The SentinelOne Annual Threat Report - A Defenders Guide from the FrontlinesThe SentinelOne Annual Threat ReportGet the Report
Experiencing a Breach?Blog
Get StartedContact Us
SentinelOne
  • Platform
    Platform Overview
    • Singularity Platform
      Welcome to Integrated Enterprise Security
    • AI for Security
      Leading the Way in AI-Powered Security Solutions
    • Securing AI
      Accelerate AI Adoption with Secure AI Tools, Apps, and Agents.
    • How It Works
      The Singularity XDR Difference
    • Singularity Marketplace
      One-Click Integrations to Unlock the Power of XDR
    • Pricing & Packaging
      Comparisons and Guidance at a Glance
    Data & AI
    • Purple AI
      Accelerate SecOps with Generative AI
    • Singularity Hyperautomation
      Easily Automate Security Processes
    • AI-SIEM
      The AI SIEM for the Autonomous SOC
    • Singularity Data Lake
      AI-Powered, Unified Data Lake
    • Singularity Data Lake for Log Analytics
      Seamlessly Ingest Data from On-Prem, Cloud or Hybrid Environments
    Endpoint Security
    • Singularity Endpoint
      Autonomous Prevention, Detection, and Response
    • Singularity XDR
      Native & Open Protection, Detection, and Response
    • Singularity RemoteOps Forensics
      Orchestrate Forensics at Scale
    • Singularity Threat Intelligence
      Comprehensive Adversary Intelligence
    • Singularity Vulnerability Management
      Application & OS Vulnerability Management
    • Singularity Identity
      Identity Threat Detection and Response
    Cloud Security
    • Singularity Cloud Security
      Block Attacks with an AI-Powered CNAPP
    • Singularity Cloud Native Security
      Secure Cloud and Development Resources
    • Singularity Cloud Workload Security
      Real-Time Cloud Workload Protection Platform
    • Singularity Cloud Data Security
      AI-Powered Threat Detection for Cloud Storage
    • Singularity Cloud Security Posture Management
      Detect and Remediate Cloud Misconfigurations
    Securing AI
    • Prompt Security
      Secure AI Tools Across Your Enterprise
  • Why SentinelOne?
    Why SentinelOne?
    • Why SentinelOne?
      Cybersecurity Built for What’s Next
    • Our Customers
      Trusted by the World’s Leading Enterprises
    • Industry Recognition
      Tested and Proven by the Experts
    • About Us
      The Industry Leader in Autonomous Cybersecurity
    Compare SentinelOne
    • Arctic Wolf
    • Broadcom
    • CrowdStrike
    • Cybereason
    • Microsoft
    • Palo Alto Networks
    • Sophos
    • Splunk
    • Trellix
    • Trend Micro
    • Wiz
    Verticals
    • Energy
    • Federal Government
    • Finance
    • Healthcare
    • Higher Education
    • K-12 Education
    • Manufacturing
    • Retail
    • State and Local Government
  • Services
    Managed Services
    • Managed Services Overview
      Wayfinder Threat Detection & Response
    • Threat Hunting
      World-Class Expertise and Threat Intelligence
    • Managed Detection & Response
      24/7/365 Expert MDR Across Your Entire Environment
    • Incident Readiness & Response
      DFIR, Breach Readiness, & Compromise Assessments
    Support, Deployment, & Health
    • Technical Account Management
      Customer Success with Personalized Service
    • SentinelOne GO
      Guided Onboarding & Deployment Advisory
    • SentinelOne University
      Live and On-Demand Training
    • Services Overview
      Comprehensive Solutions for Seamless Security Operations
    • SentinelOne Community
      Community Login
  • Partners
    Our Network
    • MSSP Partners
      Succeed Faster with SentinelOne
    • Singularity Marketplace
      Extend the Power of S1 Technology
    • Cyber Risk Partners
      Enlist Pro Response and Advisory Teams
    • Technology Alliances
      Integrated, Enterprise-Scale Solutions
    • SentinelOne for AWS
      Hosted in AWS Regions Around the World
    • Channel Partners
      Deliver the Right Solutions, Together
    • SentinelOne for Google Cloud
      Unified, Autonomous Security Giving Defenders the Advantage at Global Scale
    • Partner Locator
      Your Go-to Source for Our Top Partners in Your Region
    Partner Portal→
  • Resources
    Resource Center
    • Case Studies
    • Data Sheets
    • eBooks
    • Reports
    • Videos
    • Webinars
    • Whitepapers
    • Events
    View All Resources→
    Blog
    • Feature Spotlight
    • For CISO/CIO
    • From the Front Lines
    • Identity
    • Cloud
    • macOS
    • SentinelOne Blog
    Blog→
    Tech Resources
    • SentinelLABS
    • Ransomware Anthology
    • Cybersecurity 101
  • About
    About SentinelOne
    • About SentinelOne
      The Industry Leader in Cybersecurity
    • Investor Relations
      Financial Information & Events
    • SentinelLABS
      Threat Research for the Modern Threat Hunter
    • Careers
      The Latest Job Opportunities
    • Press & News
      Company Announcements
    • Cybersecurity Blog
      The Latest Cybersecurity Threats, News, & More
    • FAQ
      Get Answers to Our Most Frequently Asked Questions
    • DataSet
      The Live Data Platform
    • S Foundation
      Securing a Safer Future for All
    • S Ventures
      Investing in the Next Generation of Security, Data and AI
  • Pricing
Get StartedContact Us
CVE Vulnerability Database
Vulnerability Database/CVE-2023-46846

CVE-2023-46846: Squid-cache HTTP Smuggling Vulnerability

CVE-2023-46846 is an HTTP request smuggling vulnerability in Squid-cache caused by chunked decoder lenience. Attackers can bypass firewall and frontend security systems. This article covers technical details, impact, and mitigation.

Published: February 11, 2026

CVE-2023-46846 Overview

CVE-2023-46846 is an HTTP Request Smuggling vulnerability affecting the Squid caching proxy server. The flaw exists in Squid's chunked transfer encoding decoder, which exhibits lenient parsing behavior that can be exploited by remote attackers. This vulnerability allows malicious actors to smuggle HTTP requests and responses past firewall and frontend security systems, potentially bypassing security controls and accessing protected resources.

HTTP Request Smuggling attacks exploit inconsistencies in how different HTTP processors (such as proxies, load balancers, and backend servers) parse HTTP requests. In this case, Squid's lenient handling of chunked encoding allows attackers to craft specially malformed requests that are interpreted differently by Squid and downstream servers, enabling request/response smuggling.

Critical Impact

Remote attackers can bypass firewall and frontend security systems through HTTP request smuggling, potentially accessing protected resources, poisoning caches, or hijacking user sessions.

Affected Products

  • Squid-cache Squid (multiple versions)
  • Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.0
  • Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.0
  • Red Hat Enterprise Linux EUS 8.6, 8.8, 9.0, 9.2
  • Red Hat Enterprise Linux for ARM 64
  • Red Hat Enterprise Linux for IBM z Systems
  • Red Hat Enterprise Linux for Power, little endian
  • Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server AUS 8.2, 8.4, 8.6, 9.2
  • Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server TUS 8.2, 8.4, 8.6, 8.8, 9.2

Discovery Timeline

  • November 3, 2023 - CVE-2023-46846 published to NVD
  • December 18, 2024 - Last updated in NVD database

Technical Details for CVE-2023-46846

Vulnerability Analysis

The vulnerability resides in Squid's chunked transfer encoding decoder, which is responsible for parsing HTTP requests that use chunked encoding as specified in RFC 7230. The decoder exhibits lenient parsing behavior, accepting malformed chunked encoding that deviates from the HTTP specification. This lenience creates a parsing discrepancy between Squid and backend servers or security devices in the request chain.

When Squid processes an HTTP request with malformed chunked encoding, it may interpret the request boundaries differently than downstream servers. This discrepancy allows an attacker to craft a single HTTP request that Squid sees as one request, while a backend server interprets it as two separate requests. The "smuggled" second request can bypass Squid's access controls and reach the backend server directly.

The vulnerability is classified under CWE-444 (Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests), which specifically addresses HTTP Request Smuggling issues arising from different interpretations of the HTTP protocol between system components.

Root Cause

The root cause of this vulnerability is Squid's overly permissive parsing of chunked transfer encoding. The chunked decoder fails to strictly validate the format of chunk size lines and chunk data boundaries according to RFC specifications. This lenient parsing behavior accepts variations in chunk formatting that should be rejected as malformed, creating an interpretation gap that attackers can exploit.

Specifically, the decoder may accept:

  • Improper chunk size delimiters
  • Invalid characters in chunk size lines
  • Inconsistent newline handling between chunk boundaries

These parsing inconsistencies allow attackers to construct HTTP requests where the perceived request boundaries differ between Squid and other HTTP processors in the request chain.

Attack Vector

An attacker exploits this vulnerability by sending specially crafted HTTP requests to a Squid proxy server. The attack is network-based and requires no authentication or user interaction. The attacker constructs an HTTP request with malformed chunked encoding that exploits the parsing differences between Squid and backend systems.

The attack flow typically involves:

  1. The attacker sends a crafted HTTP request with malformed chunked encoding to the Squid proxy
  2. Squid's lenient parser processes the request, interpreting chunk boundaries in a specific way
  3. The request is forwarded to a backend server or passes through other security systems
  4. The backend system parses the same request differently, extracting a "hidden" second request
  5. The smuggled request bypasses Squid's access controls and security policies

This technique can be used to bypass security controls, poison web caches, hijack user sessions, or access restricted resources on backend servers. The network attack vector makes this vulnerability particularly dangerous in environments where Squid serves as a security boundary or reverse proxy.

Detection Methods for CVE-2023-46846

Indicators of Compromise

  • Unusual HTTP requests with malformed or non-standard chunked transfer encoding in Squid access logs
  • Requests containing multiple Transfer-Encoding headers or conflicting Content-Length and Transfer-Encoding headers
  • Backend server logs showing requests that don't appear in corresponding Squid proxy logs
  • Unexpected cache pollution or cache entries with suspicious content

Detection Strategies

  • Implement deep packet inspection (DPI) to detect malformed chunked encoding patterns in HTTP traffic
  • Monitor for HTTP requests containing both Content-Length and Transfer-Encoding: chunked headers simultaneously
  • Deploy web application firewalls (WAF) with rules to detect HTTP request smuggling attack patterns
  • Configure SIEM rules to correlate Squid access logs with backend server logs to identify discrepancies

Monitoring Recommendations

  • Enable verbose logging on Squid to capture detailed request parsing information
  • Implement log correlation between Squid proxy logs and backend application logs to detect request smuggling attempts
  • Monitor for unusual access patterns to restricted resources that should be blocked by Squid ACLs
  • Set up alerts for requests containing suspicious Transfer-Encoding header variations

How to Mitigate CVE-2023-46846

Immediate Actions Required

  • Update Squid to the latest patched version immediately
  • Review and restrict network access to Squid proxy servers where possible
  • Implement additional request validation at backend servers to reject malformed HTTP requests
  • Consider deploying a WAF with HTTP request smuggling detection capabilities in front of Squid

Patch Information

Security patches addressing this vulnerability have been released by Squid-cache and multiple Linux distributions. Refer to the following resources for vendor-specific patching guidance:

  • GitHub Security Advisory GHSA-j83v-w3p4-5cqh - Official Squid security advisory
  • Red Hat Security Advisory RHSA-2023:6266 - RHEL 8 patch
  • Red Hat Security Advisory RHSA-2023:6801 - RHEL 9 patch
  • Red Hat CVE Analysis - Red Hat's detailed CVE analysis

Red Hat has released updated Squid packages across all affected Enterprise Linux versions. NetApp and Debian have also released advisories and patches for affected systems.

Workarounds

  • Configure stricter HTTP request parsing at network firewalls to normalize or reject requests with malformed chunked encoding
  • If feasible, disable chunked transfer encoding support on Squid until patches can be applied
  • Implement application-layer request validation on backend servers to independently verify request integrity
  • Use network segmentation to limit the exposure of backend servers to potentially smuggled requests
bash
# Verify current Squid version
squid -v

# Check for available updates (RHEL/CentOS)
yum check-update squid

# Apply the security update
yum update squid

# Restart Squid after patching
systemctl restart squid

# Verify the new version is installed
squid -v

Disclaimer: This content was generated using AI. While we strive for accuracy, please verify critical information with official sources.

  • Vulnerability Details
  • TypeOther

  • Vendor/TechSquid

  • SeverityMEDIUM

  • CVSS Score5.3

  • EPSS Probability9.62%

  • Known ExploitedNo
  • CVSS Vector
  • CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
  • Impact Assessment
  • ConfidentialityLow
  • IntegrityNone
  • AvailabilityNone
  • CWE References
  • CWE-444
  • Technical References
  • Red Hat Security Advisory RHSA-2023:6266

  • Red Hat Security Advisory RHSA-2023:6267

  • Red Hat Security Advisory RHSA-2023:6268

  • Red Hat Security Advisory RHSA-2023:6748

  • Red Hat Security Advisory RHSA-2023:6801

  • Red Hat Security Advisory RHSA-2023:6803

  • Red Hat Security Advisory RHSA-2023:6804

  • Red Hat Security Advisory RHSA-2023:6810

  • Red Hat Security Advisory RHSA-2023:7213

  • Red Hat Security Advisory RHSA-2024:11049

  • Red Hat CVE Analysis CVE-2023-46846

  • Red Hat Bug Report #2245910

  • Debian LTS Announce Bulletin 2024-01-03

  • Debian LTS Announce Bulletin 2024-01-08

  • NetApp Security Advisory NTAP-20231130-0002
  • Vendor Resources
  • GitHub Security Advisory GHSA-j83v-w3p4-5cqh
  • Related CVEs
  • CVE-2026-32748: Squid-cache Squid DoS Vulnerability

  • CVE-2026-33526: Squid Caching Proxy DoS Vulnerability

  • CVE-2026-33515: Squid Information Disclosure Vulnerability

  • CVE-2025-62168: Squid Caching Proxy Info Disclosure Flaw
Experience the World’s Most Advanced Cybersecurity Platform

Experience the World’s Most Advanced Cybersecurity Platform

See how our intelligent, autonomous cybersecurity platform can protect your organization now and into the future.

Try SentinelOne
  • Get Started
  • Get a Demo
  • Product Tour
  • Why SentinelOne
  • Pricing & Packaging
  • FAQ
  • Contact
  • Contact Us
  • Customer Support
  • SentinelOne Status
  • Language
  • Platform
  • Singularity Platform
  • Singularity Endpoint
  • Singularity Cloud
  • Singularity AI-SIEM
  • Singularity Identity
  • Singularity Marketplace
  • Purple AI
  • Services
  • Wayfinder TDR
  • SentinelOne GO
  • Technical Account Management
  • Support Services
  • Verticals
  • Energy
  • Federal Government
  • Finance
  • Healthcare
  • Higher Education
  • K-12 Education
  • Manufacturing
  • Retail
  • State and Local Government
  • Cybersecurity for SMB
  • Resources
  • Blog
  • Labs
  • Case Studies
  • Videos
  • Product Tours
  • Events
  • Cybersecurity 101
  • eBooks
  • Webinars
  • Whitepapers
  • Press
  • News
  • Ransomware Anthology
  • Company
  • About Us
  • Our Customers
  • Careers
  • Partners
  • Legal & Compliance
  • Security & Compliance
  • Investor Relations
  • S Foundation
  • S Ventures

©2026 SentinelOne, All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Notice Terms of Use

English