The SentinelOne Annual Threat Report - A Defenders Guide from the FrontlinesThe SentinelOne Annual Threat ReportGet the Report
Experiencing a Breach?Blog
Get StartedContact Us
SentinelOne
  • Platform
    Platform Overview
    • Singularity Platform
      Welcome to Integrated Enterprise Security
    • AI for Security
      Leading the Way in AI-Powered Security Solutions
    • Securing AI
      Accelerate AI Adoption with Secure AI Tools, Apps, and Agents.
    • How It Works
      The Singularity XDR Difference
    • Singularity Marketplace
      One-Click Integrations to Unlock the Power of XDR
    • Pricing & Packaging
      Comparisons and Guidance at a Glance
    Data & AI
    • Purple AI
      Accelerate SecOps with Generative AI
    • Singularity Hyperautomation
      Easily Automate Security Processes
    • AI-SIEM
      The AI SIEM for the Autonomous SOC
    • Singularity Data Lake
      AI-Powered, Unified Data Lake
    • Singularity Data Lake for Log Analytics
      Seamlessly Ingest Data from On-Prem, Cloud or Hybrid Environments
    Endpoint Security
    • Singularity Endpoint
      Autonomous Prevention, Detection, and Response
    • Singularity XDR
      Native & Open Protection, Detection, and Response
    • Singularity RemoteOps Forensics
      Orchestrate Forensics at Scale
    • Singularity Threat Intelligence
      Comprehensive Adversary Intelligence
    • Singularity Vulnerability Management
      Application & OS Vulnerability Management
    • Singularity Identity
      Identity Threat Detection and Response
    Cloud Security
    • Singularity Cloud Security
      Block Attacks with an AI-Powered CNAPP
    • Singularity Cloud Native Security
      Secure Cloud and Development Resources
    • Singularity Cloud Workload Security
      Real-Time Cloud Workload Protection Platform
    • Singularity Cloud Data Security
      AI-Powered Threat Detection for Cloud Storage
    • Singularity Cloud Security Posture Management
      Detect and Remediate Cloud Misconfigurations
    Securing AI
    • Prompt Security
      Secure AI Tools Across Your Enterprise
  • Why SentinelOne?
    Why SentinelOne?
    • Why SentinelOne?
      Cybersecurity Built for What’s Next
    • Our Customers
      Trusted by the World’s Leading Enterprises
    • Industry Recognition
      Tested and Proven by the Experts
    • About Us
      The Industry Leader in Autonomous Cybersecurity
    Compare SentinelOne
    • Arctic Wolf
    • Broadcom
    • CrowdStrike
    • Cybereason
    • Microsoft
    • Palo Alto Networks
    • Sophos
    • Splunk
    • Trellix
    • Trend Micro
    • Wiz
    Verticals
    • Energy
    • Federal Government
    • Finance
    • Healthcare
    • Higher Education
    • K-12 Education
    • Manufacturing
    • Retail
    • State and Local Government
  • Services
    Managed Services
    • Managed Services Overview
      Wayfinder Threat Detection & Response
    • Threat Hunting
      World-Class Expertise and Threat Intelligence
    • Managed Detection & Response
      24/7/365 Expert MDR Across Your Entire Environment
    • Incident Readiness & Response
      DFIR, Breach Readiness, & Compromise Assessments
    Support, Deployment, & Health
    • Technical Account Management
      Customer Success with Personalized Service
    • SentinelOne GO
      Guided Onboarding & Deployment Advisory
    • SentinelOne University
      Live and On-Demand Training
    • Services Overview
      Comprehensive Solutions for Seamless Security Operations
    • SentinelOne Community
      Community Login
  • Partners
    Our Network
    • MSSP Partners
      Succeed Faster with SentinelOne
    • Singularity Marketplace
      Extend the Power of S1 Technology
    • Cyber Risk Partners
      Enlist Pro Response and Advisory Teams
    • Technology Alliances
      Integrated, Enterprise-Scale Solutions
    • SentinelOne for AWS
      Hosted in AWS Regions Around the World
    • Channel Partners
      Deliver the Right Solutions, Together
    • SentinelOne for Google Cloud
      Unified, Autonomous Security Giving Defenders the Advantage at Global Scale
    • Partner Locator
      Your Go-to Source for Our Top Partners in Your Region
    Partner Portal→
  • Resources
    Resource Center
    • Case Studies
    • Data Sheets
    • eBooks
    • Reports
    • Videos
    • Webinars
    • Whitepapers
    • Events
    View All Resources→
    Blog
    • Feature Spotlight
    • For CISO/CIO
    • From the Front Lines
    • Identity
    • Cloud
    • macOS
    • SentinelOne Blog
    Blog→
    Tech Resources
    • SentinelLABS
    • Ransomware Anthology
    • Cybersecurity 101
  • About
    About SentinelOne
    • About SentinelOne
      The Industry Leader in Cybersecurity
    • Investor Relations
      Financial Information & Events
    • SentinelLABS
      Threat Research for the Modern Threat Hunter
    • Careers
      The Latest Job Opportunities
    • Press & News
      Company Announcements
    • Cybersecurity Blog
      The Latest Cybersecurity Threats, News, & More
    • FAQ
      Get Answers to Our Most Frequently Asked Questions
    • DataSet
      The Live Data Platform
    • S Foundation
      Securing a Safer Future for All
    • S Ventures
      Investing in the Next Generation of Security, Data and AI
  • Pricing
Get StartedContact Us
CVE Vulnerability Database
Vulnerability Database/CVE-2025-32428

CVE-2025-32428: Jupyter Remote Desktop Proxy RCE Flaw

CVE-2025-32428 is a remote code execution vulnerability in Jupyter Remote Desktop Proxy with TigerVNC that exposes VNC servers to network access. This article covers technical details, affected versions, and mitigation.

Updated: January 22, 2026

CVE-2025-32428 Overview

CVE-2025-32428 is an Exposure of Resource to Wrong Sphere vulnerability in Jupyter Remote Desktop Proxy, a component that enables users to run a Linux Desktop environment on JupyterHub. The vulnerability affects versions prior to 3.0.1 when used with TigerVNC as the VNC server implementation. Although jupyter-remote-desktop-proxy was designed to rely on UNIX sockets readable only by the current user since version 3.0.0, the VNC server started by the proxy remained accessible via the network when TigerVNC was in use, creating a significant security exposure.

Critical Impact

Adjacent network attackers can gain unauthorized access to VNC sessions that should have been restricted to UNIX socket communication only, potentially leading to full desktop session hijacking and unauthorized system access.

Affected Products

  • Jupyter Remote Desktop Proxy versions prior to 3.0.1 when used with TigerVNC
  • JupyterHub deployments utilizing jupyter-remote-desktop-proxy with TigerVNC as the vncserver executable
  • Systems where TigerVNC (not TurboVNC) is the default VNC server implementation

Discovery Timeline

  • April 15, 2025 - CVE-2025-32428 published to NVD
  • April 15, 2025 - Last updated in NVD database

Technical Details for CVE-2025-32428

Vulnerability Analysis

This vulnerability is classified under CWE-668: Exposure of Resource to Wrong Sphere, which describes situations where a product exposes a resource to the wrong control sphere, providing unintended actors with inappropriate access. The core issue stems from a behavioral difference between TigerVNC and TurboVNC when handling socket configuration parameters.

The jupyter-remote-desktop-proxy component was updated in version 3.0.0 to use UNIX sockets for VNC communication, which should have restricted access to only the current user. However, TigerVNC does not honor the -rfbport -1 parameter in the same way TurboVNC does. While TurboVNC defaults to not opening a TCP port when using UNIX sockets, TigerVNC continues to bind to a network port, exposing the VNC session to adjacent network attackers.

This vulnerability does not affect users who have TurboVNC configured as the vncserver executable, as TurboVNC correctly defaults to not opening a TCP port when UNIX sockets are specified.

Root Cause

The root cause is the inconsistent handling of network socket configuration between TigerVNC and TurboVNC implementations. The original code assumed that specifying -rfbunixpath would be sufficient to prevent network exposure across all VNC server implementations. However, TigerVNC requires an explicit -rfbport -1 parameter to disable TCP port binding, while TurboVNC does not support this parameter but naturally defaults to the secure behavior.

Attack Vector

The attack vector requires adjacent network access, meaning an attacker must be on the same network segment as the vulnerable JupyterHub deployment. An attacker positioned on the adjacent network can:

  1. Scan for exposed VNC ports on systems running jupyter-remote-desktop-proxy with TigerVNC
  2. Connect to the exposed VNC session without proper authentication boundaries
  3. Gain access to the remote desktop session, potentially compromising sensitive data and system access
  4. Leverage the desktop session for further lateral movement within the network

The following code shows the security patch that addresses the vulnerability by explicitly disabling TCP port binding for TigerVNC:

python
            "vncserver executable not found, please install a VNC server"
        )

+    # TurboVNC and TigerVNC share the same origin and both use a Perl script
+    # as the executable vncserver. We can determine if vncserver is TigerVNC
+    # by searching tigervnc string in the Perl script.
+    #
+    # The content of the vncserver executable can differ depending on how
+    # TigerVNC and TurboVNC has been distributed. Below are files known to be
+    # read in some situations:
+    #
+    # - https://github.com/TigerVNC/tigervnc/blob/v1.13.1/unix/vncserver/vncserver.in
+    # - https://github.com/TurboVNC/turbovnc/blob/3.1.1/unix/vncserver.in
+    #
+    with open(vncserver) as vncserver_file:
+        vncserver_file_text = vncserver_file.read().casefold()
+    is_turbovnc = "turbovnc" in vncserver_file_text

    # {unix_socket} is expanded by jupyter-server-proxy
-    vnc_args = [vncserver, '-rfbunixpath', '{unix_socket}']
+    vnc_args = [vncserver, '-rfbunixpath', "{unix_socket}", "-rfbport", "-1"]
+    if is_turbovnc:
+        # turbovnc doesn't handle being passed -rfbport -1, but turbovnc also
+        # defaults to not opening a TCP port which is what we want to ensure
+        vnc_args = [vncserver, '-rfbunixpath', "{unix_socket}"]

    xstartup = os.getenv("JUPYTER_REMOTE_DESKTOP_PROXY_XSTARTUP")
    if not xstartup and not os.path.exists(os.path.expanduser('~/.vnc/xstartup')):

Source: GitHub Commit

The patch introduces VNC server type detection by reading the vncserver executable and checking for the "turbovnc" string. For TigerVNC installations, it explicitly adds -rfbport -1 to disable TCP port binding. For TurboVNC, it maintains the original behavior since TurboVNC already defaults to not opening a TCP port.

Detection Methods for CVE-2025-32428

Indicators of Compromise

  • Unexpected network connections to VNC ports (typically 5900-5999) from systems running JupyterHub
  • VNC service bindings on network interfaces where UNIX socket-only communication was expected
  • Network traffic analysis showing VNC protocol communications on TCP ports in JupyterHub environments
  • Log entries indicating VNC connections from external IP addresses to JupyterHub servers

Detection Strategies

  • Monitor for VNC-related TCP port bindings using netstat or ss commands on JupyterHub servers: ss -tlnp | grep vnc
  • Implement network segmentation monitoring to detect VNC protocol traffic between network segments
  • Deploy intrusion detection rules for VNC handshake patterns on unexpected network paths
  • Audit jupyter-remote-desktop-proxy configurations to identify TigerVNC usage

Monitoring Recommendations

  • Configure network monitoring tools to alert on VNC protocol traffic outside expected UNIX socket paths
  • Establish baseline network behavior for JupyterHub deployments and alert on deviations
  • Monitor process arguments for vncserver instances to verify -rfbport -1 is present when using TigerVNC
  • Implement periodic security scans for open VNC ports on JupyterHub infrastructure

How to Mitigate CVE-2025-32428

Immediate Actions Required

  • Upgrade jupyter-remote-desktop-proxy to version 3.0.1 or later immediately
  • Audit current JupyterHub deployments to identify systems using TigerVNC as the VNC server
  • Implement network segmentation to restrict VNC traffic until patches are applied
  • Consider temporarily switching to TurboVNC as the vncserver executable if immediate patching is not possible

Patch Information

The vulnerability has been addressed in jupyter-remote-desktop-proxy version 3.0.1. The fix introduces automatic detection of the VNC server type (TigerVNC vs TurboVNC) and applies the appropriate command-line arguments to ensure TCP port binding is disabled. Users should update to version 3.0.1 or later using their package manager:

For detailed patch information, refer to the GitHub Security Advisory and the GitHub Commit.

Workarounds

  • Switch from TigerVNC to TurboVNC as the vncserver executable, which is not affected by this vulnerability
  • Manually add -rfbport -1 to TigerVNC startup arguments in custom configurations
  • Implement firewall rules to block VNC traffic (ports 5900-5999) at the network level until patching is complete
  • Use network policies in containerized environments to restrict VNC port exposure
bash
# Verify if your system is using TigerVNC or TurboVNC
which vncserver
grep -i "turbovnc\|tigervnc" $(which vncserver)

# Check for exposed VNC ports
ss -tlnp | grep -E "590[0-9]"

# Update jupyter-remote-desktop-proxy
pip install --upgrade jupyter-remote-desktop-proxy>=3.0.1

# Firewall rule to block VNC ports temporarily (example for iptables)
iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 5900:5999 -j DROP

Disclaimer: This content was generated using AI. While we strive for accuracy, please verify critical information with official sources.

  • Vulnerability Details
  • TypeRCE

  • Vendor/TechJupyter

  • SeverityCRITICAL

  • CVSS Score9.0

  • EPSS Probability0.05%

  • Known ExploitedNo
  • CVSS Vector
  • CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
  • Impact Assessment
  • ConfidentialityLow
  • IntegrityNone
  • AvailabilityHigh
  • CWE References
  • CWE-668
  • Technical References
  • GitHub Commit Update

  • GitHub Security Advisory
  • Related CVEs
  • CVE-2024-39700: Jupyter JupyterLab RCE Vulnerability

  • CVE-2025-30167: Jupyter Core Privilege Escalation Flaw

  • CVE-2024-28179: Jupyter Server Proxy Auth Bypass Flaw

  • CVE-2024-22415: Jupyter-LSP Privilege Escalation Flaw
Default Legacy - Prefooter | Experience the World’s Most Advanced Cybersecurity Platform

Experience the World’s Most Advanced Cybersecurity Platform

See how our intelligent, autonomous cybersecurity platform can protect your organization now and into the future.

Try SentinelOne
  • Get Started
  • Get a Demo
  • Product Tour
  • Why SentinelOne
  • Pricing & Packaging
  • FAQ
  • Contact
  • Contact Us
  • Customer Support
  • SentinelOne Status
  • Language
  • Platform
  • Singularity Platform
  • Singularity Endpoint
  • Singularity Cloud
  • Singularity AI-SIEM
  • Singularity Identity
  • Singularity Marketplace
  • Purple AI
  • Services
  • Wayfinder TDR
  • SentinelOne GO
  • Technical Account Management
  • Support Services
  • Verticals
  • Energy
  • Federal Government
  • Finance
  • Healthcare
  • Higher Education
  • K-12 Education
  • Manufacturing
  • Retail
  • State and Local Government
  • Cybersecurity for SMB
  • Resources
  • Blog
  • Labs
  • Case Studies
  • Videos
  • Product Tours
  • Events
  • Cybersecurity 101
  • eBooks
  • Webinars
  • Whitepapers
  • Press
  • News
  • Ransomware Anthology
  • Company
  • About Us
  • Our Customers
  • Careers
  • Partners
  • Legal & Compliance
  • Security & Compliance
  • Investor Relations
  • S Foundation
  • S Ventures

©2026 SentinelOne, All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Notice Terms of Use

English