The SentinelOne Annual Threat Report - A Defenders Guide from the FrontlinesThe SentinelOne Annual Threat ReportGet the Report
Experiencing a Breach?Blog
Get StartedContact Us
SentinelOne
  • Platform
    Platform Overview
    • Singularity Platform
      Welcome to Integrated Enterprise Security
    • AI for Security
      Leading the Way in AI-Powered Security Solutions
    • Securing AI
      Accelerate AI Adoption with Secure AI Tools, Apps, and Agents.
    • How It Works
      The Singularity XDR Difference
    • Singularity Marketplace
      One-Click Integrations to Unlock the Power of XDR
    • Pricing & Packaging
      Comparisons and Guidance at a Glance
    Data & AI
    • Purple AI
      Accelerate SecOps with Generative AI
    • Singularity Hyperautomation
      Easily Automate Security Processes
    • AI-SIEM
      The AI SIEM for the Autonomous SOC
    • Singularity Data Lake
      AI-Powered, Unified Data Lake
    • Singularity Data Lake for Log Analytics
      Seamlessly Ingest Data from On-Prem, Cloud or Hybrid Environments
    Endpoint Security
    • Singularity Endpoint
      Autonomous Prevention, Detection, and Response
    • Singularity XDR
      Native & Open Protection, Detection, and Response
    • Singularity RemoteOps Forensics
      Orchestrate Forensics at Scale
    • Singularity Threat Intelligence
      Comprehensive Adversary Intelligence
    • Singularity Vulnerability Management
      Application & OS Vulnerability Management
    • Singularity Identity
      Identity Threat Detection and Response
    Cloud Security
    • Singularity Cloud Security
      Block Attacks with an AI-Powered CNAPP
    • Singularity Cloud Native Security
      Secure Cloud and Development Resources
    • Singularity Cloud Workload Security
      Real-Time Cloud Workload Protection Platform
    • Singularity Cloud Data Security
      AI-Powered Threat Detection for Cloud Storage
    • Singularity Cloud Security Posture Management
      Detect and Remediate Cloud Misconfigurations
    Securing AI
    • Prompt Security
      Secure AI Tools Across Your Enterprise
  • Why SentinelOne?
    Why SentinelOne?
    • Why SentinelOne?
      Cybersecurity Built for What’s Next
    • Our Customers
      Trusted by the World’s Leading Enterprises
    • Industry Recognition
      Tested and Proven by the Experts
    • About Us
      The Industry Leader in Autonomous Cybersecurity
    Compare SentinelOne
    • Arctic Wolf
    • Broadcom
    • CrowdStrike
    • Cybereason
    • Microsoft
    • Palo Alto Networks
    • Sophos
    • Splunk
    • Trellix
    • Trend Micro
    • Wiz
    Verticals
    • Energy
    • Federal Government
    • Finance
    • Healthcare
    • Higher Education
    • K-12 Education
    • Manufacturing
    • Retail
    • State and Local Government
  • Services
    Managed Services
    • Managed Services Overview
      Wayfinder Threat Detection & Response
    • Threat Hunting
      World-Class Expertise and Threat Intelligence
    • Managed Detection & Response
      24/7/365 Expert MDR Across Your Entire Environment
    • Incident Readiness & Response
      DFIR, Breach Readiness, & Compromise Assessments
    Support, Deployment, & Health
    • Technical Account Management
      Customer Success with Personalized Service
    • SentinelOne GO
      Guided Onboarding & Deployment Advisory
    • SentinelOne University
      Live and On-Demand Training
    • Services Overview
      Comprehensive Solutions for Seamless Security Operations
    • SentinelOne Community
      Community Login
  • Partners
    Our Network
    • MSSP Partners
      Succeed Faster with SentinelOne
    • Singularity Marketplace
      Extend the Power of S1 Technology
    • Cyber Risk Partners
      Enlist Pro Response and Advisory Teams
    • Technology Alliances
      Integrated, Enterprise-Scale Solutions
    • SentinelOne for AWS
      Hosted in AWS Regions Around the World
    • Channel Partners
      Deliver the Right Solutions, Together
    • SentinelOne for Google Cloud
      Unified, Autonomous Security Giving Defenders the Advantage at Global Scale
    • Partner Locator
      Your Go-to Source for Our Top Partners in Your Region
    Partner Portal→
  • Resources
    Resource Center
    • Case Studies
    • Data Sheets
    • eBooks
    • Reports
    • Videos
    • Webinars
    • Whitepapers
    • Events
    View All Resources→
    Blog
    • Feature Spotlight
    • For CISO/CIO
    • From the Front Lines
    • Identity
    • Cloud
    • macOS
    • SentinelOne Blog
    Blog→
    Tech Resources
    • SentinelLABS
    • Ransomware Anthology
    • Cybersecurity 101
  • About
    About SentinelOne
    • About SentinelOne
      The Industry Leader in Cybersecurity
    • Investor Relations
      Financial Information & Events
    • SentinelLABS
      Threat Research for the Modern Threat Hunter
    • Careers
      The Latest Job Opportunities
    • Press & News
      Company Announcements
    • Cybersecurity Blog
      The Latest Cybersecurity Threats, News, & More
    • FAQ
      Get Answers to Our Most Frequently Asked Questions
    • DataSet
      The Live Data Platform
    • S Foundation
      Securing a Safer Future for All
    • S Ventures
      Investing in the Next Generation of Security, Data and AI
  • Pricing
Get StartedContact Us
CVE Vulnerability Database
Vulnerability Database/CVE-2026-27576

CVE-2026-27576: Openclaw Openclaw DOS Vulnerability

CVE-2026-27576 is a denial of service vulnerability in Openclaw Openclaw that allows oversized prompt payloads to disrupt the ACP bridge. This post covers technical details, affected versions, impact, and mitigation.

Published: February 27, 2026

CVE-2026-27576 Overview

CVE-2026-27576 is a resource exhaustion vulnerability (CWE-400) affecting OpenClaw, a personal AI assistant application built on Node.js. In versions 2026.2.17 and below, the ACP (Agent Communication Protocol) bridge component accepts very large prompt text blocks and can assemble oversized prompt payloads before forwarding them to the chat.send function. This vulnerability allows local attackers to cause a denial of service condition by exhausting system memory through maliciously crafted oversized prompts.

Because the ACP component runs over local stdio, this vulnerability primarily affects local ACP clients such as IDE integrations that send unusually large inputs. A malicious actor with local access or a compromised IDE plugin could exploit this flaw to crash the OpenClaw service or degrade system performance.

Critical Impact

Local attackers can cause denial of service through memory exhaustion by sending oversized prompt payloads via the ACP bridge, affecting system availability.

Affected Products

  • OpenClaw versions 2026.2.17 and below (Node.js package)
  • OpenClaw ACP bridge component
  • IDE integrations utilizing OpenClaw ACP stdio interface

Discovery Timeline

  • 2026-02-21 - CVE-2026-27576 published to NVD
  • 2026-02-23 - Last updated in NVD database

Technical Details for CVE-2026-27576

Vulnerability Analysis

The vulnerability exists in the extractTextFromPrompt function within the ACP event mapper component (src/acp/event-mapper.ts). The function processes arrays of content blocks to extract text for prompt assembly but originally lacked proper size validation. This allowed arbitrarily large prompt payloads to be concatenated and held in memory before being forwarded to the chat processing function.

The root issue is that the original implementation would allocate and concatenate the full prompt string without checking the accumulated byte count during the assembly process. This creates a classic memory exhaustion attack vector where an attacker can submit multiple large content blocks that individually appear benign but result in excessive memory allocation when combined.

Root Cause

The vulnerability stems from improper input validation in the prompt processing pipeline. The extractTextFromPrompt function did not enforce byte-level size limits during the iterative concatenation of content blocks. The function processed text blocks, resource blocks, and resource link blocks without tracking cumulative size, allowing memory to be allocated for the full concatenated string before any size validation occurred.

Additionally, the byte counting logic in earlier versions failed to account for separator bytes (newline characters) added by the join() operation between blocks, creating an off-by-n error in size calculations that could allow payloads slightly exceeding intended limits.

Attack Vector

The attack requires local access to the system running OpenClaw, specifically through the ACP stdio interface. An attacker would need to:

  1. Gain access to a local ACP client (such as a compromised IDE integration)
  2. Craft prompt requests containing multiple large content blocks
  3. Submit these requests through the ACP bridge to trigger memory allocation
  4. Repeat to exhaust available system memory

The following patch demonstrates the fix that validates prompt size block-by-block before full string concatenation:

typescript
   content: string;
 };
 
-export function extractTextFromPrompt(prompt: ContentBlock[]): string {
+export function extractTextFromPrompt(prompt: ContentBlock[], maxBytes?: number): string {
   const parts: string[] = [];
+  // Track accumulated byte count per block to catch oversized prompts before full concatenation
+  let totalBytes = 0;
   for (const block of prompt) {
+    let blockText: string | undefined;
     if (block.type === "text") {
-      parts.push(block.text);
-      continue;
-    }
-    if (block.type === "resource") {
+      blockText = block.text;
+    } else if (block.type === "resource") {
       const resource = block.resource as { text?: string } | undefined;
       if (resource?.text) {
-        parts.push(resource.text);
+        blockText = resource.text;
       }
-      continue;
-    }
-    if (block.type === "resource_link") {
+    } else if (block.type === "resource_link") {
       const title = block.title ? ` (${block.title})` : "";
       const uri = block.uri ?? "";
-      const line = uri ? `[Resource link${title}] ${uri}` : `[Resource link${title}]`;
-      parts.push(line);

Source: GitHub Commit ebcf197

The fix also properly accounts for separator bytes in the size calculation:

typescript
     if (blockText !== undefined) {
       // Guard: reject before allocating the full concatenated string
       if (maxBytes !== undefined) {
-        totalBytes += Buffer.byteLength(blockText, "utf-8");
+        const separatorBytes = parts.length > 0 ? 1 : 0; // "\n" added by join() between blocks
+        totalBytes += separatorBytes + Buffer.byteLength(blockText, "utf-8");
         if (totalBytes > maxBytes) {
           throw new Error(`Prompt exceeds maximum allowed size of ${maxBytes} bytes`);
         }

Source: GitHub Commit 63e39d7

Detection Methods for CVE-2026-27576

Indicators of Compromise

  • Unusual memory consumption spikes in OpenClaw or Node.js processes
  • Repeated large payload submissions through ACP stdio interface
  • OpenClaw service crashes or restarts due to out-of-memory conditions
  • Error logs showing prompt size validation failures (post-patch indicator of attempted exploitation)

Detection Strategies

  • Monitor Node.js process memory usage for abnormal growth patterns
  • Implement logging for ACP bridge input sizes to detect anomalously large requests
  • Set up resource limits (memory cgroups) for OpenClaw processes to prevent system-wide impact
  • Review IDE plugin logs for unusual prompt submission patterns

Monitoring Recommendations

  • Configure alerting for OpenClaw process memory exceeding defined thresholds
  • Enable verbose logging for ACP bridge communications during security assessment periods
  • Monitor system resource utilization metrics for hosts running OpenClaw
  • Implement process supervision to automatically restart crashed OpenClaw instances with rate limiting

How to Mitigate CVE-2026-27576

Immediate Actions Required

  • Upgrade OpenClaw to version 2026.2.19 or later immediately
  • Review and restrict local access to systems running OpenClaw ACP interfaces
  • Implement memory limits for OpenClaw processes using OS-level controls
  • Audit IDE integrations and plugins that interact with OpenClaw for potential compromise

Patch Information

The vulnerability has been fixed in OpenClaw version 2026.2.19. The fix implements block-by-block byte counting with proper separator accounting to reject oversized prompts before memory allocation occurs. Multiple commits address this issue:

  • Security fix for ACP prompt size guardrails
  • Initial prompt size validation implementation
  • Docker image hardening with SHA256 pinning

For complete details, refer to the GitHub Security Advisory GHSA-cxpw-2g23-2vgw.

Workarounds

  • Implement OS-level memory limits for OpenClaw processes using cgroups or ulimit
  • Restrict network/local access to the ACP stdio interface to trusted clients only
  • Deploy application-level rate limiting for prompt submissions if upgrading is not immediately possible
  • Consider running OpenClaw in a containerized environment with strict resource constraints
bash
# Configuration example - Set memory limits for OpenClaw process
# Using systemd service override
mkdir -p /etc/systemd/system/openclaw.service.d
cat << EOF > /etc/systemd/system/openclaw.service.d/memory-limit.conf
[Service]
MemoryMax=2G
MemoryHigh=1.5G
EOF
systemctl daemon-reload
systemctl restart openclaw

Disclaimer: This content was generated using AI. While we strive for accuracy, please verify critical information with official sources.

  • Vulnerability Details
  • TypeDOS

  • Vendor/TechOpenclaw

  • SeverityMEDIUM

  • CVSS Score4.8

  • EPSS Probability0.01%

  • Known ExploitedNo
  • CVSS Vector
  • CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
  • Impact Assessment
  • ConfidentialityLow
  • IntegrityNone
  • AvailabilityLow
  • CWE References
  • CWE-400
  • Technical References
  • GitHub Release v2026.2.19
  • Vendor Resources
  • GitHub Commit Update

  • GitHub Commit Update

  • GitHub Commit Update

  • GitHub Security Advisory
  • Related CVEs
  • CVE-2026-32980: Openclaw DOS Vulnerability

  • CVE-2026-32044: Openclaw Archive Extraction DoS Vulnerability

  • CVE-2026-32049: Openclaw Openclaw DOS Vulnerability

  • CVE-2026-28449: Openclaw Openclaw DOS Vulnerability
Experience the World’s Most Advanced Cybersecurity Platform

Experience the World’s Most Advanced Cybersecurity Platform

See how our intelligent, autonomous cybersecurity platform can protect your organization now and into the future.

Try SentinelOne
  • Get Started
  • Get a Demo
  • Product Tour
  • Why SentinelOne
  • Pricing & Packaging
  • FAQ
  • Contact
  • Contact Us
  • Customer Support
  • SentinelOne Status
  • Language
  • Platform
  • Singularity Platform
  • Singularity Endpoint
  • Singularity Cloud
  • Singularity AI-SIEM
  • Singularity Identity
  • Singularity Marketplace
  • Purple AI
  • Services
  • Wayfinder TDR
  • SentinelOne GO
  • Technical Account Management
  • Support Services
  • Verticals
  • Energy
  • Federal Government
  • Finance
  • Healthcare
  • Higher Education
  • K-12 Education
  • Manufacturing
  • Retail
  • State and Local Government
  • Cybersecurity for SMB
  • Resources
  • Blog
  • Labs
  • Case Studies
  • Videos
  • Product Tours
  • Events
  • Cybersecurity 101
  • eBooks
  • Webinars
  • Whitepapers
  • Press
  • News
  • Ransomware Anthology
  • Company
  • About Us
  • Our Customers
  • Careers
  • Partners
  • Legal & Compliance
  • Security & Compliance
  • Investor Relations
  • S Foundation
  • S Ventures

©2026 SentinelOne, All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Notice Terms of Use

English