The SentinelOne Annual Threat Report - A Defenders Guide from the FrontlinesThe SentinelOne Annual Threat ReportGet the Report
Experiencing a Breach?Blog
Get StartedContact Us
SentinelOne
  • Platform
    Platform Overview
    • Singularity Platform
      Welcome to Integrated Enterprise Security
    • AI for Security
      Leading the Way in AI-Powered Security Solutions
    • Securing AI
      Accelerate AI Adoption with Secure AI Tools, Apps, and Agents.
    • How It Works
      The Singularity XDR Difference
    • Singularity Marketplace
      One-Click Integrations to Unlock the Power of XDR
    • Pricing & Packaging
      Comparisons and Guidance at a Glance
    Data & AI
    • Purple AI
      Accelerate SecOps with Generative AI
    • Singularity Hyperautomation
      Easily Automate Security Processes
    • AI-SIEM
      The AI SIEM for the Autonomous SOC
    • Singularity Data Lake
      AI-Powered, Unified Data Lake
    • Singularity Data Lake for Log Analytics
      Seamlessly Ingest Data from On-Prem, Cloud or Hybrid Environments
    Endpoint Security
    • Singularity Endpoint
      Autonomous Prevention, Detection, and Response
    • Singularity XDR
      Native & Open Protection, Detection, and Response
    • Singularity RemoteOps Forensics
      Orchestrate Forensics at Scale
    • Singularity Threat Intelligence
      Comprehensive Adversary Intelligence
    • Singularity Vulnerability Management
      Application & OS Vulnerability Management
    • Singularity Identity
      Identity Threat Detection and Response
    Cloud Security
    • Singularity Cloud Security
      Block Attacks with an AI-Powered CNAPP
    • Singularity Cloud Native Security
      Secure Cloud and Development Resources
    • Singularity Cloud Workload Security
      Real-Time Cloud Workload Protection Platform
    • Singularity Cloud Data Security
      AI-Powered Threat Detection for Cloud Storage
    • Singularity Cloud Security Posture Management
      Detect and Remediate Cloud Misconfigurations
    Securing AI
    • Prompt Security
      Secure AI Tools Across Your Enterprise
  • Why SentinelOne?
    Why SentinelOne?
    • Why SentinelOne?
      Cybersecurity Built for What’s Next
    • Our Customers
      Trusted by the World’s Leading Enterprises
    • Industry Recognition
      Tested and Proven by the Experts
    • About Us
      The Industry Leader in Autonomous Cybersecurity
    Compare SentinelOne
    • Arctic Wolf
    • Broadcom
    • CrowdStrike
    • Cybereason
    • Microsoft
    • Palo Alto Networks
    • Sophos
    • Splunk
    • Trellix
    • Trend Micro
    • Wiz
    Verticals
    • Energy
    • Federal Government
    • Finance
    • Healthcare
    • Higher Education
    • K-12 Education
    • Manufacturing
    • Retail
    • State and Local Government
  • Services
    Managed Services
    • Managed Services Overview
      Wayfinder Threat Detection & Response
    • Threat Hunting
      World-Class Expertise and Threat Intelligence
    • Managed Detection & Response
      24/7/365 Expert MDR Across Your Entire Environment
    • Incident Readiness & Response
      DFIR, Breach Readiness, & Compromise Assessments
    Support, Deployment, & Health
    • Technical Account Management
      Customer Success with Personalized Service
    • SentinelOne GO
      Guided Onboarding & Deployment Advisory
    • SentinelOne University
      Live and On-Demand Training
    • Services Overview
      Comprehensive Solutions for Seamless Security Operations
    • SentinelOne Community
      Community Login
  • Partners
    Our Network
    • MSSP Partners
      Succeed Faster with SentinelOne
    • Singularity Marketplace
      Extend the Power of S1 Technology
    • Cyber Risk Partners
      Enlist Pro Response and Advisory Teams
    • Technology Alliances
      Integrated, Enterprise-Scale Solutions
    • SentinelOne for AWS
      Hosted in AWS Regions Around the World
    • Channel Partners
      Deliver the Right Solutions, Together
    • SentinelOne for Google Cloud
      Unified, Autonomous Security Giving Defenders the Advantage at Global Scale
    • Partner Locator
      Your Go-to Source for Our Top Partners in Your Region
    Partner Portal→
  • Resources
    Resource Center
    • Case Studies
    • Data Sheets
    • eBooks
    • Reports
    • Videos
    • Webinars
    • Whitepapers
    • Events
    View All Resources→
    Blog
    • Feature Spotlight
    • For CISO/CIO
    • From the Front Lines
    • Identity
    • Cloud
    • macOS
    • SentinelOne Blog
    Blog→
    Tech Resources
    • SentinelLABS
    • Ransomware Anthology
    • Cybersecurity 101
  • About
    About SentinelOne
    • About SentinelOne
      The Industry Leader in Cybersecurity
    • Investor Relations
      Financial Information & Events
    • SentinelLABS
      Threat Research for the Modern Threat Hunter
    • Careers
      The Latest Job Opportunities
    • Press & News
      Company Announcements
    • Cybersecurity Blog
      The Latest Cybersecurity Threats, News, & More
    • FAQ
      Get Answers to Our Most Frequently Asked Questions
    • DataSet
      The Live Data Platform
    • S Foundation
      Securing a Safer Future for All
    • S Ventures
      Investing in the Next Generation of Security, Data and AI
  • Pricing
Get StartedContact Us
CVE Vulnerability Database
Vulnerability Database/CVE-2023-5363

CVE-2023-5363: OpenSSL Information Disclosure Flaw

CVE-2023-5363 is an information disclosure vulnerability in OpenSSL affecting key and IV processing in symmetric ciphers. This flaw can cause IV truncation leading to confidentiality loss. Learn about affected versions and fixes.

Published: February 11, 2026

CVE-2023-5363 Overview

A critical cryptographic vulnerability has been identified in OpenSSL affecting the processing of key and initialization vector (IV) lengths during symmetric cipher initialization. This flaw can lead to potential truncation or overruns when initializing certain symmetric ciphers, ultimately compromising the confidentiality of encrypted communications.

When applications call EVP_EncryptInit_ex2(), EVP_DecryptInit_ex2(), or EVP_CipherInit_ex2(), the provided OSSL_PARAM array is processed after the key and IV have already been established. Any alterations to the key length via the "keylen" parameter or the IV length via the "ivlen" parameter within the OSSL_PARAM array will not take effect as intended. This results in potential truncation or overreading of these values, affecting multiple cipher implementations.

Critical Impact

IV truncation in CCM, GCM, and OCB cipher modes can result in loss of confidentiality. Following NIST's SP 800-38D guidance for constructing deterministic IVs for AES in GCM mode, truncation of the counter portion could lead to IV reuse, a serious cryptographic weakness that can compromise encrypted data.

Affected Products

  • OpenSSL 3.0.x (prior to patched versions)
  • OpenSSL 3.1.x (prior to patched versions)
  • Debian Linux 12.0
  • NetApp H300s Firmware
  • NetApp H410s Firmware
  • NetApp H500s Firmware
  • NetApp H700s Firmware
  • NetApp H410c Firmware

Discovery Timeline

  • October 24, 2023 - OpenSSL security advisory published
  • October 25, 2023 - CVE-2023-5363 published to NVD
  • December 2, 2025 - Last updated in NVD database

Technical Details for CVE-2023-5363

Vulnerability Analysis

This vulnerability represents a cryptographic implementation flaw in OpenSSL's cipher initialization routines. The core issue lies in the order of operations when processing encryption parameters. The vulnerable API functions (EVP_EncryptInit_ex2(), EVP_DecryptInit_ex2(), and EVP_CipherInit_ex2()) establish key and IV values before processing the OSSL_PARAM array, causing any subsequent length modifications to be silently ignored.

The impacted ciphers include RC2, RC4, RC5, CCM, GCM, and OCB. For authenticated encryption modes (CCM, GCM, OCB), IV truncation poses the most serious security risk as IV uniqueness is fundamental to maintaining confidentiality. When IVs are reused with the same key, attackers can potentially recover plaintext or forge authenticated messages.

The OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue. Additionally, the OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers remain unaffected because the vulnerability lies outside of the FIPS provider boundary.

Root Cause

The root cause stems from incorrect parameter processing order in the cipher initialization functions. The OSSL_PARAM array containing key and IV length modifications is processed after the key and IV have already been established and copied into internal cipher context structures. This design flaw means that length parameters specified by the application developer are effectively ignored, causing the cipher to operate with potentially incorrect key or IV sizes.

The vulnerable API was recently introduced in OpenSSL, making this a regression in newer code paths. The processing sequence should validate and apply all parameters before establishing the key and IV values to ensure application-specified lengths are honored.

Attack Vector

The attack vector requires a network-accessible application using the vulnerable OpenSSL cipher initialization APIs with modified key or IV lengths. An attacker cannot directly exploit this vulnerability remotely; instead, the vulnerability creates conditions where cryptographic protections are weakened.

For GCM mode specifically, if an application follows NIST SP 800-38D section 8.2.1 guidance for constructing deterministic IVs, the counter portion may be truncated. This truncation increases the probability of IV collisions, which can be exploited to:

  1. Recover plaintext through XOR operations on ciphertexts encrypted with the same IV
  2. Forge authentication tags under certain conditions
  3. Compromise forward secrecy of encrypted sessions

The vulnerability manifests when applications explicitly attempt to set non-default key or IV lengths through the OSSL_PARAM mechanism. Developers intending to use custom IV lengths for specific security requirements would unknowingly be using truncated values, weakening their cryptographic implementations. See the OpenSSL Security Advisory for complete technical details.

Detection Methods for CVE-2023-5363

Indicators of Compromise

  • Applications using OpenSSL 3.0.x or 3.1.x with custom key or IV length parameters in cipher initialization
  • Decryption failures in applications where peers use different OpenSSL versions
  • Unexpected memory exceptions during cipher operations when using RC2, RC4, RC5, CCM, GCM, or OCB modes
  • Log entries indicating cryptographic operation failures or authentication tag mismatches

Detection Strategies

  • Audit application code for calls to EVP_EncryptInit_ex2(), EVP_DecryptInit_ex2(), or EVP_CipherInit_ex2() with "keylen" or "ivlen" parameters in the OSSL_PARAM array
  • Implement software composition analysis (SCA) to identify systems running vulnerable OpenSSL versions (3.0.x and 3.1.x prior to patches)
  • Monitor for cryptographic operation failures that may indicate IV collision issues in production environments
  • Review application logs for patterns suggesting encryption/decryption mismatches between communicating systems

Monitoring Recommendations

  • Deploy endpoint detection to identify vulnerable OpenSSL library versions loaded by applications
  • Establish baseline metrics for cryptographic operation success rates to detect anomalies
  • Monitor network traffic for repeated encryption patterns that may indicate IV reuse conditions
  • Implement file integrity monitoring for OpenSSL library files to ensure patched versions remain deployed

How to Mitigate CVE-2023-5363

Immediate Actions Required

  • Update OpenSSL to the latest patched version immediately on all affected systems
  • Inventory all applications and systems using OpenSSL 3.0.x or 3.1.x to determine exposure scope
  • Prioritize updates for systems handling sensitive encrypted communications using GCM, CCM, or OCB cipher modes
  • Review application code to identify use of the vulnerable cipher initialization APIs with custom length parameters

Patch Information

OpenSSL has released security patches addressing this vulnerability. Organizations should upgrade to the latest available versions of OpenSSL 3.0.x and 3.1.x that contain the fix. The patches are available through the OpenSSL Git Repository.

Downstream vendors have also released updates:

  • Debian: DSA-5532
  • NetApp: Multiple advisories including NTAP-20231027-0010

Workarounds

  • If immediate patching is not possible, avoid using the "keylen" and "ivlen" parameters in OSSL_PARAM arrays when calling the affected cipher initialization functions
  • Use default key and IV lengths for affected cipher modes until patches can be applied
  • For GCM mode implementations, ensure IV generation does not rely on application-specified IV lengths that may be ignored
  • Consider temporarily switching to cipher modes not affected by this vulnerability if application requirements permit
bash
# Check OpenSSL version on Linux systems
openssl version -a

# Verify patched version is installed
# Look for versions >= 3.0.12 or >= 3.1.4
dpkg -l | grep openssl

# For systems using package managers, update OpenSSL
apt-get update && apt-get upgrade openssl

# Verify library dependencies for applications
ldd /path/to/application | grep libssl

Disclaimer: This content was generated using AI. While we strive for accuracy, please verify critical information with official sources.

  • Vulnerability Details
  • TypeInformation Disclosure

  • Vendor/TechOpenssl

  • SeverityHIGH

  • CVSS Score7.5

  • EPSS Probability4.39%

  • Known ExploitedNo
  • CVSS Vector
  • CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
  • Impact Assessment
  • ConfidentialityLow
  • IntegrityNone
  • AvailabilityNone
  • CWE References
  • CWE-684

  • NVD-CWE-noinfo
  • Technical References
  • Openwall OSS-Security Post

  • NetApp Advisory NTAP-20231027-0010

  • NetApp Advisory NTAP-20240201-0003

  • NetApp Advisory NTAP-20240201-0004

  • NetApp Advisory NTAP-20241108-0002

  • Debian Security Advisory DSA-5532
  • Vendor Resources
  • OpenSSL Commit Diff Report

  • OpenSSL Commit Diff Report

  • OpenSSL Security Advisory
  • Related CVEs
  • CVE-2026-2673: OpenSSL TLS 1.3 Key Exchange Vulnerability

  • CVE-2025-69418: OpenSSL OCB Information Disclosure Flaw

  • CVE-2025-15469: OpenSSL Dgst Data Truncation Vulnerability

  • CVE-2025-9231: OpenSSL SM2 Timing Attack Vulnerability
Experience the World’s Most Advanced Cybersecurity Platform

Experience the World’s Most Advanced Cybersecurity Platform

See how our intelligent, autonomous cybersecurity platform can protect your organization now and into the future.

Try SentinelOne
  • Get Started
  • Get a Demo
  • Product Tour
  • Why SentinelOne
  • Pricing & Packaging
  • FAQ
  • Contact
  • Contact Us
  • Customer Support
  • SentinelOne Status
  • Language
  • Platform
  • Singularity Platform
  • Singularity Endpoint
  • Singularity Cloud
  • Singularity AI-SIEM
  • Singularity Identity
  • Singularity Marketplace
  • Purple AI
  • Services
  • Wayfinder TDR
  • SentinelOne GO
  • Technical Account Management
  • Support Services
  • Verticals
  • Energy
  • Federal Government
  • Finance
  • Healthcare
  • Higher Education
  • K-12 Education
  • Manufacturing
  • Retail
  • State and Local Government
  • Cybersecurity for SMB
  • Resources
  • Blog
  • Labs
  • Case Studies
  • Videos
  • Product Tours
  • Events
  • Cybersecurity 101
  • eBooks
  • Webinars
  • Whitepapers
  • Press
  • News
  • Ransomware Anthology
  • Company
  • About Us
  • Our Customers
  • Careers
  • Partners
  • Legal & Compliance
  • Security & Compliance
  • Investor Relations
  • S Foundation
  • S Ventures

©2026 SentinelOne, All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Notice Terms of Use

English