Join the Cyber Forum: Threat Intel on May 12, 2026 to learn how AI is reshaping threat defense.Join the Virtual Cyber Forum: Threat IntelRegister Now
Experiencing a Breach?Blog
Get StartedContact Us
SentinelOne
  • Platform
    Platform Overview
    • Singularity Platform
      Welcome to Integrated Enterprise Security
    • AI for Security
      Leading the Way in AI-Powered Security Solutions
    • Securing AI
      Accelerate AI Adoption with Secure AI Tools, Apps, and Agents.
    • How It Works
      The Singularity XDR Difference
    • Singularity Marketplace
      One-Click Integrations to Unlock the Power of XDR
    • Pricing & Packaging
      Comparisons and Guidance at a Glance
    Data & AI
    • Purple AI
      Accelerate SecOps with Generative AI
    • Singularity Hyperautomation
      Easily Automate Security Processes
    • AI-SIEM
      The AI SIEM for the Autonomous SOC
    • AI Data Pipelines
      Security Data Pipeline for AI SIEM and Data Optimization
    • Singularity Data Lake
      AI-Powered, Unified Data Lake
    • Singularity Data Lake for Log Analytics
      Seamlessly Ingest Data from On-Prem, Cloud or Hybrid Environments
    Endpoint Security
    • Singularity Endpoint
      Autonomous Prevention, Detection, and Response
    • Singularity XDR
      Native & Open Protection, Detection, and Response
    • Singularity RemoteOps Forensics
      Orchestrate Forensics at Scale
    • Singularity Threat Intelligence
      Comprehensive Adversary Intelligence
    • Singularity Vulnerability Management
      Application & OS Vulnerability Management
    • Singularity Identity
      Identity Threat Detection and Response
    Cloud Security
    • Singularity Cloud Security
      Block Attacks with an AI-Powered CNAPP
    • Singularity Cloud Native Security
      Secure Cloud and Development Resources
    • Singularity Cloud Workload Security
      Real-Time Cloud Workload Protection Platform
    • Singularity Cloud Data Security
      AI-Powered Threat Detection for Cloud Storage
    • Singularity Cloud Security Posture Management
      Detect and Remediate Cloud Misconfigurations
    Securing AI
    • Prompt Security
      Secure AI Tools Across Your Enterprise
  • Why SentinelOne?
    Why SentinelOne?
    • Why SentinelOne?
      Cybersecurity Built for What’s Next
    • Our Customers
      Trusted by the World’s Leading Enterprises
    • Industry Recognition
      Tested and Proven by the Experts
    • About Us
      The Industry Leader in Autonomous Cybersecurity
    Compare SentinelOne
    • Arctic Wolf
    • Broadcom
    • CrowdStrike
    • Cybereason
    • Microsoft
    • Palo Alto Networks
    • Sophos
    • Splunk
    • Trellix
    • Trend Micro
    • Wiz
    Verticals
    • Energy
    • Federal Government
    • Finance
    • Healthcare
    • Higher Education
    • K-12 Education
    • Manufacturing
    • Retail
    • State and Local Government
  • Services
    Managed Services
    • Managed Services Overview
      Wayfinder Threat Detection & Response
    • Threat Hunting
      World-Class Expertise and Threat Intelligence
    • Managed Detection & Response
      24/7/365 Expert MDR Across Your Entire Environment
    • Incident Readiness & Response
      DFIR, Breach Readiness, & Compromise Assessments
    Support, Deployment, & Health
    • Technical Account Management
      Customer Success with Personalized Service
    • SentinelOne GO
      Guided Onboarding & Deployment Advisory
    • SentinelOne University
      Live and On-Demand Training
    • Services Overview
      Comprehensive Solutions for Seamless Security Operations
    • SentinelOne Community
      Community Login
  • Partners
    Our Network
    • MSSP Partners
      Succeed Faster with SentinelOne
    • Singularity Marketplace
      Extend the Power of S1 Technology
    • Cyber Risk Partners
      Enlist Pro Response and Advisory Teams
    • Technology Alliances
      Integrated, Enterprise-Scale Solutions
    • SentinelOne for AWS
      Hosted in AWS Regions Around the World
    • Channel Partners
      Deliver the Right Solutions, Together
    • SentinelOne for Google Cloud
      Unified, Autonomous Security Giving Defenders the Advantage at Global Scale
    • Partner Locator
      Your Go-to Source for Our Top Partners in Your Region
    Partner Portal→
  • Resources
    Resource Center
    • Case Studies
    • Data Sheets
    • eBooks
    • Reports
    • Videos
    • Webinars
    • Whitepapers
    • Events
    View All Resources→
    Blog
    • Feature Spotlight
    • For CISO/CIO
    • From the Front Lines
    • Identity
    • Cloud
    • macOS
    • SentinelOne Blog
    Blog→
    Tech Resources
    • SentinelLABS
    • Ransomware Anthology
    • Cybersecurity 101
  • About
    About SentinelOne
    • About SentinelOne
      The Industry Leader in Cybersecurity
    • Investor Relations
      Financial Information & Events
    • SentinelLABS
      Threat Research for the Modern Threat Hunter
    • Careers
      The Latest Job Opportunities
    • Press & News
      Company Announcements
    • Cybersecurity Blog
      The Latest Cybersecurity Threats, News, & More
    • FAQ
      Get Answers to Our Most Frequently Asked Questions
    • DataSet
      The Live Data Platform
    • S Foundation
      Securing a Safer Future for All
    • S Ventures
      Investing in the Next Generation of Security, Data and AI
  • Pricing
Get StartedContact Us
CVE Vulnerability Database
Vulnerability Database/CVE-2024-42256

CVE-2024-42256: Linux Kernel Server Re-pick Vulnerability

CVE-2024-42256 is a server re-pick flaw in Linux Kernel CIFS that causes server misaccounting during subrequest retries. This post explains its technical details, affected versions, impact, and mitigation steps.

Published: April 8, 2026

CVE-2024-42256 Overview

A race condition vulnerability has been identified in the Linux kernel's CIFS (Common Internet File System) subsystem. The flaw occurs during subrequest retry operations where the server selection process is executed multiple times, leading to misaccounting of in-flight request counters. When a subrequest requires retry, cifs_prepare_write() repicks the server before renegotiating credits, then cifs_issue_write() invokes smb2_async_writev() which performs an additional server selection. If different servers are selected between these operations, the server->in_flight counter increments against one server record while decrements occur against another, causing accounting inconsistencies.

Critical Impact

This vulnerability can lead to system instability and kernel warnings, particularly affecting systems using Azure server connections in multichannel mode. The misaccounting of server requests can result in denial of service conditions.

Affected Products

  • Linux Kernel (CIFS/SMB2 subsystem)
  • Systems using netfslib-driven CIFS operations
  • Azure server connections in multichannel mode

Discovery Timeline

  • 2024-08-08 - CVE-2024-42256 published to NVD
  • 2024-09-06 - Last updated in NVD database

Technical Details for CVE-2024-42256

Vulnerability Analysis

The vulnerability stems from a design issue in the CIFS write operation retry logic within the Linux kernel. The problem arises in the interaction between netfslib and the CIFS subsystem when handling write subrequests that require retry. The flow involves multiple function calls: cifs_prepare_write() initiates server selection and credit renegotiation, followed by cifs_issue_write() which calls smb2_async_writev(). The flaw exists because smb2_async_writev() contains redundant server repick code, creating a scenario where two different servers may be selected within the same operation context.

This results in the server->in_flight counter being incremented on one server structure while being decremented on another during callback processing. The immediate symptom is a kernel warning triggered in smb2_add_credits() at fs/smb/client/smb2ops.c:97. The issue is particularly reproducible during xfstests execution against Azure servers operating in multichannel mode, with tests such as generic/249, generic/215, and generic/308 demonstrating the condition.

Root Cause

The root cause is duplicate server selection logic present in smb2_async_writev() that was unnecessary given that cifs_prepare_write() should always execute first in netfslib-driven operations. This redundant code path allowed for potential server switching mid-operation, violating the assumption that server context should remain consistent throughout a single write operation lifecycle.

Attack Vector

The vulnerability is network-accessible and does not require authentication or user interaction. An attacker capable of manipulating network conditions between a vulnerable Linux system and its CIFS/SMB server could potentially trigger retry conditions that exploit this race condition. The multichannel mode configuration increases attack surface by providing multiple server endpoints that could be selected during the repick process.

The kernel warning manifests as follows:

WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 72896 at fs/smb/client/smb2ops.c:97 smb2_add_credits+0x3f0/0x9e0 [cifs]
...
RIP: 0010:smb2_add_credits+0x3f0/0x9e0 [cifs]
...
smb2_writev_callback+0x334/0x560 [cifs]
cifs_demultiplex_thread+0x77a/0x11b0 [cifs]
kthread+0x187/0x1d0
ret_from_fork+0x34/0x60
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30

Detection Methods for CVE-2024-42256

Indicators of Compromise

  • Kernel warning messages referencing smb2_add_credits at fs/smb/client/smb2ops.c:97
  • Warning stack traces showing smb2_writev_callback and cifs_demultiplex_thread in the call chain
  • Unexpected CIFS connection behavior during multichannel operations
  • System instability when running workloads against Azure SMB servers

Detection Strategies

  • Monitor kernel logs (dmesg, /var/log/kern.log) for CIFS-related warnings containing smb2_add_credits
  • Implement alerting on CPU warnings originating from the cifs kernel module
  • Deploy kernel tracing using ftrace or eBPF to monitor server->in_flight counter anomalies
  • Use SentinelOne Singularity platform to detect kernel-level anomalies and unexpected module behavior

Monitoring Recommendations

  • Configure centralized logging to capture kernel warnings across affected systems
  • Enable CIFS debug logging temporarily during investigation with echo 1 > /proc/fs/cifs/cifsFYI
  • Monitor for performance degradation in SMB/CIFS operations that may indicate retry loops
  • Implement network monitoring for unusual SMB multichannel reconnection patterns

How to Mitigate CVE-2024-42256

Immediate Actions Required

  • Apply the latest kernel security patches containing the fix for CVE-2024-42256
  • Consider temporarily disabling CIFS multichannel mode if experiencing symptoms: echo 0 > /sys/module/cifs/parameters/enable_multichannel
  • Monitor affected systems for kernel warnings and stability issues
  • Schedule maintenance windows for kernel updates on production systems using CIFS

Patch Information

The fix removes the redundant server repick code in smb2_async_writev(). Since this function is only called from netfslib-driven code where cifs_prepare_write() should always execute first, the server should never be NULL and the preparatory step will be repeated automatically during retry operations.

Official kernel patches are available:

  • Kernel.org Commit Reference 1
  • Kernel.org Commit Reference 2

Workarounds

  • Disable CIFS multichannel mode to reduce the likelihood of triggering the race condition
  • Avoid running intensive SMB/CIFS workloads until the kernel is patched
  • If using Azure file shares, consider temporary migration to single-channel mode
  • Implement network quality improvements to reduce retry frequency
bash
# Disable CIFS multichannel mode temporarily
echo 0 > /sys/module/cifs/parameters/enable_multichannel

# Verify multichannel is disabled
cat /sys/module/cifs/parameters/enable_multichannel

# Re-enable after patching (if desired)
echo 1 > /sys/module/cifs/parameters/enable_multichannel

Disclaimer: This content was generated using AI. While we strive for accuracy, please verify critical information with official sources.

  • Vulnerability Details
  • TypeOther

  • Vendor/TechLinux Kernel

  • SeverityCRITICAL

  • CVSS Score9.8

  • EPSS Probability0.09%

  • Known ExploitedNo
  • CVSS Vector
  • CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
  • Impact Assessment
  • ConfidentialityLow
  • IntegrityNone
  • AvailabilityHigh
  • CWE References
  • NVD-CWE-noinfo
  • Vendor Resources
  • Kernel.org Commit Reference 1

  • Kernel.org Commit Reference 2
  • Related CVEs
  • CVE-2026-31439: Linux Kernel XDMA Error Handling Flaw

  • CVE-2026-31441: Linux Kernel Memory Leak Vulnerability

  • CVE-2026-31434: Linux Kernel Memory Leak Vulnerability

  • CVE-2026-31435: Linux Kernel Read Abandonment Vulnerability
Default Legacy - Prefooter | Experience the World’s Most Advanced Cybersecurity Platform

Experience the World’s Most Advanced Cybersecurity Platform

See how our intelligent, autonomous cybersecurity platform can protect your organization now and into the future.

Try SentinelOne
  • Get Started
  • Get a Demo
  • Product Tour
  • Why SentinelOne
  • Pricing & Packaging
  • FAQ
  • Contact
  • Contact Us
  • Customer Support
  • SentinelOne Status
  • Language
  • Platform
  • Singularity Platform
  • Singularity Endpoint
  • Singularity Cloud
  • Singularity AI-SIEM
  • Singularity Identity
  • Singularity Marketplace
  • Purple AI
  • Services
  • Wayfinder TDR
  • SentinelOne GO
  • Technical Account Management
  • Support Services
  • Verticals
  • Energy
  • Federal Government
  • Finance
  • Healthcare
  • Higher Education
  • K-12 Education
  • Manufacturing
  • Retail
  • State and Local Government
  • Cybersecurity for SMB
  • Resources
  • Blog
  • Labs
  • Case Studies
  • Videos
  • Product Tours
  • Events
  • Cybersecurity 101
  • eBooks
  • Webinars
  • Whitepapers
  • Press
  • News
  • Ransomware Anthology
  • Company
  • About Us
  • Our Customers
  • Careers
  • Partners
  • Legal & Compliance
  • Security & Compliance
  • Investor Relations
  • S Foundation
  • S Ventures

©2026 SentinelOne, All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Notice Terms of Use

English