The SentinelOne Annual Threat Report - A Defenders Guide from the FrontlinesThe SentinelOne Annual Threat ReportGet the Report
Experiencing a Breach?Blog
Get StartedContact Us
SentinelOne
  • Platform
    Platform Overview
    • Singularity Platform
      Welcome to Integrated Enterprise Security
    • AI for Security
      Leading the Way in AI-Powered Security Solutions
    • Securing AI
      Accelerate AI Adoption with Secure AI Tools, Apps, and Agents.
    • How It Works
      The Singularity XDR Difference
    • Singularity Marketplace
      One-Click Integrations to Unlock the Power of XDR
    • Pricing & Packaging
      Comparisons and Guidance at a Glance
    Data & AI
    • Purple AI
      Accelerate SecOps with Generative AI
    • Singularity Hyperautomation
      Easily Automate Security Processes
    • AI-SIEM
      The AI SIEM for the Autonomous SOC
    • Singularity Data Lake
      AI-Powered, Unified Data Lake
    • Singularity Data Lake for Log Analytics
      Seamlessly Ingest Data from On-Prem, Cloud or Hybrid Environments
    Endpoint Security
    • Singularity Endpoint
      Autonomous Prevention, Detection, and Response
    • Singularity XDR
      Native & Open Protection, Detection, and Response
    • Singularity RemoteOps Forensics
      Orchestrate Forensics at Scale
    • Singularity Threat Intelligence
      Comprehensive Adversary Intelligence
    • Singularity Vulnerability Management
      Application & OS Vulnerability Management
    • Singularity Identity
      Identity Threat Detection and Response
    Cloud Security
    • Singularity Cloud Security
      Block Attacks with an AI-Powered CNAPP
    • Singularity Cloud Native Security
      Secure Cloud and Development Resources
    • Singularity Cloud Workload Security
      Real-Time Cloud Workload Protection Platform
    • Singularity Cloud Data Security
      AI-Powered Threat Detection for Cloud Storage
    • Singularity Cloud Security Posture Management
      Detect and Remediate Cloud Misconfigurations
    Securing AI
    • Prompt Security
      Secure AI Tools Across Your Enterprise
  • Why SentinelOne?
    Why SentinelOne?
    • Why SentinelOne?
      Cybersecurity Built for What’s Next
    • Our Customers
      Trusted by the World’s Leading Enterprises
    • Industry Recognition
      Tested and Proven by the Experts
    • About Us
      The Industry Leader in Autonomous Cybersecurity
    Compare SentinelOne
    • Arctic Wolf
    • Broadcom
    • CrowdStrike
    • Cybereason
    • Microsoft
    • Palo Alto Networks
    • Sophos
    • Splunk
    • Trellix
    • Trend Micro
    • Wiz
    Verticals
    • Energy
    • Federal Government
    • Finance
    • Healthcare
    • Higher Education
    • K-12 Education
    • Manufacturing
    • Retail
    • State and Local Government
  • Services
    Managed Services
    • Managed Services Overview
      Wayfinder Threat Detection & Response
    • Threat Hunting
      World-Class Expertise and Threat Intelligence
    • Managed Detection & Response
      24/7/365 Expert MDR Across Your Entire Environment
    • Incident Readiness & Response
      DFIR, Breach Readiness, & Compromise Assessments
    Support, Deployment, & Health
    • Technical Account Management
      Customer Success with Personalized Service
    • SentinelOne GO
      Guided Onboarding & Deployment Advisory
    • SentinelOne University
      Live and On-Demand Training
    • Services Overview
      Comprehensive Solutions for Seamless Security Operations
    • SentinelOne Community
      Community Login
  • Partners
    Our Network
    • MSSP Partners
      Succeed Faster with SentinelOne
    • Singularity Marketplace
      Extend the Power of S1 Technology
    • Cyber Risk Partners
      Enlist Pro Response and Advisory Teams
    • Technology Alliances
      Integrated, Enterprise-Scale Solutions
    • SentinelOne for AWS
      Hosted in AWS Regions Around the World
    • Channel Partners
      Deliver the Right Solutions, Together
    • SentinelOne for Google Cloud
      Unified, Autonomous Security Giving Defenders the Advantage at Global Scale
    • Partner Locator
      Your Go-to Source for Our Top Partners in Your Region
    Partner Portal→
  • Resources
    Resource Center
    • Case Studies
    • Data Sheets
    • eBooks
    • Reports
    • Videos
    • Webinars
    • Whitepapers
    • Events
    View All Resources→
    Blog
    • Feature Spotlight
    • For CISO/CIO
    • From the Front Lines
    • Identity
    • Cloud
    • macOS
    • SentinelOne Blog
    Blog→
    Tech Resources
    • SentinelLABS
    • Ransomware Anthology
    • Cybersecurity 101
  • About
    About SentinelOne
    • About SentinelOne
      The Industry Leader in Cybersecurity
    • Investor Relations
      Financial Information & Events
    • SentinelLABS
      Threat Research for the Modern Threat Hunter
    • Careers
      The Latest Job Opportunities
    • Press & News
      Company Announcements
    • Cybersecurity Blog
      The Latest Cybersecurity Threats, News, & More
    • FAQ
      Get Answers to Our Most Frequently Asked Questions
    • DataSet
      The Live Data Platform
    • S Foundation
      Securing a Safer Future for All
    • S Ventures
      Investing in the Next Generation of Security, Data and AI
  • Pricing
Get StartedContact Us
CVE Vulnerability Database
Vulnerability Database/CVE-2026-2673

CVE-2026-2673: OpenSSL TLS 1.3 Key Exchange Vulnerability

CVE-2026-2673 is a key exchange negotiation flaw in OpenSSL TLS 1.3 servers that may cause less preferred groups to be used when DEFAULT keyword is configured. This article covers technical details, affected versions, and mitigation.

Published: March 20, 2026

CVE-2026-2673 Overview

CVE-2026-2673 is a cryptographic vulnerability in OpenSSL affecting TLS 1.3 server implementations. When a server's key exchange group configuration includes the DEFAULT keyword to incorporate the built-in default group list, an implementation defect causes the DEFAULT list to lose its "tuple" structure. This results in all server-supported groups being treated as a single sufficiently secure tuple, preventing the server from sending a Hello Retry Request (HRR) when a more preferred group from a higher security tuple is mutually supported by both client and server.

This vulnerability is particularly significant in the context of post-quantum cryptography adoption, as it may cause TLS 1.3 connections to fail to negotiate stronger hybrid post-quantum key agreement groups like X25519MLKEM768, instead falling back to classical groups such as X25519.

Critical Impact

TLS 1.3 connections may negotiate weaker key exchange groups than intended, potentially impacting cryptographic strength of encrypted communications and undermining post-quantum security preparations.

Affected Products

  • OpenSSL 3.6 (prior to 3.6.2)
  • OpenSSL 3.5 (prior to 3.5.6)

Discovery Timeline

  • 2026-03-13 - CVE-2026-2673 published to NVD
  • 2026-03-17 - Last updated in NVD database

Technical Details for CVE-2026-2673

Vulnerability Analysis

This vulnerability (CWE-757: Selection of Less-Secure Algorithm During Negotiation) stems from incorrect handling of the TLS 1.3 key exchange group configuration when using the DEFAULT keyword. OpenSSL 3.5 and later introduced a new syntax for managing key agreement groups that partitions them into distinct "tuples" representing roughly equivalent security levels. The server is designed to prefer groups from higher-security tuples and issue Hello Retry Requests when needed to achieve optimal security.

However, when the DEFAULT keyword is used to interpolate the built-in default group list into a custom configuration—whether adding or removing specific elements—the tuple structure is incorrectly flattened. This causes the server to treat all supported groups as belonging to the same security tier, eliminating the preference hierarchy and bypassing the HRR mechanism entirely.

The practical impact is that clients predicting only classical keyshares (such as X25519) in their initial ClientHello will not be prompted to retry with stronger post-quantum hybrid groups, even when both parties support them.

Root Cause

The root cause lies in the parsing and interpolation logic for the DEFAULT keyword within OpenSSL's key exchange group configuration handler. When the default list is expanded inline, the metadata indicating tuple boundaries is lost, causing all groups to be treated as equally preferred from a security standpoint. This implementation defect affects only configurations that use DEFAULT to customize the group list while retaining portions of the built-in defaults.

Attack Vector

The vulnerability is network-accessible and requires no authentication or user interaction. An attacker capable of observing or manipulating TLS handshakes could exploit this weakness in several ways:

  1. Passive Downgrade Observation: Monitoring TLS connections to identify servers susceptible to weaker-than-expected key exchange, potentially harvesting encrypted traffic for future cryptanalysis as quantum computing advances.

  2. Active Downgrade Attack: A network-positioned attacker could craft client connections that deliberately omit post-quantum keyshare predictions, knowing the server won't request a retry, ensuring all connections use classical cryptography.

  3. Long-term Data Harvest: Organizations preparing for post-quantum security may believe their TLS 1.3 deployments are using hybrid key exchange when they are actually falling back to classical algorithms, creating a false sense of security.

The vulnerability does not affect OpenSSL FIPS modules as the relevant code lies outside the FIPS boundary.

Detection Methods for CVE-2026-2673

Indicators of Compromise

  • TLS 1.3 connections consistently using classical key exchange groups (e.g., X25519, secp256r1) despite server and client support for post-quantum hybrid groups
  • Absence of Hello Retry Request (HRR) messages in TLS handshake traces where post-quantum groups should be negotiated
  • OpenSSL configuration files containing the DEFAULT keyword in key exchange group settings

Detection Strategies

  • Audit OpenSSL server configurations for use of the DEFAULT keyword in Groups, SupportedGroups, or similar directives
  • Analyze TLS handshake logs and packet captures to verify negotiated key exchange groups match expected security policies
  • Implement automated scanning to identify OpenSSL versions 3.5.x and 3.6.x in production environments
  • Review server certificates and connection metadata for unexpected fallback to classical-only key exchange

Monitoring Recommendations

  • Deploy network monitoring to track key exchange groups used in TLS 1.3 handshakes across critical infrastructure
  • Configure alerting for TLS connections that fail to negotiate expected post-quantum or hybrid key exchange groups
  • Monitor OpenSSL version deployments and correlate against vulnerability databases for affected versions
  • Implement periodic configuration audits to detect unauthorized or inadvertent use of the DEFAULT keyword

How to Mitigate CVE-2026-2673

Immediate Actions Required

  • Upgrade OpenSSL 3.6.x installations to version 3.6.2 when released
  • Upgrade OpenSSL 3.5.x installations to version 3.5.6 when released
  • Review and modify server configurations to explicitly define key exchange groups rather than using the DEFAULT keyword
  • Prioritize patching for servers handling sensitive data or those deployed as part of post-quantum security initiatives

Patch Information

OpenSSL has released security fixes addressing this vulnerability. The patches restore proper tuple structure handling when the DEFAULT keyword is used in key exchange group configuration.

Detailed patch information is available through the following resources:

  • OpenSSL Security Advisory
  • GitHub OpenSSL Commit 2157c9d
  • GitHub OpenSSL Commit 85977e0
  • OSS-Security Mailing List Disclosure

Note that OpenSSL versions 3.4, 3.3, 3.0, 1.1.1, and 1.0.2 are not affected by this vulnerability.

Workarounds

  • Replace the DEFAULT keyword with an explicit list of key exchange groups in server configuration, preserving the intended tuple structure manually
  • If explicit configuration is not feasible, temporarily use the built-in default group list without customization until patches are applied
  • Consider downgrading to OpenSSL 3.4 or earlier unaffected versions if post-quantum key exchange is not immediately required
  • Implement client-side enforcement of preferred key exchange groups where possible
bash
# Configuration example: Explicit key exchange group configuration (avoiding DEFAULT keyword)
# Instead of: Groups = DEFAULT:-secp521r1
# Use explicit group list with intended tuple structure:
openssl s_server -groups X25519MLKEM768:X25519:secp256r1:secp384r1

Disclaimer: This content was generated using AI. While we strive for accuracy, please verify critical information with official sources.

  • Vulnerability Details
  • TypeInformation Disclosure

  • Vendor/TechOpenssl

  • SeverityHIGH

  • CVSS Score7.5

  • EPSS Probability0.04%

  • Known ExploitedNo
  • CVSS Vector
  • CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
  • Impact Assessment
  • ConfidentialityLow
  • IntegrityNone
  • AvailabilityNone
  • CWE References
  • CWE-757
  • Technical References
  • GitHub OpenSSL Commit

  • GitHub OpenSSL Commit

  • OpenSSL Security Advisory

  • Openwall OSS-Security Post
  • Related CVEs
  • CVE-2025-69418: OpenSSL OCB Information Disclosure Flaw

  • CVE-2025-15469: OpenSSL Dgst Data Truncation Vulnerability

  • CVE-2023-5363: OpenSSL Information Disclosure Flaw

  • CVE-2025-9231: OpenSSL SM2 Timing Attack Vulnerability
Experience the World’s Most Advanced Cybersecurity Platform

Experience the World’s Most Advanced Cybersecurity Platform

See how our intelligent, autonomous cybersecurity platform can protect your organization now and into the future.

Try SentinelOne
  • Get Started
  • Get a Demo
  • Product Tour
  • Why SentinelOne
  • Pricing & Packaging
  • FAQ
  • Contact
  • Contact Us
  • Customer Support
  • SentinelOne Status
  • Language
  • Platform
  • Singularity Platform
  • Singularity Endpoint
  • Singularity Cloud
  • Singularity AI-SIEM
  • Singularity Identity
  • Singularity Marketplace
  • Purple AI
  • Services
  • Wayfinder TDR
  • SentinelOne GO
  • Technical Account Management
  • Support Services
  • Verticals
  • Energy
  • Federal Government
  • Finance
  • Healthcare
  • Higher Education
  • K-12 Education
  • Manufacturing
  • Retail
  • State and Local Government
  • Cybersecurity for SMB
  • Resources
  • Blog
  • Labs
  • Case Studies
  • Videos
  • Product Tours
  • Events
  • Cybersecurity 101
  • eBooks
  • Webinars
  • Whitepapers
  • Press
  • News
  • Ransomware Anthology
  • Company
  • About Us
  • Our Customers
  • Careers
  • Partners
  • Legal & Compliance
  • Security & Compliance
  • Investor Relations
  • S Foundation
  • S Ventures

©2026 SentinelOne, All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Notice Terms of Use

English