What is Honeypot? Definition, Types & Uses

Today, enterprises face numerous challenges in the form of constantly increasing malicious traffic, phishing attacks, and covert penetration. Recent data reveals that the average spam trap email address receives over 900 messages daily, while one heavily targeted honeypot trap logged 4,019,502 messages. Such large amounts highlight the importance of threat intelligence and decoy-based security strategies. One innovative method is learning what is honeypot, then deploying decoys to lure, analyze, and neutralize adversaries.

In this article, we define honeypot, from its basic uses to strategic implementation. We will discuss honeypot classification, honeypot components, and some real-life honeypot implementation scenarios. You will also see how to build honeypots effectively, explore best practices for deployment, and discover how SentinelOne’s solutions further enhance honeypots in cyber security. By the end, you will understand precisely how honeypots aid in threat detection while minimizing risk to production systems.

What is a Honeypot?

A honeypot can be defined as an intentionally created and attractive system or resource in a network whose main intention is to lure attackers and gain information about them. When adversaries engage with this isolated environment, the security teams get the live feed on the intrusion techniques and the exploit usage. To clarify what is honeypot, think of it as a carefully crafted bait that entices cybercriminals away from valuable targets. In everyday language, what is a honeypot can be described as a trap that imitates genuine services or data, luring hackers into revealing their strategies. This way, organizations strengthen their protection and prevent attacks on actual systems as they study each infiltration attempt.

What Are Honeypots Used For?

Businesses turn to honeypots as an active defense mechanism, letting them detect malicious attempts in a controlled setup. Given that ransomware attacks are on the rise, with 59% of them happening in the United States, businesses require constant information about the attempts to penetrate their systems. By tracking honeypot traps and logging adversaries’ movements, IT teams learn about zero-day exploits, suspicious IPs, or newly crafted malware. Honeypots in security also provide a safer testing ground for security patches or vulnerabilities, helping firms test risk levels without jeopardizing core assets. As a result, applications of honeypots yield both immediate detection benefits and long-term threat intelligence.

Beyond just detection, these decoys clarify honeypot meaning in corporate contexts—providing advanced warning of infiltration tactics. For instance, honeypots in cyber security reveal whether attackers target specific services (FTP, SSH, or database ports). This knowledge enables teams to change their strategies in defending the perimeter depending on the situation. As logs in honeypot implementations provide information on the steps taken, the organization can be prepared for the next moves of the attacker or credential stuffing. In the long run, the honeypot approach decreases the effects of stealthy attacks such as advanced persistent threats (APTs) in industries such as finance or healthcare.

Importance of Honeypots in Cybersecurity

Understanding “what is honeypot pads?” is one thing, but comprehending their importance in a security stack is another. Conventional security measures such as firewalls and intrusion detection systems are important but are usually more preventative. By contrast, honeypots cybersecurity solutions actively lure potential threats, creating an environment for deeper, more instructive observation. This intelligence-driven approach enhances the overall security posture and provides a proactive response to advanced or targeted threats.

1. Real-Time Threat Intelligence: Where standard logs might show suspicious traffic, honeypots record attacker interactions in detail. This information includes commands being input, attempts to exploit or execute code, and payloads that are delivered. In this way, teams improve their awareness of zero-days or new hacking tools by analyzing such events. This dynamic insight is among the top advantages of honeypots, elevating the entire security posture.
2. Resource Efficiency: Analyzing every network anomaly can be a daunting task for the security staff. Isolating malicious attempts within a honeypot environment helps filter false positives. It is less time-consuming to analyze actual intrusion attempts since decoys are much more clear indications of malicious activities. This focus encourages a more detailed analysis of the capabilities of the attacker rather than endlessly sifting through logs.
3. Early Detection of Targeted Attacks: Sophisticated threats are slow in their operations to ensure they do not trigger any alarms. However, specialized honeypot traps can attract these stealthy operators. Once an APT is inside, patterns are discovered, and defenders can respond before they otherwise would, which is the goal. Because honeypots in cyber security are seldom used by legitimate traffic, any interaction can be flagged as suspicious or malicious with high confidence.
4. Strengthened Incident Response: When a real breach occurs, teams that have studied honeypot interactions hold a tactical advantage. They are aware of the TTPs that are employed by attackers. This knowledge enhances the triage process, shortens dwell time, and minimizes data leakage or loss. By extension, honeypot data fosters a continuous improvement cycle in overall security strategies.

Types of Honeypots

Deciphering the honeypot definition also means distinguishing the many variants designed for different purposes. Some are designed to require as little user input as possible, while others replicate whole operating systems in order to ascertain more detailed information. The types of honeypots can range from straightforward to highly complex, with each approach offering unique benefits and risks. Below are the primary categories typically recognized in honeypots cybersecurity practices:

1. Low-Interaction Honeypots:  These are basic services or ports that restrict the extent to which attackers can penetrate. They gather high-level data, for example, scanning attempts and minimal exploit actions. Because of this, they reduce risk if they are compromised. However, they deliver less intelligence than complex configurations, which provide only limited information about the attacker.
2. High-Interaction Honeypots: These decoys mimic whole systems—operating systems, real services, and often true vulnerabilities. They gather a vast amount of information and also increase the possibility of the attacker’s lateral movement if not well mitigated. As these environments appear realistic, they entice more sophisticated threats to linger around and engage for longer durations. Sustaining such setups requires resources, specialized knowledge, and skills in their implementation and management.
3. Research Honeypots: They are mainly used by academic institutions or large security companies to collect threat intelligence from around the world. Both the bot and human attackers interact with a large number of targets, and a lot of logs are collected. Examples of honeypots in research might include broad sweeps of internet-facing servers. Information gained frequently results in published papers and improvements in tools for the cybersecurity field.
4. Production Honeypots: Unlike other research-oriented systems, these decoys shield a particular corporate setting. Placed in a real network segment, they mimic important services to detect intrusions at an early stage. The activities of the attacker are directly channeled to the threat identification systems of the enterprise. Honeypot in cyber security deployments like these revolve around immediate defense rather than large-scale data gathering.
5. Pure Honeypots: Also known as all-inclusive simulations, these mimic entire network segments or data centers. When it comes to the target, attackers think they are operating in a real environment with proper naming conventions and users. The process of gathering knowledge from a “pure” decoy must provide the greatest depth of intelligence. Due to the complexity, they need proper setup and supervision to make them realistic.
6. Database Honeypots: Designed for DB-tier illusions, these are particularly appealing to criminals seeking credit card information and PII. From the perspective of attackers, they are able to view operational database queries with table structures or dummy data sets. As a honeypot dimension, this approach clarifies how intruders exfiltrate or manipulate data. By logging queries, it is possible to identify the exact stolen columns or injection tactics.

Key Components of a Honeypot

Despite the type of honeypot that is being implemented, there are some elements that are vital to the success of the exercise. By going through each of the components systematically, organizations guarantee that the decoy environment is believable to attackers and harmless to real assets in the network. Understanding these building blocks clarifies what is honeypot in practical terms. The following are critical aspects that every honeypot must include.

1. Decoy Services and Data: At the heart of any definition of honeypot is the presence of believable services or files. This may include fake payroll data, databases with names derived from actual business segments, or mimic user accounts. The more authentic the decoy, the higher the engagement from attackers. Nevertheless, the enhanced complexity may lead to a higher risk if the intruder manages to get out of containment.
2. Monitoring and Logging Mechanisms: A fundamental reason behind honeypots in security is capturing attacker activity. Advanced logging systems monitor keystrokes, commands, or malicious payloads entered by users. These logs are the raw data that provide an understanding of each infiltration. If not monitored properly, a honeypot is simply a blind asset that offers no value in its current form.
3. Isolation and Containment Layer: Due to the possibility of attackers moving into actual systems, there must be a clear separation between the two environments. Network segmentation or virtualization guarantees that the malicious code stays trapped in the decoy environment. For more sophisticated operations, there are even temporary servers that are created before the attack and self-destruct after the attack. This containment makes it possible to study threats and risks within an enclosed space and away from the production equipment.
4. Alerting and Notification: It is also very important to get alerts as soon as attackers start interacting with the honeypot. It is advisable to incorporate alerts into SIEM solutions or incident response processes to ensure that action can be taken quickly. By automating notifications, security teams can, in real-time, analyze attempts or stop suspicious traffic. This is especially important for stemming a zero-day threat or newly discovered exploit at the earliest opportunity.
5. Post-Incident Analysis Tools: After an attacker is done probing, further analysis of logs, memory dump, and file modification occurs. This stage reveals new or additional TTPs that were not discovered in the prior stages. Integration with other threat intelligence sources could reveal more information about specific threat actors. The final result enhances the defense mechanisms, either fixing the vulnerabilities found in the networks or blacklisting IPs that are malicious in nature across the enterprise.

How Do Honeypots Work?

We have defined what is honeypot and its components are, but understanding the operational flow cements the concept. Honeypots function by presenting appealing targets—fake servers or data—while meticulously logging all interactions. The combination of realistic services and comprehensive event coverage provides a clear picture of the motives of an attacker. Here is the conventional honeypot life cycle as follows:

1. Deployment and Setup: Teams create a fake network that resembles an organization’s actual network. This could be a replica server farm or a single application with an exploitable flaw. DNS or IP references sometimes direct scanning attackers to the honeypot. The idea is to create an environment that makes the intruder think they have targeted something worthwhile.
2. Attacker Discovery: Adversaries usually find honeypots through automated scans or deliberate probing. Because honeypot pads might present well-known ports or vulnerabilities, attackers quickly attempt exploitation. Automated malware can also come across these decoy points. The whole idea of the lure is based on curiosity or malicious intent.
3. Interaction and Exploit: Once inside, an attacker executes programs and code, tries to gain higher-level access, or searches for information. All these moves constitute a significant record of ill intents. By analyzing them, defenders understand how threat actors operate in real-world conditions. This intelligence directly leads to modifications in the defenses of the production environment.
4. Data Capture and Analysis: As the attacker engages in their activity, the system accumulates each of the actions in the log or alert. They may be stored locally or sent in real-time to SIEM platforms for further analysis. This is a pivotal advantage among the best honeypots: the sheer detail of captured TTPs. The more information collected, the more detailed the subsequent threat assessment is.
5. Post-Attack Reset or Evolution: After each deployment, defenders can reset the decoy to its original state or modify it to obtain even more information. These may be new vulnerabilities or new details on the environment to make the honeypot more appealing. This cyclical approach fosters continuous learning. The target is constantly changing its appearance and reacting to the attacks, forcing attackers to reconsider their strategy.

How to Set Up a Honeypot?

Establishing an understanding of “what is a honeypot trap?” is only half the journey; deploying it securely is equally paramount. Poorly configured honeypots risk giving attackers a stepping-stone into real systems. They may not always be effective in preventing an intrusion, but if used appropriately, they are invaluable when it comes to identifying intrusions. Here is a concise guide on how to build a honeypot? and implement it effectively.

1. Define Objectives and Scope: Specify whether the honeypot is research-based, production-based, or a mix of both. It determines all aspects, from the complexity of the project to the data that you intend to gather. For example, a general threat intelligence honeypot could be less specific compared to an intrusion detection trap. Understanding your scope is crucial to setting up the right environment and managing risk appropriately.
2. Choose Technology Stack: Based on your objectives, you may choose between low-interaction and high-interaction pen-testing tools. For simple decoys, there are tools like Honeyd or OpenCanary, while complex VM-based setups are used for deeper traps. If you require a specialized environment, compare open-source and commercial honeypot solutions. Thoroughly reviewing the list of honeypots ensures you pick the best approach.
3. Implement Isolation Mechanisms: Place your honeypot on a separate VLAN or create several levels of virtualization. It is important not to overlap the use of resources with the production network as much as possible. The external connections should be restricted by firewalls or internal routers to direct traffic to the honeypot environment. This step makes it possible for a counter-check where even if an attacker infiltrates the decoy, the actual infrastructure is secure.
4. Configure Monitoring and Logging: Implement elaborate logging mechanisms to capture all the keystrokes, file operations, and network traffic. Real-time alerts to your SOC or SIEM can improve your organization’s reaction capability. Because collecting data is the entire point of honeypots in security, ensure logs are stored securely off the honeypot itself. This approach also maintains the integrity of forensics in case the decoy is fully penetrated.
5. Test and Validate: When preparing for the live deployment, perform a simulated attack or penetration against the decoy. Reflect on each step and determine if your logs have captured each of them correctly. Optimize settings for false positives and false negatives, such as triggers or notifications. Continuous QA ensures validity, especially when the environment is modified to reflect actual systems.

Honeypot Techniques and Deployment Strategies

Countless methods exist for designing honeypots that entice attackers while protecting genuine systems. Some revolve around minimal services, and others replicate entire enterprises replete with honeypot pads or decoy data. All of the choices are based on  budget, risk tolerance, and required intelligence level. Below are five prevalent strategies employed by honeypots security specialists worldwide:

1. Virtual Machine Cloning: Security teams create exact replicas of the actual servers, erasing all potentially sensitive information, but keeping the normal OS or application traces. This makes the attacker interactions look real while the key data is still missing. This technique is effective in high-interaction decoys targeting to gain deeper insight into intrusion strategies. It is easy to roll back a VM because they are easily reset, thus making post-breach recovery easy.
2. Honey Tokens Embedded in Production: Rather than setting up a conventional server, attackers inject fake files or credentials inside genuine networks. These tokens are stolen and used by attackers, exposing themselves when the tokens are used. The method blends honeypots with a broader detection fabric. Through monitoring the interactions with these tokens, security teams are able to identify the compromised accounts or data channels.
3. Hybrid Deployments: Some environments combine multiple decoy layers — low-interaction endpoints for catching wide-spectrum probing and a high-interaction server for analyzing sophisticated attacks. This type combines the effectiveness of the basic traps with the depth of more complex ones. This type of coverage is common with large companies because it allows for flexibility. It creates a strong security perimeter that encompasses everything from the script kiddies to the nation-state actors.
4. Distributed Honeypot Grids: Research organizations or global companies scatter honeypots across multiple geographic locations. It is possible to gain valuable threat intelligence when observing differences in attackers based on the region they are located in. For example, some groups may be interested in certain protocols or operating system vulnerabilities. This distributed approach also makes it difficult for the attacker to determine which nodes are real and which are not.
5. Deception Stack Integration: A modern movement merges honeypots with deception technology. Production hosts bear signals or phony images that direct enemies toward decoy resources. Those who follow these breadcrumbs end up in a quarantined environment. It also does not stop at the decoy server but adds illusions throughout the network to comprehensively analyze intrusions.

Key Benefits of Honeypots

Once an organization understands what is honeypot and orchestrates a safe deployment, the gains can be considerable. Honeypots not only detect attacks but also refine security posture at large. From immediate threat detection to cost savings, their advantages are well-documented in the honeypots documentation. The following are five fundamental advantages that any enterprise should take note of.

1. Enhanced Visibility into Threat Landscape: When attackers are engaged, attacking in a real environment, the defenders get to watch how attempts are made to penetrate a given system. This direct line to malicious TTPs dwarfs passive log collection from standard security tools. Honeypots transform abstract threat data into vivid records of exploitation. They are able to identify the trends earlier and make necessary changes to plug the gaps and modify security measures.
2. Reduced False Positives: Since honeypot resources are not usually accessed by legitimate users, activity in them is indicative of an attack or reconnaissance. Investigations, therefore, target suspicious activities, not random traffic fluctuations. This lower noise floor is among the top advantages of honeypots, alleviating alert fatigue across SOC teams. It is noteworthy that analysts dedicate time to the area where it counts most: actual intrusion attempts.
3. Cost-Effective Threat Intelligence: Gathering advanced threat data can be done through expensive feeds or through partnerships with other organizations. An organization can get unique data and information from a honeypot that may not be available from any other source, all without having to leave its own environment. It is possible to gain a lot of useful information with very basic hardware and open-source honeypot software. The information can influence areas as fundamental as patch priorities and as high-level as strategic budgeting.
4. Improved Forensic and Legal Support: In the case of attack logs from decoys, they are usually more organized and detailed to facilitate the collection of evidence. In the case of an attack, these logs could support legal claims and proceedings against the attacker. Since every activity is done in a sandbox, there are few chances of data leaks or issues like the chain of custody. This clarity can be very crucial if the situation turns physical and involves the police.
5. Strengthened Deterrence: When adversaries know what is a honeypot and that it is in place, they might tread more cautiously or shift attention to easier targets. It may be useful to declare an organization’s honeypot strategy in public, as this can discourage potential attackers. If criminals understand that the environment is a decoy, they spend their time and resources attacking non-valuable data. This psychological factor, which is difficult to quantify, can prevent constant scanning or attempts at infiltration.

Challenges and Limitations of Honeypots

Despite the advantages of honeypots security, deploying them is not without complications. Every issue, ranging from resource limitation to legal aspects, must be solved to achieve the goal. Understanding these pitfalls clarifies the scope of “what are honeypots in network security” and ensures you manage risk effectively. Below are five significant hurdles frequently cited in the honeypots documentation:

1. Risk of Escalation: If the honeypot is not isolated, the attacker who gains access to it may move to the actual assets. High-interaction decoys are particularly sensitive to boundary control measures in place. A small mistake in segmentation or misconfiguration can lead to even worse events, such as letting in catastrophic breaches. This reason highlights the need for proper strategy and scheduling of penetration tests on the honeypot environment.
2. Maintenance Overhead: Sophisticated honeypots demand consistent updates to remain convincing. Hackers are particularly good at noticing outdated banners, mismatched patch levels, or unrealistic system logs. Maintenance of decoys is similar to the maintenance of real systems, which means that decoys need to be refreshed frequently. If a decoy is not properly taken care of, it becomes unauthentic and of little or no intelligence value.
3. Legal and Ethical Concerns: Some people argue that decoys that attract attackers can be considered as entrapment or attract more malicious attacks. In this case, there are also legal variations on how to deal with gleaned attacker data or personal information. Enterprises must confirm compliance with local and international regulations, especially if honeypot traps record personally identifiable information.
4. False Sense of Security: A honeypot, when implemented properly, might capture a number of threats but is not a perfect solution for all infiltration attempts. That is why overreliance can make a defender oblivious to other weaknesses or other social engineering paths. The problem with this approach is that attackers can easily bypass the decoy and go straight to the production systems. Security awareness and monitoring must be maintained at all layers of the security stack.
5. Resource Allocation: Building and monitoring honeypots can require specialized staff and toolsets. Small organizations, in particular, may struggle to secure funding or resources to make such an investment. While the entry costs are lower in the case of open-source solutions, the requirements for knowledge remain high. Balancing these concerns ensures honeypots contribute effectively without becoming a burdensome side project.

Real-World Honeypot Implementations

Real-world examples highlight how best honeypots deter, document, or disrupt malicious activities. Large companies have created honeypots to attract worms or scanning malware, and promptly block the infected host. Here is a list of real-world honeypots to make the concept clearer:

• Honeynet Project Launches Honeyscanner for Honeypot Audits (2023): The Honeynet Project introduced Honeyscanner, a tool that stress-tests honeypots by simulating cyberattacks like DoS, fuzzing, and library exploits to uncover vulnerabilities. The automated analyzer assesses defenses, provides substantial descriptions of the results, and offers recommendations to the administrators on further strengthening it. Designed for enterprises and open-source developers, it ensures honeypots remain credible traps without becoming attack vectors. It is advised that organizations should incorporate such tools in the honeypot life cycle, assure configurations periodically, and update decoy systems with real threats.

• SURGe’s AI-Powered DECEIVE Honeypot Redefines Deception (2025): SURGe has developed DECEIVE, which is an AI-based open-source honeypot that emulates high-interactive Linux servers through SSH with dynamic prompts without configuration. The tool creates session summaries and threat levels (BENIGN/SUSPICIOUS/MALICIOUS), as well as logs structured JSON data for easy analysis of the attacker. Specifically, DECEIVE is designed as a proof-of-concept and is compatible with protocols such as HTTP/SMTP, allowing for the quick deployment of decoys for new threats. Security teams can experiment with AI-augmented deception, integrate it into research workflows, and combine it with traditional honeypots for layered defense—though caution is urged as it is not production-grade.

• China’s Massive Honeypot Spike Sparks Classification Debate (2023): Shodan detected an unprecedented surge in honeypots within China’s AS4538 network, jumping from 600 to 8.1 million IPs—most flagged as “medical” decoys. Based on the analysis, it was hypothesized that Shodan’s algorithms misclassified the targets since the manual scans revealed closed ports and stringent geolocation restrictions. This incident raises concerns over over-reliance on third-party scanning services that often produce high false alarms. Organizations should cross-leverage threat information, use internal network topology, and track AS-level blips to avoid distorting threat intelligence. Such anomalies can be explained by collaboration with threat-sharing communities.

• Cybereason ICS Honeypot Exposes Multistage Ransomware Tactics (2020): Cybereason’s electricity grid honeypot showed that attackers were using brute force to gain access to RDP, using Mimikatz for credential harvesting, and attempting to move laterally to domain controllers. The ransomware was unleashed after it had infected several endpoints to cause maximum impact. Critical infrastructure operators should require users to use secure RDP practices (e.g., MFA), isolate IT and OT networks, and implement BA to identify compromised credentials. Threat hunting and having an immutable backup are crucial in combating multi-stage ransomware.

How SentinelOne Enhances Honeypot Security in Cybersecurity

SentinelOne’s product uses honeypots to automatically identify and respond to threats. It will continuously monitor honeypot logs in real-time, correlating behavior with network telemetry. Policies can be set up to automatically block IPs or tools observed in decoy engagements. The platform uses AI to detect subtle anomalies in honeypot data, like unusual command sequences or payloads. If an attacker deploys a new exploit, SentinelOne flags it across all endpoints, even if the honeypot itself isn’t compromised. You can simulate high-risk vulnerabilities in decoys, knowing SentinelOne’s behavioral engine will contain any breakout attempts.

SentinelOne enhances deception technology by linking honeypot traps to active threat-hunting workflows. When a decoy is activated, the platform quarantines affected segments and starts forensic captures. You can reproduce attack scenarios to test incident response plans without endangering live systems. For organizations that employ bespoke honeypots, SentinelOne offers API integrations to feed decoy data into its threat intelligence graph. This forms a closing loop where honeypot discoveries expand detection rules for all assets being protected. If you must deal with having to handle managing multiple decoy nodes, the platform’s centralized console makes it easy to monitor and analyze.

When you blend honeypots with SentinelOne autonomous defense, deep threat visibility and real-time protection are both delivered by the teams. The solution quarantines malware samples automatically that have been gathered from decoys, so they cannot spread. You can deploy the honeypots safely, knowing SentinelOne renders threats powerless even when attackers evade initial traps.

Book a free live demo.

Best Practices for Implementing a Honeypot

Creating a functional and secure honeypot is quite challenging. However, with careful planning, these decoys enhance security while providing valuable threat intelligence. Below, we detail the guiding principles that stand out in honeypots documentation and real-world setups. These ensure you implement honeypots effectively without inadvertently increasing your attack surface.

1. Maintain Strong Isolation: Always consider the honeypot to be a hostile environment from where, at any time, an attacker may be attempting to steal information. It is best to segment it within a DMZ or in a separate VLAN to ensure the protection of the core infrastructure. To prevent any cross traffic from going unnoticed, make sure to set up the most basic inbound and outbound rules. Even if you believe that your decoy is perfect, never think that it will always remain contained.
2. Emulate Realistic Services: A decoy with an implausible layout or blatantly outdated banners will scare off serious attackers. Create settings that are similar to the typical OS settings, patch levels, or real data sets. However, exclude such data that may be detrimental to your business if disclosed to the outside world. It is easier to gain a better understanding of the tactics, techniques, and procedures that an adversary is likely to use when the environment is as close to real life as possible.
3. Log Everything Securely: It is recommended to keep logs offsite or at least encrypted from the honeypot. Even if an attacker clears local data, you still have a record of who did what in your audit trail. Collecting events into an SIEM enables correlating interactions with decoys to the rest of the network threats. This means that logs are your best friend when it comes to analyzing the aftermath of a breach.
4. Start Simple, Scale Gradually: Starting a large-scale decoy environment from scratch can be daunting for even the most experienced teams. Start with one service or a small virtual machine (VM). Determine the amount of malicious traffic and extract best practices before scaling up. Eventually, you can adjust or add further illusions for more comprehensive coverage.
5. Regularly Update and Review: Threats are dynamic in nature; therefore, the decoys should reflect the current interests of the attacker. Patch honeypots, refresh system images, and rotate false data sets. Schedule periodic red teaming or pen testing specifically against the decoy. This makes sure that your environment remains realistic, and hence, intruders are easily attracted by your trap.

Conclusion

Honeypots have proven instrumental for businesses seeking deeper insights into attacker behavior while minimizing exposure to actual production resources. By understanding what is honeypot—from definitions and types to real-world examples—organizations can skillfully deploy these deceptive traps. Correct isolation, realistic services, and detailed logging generate valuable information about zero-days, botnets, and human-operated attacks. However, advanced attackers invest a lot of effort into these diversions, which gives the defenders the necessary time to protect real values.

Yet, implementing honeypots demands careful planning, consistent updates, and legal awareness. With a proper approach, they are a cost-effective addition to your security strategy, acting as a first line of detection for threats.

Ready to integrate honeypots with cutting-edge endpoint security? Utilize SentinelOne Singularity™ for threat intelligence, which includes threat detection, real-time response, and honeypot data. Secure your network before it is compromised by using the power of artificial intelligence to counter cyber threats.