The SentinelOne Annual Threat Report - A Defenders Guide from the FrontlinesThe SentinelOne Annual Threat ReportGet the Report
Experiencing a Breach?Blog
Get StartedContact Us
SentinelOne
  • Platform
    Platform Overview
    • Singularity Platform
      Welcome to Integrated Enterprise Security
    • AI for Security
      Leading the Way in AI-Powered Security Solutions
    • Securing AI
      Accelerate AI Adoption with Secure AI Tools, Apps, and Agents.
    • How It Works
      The Singularity XDR Difference
    • Singularity Marketplace
      One-Click Integrations to Unlock the Power of XDR
    • Pricing & Packaging
      Comparisons and Guidance at a Glance
    Data & AI
    • Purple AI
      Accelerate SecOps with Generative AI
    • Singularity Hyperautomation
      Easily Automate Security Processes
    • AI-SIEM
      The AI SIEM for the Autonomous SOC
    • Singularity Data Lake
      AI-Powered, Unified Data Lake
    • Singularity Data Lake for Log Analytics
      Seamlessly Ingest Data from On-Prem, Cloud or Hybrid Environments
    Endpoint Security
    • Singularity Endpoint
      Autonomous Prevention, Detection, and Response
    • Singularity XDR
      Native & Open Protection, Detection, and Response
    • Singularity RemoteOps Forensics
      Orchestrate Forensics at Scale
    • Singularity Threat Intelligence
      Comprehensive Adversary Intelligence
    • Singularity Vulnerability Management
      Application & OS Vulnerability Management
    • Singularity Identity
      Identity Threat Detection and Response
    Cloud Security
    • Singularity Cloud Security
      Block Attacks with an AI-Powered CNAPP
    • Singularity Cloud Native Security
      Secure Cloud and Development Resources
    • Singularity Cloud Workload Security
      Real-Time Cloud Workload Protection Platform
    • Singularity Cloud Data Security
      AI-Powered Threat Detection for Cloud Storage
    • Singularity Cloud Security Posture Management
      Detect and Remediate Cloud Misconfigurations
    Securing AI
    • Prompt Security
      Secure AI Tools Across Your Enterprise
  • Why SentinelOne?
    Why SentinelOne?
    • Why SentinelOne?
      Cybersecurity Built for What’s Next
    • Our Customers
      Trusted by the World’s Leading Enterprises
    • Industry Recognition
      Tested and Proven by the Experts
    • About Us
      The Industry Leader in Autonomous Cybersecurity
    Compare SentinelOne
    • Arctic Wolf
    • Broadcom
    • CrowdStrike
    • Cybereason
    • Microsoft
    • Palo Alto Networks
    • Sophos
    • Splunk
    • Trellix
    • Trend Micro
    • Wiz
    Verticals
    • Energy
    • Federal Government
    • Finance
    • Healthcare
    • Higher Education
    • K-12 Education
    • Manufacturing
    • Retail
    • State and Local Government
  • Services
    Managed Services
    • Managed Services Overview
      Wayfinder Threat Detection & Response
    • Threat Hunting
      World-Class Expertise and Threat Intelligence
    • Managed Detection & Response
      24/7/365 Expert MDR Across Your Entire Environment
    • Incident Readiness & Response
      DFIR, Breach Readiness, & Compromise Assessments
    Support, Deployment, & Health
    • Technical Account Management
      Customer Success with Personalized Service
    • SentinelOne GO
      Guided Onboarding & Deployment Advisory
    • SentinelOne University
      Live and On-Demand Training
    • Services Overview
      Comprehensive Solutions for Seamless Security Operations
    • SentinelOne Community
      Community Login
  • Partners
    Our Network
    • MSSP Partners
      Succeed Faster with SentinelOne
    • Singularity Marketplace
      Extend the Power of S1 Technology
    • Cyber Risk Partners
      Enlist Pro Response and Advisory Teams
    • Technology Alliances
      Integrated, Enterprise-Scale Solutions
    • SentinelOne for AWS
      Hosted in AWS Regions Around the World
    • Channel Partners
      Deliver the Right Solutions, Together
    • SentinelOne for Google Cloud
      Unified, Autonomous Security Giving Defenders the Advantage at Global Scale
    • Partner Locator
      Your Go-to Source for Our Top Partners in Your Region
    Partner Portal→
  • Resources
    Resource Center
    • Case Studies
    • Data Sheets
    • eBooks
    • Reports
    • Videos
    • Webinars
    • Whitepapers
    • Events
    View All Resources→
    Blog
    • Feature Spotlight
    • For CISO/CIO
    • From the Front Lines
    • Identity
    • Cloud
    • macOS
    • SentinelOne Blog
    Blog→
    Tech Resources
    • SentinelLABS
    • Ransomware Anthology
    • Cybersecurity 101
  • About
    About SentinelOne
    • About SentinelOne
      The Industry Leader in Cybersecurity
    • Investor Relations
      Financial Information & Events
    • SentinelLABS
      Threat Research for the Modern Threat Hunter
    • Careers
      The Latest Job Opportunities
    • Press & News
      Company Announcements
    • Cybersecurity Blog
      The Latest Cybersecurity Threats, News, & More
    • FAQ
      Get Answers to Our Most Frequently Asked Questions
    • DataSet
      The Live Data Platform
    • S Foundation
      Securing a Safer Future for All
    • S Ventures
      Investing in the Next Generation of Security, Data and AI
  • Pricing
Get StartedContact Us
CVE Vulnerability Database
Vulnerability Database/CVE-2026-23465

CVE-2026-23465: Linux Kernel Btrfs Logging Vulnerability

CVE-2026-23465 is an information disclosure vulnerability in the Linux kernel's btrfs filesystem that causes missing directory entries after power failures. This article covers technical details, affected versions, and mitigation.

Published: April 10, 2026

CVE-2026-23465 Overview

A vulnerability has been identified in the Linux kernel's Btrfs filesystem implementation where directory entries (dentries) are not properly logged when handling the parent directory of a conflicting inode. When the parent directory of a conflicting inode is logged, new dentries are not being recorded, leaving the parent directory's inode marked as logged without its new dentries. This can result in data loss after power failures, as explicitly fsynced directories may not have their new entries persisted to disk.

Critical Impact

After a power failure, newly created directory entries may be missing following log replay, potentially causing data loss and filesystem inconsistencies on systems using Btrfs.

Affected Products

  • Linux Kernel (Btrfs filesystem component)
  • Systems using Btrfs filesystem with fsync operations

Discovery Timeline

  • 2026-04-03 - CVE CVE-2026-23465 published to NVD
  • 2026-04-07 - Last updated in NVD database

Technical Details for CVE-2026-23465

Vulnerability Analysis

The vulnerability resides in the Btrfs logging mechanism, specifically in how the filesystem handles directory entry logging when a conflicting inode scenario occurs. When a file is created with the same name and parent as a previously deleted directory that was persisted in a past transaction, the deleted directory's inode becomes a "conflicting inode" to the new file's inode.

During an fsync operation on a directory containing such a file, the Btrfs code logs the parent directory because the conflicting inode no longer exists. However, the logging logic fails to include the new dentries of that parent directory. This results in the parent directory being marked as "logged" without actually having its new directory entries recorded in the log.

The consequence is that subsequent fsync operations on the parent directory become no-ops (since the directory is already marked as logged), even though the new dentries were never actually persisted. If a power failure occurs before the next full sync, the log replay will not recreate these missing directory entries, leading to data loss.

Root Cause

The root cause is an incomplete logging operation in the Btrfs filesystem code. When logging the parent directory of a no longer existing conflicting inode, the code path fails to trigger the logging of new directory entries. The logging mechanism marks the parent inode as logged prematurely, before all associated dentries have been committed to the log tree.

Attack Vector

This is a data integrity vulnerability rather than a security exploitation vector in the traditional sense. The conditions for triggering this bug involve:

  1. Creating a directory and syncing it to disk
  2. Removing that directory
  3. Creating new directories and a file with the same name as the deleted directory
  4. Creating a hard link to that file in one of the new directories
  5. Performing fsync on the directory containing the hard link
  6. Performing fsync on the parent directory
  7. Experiencing a power failure before the next full filesystem sync

The scenario occurs naturally during typical filesystem operations and does not require malicious intent to trigger. However, the data loss consequences can be significant for systems relying on Btrfs journaling for data integrity.

Detection Methods for CVE-2026-23465

Indicators of Compromise

  • Missing directories or files after system recovery from unexpected shutdown
  • Btrfs log replay messages in kernel logs indicating incomplete recovery
  • Filesystem inconsistencies detected during btrfs check operations
  • User reports of missing newly created directories after power failures

Detection Strategies

  • Monitor for Btrfs-related errors in kernel logs (dmesg | grep -i btrfs)
  • Implement filesystem integrity checks after unexpected system restarts
  • Review system logs for patterns matching power failure recovery scenarios
  • Track fsync operations on Btrfs filesystems using ftrace or BPF-based monitoring

Monitoring Recommendations

  • Enable Btrfs debugging output for production systems experiencing unexplained data loss
  • Implement regular filesystem consistency checks using btrfs scrub and btrfs check
  • Monitor UPS battery health to minimize unplanned power failure scenarios
  • Consider additional backup strategies for critical data on Btrfs filesystems

How to Mitigate CVE-2026-23465

Immediate Actions Required

  • Update to a patched Linux kernel version that includes the fix
  • For critical systems, consider using sync instead of fsync to ensure full filesystem synchronization
  • Implement proper power failure protection (UPS) for systems using Btrfs
  • Review backup strategies to ensure data integrity

Patch Information

The Linux kernel maintainers have released patches to address this vulnerability. The fix ensures that new directory dentries are properly logged whenever the parent directory of a no longer existing conflicting inode is logged. Multiple commits have been merged to stable kernel branches:

  • Linux Kernel Commit 1cf30c7
  • Linux Kernel Commit 56e72c8
  • Linux Kernel Commit 6f5a519
  • Linux Kernel Commit 9573a36
  • Linux Kernel Commit f556b1e

Workarounds

  • Use sync command or syncfs() system call instead of per-file fsync() for critical directory operations
  • Implement application-level verification of directory contents after fsync operations
  • Consider using alternative filesystems (ext4, XFS) for workloads that heavily rely on fsync semantics
  • Enable Btrfs flushoncommit mount option for enhanced data safety at the cost of performance
bash
# Configuration example - mount with flushoncommit for enhanced safety
mount -o flushoncommit /dev/sda1 /mnt/btrfs

# Alternative: Use full sync instead of fsync in scripts
sync
# Or use syncfs on specific filesystem
python3 -c "import os; os.syncfs(os.open('/mnt/btrfs', os.O_RDONLY))"

Disclaimer: This content was generated using AI. While we strive for accuracy, please verify critical information with official sources.

  • Vulnerability Details
  • TypeInformation Disclosure

  • Vendor/TechLinux Kernel

  • SeverityNONE

  • CVSS ScoreN/A

  • EPSS Probability0.02%

  • Known ExploitedNo
  • Impact Assessment
  • ConfidentialityNone
  • IntegrityNone
  • AvailabilityNone
  • Technical References
  • Linux Kernel Commit 1cf30c7

  • Linux Kernel Commit 56e72c8

  • Linux Kernel Commit 6f5a519

  • Linux Kernel Commit 9573a36

  • Linux Kernel Commit f556b1e
  • Related CVEs
  • CVE-2026-23430: Linux Kernel Memory Leak Vulnerability

  • CVE-2026-23421: Linux Kernel Information Disclosure Flaw

  • CVE-2026-23303: Linux Kernel Information Disclosure Flaw

  • CVE-2026-23370: Linux Kernel Information Disclosure Flaw
Default Legacy - Prefooter | Experience the World’s Most Advanced Cybersecurity Platform

Experience the World’s Most Advanced Cybersecurity Platform

See how our intelligent, autonomous cybersecurity platform can protect your organization now and into the future.

Try SentinelOne
  • Get Started
  • Get a Demo
  • Product Tour
  • Why SentinelOne
  • Pricing & Packaging
  • FAQ
  • Contact
  • Contact Us
  • Customer Support
  • SentinelOne Status
  • Language
  • Platform
  • Singularity Platform
  • Singularity Endpoint
  • Singularity Cloud
  • Singularity AI-SIEM
  • Singularity Identity
  • Singularity Marketplace
  • Purple AI
  • Services
  • Wayfinder TDR
  • SentinelOne GO
  • Technical Account Management
  • Support Services
  • Verticals
  • Energy
  • Federal Government
  • Finance
  • Healthcare
  • Higher Education
  • K-12 Education
  • Manufacturing
  • Retail
  • State and Local Government
  • Cybersecurity for SMB
  • Resources
  • Blog
  • Labs
  • Case Studies
  • Videos
  • Product Tours
  • Events
  • Cybersecurity 101
  • eBooks
  • Webinars
  • Whitepapers
  • Press
  • News
  • Ransomware Anthology
  • Company
  • About Us
  • Our Customers
  • Careers
  • Partners
  • Legal & Compliance
  • Security & Compliance
  • Investor Relations
  • S Foundation
  • S Ventures

©2026 SentinelOne, All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Notice Terms of Use

English