The SentinelOne Annual Threat Report - A Defenders Guide from the FrontlinesThe SentinelOne Annual Threat ReportGet the Report
Experiencing a Breach?Blog
Get StartedContact Us
SentinelOne
  • Platform
    Platform Overview
    • Singularity Platform
      Welcome to Integrated Enterprise Security
    • AI for Security
      Leading the Way in AI-Powered Security Solutions
    • Securing AI
      Accelerate AI Adoption with Secure AI Tools, Apps, and Agents.
    • How It Works
      The Singularity XDR Difference
    • Singularity Marketplace
      One-Click Integrations to Unlock the Power of XDR
    • Pricing & Packaging
      Comparisons and Guidance at a Glance
    Data & AI
    • Purple AI
      Accelerate SecOps with Generative AI
    • Singularity Hyperautomation
      Easily Automate Security Processes
    • AI-SIEM
      The AI SIEM for the Autonomous SOC
    • Singularity Data Lake
      AI-Powered, Unified Data Lake
    • Singularity Data Lake for Log Analytics
      Seamlessly Ingest Data from On-Prem, Cloud or Hybrid Environments
    Endpoint Security
    • Singularity Endpoint
      Autonomous Prevention, Detection, and Response
    • Singularity XDR
      Native & Open Protection, Detection, and Response
    • Singularity RemoteOps Forensics
      Orchestrate Forensics at Scale
    • Singularity Threat Intelligence
      Comprehensive Adversary Intelligence
    • Singularity Vulnerability Management
      Application & OS Vulnerability Management
    • Singularity Identity
      Identity Threat Detection and Response
    Cloud Security
    • Singularity Cloud Security
      Block Attacks with an AI-Powered CNAPP
    • Singularity Cloud Native Security
      Secure Cloud and Development Resources
    • Singularity Cloud Workload Security
      Real-Time Cloud Workload Protection Platform
    • Singularity Cloud Data Security
      AI-Powered Threat Detection for Cloud Storage
    • Singularity Cloud Security Posture Management
      Detect and Remediate Cloud Misconfigurations
    Securing AI
    • Prompt Security
      Secure AI Tools Across Your Enterprise
  • Why SentinelOne?
    Why SentinelOne?
    • Why SentinelOne?
      Cybersecurity Built for What’s Next
    • Our Customers
      Trusted by the World’s Leading Enterprises
    • Industry Recognition
      Tested and Proven by the Experts
    • About Us
      The Industry Leader in Autonomous Cybersecurity
    Compare SentinelOne
    • Arctic Wolf
    • Broadcom
    • CrowdStrike
    • Cybereason
    • Microsoft
    • Palo Alto Networks
    • Sophos
    • Splunk
    • Trellix
    • Trend Micro
    • Wiz
    Verticals
    • Energy
    • Federal Government
    • Finance
    • Healthcare
    • Higher Education
    • K-12 Education
    • Manufacturing
    • Retail
    • State and Local Government
  • Services
    Managed Services
    • Managed Services Overview
      Wayfinder Threat Detection & Response
    • Threat Hunting
      World-Class Expertise and Threat Intelligence
    • Managed Detection & Response
      24/7/365 Expert MDR Across Your Entire Environment
    • Incident Readiness & Response
      DFIR, Breach Readiness, & Compromise Assessments
    Support, Deployment, & Health
    • Technical Account Management
      Customer Success with Personalized Service
    • SentinelOne GO
      Guided Onboarding & Deployment Advisory
    • SentinelOne University
      Live and On-Demand Training
    • Services Overview
      Comprehensive Solutions for Seamless Security Operations
    • SentinelOne Community
      Community Login
  • Partners
    Our Network
    • MSSP Partners
      Succeed Faster with SentinelOne
    • Singularity Marketplace
      Extend the Power of S1 Technology
    • Cyber Risk Partners
      Enlist Pro Response and Advisory Teams
    • Technology Alliances
      Integrated, Enterprise-Scale Solutions
    • SentinelOne for AWS
      Hosted in AWS Regions Around the World
    • Channel Partners
      Deliver the Right Solutions, Together
    • SentinelOne for Google Cloud
      Unified, Autonomous Security Giving Defenders the Advantage at Global Scale
    • Partner Locator
      Your Go-to Source for Our Top Partners in Your Region
    Partner Portal→
  • Resources
    Resource Center
    • Case Studies
    • Data Sheets
    • eBooks
    • Reports
    • Videos
    • Webinars
    • Whitepapers
    • Events
    View All Resources→
    Blog
    • Feature Spotlight
    • For CISO/CIO
    • From the Front Lines
    • Identity
    • Cloud
    • macOS
    • SentinelOne Blog
    Blog→
    Tech Resources
    • SentinelLABS
    • Ransomware Anthology
    • Cybersecurity 101
  • About
    About SentinelOne
    • About SentinelOne
      The Industry Leader in Cybersecurity
    • Investor Relations
      Financial Information & Events
    • SentinelLABS
      Threat Research for the Modern Threat Hunter
    • Careers
      The Latest Job Opportunities
    • Press & News
      Company Announcements
    • Cybersecurity Blog
      The Latest Cybersecurity Threats, News, & More
    • FAQ
      Get Answers to Our Most Frequently Asked Questions
    • DataSet
      The Live Data Platform
    • S Foundation
      Securing a Safer Future for All
    • S Ventures
      Investing in the Next Generation of Security, Data and AI
  • Pricing
Get StartedContact Us
CVE Vulnerability Database
Vulnerability Database/CVE-2026-33515

CVE-2026-33515: Squid Information Disclosure Vulnerability

CVE-2026-33515 is an information disclosure flaw in Squid caching proxy that exposes memory through improper ICP traffic handling. This post covers the technical details, affected versions, impact, and mitigation steps.

Published: March 27, 2026

CVE-2026-33515 Overview

CVE-2026-33515 is an out-of-bounds read vulnerability in Squid, a widely-used caching proxy for the Web. Prior to version 7.5, improper input validation when handling Internet Cache Protocol (ICP) traffic allows a remote attacker to trigger memory reads beyond intended boundaries. This vulnerability can result in the disclosure of small amounts of memory that may contain sensitive information when the proxy responds with errors to malformed ICP requests.

The vulnerability is limited to Squid deployments that explicitly enable ICP support by configuring a non-zero icp_port value. Importantly, this issue cannot be mitigated through icp_access denial rules, making patching the primary remediation strategy.

Critical Impact

Remote attackers can extract sensitive memory contents from vulnerable Squid proxy servers by sending crafted ICP requests, potentially exposing configuration data, cached credentials, or other sensitive information in memory.

Affected Products

  • Squid versions prior to 7.5
  • Squid deployments with ICP support enabled (icp_port configured to non-zero value)
  • All platforms running vulnerable Squid versions with ICP functionality

Discovery Timeline

  • March 26, 2026 - CVE-2026-33515 published to NVD
  • March 26, 2026 - Last updated in NVD database

Technical Details for CVE-2026-33515

Vulnerability Analysis

This vulnerability stems from CWE-125 (Out-of-Bounds Read), where Squid fails to properly validate the size and boundaries of ICP packet data before processing. When handling ICP traffic, the proxy server does not adequately verify that URL data and packet sizes are within expected bounds, allowing memory to be read beyond the allocated buffer.

The flaw is particularly concerning because ICP is designed for inter-cache communication, and many organizations may have this protocol enabled for legitimate caching hierarchy purposes. The attack requires network access to the ICP port (typically UDP port 3130) but does not require authentication or user interaction, making it exploitable by any network-reachable attacker.

Root Cause

The root cause lies in insufficient validation of ICP packet sizes and URL extraction routines. The original implementation failed to ensure that URL data extracted from raw packet buffers was properly bounds-checked before being processed. The icpGetRequest function and related URL extraction logic did not validate that the packet contained sufficient data before reading, leading to potential out-of-bounds memory access.

Attack Vector

An attacker with network access to a vulnerable Squid server's ICP port can exploit this vulnerability by:

  1. Sending malformed ICP requests with invalid packet sizes or malformed URL data
  2. Triggering the out-of-bounds read condition when Squid attempts to process the invalid request
  3. Receiving error responses that may contain leaked memory contents
  4. Repeating the attack to potentially extract additional sensitive information

The attack is network-based and can be executed remotely without authentication, targeting the ICP UDP port configured on vulnerable Squid instances.

c
// Security patch - ICP URL extraction validation improvement
// Source: https://github.com/squid-cache/squid/commit/8138e909d2058d4401e0ad49b583afaec912b165

 extern Comm::ConnectionPointer icpOutgoingConn;
 extern Ip::Address theIcpPublicHostID;
 
+/// A URI extracted from the given raw packet buffer.
+/// On errors, details the problem and returns nil.
+const char *icpGetUrl(const Ip::Address &from, const char *, const icp_common_t &);
+
 /// \ingroup ServerProtocolICPAPI
-HttpRequest* icpGetRequest(char *url, int reqnum, int fd, Ip::Address &from);
+HttpRequest *icpGetRequest(const char *url, int reqnum, int fd, const Ip::Address &from);
 
 /// \ingroup ServerProtocolICPAPI
 bool icpAccessAllowed(Ip::Address &from, HttpRequest * icp_request);

The patch introduces a new icpGetUrl function that properly validates packet buffer contents and returns nil on errors, preventing out-of-bounds reads. Additionally, parameter types were changed to const to improve memory safety.

Detection Methods for CVE-2026-33515

Indicators of Compromise

  • Unusual volume of ICP traffic on UDP port 3130 or configured icp_port
  • Malformed ICP packets with abnormal sizes in network captures
  • ICP error responses containing unexpected data patterns
  • Multiple ICP requests from external or unauthorized IP addresses
  • Squid error logs indicating ICP parsing failures or memory access issues

Detection Strategies

  • Deploy network intrusion detection rules to monitor for malformed ICP packets with size mismatches
  • Implement traffic analysis to identify reconnaissance patterns targeting the ICP port
  • Monitor Squid access logs for unusual ICP query patterns from untrusted sources
  • Use memory monitoring tools to detect abnormal memory access patterns in the Squid process

Monitoring Recommendations

  • Enable verbose ICP logging in Squid configuration for forensic analysis
  • Configure firewall logging for all ICP port traffic to track potential exploitation attempts
  • Implement SIEM rules to correlate ICP traffic anomalies with known attack signatures
  • Establish baseline ICP traffic patterns to identify deviations indicative of exploitation

How to Mitigate CVE-2026-33515

Immediate Actions Required

  • Upgrade Squid to version 7.5 or later immediately
  • If immediate patching is not possible, disable ICP support by setting icp_port 0 in squid.conf
  • Restrict network access to the ICP port using firewall rules to trusted cache peers only
  • Audit current ICP configuration and determine if the feature is operationally required
  • Review network logs for signs of prior exploitation attempts

Patch Information

The vulnerability is addressed in Squid version 7.5. The fix implements proper validation of ICP packet sizes and URL extraction to prevent out-of-bounds memory reads. The patch was developed through Pull Request #2220 and the specific code changes can be reviewed in commit 8138e909.

For detailed vulnerability information, refer to the GitHub Security Advisory GHSA-84p4-hcx7-jj7c and the Openwall OSS-Security Discussion.

Workarounds

  • Disable ICP entirely by setting icp_port 0 in Squid configuration (note: icp_access rules do NOT mitigate this vulnerability)
  • Implement network-level firewall rules to block external ICP traffic to the Squid server
  • Isolate Squid proxies that require ICP in a segmented network with strict access controls
  • Consider alternative cache peering mechanisms that do not rely on ICP if the feature can be deprecated
bash
# Configuration example - Disable ICP in squid.conf
# This is the recommended workaround if patching is not immediately possible

# Disable ICP port (default is 3130)
icp_port 0

# Note: icp_access rules do NOT mitigate CVE-2026-33515
# The vulnerability is exploited before access control checks are performed

# If ICP is required, restrict access at the firewall level
# Example iptables rule to block external ICP traffic:
# iptables -A INPUT -p udp --dport 3130 -s ! 10.0.0.0/8 -j DROP

# Restart Squid to apply configuration changes
# systemctl restart squid

Disclaimer: This content was generated using AI. While we strive for accuracy, please verify critical information with official sources.

  • Vulnerability Details
  • TypeInformation Disclosure

  • Vendor/TechSquid

  • SeverityMEDIUM

  • CVSS Score6.9

  • EPSS Probability0.96%

  • Known ExploitedNo
  • CVSS Vector
  • CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
  • Impact Assessment
  • ConfidentialityLow
  • IntegrityNone
  • AvailabilityNone
  • CWE References
  • CWE-125
  • Technical References
  • GitHub Commit Change

  • GitHub Pull Request #2220

  • GitHub Pull Request Discussion

  • GitHub Security Advisory GHSA-84p4-hcx7-jj7c

  • Openwall OSS-Security Discussion
  • Related CVEs
  • CVE-2025-62168: Squid Caching Proxy Info Disclosure Flaw

  • CVE-2022-41318: Squid-cache Information Disclosure Flaw

  • CVE-2022-41317: Squid-cache Information Disclosure Flaw

  • CVE-2021-28116: Squid-cache Information Disclosure Flaw
Experience the World’s Most Advanced Cybersecurity Platform

Experience the World’s Most Advanced Cybersecurity Platform

See how our intelligent, autonomous cybersecurity platform can protect your organization now and into the future.

Try SentinelOne
  • Get Started
  • Get a Demo
  • Product Tour
  • Why SentinelOne
  • Pricing & Packaging
  • FAQ
  • Contact
  • Contact Us
  • Customer Support
  • SentinelOne Status
  • Language
  • Platform
  • Singularity Platform
  • Singularity Endpoint
  • Singularity Cloud
  • Singularity AI-SIEM
  • Singularity Identity
  • Singularity Marketplace
  • Purple AI
  • Services
  • Wayfinder TDR
  • SentinelOne GO
  • Technical Account Management
  • Support Services
  • Verticals
  • Energy
  • Federal Government
  • Finance
  • Healthcare
  • Higher Education
  • K-12 Education
  • Manufacturing
  • Retail
  • State and Local Government
  • Cybersecurity for SMB
  • Resources
  • Blog
  • Labs
  • Case Studies
  • Videos
  • Product Tours
  • Events
  • Cybersecurity 101
  • eBooks
  • Webinars
  • Whitepapers
  • Press
  • News
  • Ransomware Anthology
  • Company
  • About Us
  • Our Customers
  • Careers
  • Partners
  • Legal & Compliance
  • Security & Compliance
  • Investor Relations
  • S Foundation
  • S Ventures

©2026 SentinelOne, All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Notice Terms of Use

English