval. This violates the implicit assumption in the workqueue scheduling code that intervals will always be positive non-zero values.

Attack Vector

An attacker with local access and sufficient privileges to send netlink messages to the bridge subsystem can exploit this vulnerability. The attack involves sending a specially crafted netlink message containing a zero value for the MRP test interval attribute. Since the validation occurs only at the application layer and not at the netlink parsing layer, the zero value passes through to the workqueue scheduling code where it triggers the resource exhaustion loop.

The attack requires CAP_NET_ADMIN capability or root privileges to send the malicious netlink configuration messages to the bridge interface.

Detection Methods for CVE-2026-31420

Indicators of Compromise

  • Unusual memory consumption patterns on systems running Linux bridge with MRP enabled
  • High CPU utilization on system_percpu_wq workqueue threads
  • Rapid increase in MRP test frame transmissions observed on bridge interfaces
  • OOM killer activation logs in kernel messages
  • System unresponsiveness preceding kernel panic

Detection Strategies

  • Monitor kernel logs for OOM killer invocations related to bridge or network workqueue processes
  • Implement netlink traffic monitoring to detect zero-interval MRP configuration attempts
  • Track workqueue execution patterns for abnormal rescheduling rates
  • Configure memory usage alerts for early detection of resource exhaustion attacks

Monitoring Recommendations

  • Enable kernel memory debugging options during development and testing phases
  • Implement real-time monitoring of bridge interface configuration changes via auditd
  • Deploy SentinelOne Singularity platform for kernel-level behavioral anomaly detection
  • Configure alerting for unusual netlink message patterns targeting bridge interfaces

How to Mitigate CVE-2026-31420

Immediate Actions Required

  • Apply the kernel patches from the stable kernel tree immediately
  • Restrict access to netlink bridge configuration to only essential administrative users
  • Consider disabling MRP functionality if not actively required in production environments
  • Implement network segmentation to limit local attacker access to affected systems

Patch Information

The vulnerability has been resolved in the Linux kernel stable tree. The fix implements NLA_POLICY_MIN(NLA_U32, 1) in the nla_policy tables for both IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_START_TEST_INTERVAL and IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_START_IN_TEST_INTERVAL attributes. This ensures zero values are rejected at the netlink attribute parsing layer before reaching the workqueue scheduling code.

Patches are available from the kernel git repository:

  • Kernel Git Commit c9bc352f716d
  • Kernel Git Commit fa6e24963342

This approach is consistent with how other bridge subsystems (br_fdb, br_mst) enforce range constraints on netlink attributes.

Workarounds

  • Limit CAP_NET_ADMIN capabilities to trusted users only using Linux capabilities or SELinux policies
  • Use network namespaces to isolate bridge configurations from untrusted processes
  • Implement mandatory access controls (SELinux/AppArmor) to restrict netlink bridge operations
  • Monitor and rate-limit netlink configuration messages at the system level
bash
# Restrict netlink bridge capabilities using SELinux (example policy)
# Review and adapt based on your distribution and security requirements
semanage boolean --modify --on deny_ptrace
audit2allow -a -M bridge_mrp_restrict
semodule -i bridge_mrp_restrict.pp

Disclaimer: This content was generated using AI. While we strive for accuracy, please verify critical information with official sources.

  • Vulnerability Details
  • TypeDOS

  • Vendor/TechLinux Kernel

  • SeverityNONE

  • CVSS ScoreN/A

  • EPSS Probability0.02%

  • Known ExploitedNo
  • Impact Assessment
  • ConfidentialityNone
  • IntegrityNone
  • AvailabilityNone
  • Technical References
  • Kernel Git Commit Reference

  • Kernel Git Commit Reference
  • Related CVEs
  • CVE-2026-31418: Linux Kernel Netfilter IPset DoS Flaw

  • CVE-2026-31415: Linux Kernel IPv6 DoS Vulnerability

  • CVE-2026-31424: Linux Kernel Netfilter DoS Vulnerability

  • CVE-2026-31423: Linux Kernel sch_hfsc DoS Vulnerability
Default Legacy - Prefooter | Experience the World’s Most Advanced Cybersecurity Platform

Experience the World’s Most Advanced Cybersecurity Platform

See how our intelligent, autonomous cybersecurity platform can protect your organization now and into the future.

Try SentinelOne
  • Get Started
  • Get a Demo
  • Product Tour
  • Why SentinelOne
  • Pricing & Packaging
  • FAQ
  • Contact
  • Contact Us
  • Customer Support
  • SentinelOne Status
  • Language
  • Platform
  • Singularity Platform
  • Singularity Endpoint
  • Singularity Cloud
  • Singularity AI-SIEM
  • Singularity Identity
  • Singularity Marketplace
  • Purple AI
  • Services
  • Wayfinder TDR
  • SentinelOne GO
  • Technical Account Management
  • Support Services
  • Verticals
  • Energy
  • Federal Government
  • Finance
  • Healthcare
  • Higher Education
  • K-12 Education
  • Manufacturing
  • Retail
  • State and Local Government
  • Cybersecurity for SMB
  • Resources
  • Blog
  • Labs
  • Case Studies
  • Videos
  • Product Tours
  • Events
  • Cybersecurity 101
  • eBooks
  • Webinars
  • Whitepapers
  • Press
  • News
  • Ransomware Anthology
  • Company
  • About Us
  • Our Customers
  • Careers
  • Partners
  • Legal & Compliance
  • Security & Compliance
  • Investor Relations
  • S Foundation
  • S Ventures

©2026 SentinelOne, All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Notice Terms of Use

English