The SentinelOne Annual Threat Report - A Defenders Guide from the FrontlinesThe SentinelOne Annual Threat ReportGet the Report
Experiencing a Breach?Blog
Get StartedContact Us
SentinelOne
  • Platform
    Platform Overview
    • Singularity Platform
      Welcome to Integrated Enterprise Security
    • AI for Security
      Leading the Way in AI-Powered Security Solutions
    • Securing AI
      Accelerate AI Adoption with Secure AI Tools, Apps, and Agents.
    • How It Works
      The Singularity XDR Difference
    • Singularity Marketplace
      One-Click Integrations to Unlock the Power of XDR
    • Pricing & Packaging
      Comparisons and Guidance at a Glance
    Data & AI
    • Purple AI
      Accelerate SecOps with Generative AI
    • Singularity Hyperautomation
      Easily Automate Security Processes
    • AI-SIEM
      The AI SIEM for the Autonomous SOC
    • Singularity Data Lake
      AI-Powered, Unified Data Lake
    • Singularity Data Lake for Log Analytics
      Seamlessly Ingest Data from On-Prem, Cloud or Hybrid Environments
    Endpoint Security
    • Singularity Endpoint
      Autonomous Prevention, Detection, and Response
    • Singularity XDR
      Native & Open Protection, Detection, and Response
    • Singularity RemoteOps Forensics
      Orchestrate Forensics at Scale
    • Singularity Threat Intelligence
      Comprehensive Adversary Intelligence
    • Singularity Vulnerability Management
      Application & OS Vulnerability Management
    • Singularity Identity
      Identity Threat Detection and Response
    Cloud Security
    • Singularity Cloud Security
      Block Attacks with an AI-Powered CNAPP
    • Singularity Cloud Native Security
      Secure Cloud and Development Resources
    • Singularity Cloud Workload Security
      Real-Time Cloud Workload Protection Platform
    • Singularity Cloud Data Security
      AI-Powered Threat Detection for Cloud Storage
    • Singularity Cloud Security Posture Management
      Detect and Remediate Cloud Misconfigurations
    Securing AI
    • Prompt Security
      Secure AI Tools Across Your Enterprise
  • Why SentinelOne?
    Why SentinelOne?
    • Why SentinelOne?
      Cybersecurity Built for What’s Next
    • Our Customers
      Trusted by the World’s Leading Enterprises
    • Industry Recognition
      Tested and Proven by the Experts
    • About Us
      The Industry Leader in Autonomous Cybersecurity
    Compare SentinelOne
    • Arctic Wolf
    • Broadcom
    • CrowdStrike
    • Cybereason
    • Microsoft
    • Palo Alto Networks
    • Sophos
    • Splunk
    • Trellix
    • Trend Micro
    • Wiz
    Verticals
    • Energy
    • Federal Government
    • Finance
    • Healthcare
    • Higher Education
    • K-12 Education
    • Manufacturing
    • Retail
    • State and Local Government
  • Services
    Managed Services
    • Managed Services Overview
      Wayfinder Threat Detection & Response
    • Threat Hunting
      World-Class Expertise and Threat Intelligence
    • Managed Detection & Response
      24/7/365 Expert MDR Across Your Entire Environment
    • Incident Readiness & Response
      DFIR, Breach Readiness, & Compromise Assessments
    Support, Deployment, & Health
    • Technical Account Management
      Customer Success with Personalized Service
    • SentinelOne GO
      Guided Onboarding & Deployment Advisory
    • SentinelOne University
      Live and On-Demand Training
    • Services Overview
      Comprehensive Solutions for Seamless Security Operations
    • SentinelOne Community
      Community Login
  • Partners
    Our Network
    • MSSP Partners
      Succeed Faster with SentinelOne
    • Singularity Marketplace
      Extend the Power of S1 Technology
    • Cyber Risk Partners
      Enlist Pro Response and Advisory Teams
    • Technology Alliances
      Integrated, Enterprise-Scale Solutions
    • SentinelOne for AWS
      Hosted in AWS Regions Around the World
    • Channel Partners
      Deliver the Right Solutions, Together
    • SentinelOne for Google Cloud
      Unified, Autonomous Security Giving Defenders the Advantage at Global Scale
    • Partner Locator
      Your Go-to Source for Our Top Partners in Your Region
    Partner Portal→
  • Resources
    Resource Center
    • Case Studies
    • Data Sheets
    • eBooks
    • Reports
    • Videos
    • Webinars
    • Whitepapers
    • Events
    View All Resources→
    Blog
    • Feature Spotlight
    • For CISO/CIO
    • From the Front Lines
    • Identity
    • Cloud
    • macOS
    • SentinelOne Blog
    Blog→
    Tech Resources
    • SentinelLABS
    • Ransomware Anthology
    • Cybersecurity 101
  • About
    About SentinelOne
    • About SentinelOne
      The Industry Leader in Cybersecurity
    • Investor Relations
      Financial Information & Events
    • SentinelLABS
      Threat Research for the Modern Threat Hunter
    • Careers
      The Latest Job Opportunities
    • Press & News
      Company Announcements
    • Cybersecurity Blog
      The Latest Cybersecurity Threats, News, & More
    • FAQ
      Get Answers to Our Most Frequently Asked Questions
    • DataSet
      The Live Data Platform
    • S Foundation
      Securing a Safer Future for All
    • S Ventures
      Investing in the Next Generation of Security, Data and AI
  • Pricing
Get StartedContact Us
CVE Vulnerability Database
Vulnerability Database/CVE-2026-34520

CVE-2026-34520: AIOHTTP Information Disclosure Flaw

CVE-2026-34520 is an information disclosure vulnerability in AIOHTTP where the C parser accepts null bytes and control characters in response headers. This article covers technical details, affected versions, and mitigations.

Published: April 2, 2026

CVE-2026-34520 Overview

AIOHTTP is an asynchronous HTTP client/server framework for asyncio and Python. Prior to version 3.13.4, the C parser (the default for most installs) accepted null bytes and control characters in response headers. This HTTP Response Splitting vulnerability (CWE-113) could allow attackers to inject malicious content into HTTP responses by exploiting improper validation of header values.

Critical Impact

Applications using AIOHTTP versions prior to 3.13.4 may be vulnerable to HTTP response header injection attacks where control characters and null bytes are improperly accepted, potentially enabling cache poisoning or cross-site scripting scenarios.

Affected Products

  • AIOHTTP versions prior to 3.13.4
  • Python applications using the AIOHTTP C parser (default installation)
  • asyncio-based HTTP client/server implementations using vulnerable AIOHTTP versions

Discovery Timeline

  • 2026-04-01 - CVE CVE-2026-34520 published to NVD
  • 2026-04-01 - Last updated in NVD database

Technical Details for CVE-2026-34520

Vulnerability Analysis

This vulnerability stems from insufficient input validation in AIOHTTP's C parser when processing HTTP response headers. The parser failed to reject null bytes (\\x00) and various control characters (ASCII codes 0x00-0x08, 0x0a-0x1f, and 0x7f) in header field values, violating RFC 9110 Section 5.5 specifications for field-value character requirements.

HTTP Response Splitting (CWE-113) vulnerabilities occur when applications allow untrusted data to be included in HTTP response headers without proper sanitization. In this case, an attacker-controlled server or man-in-the-middle could inject malformed headers containing forbidden control characters, potentially leading to header injection attacks or response manipulation.

Root Cause

The root cause lies in the C parser's character validation routine for HTTP header values. The original implementation did not enforce RFC 9110 Section 5.5 requirements, which explicitly forbid certain control characters in field-values. The parser accepted a broader range of characters than permitted by the HTTP specification, creating an injection vector.

Attack Vector

This vulnerability is exploitable over the network without authentication or user interaction. An attacker could exploit this by:

  1. Operating a malicious HTTP server that sends responses with forbidden control characters in headers
  2. Performing a man-in-the-middle attack to inject malformed headers into HTTP responses
  3. Exploiting downstream processing that relies on header integrity for security decisions

The attack could potentially enable cache poisoning, session fixation, or cross-site scripting depending on how the application processes the malformed headers.

python
# Security patch in aiohttp/http_parser.py - [PR #12231/7043bc56 backport][3.13] Adjust header value character checks to RFC
 #     token = 1*tchar
 _TCHAR_SPECIALS: Final[str] = re.escape("!#$%&'*+-.^_`|~")
TOKENRE: Final[Pattern[str]] = re.compile(f"[0-9A-Za-z{_TCHAR_SPECIALS}]+")
+# https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9110#section-5.5-5
+_FIELD_VALUE_FORBIDDEN_CTL_RE: Final[Pattern[str]] = re.compile(
+    r"[\\x00-\\x08\\x0a-\\x1f\\x7f]"
+)
VERSRE: Final[Pattern[str]] = re.compile(r"HTTP/(\d)\.(\d)", re.ASCII)
DIGITS: Final[Pattern[str]] = re.compile(r"\d+", re.ASCII)
HEXDIGITS: Final[Pattern[bytes]] = re.compile(rb"[0-9a-fA-F]+")

Source: GitHub Commit 9370b97

The patch adds a new regular expression _FIELD_VALUE_FORBIDDEN_CTL_RE that matches forbidden control characters as specified in RFC 9110 Section 5.5-5, enabling proper rejection of malformed header values.

Detection Methods for CVE-2026-34520

Indicators of Compromise

  • HTTP responses containing null bytes (\\x00) or control characters in header values
  • Unusual header parsing errors or exceptions in application logs
  • Evidence of header injection attempts in web server or proxy logs

Detection Strategies

  • Monitor for anomalous HTTP traffic patterns containing control characters in header fields
  • Implement network-level inspection for RFC-violating HTTP responses
  • Review application logs for unexpected header parsing behavior or exceptions
  • Deploy intrusion detection rules that flag responses with forbidden control sequences

Monitoring Recommendations

  • Enable verbose logging for HTTP client operations to capture header processing details
  • Implement alerting for HTTP response parsing exceptions in production environments
  • Monitor for cache poisoning indicators such as unexpected cache entries or stale content
  • Review proxy and CDN logs for evidence of response manipulation

How to Mitigate CVE-2026-34520

Immediate Actions Required

  • Upgrade AIOHTTP to version 3.13.4 or later immediately
  • Audit applications for direct exposure to untrusted HTTP servers
  • Review proxy and gateway configurations to ensure header validation is enabled
  • Implement network-level filtering for malformed HTTP responses where possible

Patch Information

The vulnerability has been patched in AIOHTTP version 3.13.4. The fix implements proper RFC 9110 compliance by adding validation that rejects header values containing forbidden control characters (null bytes and ASCII control codes). Organizations should upgrade to 3.13.4 or later to remediate this vulnerability.

For detailed patch information, see the GitHub Security Advisory GHSA-63hf-3vf5-4wqf and the version 3.13.4 release notes.

Workarounds

  • Use the pure Python parser instead of the C parser if immediate patching is not possible
  • Implement an upstream proxy or WAF that validates HTTP response headers before forwarding
  • Restrict application connectivity to trusted HTTP endpoints only
  • Apply network segmentation to limit exposure to potentially malicious servers
bash
# Upgrade AIOHTTP to patched version
pip install --upgrade aiohttp>=3.13.4

# Verify installed version
pip show aiohttp | grep Version

Disclaimer: This content was generated using AI. While we strive for accuracy, please verify critical information with official sources.

  • Vulnerability Details
  • TypeInformation Disclosure

  • Vendor/TechAiohttp

  • SeverityLOW

  • CVSS Score2.7

  • EPSS Probability0.04%

  • Known ExploitedNo
  • CVSS Vector
  • CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
  • Impact Assessment
  • ConfidentialityLow
  • IntegrityNone
  • AvailabilityNone
  • CWE References
  • CWE-113
  • Technical References
  • GitHub Commit Change

  • GitHub Release v3.13.4

  • GitHub Security Advisory GHSA-63hf-3vf5-4wqf
  • Related CVEs
  • CVE-2026-34518: AIOHTTP Information Disclosure Flaw

  • CVE-2026-34515: AIOHTTP Information Disclosure Vulnerability

  • CVE-2026-34525: AIOHTTP Multiple Host Headers Vulnerability

  • CVE-2026-34519: AIOHTTP XSS Vulnerability
Experience the World’s Most Advanced Cybersecurity Platform

Experience the World’s Most Advanced Cybersecurity Platform

See how our intelligent, autonomous cybersecurity platform can protect your organization now and into the future.

Try SentinelOne
  • Get Started
  • Get a Demo
  • Product Tour
  • Why SentinelOne
  • Pricing & Packaging
  • FAQ
  • Contact
  • Contact Us
  • Customer Support
  • SentinelOne Status
  • Language
  • Platform
  • Singularity Platform
  • Singularity Endpoint
  • Singularity Cloud
  • Singularity AI-SIEM
  • Singularity Identity
  • Singularity Marketplace
  • Purple AI
  • Services
  • Wayfinder TDR
  • SentinelOne GO
  • Technical Account Management
  • Support Services
  • Verticals
  • Energy
  • Federal Government
  • Finance
  • Healthcare
  • Higher Education
  • K-12 Education
  • Manufacturing
  • Retail
  • State and Local Government
  • Cybersecurity for SMB
  • Resources
  • Blog
  • Labs
  • Case Studies
  • Videos
  • Product Tours
  • Events
  • Cybersecurity 101
  • eBooks
  • Webinars
  • Whitepapers
  • Press
  • News
  • Ransomware Anthology
  • Company
  • About Us
  • Our Customers
  • Careers
  • Partners
  • Legal & Compliance
  • Security & Compliance
  • Investor Relations
  • S Foundation
  • S Ventures

©2026 SentinelOne, All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Notice Terms of Use

English