Join the Cyber Forum: Threat Intel on May 12, 2026 to learn how AI is reshaping threat defense.Join the Virtual Cyber Forum: Threat IntelRegister Now
Experiencing a Breach?Blog
Get StartedContact Us
SentinelOne
  • Platform
    Platform Overview
    • Singularity Platform
      Welcome to Integrated Enterprise Security
    • AI for Security
      Leading the Way in AI-Powered Security Solutions
    • Securing AI
      Accelerate AI Adoption with Secure AI Tools, Apps, and Agents.
    • How It Works
      The Singularity XDR Difference
    • Singularity Marketplace
      One-Click Integrations to Unlock the Power of XDR
    • Pricing & Packaging
      Comparisons and Guidance at a Glance
    Data & AI
    • Purple AI
      Accelerate SecOps with Generative AI
    • Singularity Hyperautomation
      Easily Automate Security Processes
    • AI-SIEM
      The AI SIEM for the Autonomous SOC
    • AI Data Pipelines
      Security Data Pipeline for AI SIEM and Data Optimization
    • Singularity Data Lake
      AI-Powered, Unified Data Lake
    • Singularity Data Lake for Log Analytics
      Seamlessly Ingest Data from On-Prem, Cloud or Hybrid Environments
    Endpoint Security
    • Singularity Endpoint
      Autonomous Prevention, Detection, and Response
    • Singularity XDR
      Native & Open Protection, Detection, and Response
    • Singularity RemoteOps Forensics
      Orchestrate Forensics at Scale
    • Singularity Threat Intelligence
      Comprehensive Adversary Intelligence
    • Singularity Vulnerability Management
      Application & OS Vulnerability Management
    • Singularity Identity
      Identity Threat Detection and Response
    Cloud Security
    • Singularity Cloud Security
      Block Attacks with an AI-Powered CNAPP
    • Singularity Cloud Native Security
      Secure Cloud and Development Resources
    • Singularity Cloud Workload Security
      Real-Time Cloud Workload Protection Platform
    • Singularity Cloud Data Security
      AI-Powered Threat Detection for Cloud Storage
    • Singularity Cloud Security Posture Management
      Detect and Remediate Cloud Misconfigurations
    Securing AI
    • Prompt Security
      Secure AI Tools Across Your Enterprise
  • Why SentinelOne?
    Why SentinelOne?
    • Why SentinelOne?
      Cybersecurity Built for What’s Next
    • Our Customers
      Trusted by the World’s Leading Enterprises
    • Industry Recognition
      Tested and Proven by the Experts
    • About Us
      The Industry Leader in Autonomous Cybersecurity
    Compare SentinelOne
    • Arctic Wolf
    • Broadcom
    • CrowdStrike
    • Cybereason
    • Microsoft
    • Palo Alto Networks
    • Sophos
    • Splunk
    • Trellix
    • Trend Micro
    • Wiz
    Verticals
    • Energy
    • Federal Government
    • Finance
    • Healthcare
    • Higher Education
    • K-12 Education
    • Manufacturing
    • Retail
    • State and Local Government
  • Services
    Managed Services
    • Managed Services Overview
      Wayfinder Threat Detection & Response
    • Threat Hunting
      World-Class Expertise and Threat Intelligence
    • Managed Detection & Response
      24/7/365 Expert MDR Across Your Entire Environment
    • Incident Readiness & Response
      DFIR, Breach Readiness, & Compromise Assessments
    Support, Deployment, & Health
    • Technical Account Management
      Customer Success with Personalized Service
    • SentinelOne GO
      Guided Onboarding & Deployment Advisory
    • SentinelOne University
      Live and On-Demand Training
    • Services Overview
      Comprehensive Solutions for Seamless Security Operations
    • SentinelOne Community
      Community Login
  • Partners
    Our Network
    • MSSP Partners
      Succeed Faster with SentinelOne
    • Singularity Marketplace
      Extend the Power of S1 Technology
    • Cyber Risk Partners
      Enlist Pro Response and Advisory Teams
    • Technology Alliances
      Integrated, Enterprise-Scale Solutions
    • SentinelOne for AWS
      Hosted in AWS Regions Around the World
    • Channel Partners
      Deliver the Right Solutions, Together
    • SentinelOne for Google Cloud
      Unified, Autonomous Security Giving Defenders the Advantage at Global Scale
    • Partner Locator
      Your Go-to Source for Our Top Partners in Your Region
    Partner Portal→
  • Resources
    Resource Center
    • Case Studies
    • Data Sheets
    • eBooks
    • Reports
    • Videos
    • Webinars
    • Whitepapers
    • Events
    View All Resources→
    Blog
    • Feature Spotlight
    • For CISO/CIO
    • From the Front Lines
    • Identity
    • Cloud
    • macOS
    • SentinelOne Blog
    Blog→
    Tech Resources
    • SentinelLABS
    • Ransomware Anthology
    • Cybersecurity 101
  • About
    About SentinelOne
    • About SentinelOne
      The Industry Leader in Cybersecurity
    • Investor Relations
      Financial Information & Events
    • SentinelLABS
      Threat Research for the Modern Threat Hunter
    • Careers
      The Latest Job Opportunities
    • Press & News
      Company Announcements
    • Cybersecurity Blog
      The Latest Cybersecurity Threats, News, & More
    • FAQ
      Get Answers to Our Most Frequently Asked Questions
    • DataSet
      The Live Data Platform
    • S Foundation
      Securing a Safer Future for All
    • S Ventures
      Investing in the Next Generation of Security, Data and AI
  • Pricing
Get StartedContact Us
CVE Vulnerability Database
Vulnerability Database/CVE-2020-1971

CVE-2020-1971: OpenSSL EDIPARTYNAME DoS Vulnerability

CVE-2020-1971 is a denial of service flaw in OpenSSL caused by NULL pointer dereference in GENERAL_NAME_cmp when processing EDIPARTYNAME. This article covers the technical details, affected versions, and mitigation strategies.

Published: March 4, 2026

CVE-2020-1971 Overview

CVE-2020-1971 is a Null Pointer Dereference vulnerability in OpenSSL's GENERAL_NAME_cmp function that can be exploited to cause a denial of service condition. The vulnerability exists in how OpenSSL handles comparisons of X.509 GeneralName types when both contain an EDIPARTYNAME. When an attacker controls both items being compared—such as a malicious certificate and a malicious CRL—they can trigger a NULL pointer dereference resulting in an application crash.

The X.509 GeneralName type is a generic structure for representing different types of names, including EDIPartyName. OpenSSL's GENERAL_NAME_cmp function is used for comparing CRL distribution point names against embedded distribution points in X509 certificates, and for verifying timestamp response token signers against timestamp authority names.

Critical Impact

Applications using vulnerable OpenSSL versions for certificate validation or timestamp verification can be crashed remotely if an attacker can supply malicious certificates and CRLs. Applications that automatically download CRLs based on certificate-embedded URLs are particularly at risk.

Affected Products

  • OpenSSL 1.1.1 through 1.1.1h
  • OpenSSL 1.0.2 through 1.0.2w
  • Debian Linux 9.0 and 10.0
  • Fedora 32 and 33
  • Node.js (multiple versions)
  • Oracle MySQL Server, GraalVM, HTTP Server, and numerous Oracle products
  • NetApp Data ONTAP, SnapCenter, Active IQ Unified Manager, and other NetApp products
  • Tenable Nessus Network Monitor and Log Correlation Engine
  • Siemens SINEC Infrastructure Network Services

Discovery Timeline

  • 2020-12-08 - CVE-2020-1971 published to NVD
  • 2024-11-21 - Last updated in NVD database

Technical Details for CVE-2020-1971

Vulnerability Analysis

The vulnerability resides in OpenSSL's GENERAL_NAME_cmp function, which compares different instances of GENERAL_NAME structures. When both GENERAL_NAME arguments contain an EDIPARTYNAME type, the comparison function incorrectly handles the data, leading to a NULL pointer dereference.

OpenSSL uses this comparison function in two critical scenarios: verifying CRL distribution points against those embedded in X509 certificates, and validating timestamp response token signers through the TS_RESP_verify_response and TS_RESP_verify_token API functions. The vulnerability can be triggered prior to signature verification on certificates and CRLs, expanding the attack surface.

An interesting characteristic of this vulnerability is that affected OpenSSL versions cannot actually parse or construct correct encodings of EDIPARTYNAME. However, malformed EDIPARTYNAME structures that OpenSSL's parser will accept can be crafted to trigger the vulnerability.

Root Cause

The root cause is improper handling of NULL pointers within the GENERAL_NAME_cmp function when processing EDIPARTYNAME types. The function fails to validate that internal pointers are non-NULL before dereferencing them during the comparison operation. This represents CWE-476 (NULL Pointer Dereference).

Attack Vector

The attack requires network access and the ability to supply both items being compared. The most practical attack scenario involves:

  1. An attacker creates a malicious X509 certificate containing a specially crafted EDIPARTYNAME in its CRL distribution point
  2. The attacker also creates or controls a malicious CRL with a matching malformed EDIPARTYNAME
  3. When a vulnerable application attempts to verify the certificate against the CRL, the comparison triggers the NULL pointer dereference

Applications with automatic CRL downloading enabled (such as those using the -crl_download option in OpenSSL's s_server, s_client, or verify tools) are particularly vulnerable, as demonstrated by OpenSSL's security researchers.

The attack can be delivered as follows:

Attack Scenario:
1. Victim application configured with automatic CRL downloading
2. Attacker provides malicious certificate to victim (e.g., during TLS handshake)
3. Certificate contains malformed CRL distribution point with crafted EDIPARTYNAME
4. Application follows embedded URL to download attacker-controlled CRL
5. CRL contains matching malformed EDIPARTYNAME
6. GENERAL_NAME_cmp() called to compare distribution points
7. NULL pointer dereference occurs, crashing the application

Detection Methods for CVE-2020-1971

Indicators of Compromise

  • Sudden crashes in applications using OpenSSL for certificate validation
  • Core dumps or crash logs showing NULL pointer dereference in OpenSSL libraries
  • Unexpected CRL download attempts to unfamiliar or suspicious URLs
  • Application failures during TLS handshake or certificate verification operations

Detection Strategies

  • Monitor application logs for crashes related to OpenSSL certificate or CRL processing functions
  • Implement network monitoring to detect unusual CRL download patterns or connections to suspicious distribution points
  • Use vulnerability scanners to identify systems running affected OpenSSL versions (1.1.1 through 1.1.1h or 1.0.2 through 1.0.2w)
  • Deploy runtime application monitoring to detect NULL pointer dereference exceptions in SSL/TLS handling code

Monitoring Recommendations

  • Enable crash reporting and alerting for critical applications using OpenSSL
  • Monitor for repeated application restarts that may indicate ongoing denial of service attacks
  • Track network traffic for certificate exchanges containing unusual or malformed EDIPARTYNAME extensions
  • Implement logging around certificate validation and CRL checking operations

How to Mitigate CVE-2020-1971

Immediate Actions Required

  • Upgrade OpenSSL to version 1.1.1i or later for the 1.1.1 branch
  • Upgrade OpenSSL to version 1.0.2x or later for the 1.0.2 branch
  • Update all dependent applications and libraries that bundle OpenSSL
  • Review and update Oracle, NetApp, Tenable, Siemens, and other vendor products to patched versions

Patch Information

OpenSSL has released patched versions that address this vulnerability:

  • OpenSSL 1.1.1i fixes the vulnerability for the 1.1.1 branch (affected: 1.1.1 through 1.1.1h)
  • OpenSSL 1.0.2x fixes the vulnerability for the 1.0.2 branch (affected: 1.0.2 through 1.0.2w)

The patches are available through the OpenSSL Security Advisory December 2020. Additional vendor-specific patches are available from Oracle CPU April 2021, NetApp Security Advisory, and Debian Security Advisory DSA-4807.

Workarounds

  • Disable automatic CRL downloading where possible (remove -crl_download option from OpenSSL tools)
  • Implement network-level filtering to block CRL downloads from untrusted sources
  • Configure applications to use a trusted, locally-maintained CRL repository instead of following certificate-embedded URLs
  • Consider disabling CRL checking temporarily while patching, accepting the trade-off in revocation checking capability
bash
# Example: Check OpenSSL version and update on Debian/Ubuntu
openssl version
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get install openssl libssl1.1

# Example: Verify updated version
openssl version -a
# Should show 1.1.1i or later

# Example: Disable CRL downloading in OpenSSL s_client (remove -crl_download flag)
# Instead of:
# openssl s_client -connect example.com:443 -crl_download
# Use:
openssl s_client -connect example.com:443

Disclaimer: This content was generated using AI. While we strive for accuracy, please verify critical information with official sources.

  • Vulnerability Details
  • TypeDOS

  • Vendor/TechOpenssl

  • SeverityMEDIUM

  • CVSS Score5.9

  • EPSS Probability0.33%

  • Known ExploitedNo
  • CVSS Vector
  • CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
  • Impact Assessment
  • ConfidentialityHigh
  • IntegrityNone
  • AvailabilityHigh
  • CWE References
  • CWE-476
  • Technical References
  • Openwall OSS Security Discussion

  • Siemens Security Certificate SSA-389290

  • OpenSSL Commit Diff 2154ab83

  • OpenSSL Commit Diff f960d812

  • Pulse Secure Advisory SA44676

  • Apache Tomcat Dev Mailing List

  • Apache Pulsar Commits Mailing List

  • Debian LTS Announcement December 2020

  • Debian LTS Announcement December 2020

  • Fedora Package Announcement

  • Fedora Package Announcement

  • FreeBSD Security Advisory SA-20:33

  • Gentoo GLSA 202012-13

  • NetApp Security Advisory NTAP-20201218

  • NetApp Security Advisory NTAP-20210513

  • NetApp Security Advisory NTAP-20240621

  • Debian Security Advisory DSA-4807

  • Oracle CPU January 2021 Security Alerts

  • Oracle CPU October 2021 Security Alerts

  • Tenable Security Advisory TNS-2020-11

  • Tenable Security Advisory TNS-2021-09

  • Tenable Security Advisory TNS-2021-10
  • Vendor Resources
  • OpenSSL Security Advisory December 2020

  • Oracle CPU July 2021 Security Alerts

  • Oracle CPU April 2021 Security Alerts

  • Oracle CPU April 2022 Security Alerts
  • Related CVEs
  • CVE-2026-28389: OpenSSL CMS DoS Vulnerability

  • CVE-2026-28388: OpenSSL Delta CRL DoS Vulnerability

  • CVE-2026-28386: OpenSSL AES-CFB128 DoS Vulnerability

  • CVE-2026-28390: OpenSSL CMS DoS Vulnerability
Default Legacy - Prefooter | Experience the World’s Most Advanced Cybersecurity Platform

Experience the World’s Most Advanced Cybersecurity Platform

See how our intelligent, autonomous cybersecurity platform can protect your organization now and into the future.

Try SentinelOne
  • Get Started
  • Get a Demo
  • Product Tour
  • Why SentinelOne
  • Pricing & Packaging
  • FAQ
  • Contact
  • Contact Us
  • Customer Support
  • SentinelOne Status
  • Language
  • Platform
  • Singularity Platform
  • Singularity Endpoint
  • Singularity Cloud
  • Singularity AI-SIEM
  • Singularity Identity
  • Singularity Marketplace
  • Purple AI
  • Services
  • Wayfinder TDR
  • SentinelOne GO
  • Technical Account Management
  • Support Services
  • Verticals
  • Energy
  • Federal Government
  • Finance
  • Healthcare
  • Higher Education
  • K-12 Education
  • Manufacturing
  • Retail
  • State and Local Government
  • Cybersecurity for SMB
  • Resources
  • Blog
  • Labs
  • Case Studies
  • Videos
  • Product Tours
  • Events
  • Cybersecurity 101
  • eBooks
  • Webinars
  • Whitepapers
  • Press
  • News
  • Ransomware Anthology
  • Company
  • About Us
  • Our Customers
  • Careers
  • Partners
  • Legal & Compliance
  • Security & Compliance
  • Investor Relations
  • S Foundation
  • S Ventures

©2026 SentinelOne, All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Notice Terms of Use

English