The SentinelOne Annual Threat Report - A Defenders Guide from the FrontlinesThe SentinelOne Annual Threat ReportGet the Report
Experiencing a Breach?Blog
Get StartedContact Us
SentinelOne
  • Platform
    Platform Overview
    • Singularity Platform
      Welcome to Integrated Enterprise Security
    • AI for Security
      Leading the Way in AI-Powered Security Solutions
    • Securing AI
      Accelerate AI Adoption with Secure AI Tools, Apps, and Agents.
    • How It Works
      The Singularity XDR Difference
    • Singularity Marketplace
      One-Click Integrations to Unlock the Power of XDR
    • Pricing & Packaging
      Comparisons and Guidance at a Glance
    Data & AI
    • Purple AI
      Accelerate SecOps with Generative AI
    • Singularity Hyperautomation
      Easily Automate Security Processes
    • AI-SIEM
      The AI SIEM for the Autonomous SOC
    • AI Data Pipelines
      Security Data Pipeline for AI SIEM and Data Optimization
    • Singularity Data Lake
      AI-Powered, Unified Data Lake
    • Singularity Data Lake for Log Analytics
      Seamlessly Ingest Data from On-Prem, Cloud or Hybrid Environments
    Endpoint Security
    • Singularity Endpoint
      Autonomous Prevention, Detection, and Response
    • Singularity XDR
      Native & Open Protection, Detection, and Response
    • Singularity RemoteOps Forensics
      Orchestrate Forensics at Scale
    • Singularity Threat Intelligence
      Comprehensive Adversary Intelligence
    • Singularity Vulnerability Management
      Application & OS Vulnerability Management
    • Singularity Identity
      Identity Threat Detection and Response
    Cloud Security
    • Singularity Cloud Security
      Block Attacks with an AI-Powered CNAPP
    • Singularity Cloud Native Security
      Secure Cloud and Development Resources
    • Singularity Cloud Workload Security
      Real-Time Cloud Workload Protection Platform
    • Singularity Cloud Data Security
      AI-Powered Threat Detection for Cloud Storage
    • Singularity Cloud Security Posture Management
      Detect and Remediate Cloud Misconfigurations
    Securing AI
    • Prompt Security
      Secure AI Tools Across Your Enterprise
  • Why SentinelOne?
    Why SentinelOne?
    • Why SentinelOne?
      Cybersecurity Built for What’s Next
    • Our Customers
      Trusted by the World’s Leading Enterprises
    • Industry Recognition
      Tested and Proven by the Experts
    • About Us
      The Industry Leader in Autonomous Cybersecurity
    Compare SentinelOne
    • Arctic Wolf
    • Broadcom
    • CrowdStrike
    • Cybereason
    • Microsoft
    • Palo Alto Networks
    • Sophos
    • Splunk
    • Trellix
    • Trend Micro
    • Wiz
    Verticals
    • Energy
    • Federal Government
    • Finance
    • Healthcare
    • Higher Education
    • K-12 Education
    • Manufacturing
    • Retail
    • State and Local Government
  • Services
    Managed Services
    • Managed Services Overview
      Wayfinder Threat Detection & Response
    • Threat Hunting
      World-Class Expertise and Threat Intelligence
    • Managed Detection & Response
      24/7/365 Expert MDR Across Your Entire Environment
    • Incident Readiness & Response
      DFIR, Breach Readiness, & Compromise Assessments
    Support, Deployment, & Health
    • Technical Account Management
      Customer Success with Personalized Service
    • SentinelOne GO
      Guided Onboarding & Deployment Advisory
    • SentinelOne University
      Live and On-Demand Training
    • Services Overview
      Comprehensive Solutions for Seamless Security Operations
    • SentinelOne Community
      Community Login
  • Partners
    Our Network
    • MSSP Partners
      Succeed Faster with SentinelOne
    • Singularity Marketplace
      Extend the Power of S1 Technology
    • Cyber Risk Partners
      Enlist Pro Response and Advisory Teams
    • Technology Alliances
      Integrated, Enterprise-Scale Solutions
    • SentinelOne for AWS
      Hosted in AWS Regions Around the World
    • Channel Partners
      Deliver the Right Solutions, Together
    • SentinelOne for Google Cloud
      Unified, Autonomous Security Giving Defenders the Advantage at Global Scale
    • Partner Locator
      Your Go-to Source for Our Top Partners in Your Region
    Partner Portal→
  • Resources
    Resource Center
    • Case Studies
    • Data Sheets
    • eBooks
    • Reports
    • Videos
    • Webinars
    • Whitepapers
    • Events
    View All Resources→
    Blog
    • Feature Spotlight
    • For CISO/CIO
    • From the Front Lines
    • Identity
    • Cloud
    • macOS
    • SentinelOne Blog
    Blog→
    Tech Resources
    • SentinelLABS
    • Ransomware Anthology
    • Cybersecurity 101
  • About
    About SentinelOne
    • About SentinelOne
      The Industry Leader in Cybersecurity
    • Investor Relations
      Financial Information & Events
    • SentinelLABS
      Threat Research for the Modern Threat Hunter
    • Careers
      The Latest Job Opportunities
    • Press & News
      Company Announcements
    • Cybersecurity Blog
      The Latest Cybersecurity Threats, News, & More
    • FAQ
      Get Answers to Our Most Frequently Asked Questions
    • DataSet
      The Live Data Platform
    • S Foundation
      Securing a Safer Future for All
    • S Ventures
      Investing in the Next Generation of Security, Data and AI
  • Pricing
Get StartedContact Us
CVE Vulnerability Database
Vulnerability Database/CVE-2026-23225

CVE-2026-23225: Linux Kernel Use-After-Free Vulnerability

CVE-2026-23225 is a use-after-free flaw in the Linux kernel's MMCID management code that causes out-of-bounds memory access during mode switching. This article covers technical details, affected versions, and mitigation.

Published: February 20, 2026

CVE-2026-23225 Overview

A memory corruption vulnerability exists in the Linux kernel's scheduler MMCID (Memory-Mapped Concurrency ID) management code. The vulnerability manifests as an out-of-bounds access that was initially reported as a KASAN (Kernel Address Sanitizer) use-after-free condition. The flaw occurs during mode switching in the CID management system when the kernel incorrectly assumes CPU ownership of a CID during task exit operations.

Critical Impact

Local attackers may exploit this out-of-bounds memory access vulnerability to cause system instability, kernel crashes, or potentially achieve privilege escalation on affected Linux kernel systems.

Affected Products

  • Linux kernel (versions with vulnerable MMCID management code)
  • Systems using per-CPU CID mode switching functionality
  • Linux-based distributions with affected kernel versions

Discovery Timeline

  • February 18, 2026 - CVE-2026-23225 published to NVD
  • February 18, 2026 - Last updated in NVD database

Technical Details for CVE-2026-23225

Vulnerability Analysis

This vulnerability is classified as an Out-of-Bounds Access in the Linux kernel scheduler's MMCID management subsystem. The root issue involves improper validation of CID (Concurrency ID) ownership during mode transitions between per-CPU and per-task CID modes.

The vulnerability was discovered by Shinichiro, who identified that the kernel's sched_mm_cid_exit() function incorrectly assumes that a CID is CPU-owned based solely on the prior operational mode being per-CPU. This assumption fails in race condition scenarios where a task exits with the TRANSIT bit set but the ONCPU bit is not set.

When a task exits under these conditions, the mm_drop_cid_on_cpu() function is invoked, which attempts to clear the non-existent ONCPU bit. Subsequently, a clear_bit() operation is executed with an extremely large bit number (bit 29 from the TRANSIT flag), resulting in an out-of-bounds memory access.

Root Cause

The vulnerability stems from a race condition in the MMCID management code during concurrent task operations. When a parent task (T0) forks a new task and switches to per-CPU CID mode, it sets the MM_CID_TRANSIT bit on other tasks running in userspace. If one of these tasks (T1) exits before being scheduled again, it retains the TRANSIT bit set.

The sched_mm_cid_remove_user() function correctly clears the TRANSIT bit and drops the CID from the task structure but does not update the per-CPU storage. While this is functionally correct since CID ownership requires the ONCPU bit (which is mutually exclusive with TRANSIT), the subsequent sched_mm_cid_exit() function fails to validate actual CPU ownership before invoking cleanup operations.

Attack Vector

The attack vector for this vulnerability involves local access to the system. An attacker with the ability to execute code on the affected system could potentially trigger the race condition by manipulating task creation, scheduling, and exit timing. The exploitation scenario involves:

  1. Creating multiple tasks that utilize the MMCID scheduling features
  2. Triggering a mode switch from per-task to per-CPU CID mode via fork operations
  3. Timing task exits to occur while the TRANSIT bit is set but before the task is rescheduled
  4. Causing the out-of-bounds memory access when clear_bit() is called with bit 29

The vulnerability mechanism involves improper state validation in the kernel scheduler. During mode transitions, the kernel sets the MM_CID_TRANSIT flag on tasks, but fails to properly verify CID ownership state before performing cleanup operations. When mm_drop_cid_on_cpu() executes without validating the ONCPU bit status, passing the TRANSIT bit value (bit 29) to clear_bit() results in memory access far beyond the intended boundaries.

Detection Methods for CVE-2026-23225

Indicators of Compromise

  • KASAN (Kernel Address Sanitizer) reports indicating use-after-free or out-of-bounds access in scheduler code
  • Kernel panic or crash logs referencing sched_mm_cid_exit(), mm_drop_cid_on_cpu(), or related MMCID functions
  • System instability during heavy multitasking workloads involving frequent process creation and termination

Detection Strategies

  • Enable KASAN in kernel builds to detect out-of-bounds memory accesses during testing and development
  • Monitor system logs for kernel oops or panic messages related to the scheduler subsystem
  • Implement kernel crash dump analysis to identify exploitation attempts targeting MMCID code paths

Monitoring Recommendations

  • Configure kernel crash dump collection (kdump) to capture detailed crash information for forensic analysis
  • Set up automated alerting for kernel log entries containing mm_cid, sched_mm_cid, or related scheduler functions
  • Monitor system stability metrics and investigate unexpected kernel crashes or reboots

How to Mitigate CVE-2026-23225

Immediate Actions Required

  • Apply the official kernel patch that validates CID CPU ownership in mm_drop_cid_on_cpu() before performing cleanup operations
  • Update to a patched kernel version that includes commit 81f29975631db8a78651b3140ecd0f88ffafc476
  • Prioritize patching for systems running multi-threaded applications with heavy process creation patterns

Patch Information

The fix has been committed to the Linux kernel stable tree. The patch modifies mm_drop_cid_on_cpu() to properly validate that the CID is actually CPU-owned before attempting to clear bits, preventing the out-of-bounds access when the TRANSIT bit is set. Technical details and the complete patch are available in the Linux Kernel Commit.

Workarounds

  • If immediate patching is not feasible, consider reducing multiprocessing workloads that involve frequent fork/exit patterns
  • Monitor systems closely for signs of instability and prepare for emergency patching if exploitation is detected
  • Enable KASAN in development and staging environments to identify potential exploitation attempts before production impact
bash
# Verify current kernel version and check for vulnerable MMCID code
uname -r

# Check if the fix commit is present in your kernel source
git log --oneline | grep "81f29975631db8a78651b3140ecd0f88ffafc476"

# Apply kernel updates using your distribution's package manager
# For Debian/Ubuntu:
sudo apt update && sudo apt upgrade linux-image-$(uname -r)

# For RHEL/CentOS:
sudo yum update kernel

Disclaimer: This content was generated using AI. While we strive for accuracy, please verify critical information with official sources.

  • Vulnerability Details
  • TypeUse After Free

  • Vendor/TechLinux Kernel

  • SeverityNONE

  • CVSS ScoreN/A

  • EPSS Probability0.02%

  • Known ExploitedNo
  • Impact Assessment
  • ConfidentialityNone
  • IntegrityNone
  • AvailabilityNone
  • Technical References
  • Linux Kernel Commit Summary
  • Related CVEs
  • CVE-2026-31414: Linux Kernel Use-After-Free Vulnerability

  • CVE-2026-31426: Linux Kernel Use-After-Free Vulnerability

  • CVE-2026-31427: Linux Kernel Use-After-Free Vulnerability

  • CVE-2026-31419: Linux Kernel Use-After-Free Vulnerability
Default Legacy - Prefooter | Experience the World’s Most Advanced Cybersecurity Platform

Experience the World’s Most Advanced Cybersecurity Platform

See how our intelligent, autonomous cybersecurity platform can protect your organization now and into the future.

Try SentinelOne
  • Get Started
  • Get a Demo
  • Product Tour
  • Why SentinelOne
  • Pricing & Packaging
  • FAQ
  • Contact
  • Contact Us
  • Customer Support
  • SentinelOne Status
  • Language
  • Platform
  • Singularity Platform
  • Singularity Endpoint
  • Singularity Cloud
  • Singularity AI-SIEM
  • Singularity Identity
  • Singularity Marketplace
  • Purple AI
  • Services
  • Wayfinder TDR
  • SentinelOne GO
  • Technical Account Management
  • Support Services
  • Verticals
  • Energy
  • Federal Government
  • Finance
  • Healthcare
  • Higher Education
  • K-12 Education
  • Manufacturing
  • Retail
  • State and Local Government
  • Cybersecurity for SMB
  • Resources
  • Blog
  • Labs
  • Case Studies
  • Videos
  • Product Tours
  • Events
  • Cybersecurity 101
  • eBooks
  • Webinars
  • Whitepapers
  • Press
  • News
  • Ransomware Anthology
  • Company
  • About Us
  • Our Customers
  • Careers
  • Partners
  • Legal & Compliance
  • Security & Compliance
  • Investor Relations
  • S Foundation
  • S Ventures

©2026 SentinelOne, All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Notice Terms of Use

English