Join the Cyber Forum: Threat Intel on May 12, 2026 to learn how AI is reshaping threat defense.Join the Virtual Cyber Forum: Threat IntelRegister Now
Experiencing a Breach?Blog
Get StartedContact Us
SentinelOne
  • Platform
    Platform Overview
    • Singularity Platform
      Welcome to Integrated Enterprise Security
    • AI for Security
      Leading the Way in AI-Powered Security Solutions
    • Securing AI
      Accelerate AI Adoption with Secure AI Tools, Apps, and Agents.
    • How It Works
      The Singularity XDR Difference
    • Singularity Marketplace
      One-Click Integrations to Unlock the Power of XDR
    • Pricing & Packaging
      Comparisons and Guidance at a Glance
    Data & AI
    • Purple AI
      Accelerate SecOps with Generative AI
    • Singularity Hyperautomation
      Easily Automate Security Processes
    • AI-SIEM
      The AI SIEM for the Autonomous SOC
    • AI Data Pipelines
      Security Data Pipeline for AI SIEM and Data Optimization
    • Singularity Data Lake
      AI-Powered, Unified Data Lake
    • Singularity Data Lake for Log Analytics
      Seamlessly Ingest Data from On-Prem, Cloud or Hybrid Environments
    Endpoint Security
    • Singularity Endpoint
      Autonomous Prevention, Detection, and Response
    • Singularity XDR
      Native & Open Protection, Detection, and Response
    • Singularity RemoteOps Forensics
      Orchestrate Forensics at Scale
    • Singularity Threat Intelligence
      Comprehensive Adversary Intelligence
    • Singularity Vulnerability Management
      Application & OS Vulnerability Management
    • Singularity Identity
      Identity Threat Detection and Response
    Cloud Security
    • Singularity Cloud Security
      Block Attacks with an AI-Powered CNAPP
    • Singularity Cloud Native Security
      Secure Cloud and Development Resources
    • Singularity Cloud Workload Security
      Real-Time Cloud Workload Protection Platform
    • Singularity Cloud Data Security
      AI-Powered Threat Detection for Cloud Storage
    • Singularity Cloud Security Posture Management
      Detect and Remediate Cloud Misconfigurations
    Securing AI
    • Prompt Security
      Secure AI Tools Across Your Enterprise
  • Why SentinelOne?
    Why SentinelOne?
    • Why SentinelOne?
      Cybersecurity Built for What’s Next
    • Our Customers
      Trusted by the World’s Leading Enterprises
    • Industry Recognition
      Tested and Proven by the Experts
    • About Us
      The Industry Leader in Autonomous Cybersecurity
    Compare SentinelOne
    • Arctic Wolf
    • Broadcom
    • CrowdStrike
    • Cybereason
    • Microsoft
    • Palo Alto Networks
    • Sophos
    • Splunk
    • Trellix
    • Trend Micro
    • Wiz
    Verticals
    • Energy
    • Federal Government
    • Finance
    • Healthcare
    • Higher Education
    • K-12 Education
    • Manufacturing
    • Retail
    • State and Local Government
  • Services
    Managed Services
    • Managed Services Overview
      Wayfinder Threat Detection & Response
    • Threat Hunting
      World-Class Expertise and Threat Intelligence
    • Managed Detection & Response
      24/7/365 Expert MDR Across Your Entire Environment
    • Incident Readiness & Response
      DFIR, Breach Readiness, & Compromise Assessments
    Support, Deployment, & Health
    • Technical Account Management
      Customer Success with Personalized Service
    • SentinelOne GO
      Guided Onboarding & Deployment Advisory
    • SentinelOne University
      Live and On-Demand Training
    • Services Overview
      Comprehensive Solutions for Seamless Security Operations
    • SentinelOne Community
      Community Login
  • Partners
    Our Network
    • MSSP Partners
      Succeed Faster with SentinelOne
    • Singularity Marketplace
      Extend the Power of S1 Technology
    • Cyber Risk Partners
      Enlist Pro Response and Advisory Teams
    • Technology Alliances
      Integrated, Enterprise-Scale Solutions
    • SentinelOne for AWS
      Hosted in AWS Regions Around the World
    • Channel Partners
      Deliver the Right Solutions, Together
    • SentinelOne for Google Cloud
      Unified, Autonomous Security Giving Defenders the Advantage at Global Scale
    • Partner Locator
      Your Go-to Source for Our Top Partners in Your Region
    Partner Portal→
  • Resources
    Resource Center
    • Case Studies
    • Data Sheets
    • eBooks
    • Reports
    • Videos
    • Webinars
    • Whitepapers
    • Events
    View All Resources→
    Blog
    • Feature Spotlight
    • For CISO/CIO
    • From the Front Lines
    • Identity
    • Cloud
    • macOS
    • SentinelOne Blog
    Blog→
    Tech Resources
    • SentinelLABS
    • Ransomware Anthology
    • Cybersecurity 101
  • About
    About SentinelOne
    • About SentinelOne
      The Industry Leader in Cybersecurity
    • Investor Relations
      Financial Information & Events
    • SentinelLABS
      Threat Research for the Modern Threat Hunter
    • Careers
      The Latest Job Opportunities
    • Press & News
      Company Announcements
    • Cybersecurity Blog
      The Latest Cybersecurity Threats, News, & More
    • FAQ
      Get Answers to Our Most Frequently Asked Questions
    • DataSet
      The Live Data Platform
    • S Foundation
      Securing a Safer Future for All
    • S Ventures
      Investing in the Next Generation of Security, Data and AI
  • Pricing
Get StartedContact Us
CVE Vulnerability Database
Vulnerability Database/CVE-2025-71200

CVE-2025-71200: Linux Kernel SDHCI-DWCMSHC DoS Flaw

CVE-2025-71200 is a denial of service vulnerability in the Linux kernel SDHCI-DWCMSHC driver affecting Rockchip controllers in HS200/HS400 modes. This article covers technical details, affected versions, and mitigation.

Published: February 20, 2026

CVE-2025-71200 Overview

A vulnerability has been identified in the Linux kernel's MMC (MultiMediaCard) subsystem, specifically within the sdhci-of-dwcmshc driver used for Rockchip DWC MSHC controllers. The vulnerability allows illegal clock frequency reduction when operating in HS200 or HS400 timing modes, which can lead to link failure and system instability.

When operating in HS200 or HS400 timing modes, reducing the clock frequency below 52MHz causes the communication link to break, as the Rockchip DWC MSHC controller requires maintaining a minimum clock of 52MHz in these high-speed modes. This can be triggered through the debugfs interface, leading to CQE (Command Queue Engine) recovery failures and potential system warnings.

Critical Impact

Exploitation of this vulnerability can cause MMC link failures, CQE recovery errors, and kernel warnings that may impact system stability on devices using Rockchip DWC MSHC controllers.

Affected Products

  • Linux kernel with sdhci-of-dwcmshc driver
  • Systems using Rockchip RK3588 and similar SoCs with DWC MSHC controllers
  • Devices operating MMC in HS200 or HS400 timing modes

Discovery Timeline

  • 2026-02-14 - CVE CVE-2025-71200 published to NVD
  • 2026-02-18 - Last updated in NVD database

Technical Details for CVE-2025-71200

Vulnerability Analysis

The vulnerability exists in the sdhci-of-dwcmshc driver, which handles the Synopsis DesignWare Mobile Storage Host Controller interface for platforms like Rockchip. The driver failed to implement proper validation of clock frequency changes when the MMC interface is operating in high-speed modes (HS200 or HS400).

The HS200 and HS400 timing modes are high-performance operating modes for eMMC storage that require strict adherence to timing specifications. The Rockchip DWC MSHC controller specifically requires a minimum clock frequency of 52MHz when operating in these modes. Prior to the fix, the driver allowed clock frequency changes through the debugfs interface without validating whether the new frequency met the minimum requirements for the current timing mode.

Root Cause

The root cause is the lack of input validation in the clock configuration path of the sdhci-of-dwcmshc driver. The driver's debugfs interface allowed arbitrary clock frequency values to be written to /sys/kernel/debug/mmc0/clock without checking if the requested frequency was compatible with the current timing mode. When a frequency below 52MHz was set while operating in HS200/HS400 mode, it violated the hardware requirements, causing the communication link to fail.

Attack Vector

The attack vector requires local access to the system with sufficient privileges to write to the debugfs interface. An attacker with root access or appropriate capabilities could trigger this vulnerability by writing an invalid clock value through the debugfs filesystem.

The vulnerability manifests when a clock frequency below 52MHz is written to the debugfs clock interface while the MMC controller is operating in HS200 or HS400 mode. This causes the hardware link to break, triggering CQE recovery procedures that subsequently fail, resulting in kernel warnings and potential system instability.

As shown in the kernel logs from the CVE description, when the clock is set to 50000000 (50MHz) via echo 50000000 > /sys/kernel/debug/mmc0/clock, the system experiences CQE recovery failures, halt failures, and spurious TCN (Task Completion Notification) events, ultimately resulting in a kernel WARNING.

Detection Methods for CVE-2025-71200

Indicators of Compromise

  • Kernel log messages indicating mmc0: running CQE recovery followed by mmc0: cqhci: Failed to halt
  • WARNING messages originating from drivers/mmc/host/cqhci-core.c at the cqhci_irq function
  • Spurious TCN (Task Completion Notification) messages for MMC tags
  • System instability or storage access failures on Rockchip-based platforms

Detection Strategies

  • Monitor kernel logs (dmesg, /var/log/kern.log) for CQE recovery and halt failure messages from the cqhci subsystem
  • Implement auditd rules to track writes to /sys/kernel/debug/mmc*/clock debugfs interfaces
  • Monitor for unusual patterns of MMC subsystem errors that may indicate exploitation attempts
  • Check for unauthorized access to debugfs mount points on production systems

Monitoring Recommendations

  • Configure centralized logging to capture kernel warnings and MMC subsystem errors
  • Implement file integrity monitoring on debugfs access patterns
  • Set up alerts for repeated CQE recovery failures in the MMC subsystem
  • Monitor system stability metrics on devices using Rockchip DWC MSHC controllers

How to Mitigate CVE-2025-71200

Immediate Actions Required

  • Update to a patched Linux kernel version that includes the clock validation fix
  • Restrict access to the debugfs filesystem on production systems
  • Limit root access and capabilities that allow debugfs writes
  • Consider unmounting or disabling debugfs on production systems where it's not required

Patch Information

The vulnerability has been addressed through multiple kernel commits that add validation to prevent illegal clock reduction in HS200/HS400 modes. The fix adds a check to ensure clock frequencies below 52MHz are rejected when the controller is operating in these high-speed timing modes.

Patches are available from the following kernel git commits:

  • Kernel Git Commit 3009738a855c
  • Kernel Git Commit 36be050f21de
  • Kernel Git Commit 59b8a1ca6df4
  • Kernel Git Commit de0ad7156036
  • Kernel Git Commit f2677d6e2bbc

Workarounds

  • Unmount or restrict access to debugfs on production systems where clock manipulation is not needed
  • Implement strict access controls limiting root access on affected systems
  • Use SELinux or AppArmor policies to restrict writes to MMC debugfs interfaces
  • Monitor and alert on any attempts to modify MMC clock settings through debugfs
bash
# Configuration example - Restrict debugfs access
# Unmount debugfs on production systems
umount /sys/kernel/debug

# Or restrict access via permissions (if debugfs must remain mounted)
chmod 700 /sys/kernel/debug
chmod 700 /sys/kernel/debug/mmc*

# Example SELinux policy to deny writes to mmc debugfs
# semodule -i mmc_debugfs_deny.pp

Disclaimer: This content was generated using AI. While we strive for accuracy, please verify critical information with official sources.

  • Vulnerability Details
  • TypeDOS

  • Vendor/TechLinux Kernel

  • SeverityNONE

  • CVSS ScoreN/A

  • EPSS Probability0.02%

  • Known ExploitedNo
  • Impact Assessment
  • ConfidentialityNone
  • IntegrityNone
  • AvailabilityNone
  • Technical References
  • Kernel Git Commit Update

  • Kernel Git Commit Update

  • Kernel Git Commit Update

  • Kernel Git Commit Update

  • Kernel Git Commit Update
  • Related CVEs
  • CVE-2026-31465: Linux Kernel Writeback DoS Vulnerability

  • CVE-2026-31472: Linux Kernel IPTFS DoS Vulnerability

  • CVE-2026-31451: Linux Kernel ext4 DOS Vulnerability

  • CVE-2026-31448: Linux Kernel ext4 DoS Vulnerability
Default Legacy - Prefooter | Experience the World’s Most Advanced Cybersecurity Platform

Experience the World’s Most Advanced Cybersecurity Platform

See how our intelligent, autonomous cybersecurity platform can protect your organization now and into the future.

Try SentinelOne
  • Get Started
  • Get a Demo
  • Product Tour
  • Why SentinelOne
  • Pricing & Packaging
  • FAQ
  • Contact
  • Contact Us
  • Customer Support
  • SentinelOne Status
  • Language
  • Platform
  • Singularity Platform
  • Singularity Endpoint
  • Singularity Cloud
  • Singularity AI-SIEM
  • Singularity Identity
  • Singularity Marketplace
  • Purple AI
  • Services
  • Wayfinder TDR
  • SentinelOne GO
  • Technical Account Management
  • Support Services
  • Verticals
  • Energy
  • Federal Government
  • Finance
  • Healthcare
  • Higher Education
  • K-12 Education
  • Manufacturing
  • Retail
  • State and Local Government
  • Cybersecurity for SMB
  • Resources
  • Blog
  • Labs
  • Case Studies
  • Videos
  • Product Tours
  • Events
  • Cybersecurity 101
  • eBooks
  • Webinars
  • Whitepapers
  • Press
  • News
  • Ransomware Anthology
  • Company
  • About Us
  • Our Customers
  • Careers
  • Partners
  • Legal & Compliance
  • Security & Compliance
  • Investor Relations
  • S Foundation
  • S Ventures

©2026 SentinelOne, All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Notice Terms of Use

English