The SentinelOne Annual Threat Report - A Defenders Guide from the FrontlinesThe SentinelOne Annual Threat ReportGet the Report
Experiencing a Breach?Blog
Get StartedContact Us
SentinelOne
  • Platform
    Platform Overview
    • Singularity Platform
      Welcome to Integrated Enterprise Security
    • AI for Security
      Leading the Way in AI-Powered Security Solutions
    • Securing AI
      Accelerate AI Adoption with Secure AI Tools, Apps, and Agents.
    • How It Works
      The Singularity XDR Difference
    • Singularity Marketplace
      One-Click Integrations to Unlock the Power of XDR
    • Pricing & Packaging
      Comparisons and Guidance at a Glance
    Data & AI
    • Purple AI
      Accelerate SecOps with Generative AI
    • Singularity Hyperautomation
      Easily Automate Security Processes
    • AI-SIEM
      The AI SIEM for the Autonomous SOC
    • AI Data Pipelines
      Security Data Pipeline for AI SIEM and Data Optimization
    • Singularity Data Lake
      AI-Powered, Unified Data Lake
    • Singularity Data Lake for Log Analytics
      Seamlessly Ingest Data from On-Prem, Cloud or Hybrid Environments
    Endpoint Security
    • Singularity Endpoint
      Autonomous Prevention, Detection, and Response
    • Singularity XDR
      Native & Open Protection, Detection, and Response
    • Singularity RemoteOps Forensics
      Orchestrate Forensics at Scale
    • Singularity Threat Intelligence
      Comprehensive Adversary Intelligence
    • Singularity Vulnerability Management
      Application & OS Vulnerability Management
    • Singularity Identity
      Identity Threat Detection and Response
    Cloud Security
    • Singularity Cloud Security
      Block Attacks with an AI-Powered CNAPP
    • Singularity Cloud Native Security
      Secure Cloud and Development Resources
    • Singularity Cloud Workload Security
      Real-Time Cloud Workload Protection Platform
    • Singularity Cloud Data Security
      AI-Powered Threat Detection for Cloud Storage
    • Singularity Cloud Security Posture Management
      Detect and Remediate Cloud Misconfigurations
    Securing AI
    • Prompt Security
      Secure AI Tools Across Your Enterprise
  • Why SentinelOne?
    Why SentinelOne?
    • Why SentinelOne?
      Cybersecurity Built for What’s Next
    • Our Customers
      Trusted by the World’s Leading Enterprises
    • Industry Recognition
      Tested and Proven by the Experts
    • About Us
      The Industry Leader in Autonomous Cybersecurity
    Compare SentinelOne
    • Arctic Wolf
    • Broadcom
    • CrowdStrike
    • Cybereason
    • Microsoft
    • Palo Alto Networks
    • Sophos
    • Splunk
    • Trellix
    • Trend Micro
    • Wiz
    Verticals
    • Energy
    • Federal Government
    • Finance
    • Healthcare
    • Higher Education
    • K-12 Education
    • Manufacturing
    • Retail
    • State and Local Government
  • Services
    Managed Services
    • Managed Services Overview
      Wayfinder Threat Detection & Response
    • Threat Hunting
      World-Class Expertise and Threat Intelligence
    • Managed Detection & Response
      24/7/365 Expert MDR Across Your Entire Environment
    • Incident Readiness & Response
      DFIR, Breach Readiness, & Compromise Assessments
    Support, Deployment, & Health
    • Technical Account Management
      Customer Success with Personalized Service
    • SentinelOne GO
      Guided Onboarding & Deployment Advisory
    • SentinelOne University
      Live and On-Demand Training
    • Services Overview
      Comprehensive Solutions for Seamless Security Operations
    • SentinelOne Community
      Community Login
  • Partners
    Our Network
    • MSSP Partners
      Succeed Faster with SentinelOne
    • Singularity Marketplace
      Extend the Power of S1 Technology
    • Cyber Risk Partners
      Enlist Pro Response and Advisory Teams
    • Technology Alliances
      Integrated, Enterprise-Scale Solutions
    • SentinelOne for AWS
      Hosted in AWS Regions Around the World
    • Channel Partners
      Deliver the Right Solutions, Together
    • SentinelOne for Google Cloud
      Unified, Autonomous Security Giving Defenders the Advantage at Global Scale
    • Partner Locator
      Your Go-to Source for Our Top Partners in Your Region
    Partner Portal→
  • Resources
    Resource Center
    • Case Studies
    • Data Sheets
    • eBooks
    • Reports
    • Videos
    • Webinars
    • Whitepapers
    • Events
    View All Resources→
    Blog
    • Feature Spotlight
    • For CISO/CIO
    • From the Front Lines
    • Identity
    • Cloud
    • macOS
    • SentinelOne Blog
    Blog→
    Tech Resources
    • SentinelLABS
    • Ransomware Anthology
    • Cybersecurity 101
  • About
    About SentinelOne
    • About SentinelOne
      The Industry Leader in Cybersecurity
    • Investor Relations
      Financial Information & Events
    • SentinelLABS
      Threat Research for the Modern Threat Hunter
    • Careers
      The Latest Job Opportunities
    • Press & News
      Company Announcements
    • Cybersecurity Blog
      The Latest Cybersecurity Threats, News, & More
    • FAQ
      Get Answers to Our Most Frequently Asked Questions
    • DataSet
      The Live Data Platform
    • S Foundation
      Securing a Safer Future for All
    • S Ventures
      Investing in the Next Generation of Security, Data and AI
  • Pricing
Get StartedContact Us
CVE Vulnerability Database
Vulnerability Database/CVE-2026-24470

CVE-2026-24470: Skipper Ingress SSRF Vulnerability

CVE-2026-24470 is a server-side request forgery vulnerability in Skipper HTTP router affecting versions before 0.24.0. Attackers can exploit ExternalName services to access internal networks. This article covers technical details, affected versions, impact, and mitigation strategies.

Published: January 30, 2026

CVE-2026-24470 Overview

Skipper, an HTTP router and reverse proxy for service composition developed by Zalando, contains a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in versions prior to 0.24.0. When Skipper operates as a Kubernetes Ingress controller, users with permissions to create Ingress resources and Services of type ExternalName can craft routes that exploit Skipper's network access to reach internal services that should otherwise be inaccessible. This vulnerability affects the fundamental security boundary between external and internal network resources in Kubernetes environments.

Critical Impact

Attackers with limited Kubernetes RBAC permissions can leverage Skipper's privileged network position to access internal services, potentially exposing sensitive data, internal APIs, and backend systems not intended for external access.

Affected Products

  • Skipper HTTP Router versions prior to 0.24.0
  • Kubernetes deployments using Skipper as an Ingress controller with ExternalName services enabled
  • Service mesh configurations where Skipper handles east-west traffic routing

Discovery Timeline

  • 2026-01-26 - CVE-2026-24470 published to NVD
  • 2026-01-27 - Last updated in NVD database

Technical Details for CVE-2026-24470

Vulnerability Analysis

This vulnerability is classified under CWE-441 (Unintended Proxy or Intermediary), which occurs when a product acts as an intermediary or proxy and performs requests on behalf of a client without sufficient validation that the requests are appropriate. The attack leverages Kubernetes ExternalName services, which provide a mechanism to alias external DNS names to internal service names. When Skipper processes Ingress rules pointing to ExternalName services, it follows the external reference using its own network context—which typically has elevated access to internal cluster resources and services.

The exploitation requires a threat actor with Kubernetes RBAC permissions to create both Ingress and Service objects. While these permissions are often granted to developers or deployment pipelines, they were not designed with the assumption that they could be weaponized to bypass network segmentation. The attacker creates an ExternalName service pointing to an internal target (such as internal-api.cluster.local or metadata services), then configures an Ingress to route traffic through Skipper to that service. Skipper, operating with its privileged network position, resolves and forwards requests to the internal target.

Root Cause

The root cause lies in Skipper's default configuration that allowed Kubernetes ExternalName services without restriction. The Kubernetes ExternalName service type was designed for legitimate use cases such as aliasing external databases or third-party services. However, when combined with an Ingress controller, it creates a proxy chain that can be abused for SSRF attacks. Skipper did not implement adequate validation or restrictions on ExternalName targets by default, trusting that Kubernetes RBAC would prevent malicious configurations.

Attack Vector

The attack is network-based and requires the attacker to have authenticated access to the Kubernetes API with permissions to create Ingress and Service resources. The attack flow involves:

  1. Creating an ExternalName Service targeting an internal resource (e.g., kubernetes.default.svc, cloud provider metadata endpoints, or internal microservices)
  2. Creating an Ingress resource that routes external traffic through Skipper to the ExternalName service
  3. Sending HTTP requests through the Ingress that Skipper forwards to the internal target
  4. Receiving responses from internal services that should not be externally accessible
go
// Security patch in config/config.go - disables kubernetes external name by default
// Source: https://github.com/zalando/skipper/commit/a4c87ce029a58eb8e1c2c1f93049194a39cf6219

 	KubernetesAnnotationPredicates                       []kubernetes.AnnotationPredicates  `yaml:"-"`
 	KubernetesAnnotationFiltersAppend                    []kubernetes.AnnotationFilters     `yaml:"-"`
 	KubernetesEastWestRangePredicates                    []*eskip.Predicate                 `yaml:"-"`
+	EnableKubernetesExternalNames                        bool                               `yaml:"enable-kubernetes-external-names"`
 	KubernetesOnlyAllowedExternalNames                   bool                               `yaml:"kubernetes-only-allowed-external-names"`
 	KubernetesAllowedExternalNames                       regexpListFlag                     `yaml:"kubernetes-allowed-external-names"`
 	KubernetesRedisServiceNamespace                      string                             `yaml:"kubernetes-redis-service-namespace"`

Source: GitHub Commit Update

Detection Methods for CVE-2026-24470

Indicators of Compromise

  • Kubernetes Service objects of type ExternalName pointing to internal cluster DNS names, cloud metadata endpoints (e.g., 169.254.169.254), or unexpected internal IP addresses
  • Ingress resources routing to ExternalName services created by non-administrative users
  • Unusual traffic patterns from Skipper pods to internal services not typically accessed via Ingress
  • Audit log entries showing creation of ExternalName services followed by Ingress configurations

Detection Strategies

  • Enable Kubernetes audit logging and monitor for Service type ExternalName creations with internal targets
  • Implement admission controllers (OPA Gatekeeper, Kyverno) to alert on or block suspicious ExternalName service configurations
  • Monitor Skipper access logs for requests targeting internal service endpoints or metadata services
  • Deploy network policies and monitor for violations from Skipper pods accessing unexpected destinations

Monitoring Recommendations

  • Configure alerts for any new ExternalName Service objects created in production namespaces
  • Implement network flow monitoring between Skipper ingress pods and internal services
  • Review Skipper configuration regularly to ensure ExternalName services are disabled or properly allowlisted
  • Monitor for reconnaissance patterns such as repeated requests to common internal endpoints through the Ingress

How to Mitigate CVE-2026-24470

Immediate Actions Required

  • Upgrade Skipper to version 0.24.0 or later, which disables Kubernetes ExternalName services by default
  • Audit existing ExternalName services in your cluster and remove any that are not explicitly required
  • Implement Kubernetes NetworkPolicies to restrict Skipper's egress traffic to only expected backend services
  • Review RBAC permissions and restrict Service and Ingress creation to trusted users and service accounts

Patch Information

The security fix was introduced in Skipper version 0.24.0. The patch adds a new configuration option EnableKubernetesExternalNames which defaults to false, effectively disabling the vulnerable behavior. Organizations requiring ExternalName functionality can re-enable it with proper allowlisting using the KubernetesOnlyAllowedExternalNames and KubernetesAllowedExternalNames configuration options. For detailed patch information, refer to the GitHub Security Advisory and the commit implementing the fix.

Workarounds

  • If upgrading is not immediately possible, configure kubernetes-only-allowed-external-names: true and explicitly define safe targets using kubernetes-allowed-external-names with strict regular expressions
  • Deploy Kubernetes admission controllers to block creation of ExternalName services cluster-wide or in sensitive namespaces
  • Implement NetworkPolicies that restrict Skipper pod egress to only approved backend service IP ranges
  • Use Kubernetes RBAC to revoke Service creation permissions from untrusted users and service accounts
bash
# Skipper configuration to restrict ExternalName services
# Add to skipper deployment arguments or config file

# Option 1: Disable ExternalName entirely (recommended for versions < 0.24.0)
skipper \
  -kubernetes-only-allowed-external-names=true \
  -kubernetes-allowed-external-names=""

# Option 2: Allowlist specific safe external targets
skipper \
  -kubernetes-only-allowed-external-names=true \
  -kubernetes-allowed-external-names="^external-db\.example\.com$" \
  -kubernetes-allowed-external-names="^api\.trusted-partner\.com$"

Disclaimer: This content was generated using AI. While we strive for accuracy, please verify critical information with official sources.

  • Vulnerability Details
  • TypeOther

  • Vendor/TechSkipper

  • SeverityHIGH

  • CVSS Score8.1

  • EPSS Probability0.02%

  • Known ExploitedNo
  • CVSS Vector
  • CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
  • Impact Assessment
  • ConfidentialityLow
  • IntegrityNone
  • AvailabilityNone
  • CWE References
  • CWE-441
  • Technical References
  • GitHub Commit Update

  • GitHub Security Advisory

  • Kubernetes Service Documentation
  • Related CVEs
  • CVE-2026-23742: Skipper Information Disclosure Vulnerability
Default Legacy - Prefooter | Experience the World’s Most Advanced Cybersecurity Platform

Experience the World’s Most Advanced Cybersecurity Platform

See how our intelligent, autonomous cybersecurity platform can protect your organization now and into the future.

Try SentinelOne
  • Get Started
  • Get a Demo
  • Product Tour
  • Why SentinelOne
  • Pricing & Packaging
  • FAQ
  • Contact
  • Contact Us
  • Customer Support
  • SentinelOne Status
  • Language
  • Platform
  • Singularity Platform
  • Singularity Endpoint
  • Singularity Cloud
  • Singularity AI-SIEM
  • Singularity Identity
  • Singularity Marketplace
  • Purple AI
  • Services
  • Wayfinder TDR
  • SentinelOne GO
  • Technical Account Management
  • Support Services
  • Verticals
  • Energy
  • Federal Government
  • Finance
  • Healthcare
  • Higher Education
  • K-12 Education
  • Manufacturing
  • Retail
  • State and Local Government
  • Cybersecurity for SMB
  • Resources
  • Blog
  • Labs
  • Case Studies
  • Videos
  • Product Tours
  • Events
  • Cybersecurity 101
  • eBooks
  • Webinars
  • Whitepapers
  • Press
  • News
  • Ransomware Anthology
  • Company
  • About Us
  • Our Customers
  • Careers
  • Partners
  • Legal & Compliance
  • Security & Compliance
  • Investor Relations
  • S Foundation
  • S Ventures

©2026 SentinelOne, All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Notice Terms of Use

English