The Good, the Bad and the Ugly in Cybersecurity – Week 44

The Good | Former GM of DoD Contractor Pleads Guilty to Selling U.S. Cyber Secrets

Peter Williams, a former general manager at U.S. defense contractor L3Harris Trenchant, has pleaded guilty in U.S. federal court to two counts of stealing and selling classified cybersecurity tools and trade secrets to a Russian exploit broker.

Between 2022 and 2025, Williams stole at least eight restricted cyber-exploit components that were developed for the U.S. government and select allied partners. The DoJ stated that these tools, valued at $35 million, were part of Trenchant’s sensitive research and were never intended for foreign sale. Williams sold them for at least $1.3 million in cryptocurrency, signing formal contracts with the Russian intermediary for the initial sale of the components as well as a promise to provide follow-on technical support. Williams used the illicit proceeds to purchase luxury items, according to court filings.

Trenchant, L3Harris Technologies’ cyber capabilities arm, develops advanced offensive and defensive tools used by government agencies within the Five Eyes intelligence alliance. According to the DoJ, Williams abused his privileged access at Trenchant Systems to siphon the data, giving various customers of the broker, including the Russian government and other foreign cyber threat actors, an edge in targeting U.S. citizens, businesses, and critical infrastructure.

While the court reports did not name the broker, prior reporting suggests it may be Operation Zero, a Russian platform known for buying and reselling zero-day exploits, often rewarding developers with large cryptocurrency payouts.

Source: X via CyberScoop

Williams now faces up to 10 years in prison and fines of $250,000 or twice the profit gained. As international cyber brokers expand in their roles as international arms dealers, law enforcement officials reaffirm their hard stance against malicious insiders abusing their positions of trust.

The Bad | New “Brash” Flaw Crashes Chromium Browsers with Timed Attacks

Security researcher Jose Pino has disclosed a severe vulnerability in Chromium’s Blink rendering engine that allows attackers to crash Chromium-based browsers within seconds. Pino has named the vulnerability “Brash” and attributes it to an architectural oversight that fails to rate-limit updates to the document.title API. Without the rate-limiting, an attacker can generate millions of document object model (DOM) mutations per second by repeatedly changing the page title, overwhelming the browser, and consuming CPU resources until the UI thread becomes unresponsive.

Source: GitHub

The Brash exploit occurs in three phases. First, the attacker prepares a hash seed by loading 100 unique 512-character hexadecimal strings into memory to vary title updates and maximize the impact of the attack. Then, the attacker launches burst injections that perform three consecutive document.title updates in a row, which in default test settings inject roughly 24 million updates per second using a burst size of 8,000 and a 1 ms interval. Lastly, the sustained stream of updates saturates the browser’s main thread, forcing both the tab and the browser to hang or crash and requiring forced termination.

Brash can be scheduled to run at precise moments, enabling a logic-bomb style attack that remains dormant until a timed trigger activates. This increases the danger since attackers can control when the large-scale disruption will occur. Hypothetically, a single click on a specially crafted URL can detonate the attack with millisecond accuracy and little initial indication.

The vulnerability affects Google Chrome and all Chromium-based browsers, including Microsoft Edge, Brave, Opera, Vivaldi, Arc, Dia, OpenAI ChatGPT Atlas, and Perplexity Comet. WebKit-based browsers such as Mozilla Firefox and Apple Safari are not vulnerable to Brash as well as any iOS third-party browsers.

The Ugly | Hacktivists Manipulate Canadian Industrial Systems, Triggering Safety Risks

The Canadian Centre for Cyber Security has issued a warning that hacktivists have breached multiple critical infrastructure systems across Canada, altering industrial controls in ways that could have created dangerous conditions. The alert highlights rising malicious activity that targets internet-exposed Industrial Control Systems (ICS) and urges firms to shore up their security measures to prevent such attacks.

The bulletin cites three recent incidents. In the first, a water treatment facility experienced tampering with water pressure controls, degrading service for the local community. Following that, a Canadian oil and gas company had its Automated Tank Gauge (ATG) manipulated, triggering false alarms. In a third breach, a grain drying silo on a farm had temperature and humidity settings altered, creating potentially unsafe conditions if the changes had gone undetected.

Authorities believe these attacks were opportunistic rather than being technically sophisticated, and intended to attract media attention, underme public trust, and harm the reputation of Canadian authorities. Hacktivists have been known to collaborate with advanced persistent threat (APT) groups to amplify the reach of disruptive acts and cause public unrest.

Although none of the targeted facilities suffered damage, the incidents underline inherent risks in poorly protected ICS, including programmable logic controllers (PLCs), supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) systems, human-machine interfaces (HMIs), and industrial IoT devices.

The Cyber Centre recommends that organizations inventory and secure internet-accessible ICS devices, remove direct internet exposure where possible, implement VPNs with multi-factor authentication (MFA), maintain regular firmware updates, and conduct regular penetration testing. Resources like the Cyber Security Readiness Goals (CRGs) can offer guidance for critical infrastructure firms and officials remind organizations that suspicious activity should be reported via My Cyber Portal or to local authorities to reduce risks of future compromise.

Source: Canadian Centre for Cyber Security