The SentinelOne Annual Threat Report - A Defenders Guide from the FrontlinesThe SentinelOne Annual Threat ReportGet the Report
Experiencing a Breach?Blog
Get StartedContact Us
SentinelOne
  • Platform
    Platform Overview
    • Singularity Platform
      Welcome to Integrated Enterprise Security
    • AI for Security
      Leading the Way in AI-Powered Security Solutions
    • Securing AI
      Accelerate AI Adoption with Secure AI Tools, Apps, and Agents.
    • How It Works
      The Singularity XDR Difference
    • Singularity Marketplace
      One-Click Integrations to Unlock the Power of XDR
    • Pricing & Packaging
      Comparisons and Guidance at a Glance
    Data & AI
    • Purple AI
      Accelerate SecOps with Generative AI
    • Singularity Hyperautomation
      Easily Automate Security Processes
    • AI-SIEM
      The AI SIEM for the Autonomous SOC
    • AI Data Pipelines
      Security Data Pipeline for AI SIEM and Data Optimization
    • Singularity Data Lake
      AI-Powered, Unified Data Lake
    • Singularity Data Lake for Log Analytics
      Seamlessly Ingest Data from On-Prem, Cloud or Hybrid Environments
    Endpoint Security
    • Singularity Endpoint
      Autonomous Prevention, Detection, and Response
    • Singularity XDR
      Native & Open Protection, Detection, and Response
    • Singularity RemoteOps Forensics
      Orchestrate Forensics at Scale
    • Singularity Threat Intelligence
      Comprehensive Adversary Intelligence
    • Singularity Vulnerability Management
      Application & OS Vulnerability Management
    • Singularity Identity
      Identity Threat Detection and Response
    Cloud Security
    • Singularity Cloud Security
      Block Attacks with an AI-Powered CNAPP
    • Singularity Cloud Native Security
      Secure Cloud and Development Resources
    • Singularity Cloud Workload Security
      Real-Time Cloud Workload Protection Platform
    • Singularity Cloud Data Security
      AI-Powered Threat Detection for Cloud Storage
    • Singularity Cloud Security Posture Management
      Detect and Remediate Cloud Misconfigurations
    Securing AI
    • Prompt Security
      Secure AI Tools Across Your Enterprise
  • Why SentinelOne?
    Why SentinelOne?
    • Why SentinelOne?
      Cybersecurity Built for What’s Next
    • Our Customers
      Trusted by the World’s Leading Enterprises
    • Industry Recognition
      Tested and Proven by the Experts
    • About Us
      The Industry Leader in Autonomous Cybersecurity
    Compare SentinelOne
    • Arctic Wolf
    • Broadcom
    • CrowdStrike
    • Cybereason
    • Microsoft
    • Palo Alto Networks
    • Sophos
    • Splunk
    • Trellix
    • Trend Micro
    • Wiz
    Verticals
    • Energy
    • Federal Government
    • Finance
    • Healthcare
    • Higher Education
    • K-12 Education
    • Manufacturing
    • Retail
    • State and Local Government
  • Services
    Managed Services
    • Managed Services Overview
      Wayfinder Threat Detection & Response
    • Threat Hunting
      World-Class Expertise and Threat Intelligence
    • Managed Detection & Response
      24/7/365 Expert MDR Across Your Entire Environment
    • Incident Readiness & Response
      DFIR, Breach Readiness, & Compromise Assessments
    Support, Deployment, & Health
    • Technical Account Management
      Customer Success with Personalized Service
    • SentinelOne GO
      Guided Onboarding & Deployment Advisory
    • SentinelOne University
      Live and On-Demand Training
    • Services Overview
      Comprehensive Solutions for Seamless Security Operations
    • SentinelOne Community
      Community Login
  • Partners
    Our Network
    • MSSP Partners
      Succeed Faster with SentinelOne
    • Singularity Marketplace
      Extend the Power of S1 Technology
    • Cyber Risk Partners
      Enlist Pro Response and Advisory Teams
    • Technology Alliances
      Integrated, Enterprise-Scale Solutions
    • SentinelOne for AWS
      Hosted in AWS Regions Around the World
    • Channel Partners
      Deliver the Right Solutions, Together
    • SentinelOne for Google Cloud
      Unified, Autonomous Security Giving Defenders the Advantage at Global Scale
    • Partner Locator
      Your Go-to Source for Our Top Partners in Your Region
    Partner Portal→
  • Resources
    Resource Center
    • Case Studies
    • Data Sheets
    • eBooks
    • Reports
    • Videos
    • Webinars
    • Whitepapers
    • Events
    View All Resources→
    Blog
    • Feature Spotlight
    • For CISO/CIO
    • From the Front Lines
    • Identity
    • Cloud
    • macOS
    • SentinelOne Blog
    Blog→
    Tech Resources
    • SentinelLABS
    • Ransomware Anthology
    • Cybersecurity 101
  • About
    About SentinelOne
    • About SentinelOne
      The Industry Leader in Cybersecurity
    • Investor Relations
      Financial Information & Events
    • SentinelLABS
      Threat Research for the Modern Threat Hunter
    • Careers
      The Latest Job Opportunities
    • Press & News
      Company Announcements
    • Cybersecurity Blog
      The Latest Cybersecurity Threats, News, & More
    • FAQ
      Get Answers to Our Most Frequently Asked Questions
    • DataSet
      The Live Data Platform
    • S Foundation
      Securing a Safer Future for All
    • S Ventures
      Investing in the Next Generation of Security, Data and AI
  • Pricing
Get StartedContact Us
CVE Vulnerability Database
Vulnerability Database/CVE-2021-25736

CVE-2021-25736: Kubernetes Information Disclosure Flaw

CVE-2021-25736 is an information disclosure vulnerability in Kubernetes kube-proxy on Windows that can unintentionally forward traffic to local processes. This article covers technical details, affected systems, and mitigations.

Updated: May 16, 2026

CVE-2021-25736 Overview

CVE-2021-25736 affects the Kubernetes kube-proxy component running on Windows nodes. The flaw allows unintended forwarding of network traffic to local processes listening on the same TCP/UDP port as a LoadBalancer Service. Exploitation requires that the LoadBalancer controller does not populate the status.loadBalancer.ingress[].ip field for the Service. Clusters where the controller correctly sets this field are not impacted.

The issue is tracked under [CWE-114] (Process Control) and impacts the confidentiality of traffic flowing through Windows-based Kubernetes data planes. The vulnerability was disclosed through the Kubernetes security announcement process and addressed via upstream patches.

Critical Impact

An attacker with low privileges on the network can intercept or receive traffic intended for a LoadBalancer Service backend, exposing sensitive data flowing through Windows kube-proxy instances.

Affected Products

  • Kubernetes (versions prior to the patched releases referenced in the Kubernetes security announcement)
  • Microsoft Windows nodes running kube-proxy
  • Downstream distributions including NetApp products that ship Kubernetes components

Discovery Timeline

  • 2023-10-30 - CVE-2021-25736 published to NVD
  • 2025-06-12 - Last updated in NVD database

Technical Details for CVE-2021-25736

Vulnerability Analysis

The defect resides in the Windows implementation of kube-proxy, the network proxy that maintains Service abstractions on each node. When a Kubernetes Service of type LoadBalancer is created, kube-proxy installs forwarding rules so that traffic arriving at the load balancer ingress IP reaches the correct pods.

On Windows nodes, kube-proxy evaluates the Service spec.ports[*].port value when programming these rules. If the upstream LoadBalancer controller never populates status.loadBalancer.ingress[].ip, kube-proxy falls back to a code path that can match any traffic destined to that port on the node. As a result, traffic intended for the Service can be redirected to unrelated local processes that happen to bind the same port.

Root Cause

The root cause is improper validation of the LoadBalancer Service state before installing port-level forwarding rules. The Windows kube-proxy code did not require a populated status.loadBalancer.ingress[].ip field before programming HNS (Host Networking Service) policies tied to spec.ports[*].port. This omission allowed local listeners to receive traffic that should have been scoped to the load balancer ingress endpoint, aligning with [CWE-114] process-control weaknesses.

Attack Vector

Exploitation requires an attacker who can run a process on a Windows worker node and bind to the same port number declared in a LoadBalancer Service spec.ports[*].port. Once bound, the attacker's process can receive traffic that legitimate clients send to the Service. The attack vector is network-based with high complexity, because it depends on cluster configuration in which the LoadBalancer controller does not set the ingress IP status field. No user interaction is required. See the upstream fix in the Kubernetes Pull Request #99958 for the implementation change that scopes forwarding to the validated ingress IP.

Detection Methods for CVE-2021-25736

Indicators of Compromise

  • Unexpected processes on Windows nodes binding to ports listed in LoadBalancer Service spec.ports[*].port definitions.
  • Service traffic terminating at a local process rather than the intended backend pod, observable through application logs or session anomalies.
  • LoadBalancer Service objects whose status.loadBalancer.ingress[].ip field is empty while traffic is still flowing through kube-proxy.

Detection Strategies

  • Audit all Service objects of type LoadBalancer and flag any with an empty status.loadBalancer.ingress array.
  • Inventory listening sockets on Windows worker nodes using netstat -ano and correlate against Service port declarations.
  • Review HNS policy configurations on Windows nodes to confirm forwarding rules reference a valid ingress IP, not only a port.

Monitoring Recommendations

  • Forward Kubernetes audit logs and Windows network telemetry to a centralized analytics platform for correlation across nodes.
  • Alert when a non-system process on a Windows node binds to a port that matches a published Service port.
  • Monitor kube-proxy version and configuration drift across the cluster to ensure all Windows nodes run patched builds.

How to Mitigate CVE-2021-25736

Immediate Actions Required

  • Upgrade kube-proxy on all Windows nodes to a Kubernetes release that includes the fix from Kubernetes PR #99958.
  • Verify that the LoadBalancer controller in use populates status.loadBalancer.ingress[].ip for every Service of type LoadBalancer.
  • Review and restrict which workloads and users can create privileged listeners on Windows nodes.

Patch Information

The Kubernetes project addressed CVE-2021-25736 in upstream releases referenced by the Kubernetes Security Announcement. Downstream vendors including NetApp issued coordinated advisories; see the NetApp Security Advisory NTAP-20231221-0003 for distribution-specific guidance. Operators should apply the patched kube-proxy binary to all Windows nodes and confirm the deployment with kubectl get nodes -o wide and kube-proxy --version.

Workarounds

  • Configure the LoadBalancer controller to always populate status.loadBalancer.ingress[].ip so that kube-proxy programs forwarding rules scoped to a specific IP.
  • Avoid scheduling untrusted workloads on Windows nodes that host LoadBalancer Service backends.
  • Use network policies and host-level firewall rules on Windows nodes to prevent unauthorized processes from binding to Service ports.
bash
# Verify LoadBalancer Services have ingress IP populated
kubectl get svc --all-namespaces -o jsonpath='{range .items[?(@.spec.type=="LoadBalancer")]}{.metadata.namespace}{"/"}{.metadata.name}{" ingress="}{.status.loadBalancer.ingress}{"\n"}{end}'

# Check kube-proxy version on Windows nodes
kubectl get nodes -l kubernetes.io/os=windows -o jsonpath='{range .items[*]}{.metadata.name}{" "}{.status.nodeInfo.kubeProxyVersion}{"\n"}{end}'

Disclaimer: This content was generated using AI. While we strive for accuracy, please verify critical information with official sources.

  • Vulnerability Details
  • TypeInformation Disclosure

  • Vendor/TechKubernetes

  • SeverityMEDIUM

  • CVSS Score6.3

  • EPSS Probability0.09%

  • Known ExploitedNo
  • CVSS Vector
  • CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
  • Impact Assessment
  • ConfidentialityHigh
  • IntegrityNone
  • AvailabilityNone
  • CWE References
  • NVD-CWE-noinfo

  • CWE-114
  • Technical References
  • GitHub Pull Request

  • Kubernetes Security Announcement

  • NetApp Security Advisory
  • Related CVEs
  • CVE-2025-9708: Kubernetes C# Client Certificate Flaw

  • CVE-2023-2878: Kubernetes Secrets Store CSI Driver Vulnerability

  • CVE-2024-5321: Kubernetes Windows Log Disclosure Flaw

  • CVE-2021-25746: Kubernetes Ingress-nginx Disclosure Flaw
Default Legacy - Prefooter | Experience the World’s Most Advanced Cybersecurity Platform

Experience the World’s Most Advanced Cybersecurity Platform

See how our intelligent, autonomous cybersecurity platform can protect your organization now and into the future.

Try SentinelOne
  • Get Started
  • Get a Demo
  • Product Tour
  • Why SentinelOne
  • Pricing & Packaging
  • FAQ
  • Contact
  • Contact Us
  • Customer Support
  • SentinelOne Status
  • Language
  • Platform
  • Singularity Platform
  • Singularity Endpoint
  • Singularity Cloud
  • Singularity AI-SIEM
  • Singularity Identity
  • Singularity Marketplace
  • Purple AI
  • Services
  • Wayfinder TDR
  • SentinelOne GO
  • Technical Account Management
  • Support Services
  • Verticals
  • Energy
  • Federal Government
  • Finance
  • Healthcare
  • Higher Education
  • K-12 Education
  • Manufacturing
  • Retail
  • State and Local Government
  • Cybersecurity for SMB
  • Resources
  • Blog
  • Labs
  • Case Studies
  • Videos
  • Product Tours
  • Events
  • Cybersecurity 101
  • eBooks
  • Webinars
  • Whitepapers
  • Press
  • News
  • Ransomware Anthology
  • Company
  • About Us
  • Our Customers
  • Careers
  • Partners
  • Legal & Compliance
  • Security & Compliance
  • Investor Relations
  • S Foundation
  • S Ventures

©2026 SentinelOne, All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Notice Terms of Use

English