Join the Cyber Forum: Threat Intel on May 12, 2026 to learn how AI is reshaping threat defense.Join the Virtual Cyber Forum: Threat IntelRegister Now
Experiencing a Breach?Blog
Get StartedContact Us
SentinelOne
  • Platform
    Platform Overview
    • Singularity Platform
      Welcome to Integrated Enterprise Security
    • AI for Security
      Leading the Way in AI-Powered Security Solutions
    • Securing AI
      Accelerate AI Adoption with Secure AI Tools, Apps, and Agents.
    • How It Works
      The Singularity XDR Difference
    • Singularity Marketplace
      One-Click Integrations to Unlock the Power of XDR
    • Pricing & Packaging
      Comparisons and Guidance at a Glance
    Data & AI
    • Purple AI
      Accelerate SecOps with Generative AI
    • Singularity Hyperautomation
      Easily Automate Security Processes
    • AI-SIEM
      The AI SIEM for the Autonomous SOC
    • AI Data Pipelines
      Security Data Pipeline for AI SIEM and Data Optimization
    • Singularity Data Lake
      AI-Powered, Unified Data Lake
    • Singularity Data Lake for Log Analytics
      Seamlessly Ingest Data from On-Prem, Cloud or Hybrid Environments
    Endpoint Security
    • Singularity Endpoint
      Autonomous Prevention, Detection, and Response
    • Singularity XDR
      Native & Open Protection, Detection, and Response
    • Singularity RemoteOps Forensics
      Orchestrate Forensics at Scale
    • Singularity Threat Intelligence
      Comprehensive Adversary Intelligence
    • Singularity Vulnerability Management
      Application & OS Vulnerability Management
    • Singularity Identity
      Identity Threat Detection and Response
    Cloud Security
    • Singularity Cloud Security
      Block Attacks with an AI-Powered CNAPP
    • Singularity Cloud Native Security
      Secure Cloud and Development Resources
    • Singularity Cloud Workload Security
      Real-Time Cloud Workload Protection Platform
    • Singularity Cloud Data Security
      AI-Powered Threat Detection for Cloud Storage
    • Singularity Cloud Security Posture Management
      Detect and Remediate Cloud Misconfigurations
    Securing AI
    • Prompt Security
      Secure AI Tools Across Your Enterprise
  • Why SentinelOne?
    Why SentinelOne?
    • Why SentinelOne?
      Cybersecurity Built for What’s Next
    • Our Customers
      Trusted by the World’s Leading Enterprises
    • Industry Recognition
      Tested and Proven by the Experts
    • About Us
      The Industry Leader in Autonomous Cybersecurity
    Compare SentinelOne
    • Arctic Wolf
    • Broadcom
    • CrowdStrike
    • Cybereason
    • Microsoft
    • Palo Alto Networks
    • Sophos
    • Splunk
    • Trellix
    • Trend Micro
    • Wiz
    Verticals
    • Energy
    • Federal Government
    • Finance
    • Healthcare
    • Higher Education
    • K-12 Education
    • Manufacturing
    • Retail
    • State and Local Government
  • Services
    Managed Services
    • Managed Services Overview
      Wayfinder Threat Detection & Response
    • Threat Hunting
      World-Class Expertise and Threat Intelligence
    • Managed Detection & Response
      24/7/365 Expert MDR Across Your Entire Environment
    • Incident Readiness & Response
      DFIR, Breach Readiness, & Compromise Assessments
    Support, Deployment, & Health
    • Technical Account Management
      Customer Success with Personalized Service
    • SentinelOne GO
      Guided Onboarding & Deployment Advisory
    • SentinelOne University
      Live and On-Demand Training
    • Services Overview
      Comprehensive Solutions for Seamless Security Operations
    • SentinelOne Community
      Community Login
  • Partners
    Our Network
    • MSSP Partners
      Succeed Faster with SentinelOne
    • Singularity Marketplace
      Extend the Power of S1 Technology
    • Cyber Risk Partners
      Enlist Pro Response and Advisory Teams
    • Technology Alliances
      Integrated, Enterprise-Scale Solutions
    • SentinelOne for AWS
      Hosted in AWS Regions Around the World
    • Channel Partners
      Deliver the Right Solutions, Together
    • SentinelOne for Google Cloud
      Unified, Autonomous Security Giving Defenders the Advantage at Global Scale
    • Partner Locator
      Your Go-to Source for Our Top Partners in Your Region
    Partner Portal→
  • Resources
    Resource Center
    • Case Studies
    • Data Sheets
    • eBooks
    • Reports
    • Videos
    • Webinars
    • Whitepapers
    • Events
    View All Resources→
    Blog
    • Feature Spotlight
    • For CISO/CIO
    • From the Front Lines
    • Identity
    • Cloud
    • macOS
    • SentinelOne Blog
    Blog→
    Tech Resources
    • SentinelLABS
    • Ransomware Anthology
    • Cybersecurity 101
  • About
    About SentinelOne
    • About SentinelOne
      The Industry Leader in Cybersecurity
    • Investor Relations
      Financial Information & Events
    • SentinelLABS
      Threat Research for the Modern Threat Hunter
    • Careers
      The Latest Job Opportunities
    • Press & News
      Company Announcements
    • Cybersecurity Blog
      The Latest Cybersecurity Threats, News, & More
    • FAQ
      Get Answers to Our Most Frequently Asked Questions
    • DataSet
      The Live Data Platform
    • S Foundation
      Securing a Safer Future for All
    • S Ventures
      Investing in the Next Generation of Security, Data and AI
  • Pricing
Get StartedContact Us
CVE Vulnerability Database
Vulnerability Database/CVE-2026-31413

CVE-2026-31413: Linux Kernel BPF Privilege Escalation

CVE-2026-31413 is a privilege escalation vulnerability in the Linux kernel's BPF subsystem that allows exploitable verifier divergence leading to out-of-bounds map access. This post covers technical details, impact, and mitigation.

Published: April 17, 2026

CVE-2026-31413 Overview

A critical vulnerability has been identified in the Linux kernel's BPF (Berkeley Packet Filter) verifier subsystem. The flaw resides in the maybe_fork_scalars() function, which incorrectly handles scalar forking when processing BPF_OR operations with constant source operands. When the destination register has a signed range of [-1, 0], the verifier forks state incorrectly, leading to a verifier/runtime divergence that can be exploited for out-of-bounds map access.

Critical Impact

This vulnerability creates an exploitable divergence between BPF verifier analysis and runtime execution, allowing attackers to bypass kernel security checks and perform out-of-bounds memory access on BPF maps.

Affected Products

  • Linux kernel (versions containing vulnerable BPF verifier code)
  • Systems with BPF subsystem enabled
  • Container and cloud environments utilizing eBPF for security monitoring

Discovery Timeline

  • 2026-04-12 - CVE CVE-2026-31413 published to NVD
  • 2026-04-13 - Last updated in NVD database

Technical Details for CVE-2026-31413

Vulnerability Analysis

The vulnerability stems from a logical error in the BPF verifier's state forking mechanism when handling BPF_OR ALU operations. The maybe_fork_scalars() function is designed to optimize verifier analysis by forking execution paths when certain conditions are met. When the destination operand (dst) has a signed range of [-1, 0] and the source operand is a constant, the verifier creates two execution paths: one where dst = 0 (pushed path) and one where dst = -1 (current path).

For BPF_AND operations, this forking is mathematically sound because 0 & K == 0 for any constant K. However, for BPF_OR operations, the logic breaks down: 0 | K == K, not 0. This means the pushed path incorrectly tracks the destination as 0 when the actual runtime value would be K, creating a dangerous discrepancy between what the verifier believes and what actually executes.

This verifier/runtime divergence is a severe class of vulnerability because the BPF verifier serves as a critical security boundary, ensuring that BPF programs cannot perform unsafe memory operations. When the verifier's model diverges from runtime reality, attackers can craft BPF programs that pass verification but perform out-of-bounds memory accesses during execution.

Root Cause

The root cause is an incorrect argument passed to push_stack() within the maybe_fork_scalars() function. The function passes env->insn_idx + 1 to push_stack(), causing the pushed path to skip re-execution of the ALU instruction. This means the pushed path proceeds with the assumption that dst = 0 without computing the actual result of the BPF_OR operation (0 | K = K).

The fix involves passing env->insn_idx (instead of env->insn_idx + 1) to push_stack(), ensuring the pushed path re-executes the ALU instruction with dst = 0 and correctly computes the result for any opcode, including BPF_OR.

Attack Vector

An attacker with the ability to load BPF programs (requiring CAP_BPF capability or unprivileged BPF access if enabled) can exploit this vulnerability by crafting a malicious BPF program that:

  1. Sets up a register with a signed range of [-1, 0]
  2. Performs a BPF_OR operation with a carefully chosen constant
  3. Uses the resulting register (which the verifier incorrectly tracks as 0) to calculate map access indices
  4. Performs out-of-bounds reads or writes on BPF maps, potentially leading to information disclosure or arbitrary kernel memory corruption

The vulnerability mechanism involves the verifier incorrectly tracking register values during BPF_OR operations. When a register has a signed range of [-1, 0] and is OR'ed with a constant K, the verifier forks state and tracks one path with the register set to 0. However, the runtime value would be K (since 0 | K == K), creating a discrepancy that allows out-of-bounds map access. For full technical details and the patch implementation, see the kernel git commits.

Detection Methods for CVE-2026-31413

Indicators of Compromise

  • Unusual BPF program loading activity, particularly programs with complex ALU operations involving BPF_OR
  • Unexpected out-of-bounds access patterns in kernel logs related to BPF map operations
  • Anomalous BPF verifier behavior or increased verifier rejection rates

Detection Strategies

  • Monitor bpf() system calls for suspicious program loading patterns
  • Enable BPF audit logging to track program loads and identify potentially malicious programs
  • Deploy kernel security modules that can inspect BPF programs before execution

Monitoring Recommendations

  • Enable enhanced BPF logging via /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/bpf/
  • Monitor for unexpected privilege escalation attempts following BPF program execution
  • Implement runtime BPF program monitoring to detect anomalous memory access patterns

How to Mitigate CVE-2026-31413

Immediate Actions Required

  • Apply the kernel patches from the official kernel git repository immediately
  • If patching is not immediately possible, consider disabling unprivileged BPF access via sysctl kernel.unprivileged_bpf_disabled=1
  • Audit existing BPF programs for suspicious patterns involving scalar forking operations
  • Restrict CAP_BPF capability to trusted processes only

Patch Information

The Linux kernel maintainers have released patches to address this vulnerability. The fix modifies the maybe_fork_scalars() function to pass env->insn_idx (instead of env->insn_idx + 1) to push_stack(), ensuring correct re-execution of ALU instructions on forked paths. Patches are available through the official kernel git repository:

  • Kernel Git Commit 342aa1e
  • Kernel Git Commit 58bd87d
  • Kernel Git Commit c845894
  • Kernel Git Commit d13281a

Workarounds

  • Disable unprivileged BPF access if not required by applications
  • Implement strict CAP_BPF capability restrictions using Linux Security Modules
  • Consider using Seccomp filters to restrict bpf() system call access for untrusted processes
bash
# Disable unprivileged BPF access as a temporary workaround
sysctl -w kernel.unprivileged_bpf_disabled=1

# Make the setting persistent across reboots
echo "kernel.unprivileged_bpf_disabled=1" >> /etc/sysctl.conf

Disclaimer: This content was generated using AI. While we strive for accuracy, please verify critical information with official sources.

  • Vulnerability Details
  • TypePrivilege Escalation

  • Vendor/TechLinux Kernel

  • SeverityNONE

  • CVSS ScoreN/A

  • EPSS Probability0.01%

  • Known ExploitedNo
  • Impact Assessment
  • ConfidentialityNone
  • IntegrityNone
  • AvailabilityNone
  • Technical References
  • Kernel Git Commit 342aa1e

  • Kernel Git Commit 58bd87d

  • Kernel Git Commit c845894

  • Kernel Git Commit d13281a
  • Related CVEs
  • CVE-2026-31425: Linux Kernel Privilege Escalation Flaw

  • CVE-2026-31411: Linux Kernel Privilege Escalation Flaw

  • CVE-2026-23438: Linux Kernel Privilege Escalation Flaw

  • CVE-2026-23439: Linux Kernel Privilege Escalation Flaw
Default Legacy - Prefooter | Experience the World’s Most Advanced Cybersecurity Platform

Experience the World’s Most Advanced Cybersecurity Platform

See how our intelligent, autonomous cybersecurity platform can protect your organization now and into the future.

Try SentinelOne
  • Get Started
  • Get a Demo
  • Product Tour
  • Why SentinelOne
  • Pricing & Packaging
  • FAQ
  • Contact
  • Contact Us
  • Customer Support
  • SentinelOne Status
  • Language
  • Platform
  • Singularity Platform
  • Singularity Endpoint
  • Singularity Cloud
  • Singularity AI-SIEM
  • Singularity Identity
  • Singularity Marketplace
  • Purple AI
  • Services
  • Wayfinder TDR
  • SentinelOne GO
  • Technical Account Management
  • Support Services
  • Verticals
  • Energy
  • Federal Government
  • Finance
  • Healthcare
  • Higher Education
  • K-12 Education
  • Manufacturing
  • Retail
  • State and Local Government
  • Cybersecurity for SMB
  • Resources
  • Blog
  • Labs
  • Case Studies
  • Videos
  • Product Tours
  • Events
  • Cybersecurity 101
  • eBooks
  • Webinars
  • Whitepapers
  • Press
  • News
  • Ransomware Anthology
  • Company
  • About Us
  • Our Customers
  • Careers
  • Partners
  • Legal & Compliance
  • Security & Compliance
  • Investor Relations
  • S Foundation
  • S Ventures

©2026 SentinelOne, All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Notice Terms of Use

English