The SentinelOne Annual Threat Report - A Defenders Guide from the FrontlinesThe SentinelOne Annual Threat ReportGet the Report
Experiencing a Breach?Blog
Get StartedContact Us
SentinelOne
  • Platform
    Platform Overview
    • Singularity Platform
      Welcome to Integrated Enterprise Security
    • AI for Security
      Leading the Way in AI-Powered Security Solutions
    • Securing AI
      Accelerate AI Adoption with Secure AI Tools, Apps, and Agents.
    • How It Works
      The Singularity XDR Difference
    • Singularity Marketplace
      One-Click Integrations to Unlock the Power of XDR
    • Pricing & Packaging
      Comparisons and Guidance at a Glance
    Data & AI
    • Purple AI
      Accelerate SecOps with Generative AI
    • Singularity Hyperautomation
      Easily Automate Security Processes
    • AI-SIEM
      The AI SIEM for the Autonomous SOC
    • Singularity Data Lake
      AI-Powered, Unified Data Lake
    • Singularity Data Lake for Log Analytics
      Seamlessly Ingest Data from On-Prem, Cloud or Hybrid Environments
    Endpoint Security
    • Singularity Endpoint
      Autonomous Prevention, Detection, and Response
    • Singularity XDR
      Native & Open Protection, Detection, and Response
    • Singularity RemoteOps Forensics
      Orchestrate Forensics at Scale
    • Singularity Threat Intelligence
      Comprehensive Adversary Intelligence
    • Singularity Vulnerability Management
      Application & OS Vulnerability Management
    • Singularity Identity
      Identity Threat Detection and Response
    Cloud Security
    • Singularity Cloud Security
      Block Attacks with an AI-Powered CNAPP
    • Singularity Cloud Native Security
      Secure Cloud and Development Resources
    • Singularity Cloud Workload Security
      Real-Time Cloud Workload Protection Platform
    • Singularity Cloud Data Security
      AI-Powered Threat Detection for Cloud Storage
    • Singularity Cloud Security Posture Management
      Detect and Remediate Cloud Misconfigurations
    Securing AI
    • Prompt Security
      Secure AI Tools Across Your Enterprise
  • Why SentinelOne?
    Why SentinelOne?
    • Why SentinelOne?
      Cybersecurity Built for What’s Next
    • Our Customers
      Trusted by the World’s Leading Enterprises
    • Industry Recognition
      Tested and Proven by the Experts
    • About Us
      The Industry Leader in Autonomous Cybersecurity
    Compare SentinelOne
    • Arctic Wolf
    • Broadcom
    • CrowdStrike
    • Cybereason
    • Microsoft
    • Palo Alto Networks
    • Sophos
    • Splunk
    • Trellix
    • Trend Micro
    • Wiz
    Verticals
    • Energy
    • Federal Government
    • Finance
    • Healthcare
    • Higher Education
    • K-12 Education
    • Manufacturing
    • Retail
    • State and Local Government
  • Services
    Managed Services
    • Managed Services Overview
      Wayfinder Threat Detection & Response
    • Threat Hunting
      World-Class Expertise and Threat Intelligence
    • Managed Detection & Response
      24/7/365 Expert MDR Across Your Entire Environment
    • Incident Readiness & Response
      DFIR, Breach Readiness, & Compromise Assessments
    Support, Deployment, & Health
    • Technical Account Management
      Customer Success with Personalized Service
    • SentinelOne GO
      Guided Onboarding & Deployment Advisory
    • SentinelOne University
      Live and On-Demand Training
    • Services Overview
      Comprehensive Solutions for Seamless Security Operations
    • SentinelOne Community
      Community Login
  • Partners
    Our Network
    • MSSP Partners
      Succeed Faster with SentinelOne
    • Singularity Marketplace
      Extend the Power of S1 Technology
    • Cyber Risk Partners
      Enlist Pro Response and Advisory Teams
    • Technology Alliances
      Integrated, Enterprise-Scale Solutions
    • SentinelOne for AWS
      Hosted in AWS Regions Around the World
    • Channel Partners
      Deliver the Right Solutions, Together
    • SentinelOne for Google Cloud
      Unified, Autonomous Security Giving Defenders the Advantage at Global Scale
    • Partner Locator
      Your Go-to Source for Our Top Partners in Your Region
    Partner Portal→
  • Resources
    Resource Center
    • Case Studies
    • Data Sheets
    • eBooks
    • Reports
    • Videos
    • Webinars
    • Whitepapers
    • Events
    View All Resources→
    Blog
    • Feature Spotlight
    • For CISO/CIO
    • From the Front Lines
    • Identity
    • Cloud
    • macOS
    • SentinelOne Blog
    Blog→
    Tech Resources
    • SentinelLABS
    • Ransomware Anthology
    • Cybersecurity 101
  • About
    About SentinelOne
    • About SentinelOne
      The Industry Leader in Cybersecurity
    • Investor Relations
      Financial Information & Events
    • SentinelLABS
      Threat Research for the Modern Threat Hunter
    • Careers
      The Latest Job Opportunities
    • Press & News
      Company Announcements
    • Cybersecurity Blog
      The Latest Cybersecurity Threats, News, & More
    • FAQ
      Get Answers to Our Most Frequently Asked Questions
    • DataSet
      The Live Data Platform
    • S Foundation
      Securing a Safer Future for All
    • S Ventures
      Investing in the Next Generation of Security, Data and AI
  • Pricing
Get StartedContact Us
CVE Vulnerability Database
Vulnerability Database/CVE-2025-66199

CVE-2025-66199: OpenSSL TLS 1.3 DoS Vulnerability

CVE-2025-66199 is a denial of service flaw in OpenSSL TLS 1.3 certificate compression that allows attackers to cause excessive memory allocation. This post covers technical details, affected versions, impact, and mitigation.

Published: January 30, 2026

CVE-2025-66199 Overview

CVE-2025-66199 is a resource exhaustion vulnerability in OpenSSL's TLS 1.3 certificate compression implementation. When certificate compression is enabled, a TLS 1.3 connection can be forced to allocate a large buffer (up to approximately 22 MiB) before decompression without checking against the configured certificate size limit. This vulnerability allows an attacker to cause significant per-connection memory allocations and extra CPU work, potentially leading to service degradation or Denial of Service (DoS).

Critical Impact

Attackers can exploit this flaw to cause large per-connection memory allocations (up to ~22 MiB each) followed by handshake failure, potentially exhausting server resources and causing denial of service conditions without authentication.

Affected Products

  • OpenSSL 3.6
  • OpenSSL 3.5
  • OpenSSL 3.4
  • OpenSSL 3.3

Discovery Timeline

  • January 27, 2026 - CVE-2025-66199 published to NVD
  • January 29, 2026 - Last updated in NVD database

Technical Details for CVE-2025-66199

Vulnerability Analysis

This vulnerability affects OpenSSL's handling of TLS 1.3 CompressedCertificate messages. When processing compressed certificates, the peer-supplied uncompressed certificate length from a CompressedCertificate message is used to grow a heap buffer prior to decompression. Critically, this length is not bounded by the max_cert_list setting, which normally constrains certificate message sizes.

The vulnerability manifests in builds where TLS 1.3 certificate compression is compiled in (i.e., without OPENSSL_NO_COMP_ALG) and at least one compression algorithm (brotli, zlib, or zstd) is available, and where the compression extension is negotiated during the TLS handshake. Both clients receiving a server CompressedCertificate and servers in mutual TLS (mTLS) scenarios receiving a client CompressedCertificate are affected. Importantly, servers that do not request client certificates are not vulnerable to client-initiated attacks.

The FIPS modules in OpenSSL 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, and 3.3 are not affected by this issue, as the TLS implementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary. Additionally, OpenSSL 3.0, 1.1.1, and 1.0.2 are not affected.

Root Cause

The root cause is classified as CWE-789 (Memory Allocation with Excessive Size Value). The vulnerability stems from improper validation of the uncompressed certificate length field in CompressedCertificate messages. The code path responsible for buffer allocation uses the peer-provided length value without checking it against the max_cert_list configuration limit, allowing attackers to specify arbitrarily large buffer sizes.

Attack Vector

The attack is conducted over the network during TLS 1.3 handshake negotiation. An attacker can send a malicious CompressedCertificate message with an inflated uncompressed length field, causing the target to allocate excessive memory. The attack requires:

  1. A TLS 1.3 connection where certificate compression is negotiated
  2. At least one compression algorithm (brotli, zlib, or zstd) enabled on the target
  3. For client attacks: A malicious server sending a crafted CompressedCertificate
  4. For server attacks: Mutual TLS configuration where the server requests client certificates

The attack does not result in memory corruption or information disclosure—only resource exhaustion through excessive allocations followed by handshake failure.

Detection Methods for CVE-2025-66199

Indicators of Compromise

  • Unusual spikes in memory consumption on systems running vulnerable OpenSSL versions during TLS handshakes
  • High frequency of TLS 1.3 handshake failures following large memory allocations
  • Abnormal memory allocation patterns in processes handling TLS connections
  • System logs indicating memory pressure or out-of-memory conditions correlated with TLS activity

Detection Strategies

  • Monitor memory usage patterns on TLS-terminating services for sudden per-connection spikes approaching 22 MiB
  • Implement alerting on TLS handshake failure rates exceeding normal baselines
  • Deploy network monitoring to detect anomalous CompressedCertificate message patterns in TLS 1.3 traffic
  • Use endpoint detection tools to identify processes experiencing unusual memory allocation behavior during certificate processing

Monitoring Recommendations

  • Enable detailed logging for TLS handshake events and failures on affected systems
  • Configure memory threshold alerts on systems using OpenSSL 3.3 through 3.6 for TLS termination
  • Track the ratio of successful to failed TLS 1.3 handshakes as a potential attack indicator
  • Review system resource utilization dashboards for correlation between TLS traffic and memory consumption

How to Mitigate CVE-2025-66199

Immediate Actions Required

  • Identify all systems running OpenSSL versions 3.3, 3.4, 3.5, or 3.6 with TLS 1.3 certificate compression enabled
  • Apply the security patches from OpenSSL immediately to affected systems
  • If patching is not immediately possible, disable receiving compressed certificates using the SSL_OP_NO_RX_CERTIFICATE_COMPRESSION option
  • Review mTLS configurations and consider temporarily disabling client certificate requests on vulnerable servers if client authentication is not critical

Patch Information

OpenSSL has released patches addressing this vulnerability. The fixes are available in the following commits:

  • OpenSSL Commit 3ed1f75
  • OpenSSL Commit 6184a4f
  • OpenSSL Commit 895150b
  • OpenSSL Commit 966a247

For complete advisory details, refer to the OpenSSL Security Advisory.

Workarounds

  • Set SSL_OP_NO_RX_CERTIFICATE_COMPRESSION option to disable receiving compressed certificates until patches can be applied
  • If mutual TLS is not required, configure servers to not request client certificates to prevent client-initiated attacks
  • Rebuild OpenSSL with OPENSSL_NO_COMP_ALG to completely disable certificate compression support
  • Implement rate limiting and connection throttling on TLS-terminating services to reduce the impact of exploitation attempts
bash
# Configuration example - Disable receiving compressed certificates in OpenSSL
# Add to your SSL/TLS configuration code:
# SSL_CTX_set_options(ctx, SSL_OP_NO_RX_CERTIFICATE_COMPRESSION);

# For nginx with OpenSSL, ensure you're using patched OpenSSL versions
# Check OpenSSL version:
openssl version

# Verify if certificate compression is compiled in:
openssl list -disabled | grep comp

Disclaimer: This content was generated using AI. While we strive for accuracy, please verify critical information with official sources.

  • Vulnerability Details
  • TypeDOS

  • Vendor/TechOpenssl

  • SeverityMEDIUM

  • CVSS Score5.9

  • EPSS Probability0.02%

  • Known ExploitedNo
  • CVSS Vector
  • CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
  • Impact Assessment
  • ConfidentialityHigh
  • IntegrityNone
  • AvailabilityHigh
  • CWE References
  • CWE-789
  • Technical References
  • GitHub OpenSSL Commit

  • GitHub OpenSSL Commit

  • GitHub OpenSSL Commit

  • GitHub OpenSSL Commit

  • OpenSSL Security Advisory
  • Related CVEs
  • CVE-2026-22795: OpenSSL PKCS#12 Parsing DoS Vulnerability

  • CVE-2025-69421: OpenSSL PKCS#12 DoS Vulnerability

  • CVE-2025-69420: OpenSSL TimeStamp DoS Vulnerability

  • CVE-2026-22796: OpenSSL PKCS#7 Signature DoS Vulnerability
Experience the World’s Most Advanced Cybersecurity Platform

Experience the World’s Most Advanced Cybersecurity Platform

See how our intelligent, autonomous cybersecurity platform can protect your organization now and into the future.

Try SentinelOne
  • Get Started
  • Get a Demo
  • Product Tour
  • Why SentinelOne
  • Pricing & Packaging
  • FAQ
  • Contact
  • Contact Us
  • Customer Support
  • SentinelOne Status
  • Language
  • Platform
  • Singularity Platform
  • Singularity Endpoint
  • Singularity Cloud
  • Singularity AI-SIEM
  • Singularity Identity
  • Singularity Marketplace
  • Purple AI
  • Services
  • Wayfinder TDR
  • SentinelOne GO
  • Technical Account Management
  • Support Services
  • Verticals
  • Energy
  • Federal Government
  • Finance
  • Healthcare
  • Higher Education
  • K-12 Education
  • Manufacturing
  • Retail
  • State and Local Government
  • Cybersecurity for SMB
  • Resources
  • Blog
  • Labs
  • Case Studies
  • Videos
  • Product Tours
  • Events
  • Cybersecurity 101
  • eBooks
  • Webinars
  • Whitepapers
  • Press
  • News
  • Ransomware Anthology
  • Company
  • About Us
  • Our Customers
  • Careers
  • Partners
  • Legal & Compliance
  • Security & Compliance
  • Investor Relations
  • S Foundation
  • S Ventures

©2026 SentinelOne, All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Notice Terms of Use

English