A Leader in the 2025 Gartner® Magic Quadrant™ for Endpoint Protection Platforms. Five years running.A Leader in the Gartner® Magic Quadrant™Read the Report
Experiencing a Breach?Blog
Get StartedContact Us
SentinelOne
  • Platform
    Platform Overview
    • Singularity Platform
      Welcome to Integrated Enterprise Security
    • AI Security Portfolio
      Leading the Way in AI-Powered Security Solutions
    • How It Works
      The Singularity XDR Difference
    • Singularity Marketplace
      One-Click Integrations to Unlock the Power of XDR
    • Pricing & Packaging
      Comparisons and Guidance at a Glance
    Data & AI
    • Purple AI
      Accelerate SecOps with Generative AI
    • Singularity Hyperautomation
      Easily Automate Security Processes
    • AI-SIEM
      The AI SIEM for the Autonomous SOC
    • Singularity Data Lake
      AI-Powered, Unified Data Lake
    • Singularity Data Lake for Log Analytics
      Seamlessly Ingest Data from On-Prem, Cloud or Hybrid Environments
    Endpoint Security
    • Singularity Endpoint
      Autonomous Prevention, Detection, and Response
    • Singularity XDR
      Native & Open Protection, Detection, and Response
    • Singularity RemoteOps Forensics
      Orchestrate Forensics at Scale
    • Singularity Threat Intelligence
      Comprehensive Adversary Intelligence
    • Singularity Vulnerability Management
      Application & OS Vulnerability Management
    • Singularity Identity
      Identity Threat Detection and Response
    Cloud Security
    • Singularity Cloud Security
      Block Attacks with an AI-powered CNAPP
    • Singularity Cloud Native Security
      Secure Cloud and Development Resources
    • Singularity Cloud Workload Security
      Real-Time Cloud Workload Protection Platform
    • Singularity Cloud Data Security
      AI-Powered Threat Detection for Cloud Storage
    • Singularity Cloud Security Posture Management
      Detect and Remediate Cloud Misconfigurations
    Securing AI
    • Prompt Security
      Secure AI Tools Across Your Enterprise
  • Why SentinelOne?
    Why SentinelOne?
    • Why SentinelOne?
      Cybersecurity Built for What’s Next
    • Our Customers
      Trusted by the World’s Leading Enterprises
    • Industry Recognition
      Tested and Proven by the Experts
    • About Us
      The Industry Leader in Autonomous Cybersecurity
    Compare SentinelOne
    • Arctic Wolf
    • Broadcom
    • CrowdStrike
    • Cybereason
    • Microsoft
    • Palo Alto Networks
    • Sophos
    • Splunk
    • Trellix
    • Trend Micro
    • Wiz
    Verticals
    • Energy
    • Federal Government
    • Finance
    • Healthcare
    • Higher Education
    • K-12 Education
    • Manufacturing
    • Retail
    • State and Local Government
  • Services
    Managed Services
    • Managed Services Overview
      Wayfinder Threat Detection & Response
    • Threat Hunting
      World-Class Expertise and Threat Intelligence
    • Managed Detection & Response
      24/7/365 Expert MDR Across Your Entire Environment
    • Incident Readiness & Response
      Digital Forensics, IRR & Breach Readiness
    Support, Deployment, & Health
    • Technical Account Management
      Customer Success with Personalized Service
    • SentinelOne GO
      Guided Onboarding & Deployment Advisory
    • SentinelOne University
      Live and On-Demand Training
    • Services Overview
      Comprehensive Solutions for Seamless Security Operations
    • SentinelOne Community
      Community Login
  • Partners
    Our Network
    • MSSP Partners
      Succeed Faster with SentinelOne
    • Singularity Marketplace
      Extend the Power of S1 Technology
    • Cyber Risk Partners
      Enlist Pro Response and Advisory Teams
    • Technology Alliances
      Integrated, Enterprise-Scale Solutions
    • SentinelOne for AWS
      Hosted in AWS Regions Around the World
    • Channel Partners
      Deliver the Right Solutions, Together
    • Partner Locator
      Your Go-to Source for Our Top Partners in Your Region
    Partner Portal→
  • Resources
    Resource Center
    • Case Studies
    • Data Sheets
    • eBooks
    • Reports
    • Videos
    • Webinars
    • Whitepapers
    • Events
    View All Resources→
    Blog
    • Feature Spotlight
    • For CISO/CIO
    • From the Front Lines
    • Identity
    • Cloud
    • macOS
    • SentinelOne Blog
    Blog→
    Tech Resources
    • SentinelLABS
    • Ransomware Anthology
    • Cybersecurity 101
  • About
    About SentinelOne
    • About SentinelOne
      The Industry Leader in Cybersecurity
    • Investor Relations
      Financial Information & Events
    • SentinelLABS
      Threat Research for the Modern Threat Hunter
    • Careers
      The Latest Job Opportunities
    • Press & News
      Company Announcements
    • Cybersecurity Blog
      The Latest Cybersecurity Threats, News, & More
    • FAQ
      Get Answers to Our Most Frequently Asked Questions
    • DataSet
      The Live Data Platform
    • S Foundation
      Securing a Safer Future for All
    • S Ventures
      Investing in the Next Generation of Security, Data and AI
  • Pricing
Get StartedContact Us
CVE Vulnerability Database
Vulnerability Database/CVE-2025-11187

CVE-2025-11187: OpenSSL Buffer Overflow Vulnerability

CVE-2025-11187 is a stack-based buffer overflow in OpenSSL's PKCS#12 PBMAC1 processing that can cause crashes or enable code execution. This article covers the technical details, affected versions, impact, and mitigation.

Published: January 30, 2026

CVE-2025-11187 Overview

CVE-2025-11187 is a vulnerability in OpenSSL affecting PBMAC1 parameter validation in PKCS#12 files. The flaw can trigger a stack-based buffer overflow, invalid pointer, or NULL pointer dereference during MAC verification when processing maliciously crafted PKCS#12 files.

The vulnerability occurs because PBKDF2 salt and keylength parameters from PKCS#12 files using PBMAC1 for MAC verification are used without proper validation. When the keylength value exceeds the 64-byte fixed stack buffer used for the derived key, a buffer overflow occurs with attacker-controlled length. Additionally, if the salt parameter is not an OCTET STRING type, this can lead to invalid or NULL pointer dereference conditions.

Critical Impact

This vulnerability may cause a crash leading to Denial of Service for applications that parse untrusted PKCS#12 files. The buffer overflow may also potentially enable code execution depending on platform mitigations.

Affected Products

  • OpenSSL 3.6
  • OpenSSL 3.5
  • OpenSSL 3.4

Discovery Timeline

  • 2026-01-27 - CVE CVE-2025-11187 published to NVD
  • 2026-01-29 - Last updated in NVD database

Technical Details for CVE-2025-11187

Vulnerability Analysis

This vulnerability represents a classic case of insufficient input validation in cryptographic library functions. The PBMAC1 (Password-Based Message Authentication Code 1) implementation in OpenSSL fails to validate user-controllable parameters before using them in security-critical operations.

The core issue lies in the PKCS#12 MAC verification process. When a PKCS#12 file specifies PBMAC1 as the MAC algorithm, OpenSSL reads the PBKDF2 (Password-Based Key Derivation Function 2) parameters directly from the file structure without bounds checking. The keylength parameter is particularly dangerous as it directly controls how many bytes are written to a fixed 64-byte stack buffer during key derivation.

The NULL pointer dereference variant occurs when the salt parameter has an unexpected ASN.1 type. The code expects an OCTET STRING type but does not properly validate this, leading to pointer issues when processing malformed data.

Root Cause

The root cause is missing validation of PBMAC1 parameters in PKCS#12 file parsing. Specifically, the PBKDF2 keylength parameter is not validated against the 64-byte stack buffer size before key derivation, and the salt parameter type is not verified to be an OCTET STRING before dereferencing.

Attack Vector

Exploitation requires an attacker to craft a malicious PKCS#12 file with manipulated PBMAC1 parameters. The attack vector is local, requiring the victim to open or process the malicious file through an application using vulnerable OpenSSL versions.

The attack scenario involves:

  1. Creating a PKCS#12 file that uses PBMAC1 for MAC
  2. Setting the keylength parameter to a value greater than 64 bytes to trigger the buffer overflow
  3. Alternatively, setting the salt parameter to a non-OCTET STRING type to trigger pointer issues
  4. Convincing a user or application to process the malicious file

While exploiting this issue requires processing a maliciously crafted PKCS#12 file, the practical exploitability is limited because it is uncommon for applications to accept untrusted PKCS#12 files. These files are typically used to store private keys which are trusted by definition. For this reason, the OpenSSL project assessed this as moderate severity.

It should be noted that the FIPS modules in versions 3.6, 3.5, and 3.4 are not affected by this issue, as PKCS#12 processing is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary. OpenSSL versions 3.3, 3.0, 1.1.1, and 1.0.2 are not affected as they do not support PBMAC1 in PKCS#12.

Detection Methods for CVE-2025-11187

Indicators of Compromise

  • Unexpected application crashes when processing PKCS#12 files
  • Stack corruption or segmentation faults in processes using OpenSSL for certificate handling
  • Anomalous PKCS#12 files with unusually large keylength values in PBMAC1 parameters
  • Memory corruption indicators in application logs during certificate import operations

Detection Strategies

  • Monitor for crashes in applications that process PKCS#12 files, particularly with stack-based crash signatures
  • Implement file integrity monitoring on systems that regularly process certificate files
  • Use static analysis tools to identify applications using vulnerable OpenSSL versions for PKCS#12 processing
  • Deploy endpoint detection capabilities to identify exploitation attempts through abnormal memory access patterns

Monitoring Recommendations

  • Enable detailed logging for certificate processing operations in affected applications
  • Monitor for unusual PKCS#12 file submissions to certificate management systems
  • Implement alerting for application crashes with stack overflow signatures
  • Track OpenSSL version usage across your infrastructure to identify vulnerable deployments

How to Mitigate CVE-2025-11187

Immediate Actions Required

  • Upgrade OpenSSL to patched versions as soon as they become available
  • Audit applications that process PKCS#12 files from potentially untrusted sources
  • Implement strict input validation for any PKCS#12 file processing workflows
  • Consider restricting PKCS#12 file imports to trusted sources only until patches are applied

Patch Information

OpenSSL has released security patches to address this vulnerability. The fixes add proper validation of PBMAC1 parameters before use. Security patches are available via the following commits:

  • GitHub OpenSSL Commit 205e3a5
  • GitHub OpenSSL Commit 8caf359
  • GitHub OpenSSL Commit e1079bc

For complete details, refer to the OpenSSL Security Advisory.

Workarounds

  • Restrict PKCS#12 file processing to trusted sources only
  • Implement application-level input validation to reject PKCS#12 files with suspicious parameters
  • If possible, downgrade to OpenSSL 3.3 or earlier which do not support PBMAC1 in PKCS#12
  • Isolate certificate processing operations in sandboxed environments to limit potential impact
bash
# Check OpenSSL version to determine vulnerability status
openssl version -a

# Verify if PBMAC1 support is present (affected versions only)
# Affected: OpenSSL 3.4, 3.5, 3.6
# Not affected: OpenSSL 3.3, 3.0, 1.1.1, 1.0.2

Disclaimer: This content was generated using AI. While we strive for accuracy, please verify critical information with official sources.

  • Vulnerability Details
  • TypeBuffer Overflow

  • Vendor/TechOpenssl

  • SeverityMEDIUM

  • CVSS Score6.1

  • EPSS Probability0.02%

  • Known ExploitedNo
  • CVSS Vector
  • CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
  • Impact Assessment
  • ConfidentialityLow
  • IntegrityLow
  • AvailabilityHigh
  • CWE References
  • CWE-476
  • Technical References
  • GitHub OpenSSL Commit

  • GitHub OpenSSL Commit

  • GitHub OpenSSL Commit

  • OpenSSL Security Advisory
  • Related CVEs
  • CVE-2025-15467: OpenSSL CMS Buffer Overflow Vulnerability

  • CVE-2025-69419: OpenSSL Buffer Overflow Vulnerability

  • CVE-2022-3786: OpenSSL Buffer Overflow Vulnerability

  • CVE-2022-3602: OpenSSL Buffer Overflow Vulnerability
Experience the World’s Most Advanced Cybersecurity Platform

Experience the World’s Most Advanced Cybersecurity Platform

See how our intelligent, autonomous cybersecurity platform can protect your organization now and into the future.

Try SentinelOne
  • Get Started
  • Get a Demo
  • Product Tour
  • Why SentinelOne
  • Pricing & Packaging
  • FAQ
  • Contact
  • Contact Us
  • Customer Support
  • SentinelOne Status
  • Language
  • English
  • Platform
  • Singularity Platform
  • Singularity Endpoint
  • Singularity Cloud
  • Singularity AI-SIEM
  • Singularity Identity
  • Singularity Marketplace
  • Purple AI
  • Services
  • Wayfinder TDR
  • SentinelOne GO
  • Technical Account Management
  • Support Services
  • Verticals
  • Energy
  • Federal Government
  • Finance
  • Healthcare
  • Higher Education
  • K-12 Education
  • Manufacturing
  • Retail
  • State and Local Government
  • Cybersecurity for SMB
  • Resources
  • Blog
  • Labs
  • Case Studies
  • Videos
  • Product Tours
  • Events
  • Cybersecurity 101
  • eBooks
  • Webinars
  • Whitepapers
  • Press
  • News
  • Ransomware Anthology
  • Company
  • About Us
  • Our Customers
  • Careers
  • Partners
  • Legal & Compliance
  • Security & Compliance
  • Investor Relations
  • S Foundation
  • S Ventures

©2026 SentinelOne, All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Notice Terms of Use