The SentinelOne Annual Threat Report - A Defenders Guide from the FrontlinesThe SentinelOne Annual Threat ReportGet the Report
Experiencing a Breach?Blog
Get StartedContact Us
SentinelOne
  • Platform
    Platform Overview
    • Singularity Platform
      Welcome to Integrated Enterprise Security
    • AI for Security
      Leading the Way in AI-Powered Security Solutions
    • Securing AI
      Accelerate AI Adoption with Secure AI Tools, Apps, and Agents.
    • How It Works
      The Singularity XDR Difference
    • Singularity Marketplace
      One-Click Integrations to Unlock the Power of XDR
    • Pricing & Packaging
      Comparisons and Guidance at a Glance
    Data & AI
    • Purple AI
      Accelerate SecOps with Generative AI
    • Singularity Hyperautomation
      Easily Automate Security Processes
    • AI-SIEM
      The AI SIEM for the Autonomous SOC
    • AI Data Pipelines
      Security Data Pipeline for AI SIEM and Data Optimization
    • Singularity Data Lake
      AI-Powered, Unified Data Lake
    • Singularity Data Lake for Log Analytics
      Seamlessly Ingest Data from On-Prem, Cloud or Hybrid Environments
    Endpoint Security
    • Singularity Endpoint
      Autonomous Prevention, Detection, and Response
    • Singularity XDR
      Native & Open Protection, Detection, and Response
    • Singularity RemoteOps Forensics
      Orchestrate Forensics at Scale
    • Singularity Threat Intelligence
      Comprehensive Adversary Intelligence
    • Singularity Vulnerability Management
      Application & OS Vulnerability Management
    • Singularity Identity
      Identity Threat Detection and Response
    Cloud Security
    • Singularity Cloud Security
      Block Attacks with an AI-Powered CNAPP
    • Singularity Cloud Native Security
      Secure Cloud and Development Resources
    • Singularity Cloud Workload Security
      Real-Time Cloud Workload Protection Platform
    • Singularity Cloud Data Security
      AI-Powered Threat Detection for Cloud Storage
    • Singularity Cloud Security Posture Management
      Detect and Remediate Cloud Misconfigurations
    Securing AI
    • Prompt Security
      Secure AI Tools Across Your Enterprise
  • Why SentinelOne?
    Why SentinelOne?
    • Why SentinelOne?
      Cybersecurity Built for What’s Next
    • Our Customers
      Trusted by the World’s Leading Enterprises
    • Industry Recognition
      Tested and Proven by the Experts
    • About Us
      The Industry Leader in Autonomous Cybersecurity
    Compare SentinelOne
    • Arctic Wolf
    • Broadcom
    • CrowdStrike
    • Cybereason
    • Microsoft
    • Palo Alto Networks
    • Sophos
    • Splunk
    • Trellix
    • Trend Micro
    • Wiz
    Verticals
    • Energy
    • Federal Government
    • Finance
    • Healthcare
    • Higher Education
    • K-12 Education
    • Manufacturing
    • Retail
    • State and Local Government
  • Services
    Managed Services
    • Managed Services Overview
      Wayfinder Threat Detection & Response
    • Threat Hunting
      World-Class Expertise and Threat Intelligence
    • Managed Detection & Response
      24/7/365 Expert MDR Across Your Entire Environment
    • Incident Readiness & Response
      DFIR, Breach Readiness, & Compromise Assessments
    Support, Deployment, & Health
    • Technical Account Management
      Customer Success with Personalized Service
    • SentinelOne GO
      Guided Onboarding & Deployment Advisory
    • SentinelOne University
      Live and On-Demand Training
    • Services Overview
      Comprehensive Solutions for Seamless Security Operations
    • SentinelOne Community
      Community Login
  • Partners
    Our Network
    • MSSP Partners
      Succeed Faster with SentinelOne
    • Singularity Marketplace
      Extend the Power of S1 Technology
    • Cyber Risk Partners
      Enlist Pro Response and Advisory Teams
    • Technology Alliances
      Integrated, Enterprise-Scale Solutions
    • SentinelOne for AWS
      Hosted in AWS Regions Around the World
    • Channel Partners
      Deliver the Right Solutions, Together
    • SentinelOne for Google Cloud
      Unified, Autonomous Security Giving Defenders the Advantage at Global Scale
    • Partner Locator
      Your Go-to Source for Our Top Partners in Your Region
    Partner Portal→
  • Resources
    Resource Center
    • Case Studies
    • Data Sheets
    • eBooks
    • Reports
    • Videos
    • Webinars
    • Whitepapers
    • Events
    View All Resources→
    Blog
    • Feature Spotlight
    • For CISO/CIO
    • From the Front Lines
    • Identity
    • Cloud
    • macOS
    • SentinelOne Blog
    Blog→
    Tech Resources
    • SentinelLABS
    • Ransomware Anthology
    • Cybersecurity 101
  • About
    About SentinelOne
    • About SentinelOne
      The Industry Leader in Cybersecurity
    • Investor Relations
      Financial Information & Events
    • SentinelLABS
      Threat Research for the Modern Threat Hunter
    • Careers
      The Latest Job Opportunities
    • Press & News
      Company Announcements
    • Cybersecurity Blog
      The Latest Cybersecurity Threats, News, & More
    • FAQ
      Get Answers to Our Most Frequently Asked Questions
    • DataSet
      The Live Data Platform
    • S Foundation
      Securing a Safer Future for All
    • S Ventures
      Investing in the Next Generation of Security, Data and AI
  • Pricing
Get StartedContact Us
CVE Vulnerability Database
Vulnerability Database/CVE-2026-43990

CVE-2026-43990: JunoClaw Plugin-Shell RCE Vulnerability

CVE-2026-43990 is a remote code execution vulnerability in JunoClaw's plugin-shell component that allows shell metacharacter injection. This article covers technical details, affected versions, security impact, and mitigation.

Published: May 17, 2026

CVE-2026-43990 Overview

CVE-2026-43990 is a command injection vulnerability in JunoClaw, an agentic AI platform built on Juno Network. The flaw resides in plugin-shell's run_command function, which wrapped every agent-supplied command in sh -c or cmd /C and passed the full argument string to the shell parser. This behavior allowed shell metacharacters in agent-supplied arguments to be interpreted as command syntax. The issue is tracked as CWE-77: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command. The vulnerability is fixed in version 0.x.y-security-1.

Critical Impact

An attacker controlling agent inputs can inject arbitrary shell commands through metacharacters, achieving local code execution with full confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact on the host.

Affected Products

  • JunoClaw plugin-shell versions prior to 0.x.y-security-1
  • JunoClaw runtime (junoclaw-runtime) builds that link plugin-shell
  • Agentic workflows using the run_command interface on the Juno Network platform

Discovery Timeline

  • 2026-05-12 - CVE-2026-43990 published to NVD
  • 2026-05-13 - Last updated in NVD database

Technical Details for CVE-2026-43990

Vulnerability Analysis

The vulnerability stems from how plugin-shell constructed and executed agent-supplied commands. The run_command wrapper invoked the system shell (sh -c on Unix-like systems, cmd /C on Windows) and forwarded the entire argument string for parsing. Because the shell interprets characters such as ;, &&, |, `, $(), and redirection operators, any agent-supplied argument containing these metacharacters became executable syntax. An attacker who can influence the prompt or tool input feeding the agent can therefore append arbitrary commands to the intended invocation. The impact is local code execution under the privileges of the JunoClaw runtime process.

Root Cause

The root cause is a failure to neutralize special elements before delegating execution to a command interpreter [CWE-77]. Instead of using direct process execution APIs with an argv vector, run_command concatenated agent input into a single shell-parsed string. This collapsed the boundary between command name, arguments, and shell control syntax.

Attack Vector

Exploitation requires local access in the CVSS sense: the attacker must be able to supply input that the agent passes to run_command. In practice, this includes any upstream prompt, retrieved document, or tool result that the agent treats as a command argument. Crafting an argument such as benign_value; malicious_command causes the shell to execute both. No authentication or user interaction is required at the shell layer.

The upstream fix introduces a Cargo feature gate and an allowlist-only execution path. The shell and Python execution paths are now opt-in via the unsafe-shell feature, and arguments are tokenized using shell-words rather than concatenated into a shell-parsed string.

toml
edition = "2021"
description = "JunoClaw agent execution runtime"

[features]
default = []
# Forwards `unsafe-shell` to plugin-shell. Off by default; enabling adds the
# shell + Python execution code paths to the binary. See plugin-shell's
# Cargo.toml and SECURITY.md for the full opt-in semantics.
unsafe-shell = ["plugin-shell/unsafe-shell"]

[dependencies]
junoclaw-core = { path = "../junoclaw-core" }
plugin-llm = { path = "../../plugins/plugin-llm" }

Source: GitHub Commit 2bc54f6

Detection Methods for CVE-2026-43990

Indicators of Compromise

  • Process trees showing the JunoClaw runtime spawning sh -c or cmd /C followed by unexpected child processes such as curl, wget, nc, bash, powershell, or python invoked outside the agent's documented toolset.
  • Agent execution logs containing shell metacharacters (;, &&, ||, |, `, $(, >, <) inside run_command argument fields.
  • Outbound network connections originating from the JunoClaw runtime process to domains not associated with configured LLM or tool endpoints.

Detection Strategies

  • Audit plugin-shell invocation logs for argument strings that contain shell control characters and correlate them with the originating agent prompt or tool result.
  • Apply EDR rules that flag the JunoClaw runtime binary spawning interactive shells or scripting interpreters as immediate children.
  • Inspect builds for the unsafe-shell Cargo feature; binaries compiled without it should not contain the shell execution code path.

Monitoring Recommendations

  • Enable command-line auditing (auditd execve on Linux, Sysmon Event ID 1 on Windows) for all hosts running JunoClaw agents.
  • Forward agent input/output logs to a centralized analytics pipeline and alert on metacharacter patterns adjacent to tool-call arguments.
  • Baseline normal child processes of the JunoClaw runtime and alert on deviations.

How to Mitigate CVE-2026-43990

Immediate Actions Required

  • Upgrade JunoClaw to release v0.x.y-security-1 or later, available on the JunoClaw GitHub releases page.
  • Rebuild downstream binaries with the default = [] feature set so the unsafe-shell code path is excluded unless explicitly required.
  • Review agent tool definitions and remove any direct exposure of run_command to untrusted prompt input.

Patch Information

The fix is delivered in commit 2bc54f6 and released as v0.x.y-security-1. The patch adds the shell-words and tempfile crates, gates shell and Python execution behind the opt-in unsafe-shell Cargo feature, and restricts execution to an allowlist. Full details are in the GitHub Security Advisory GHSA-gpvm-3chf-2649.

text
  "junoclaw-core",
  "serde",
  "serde_json",
+ "shell-words",
+ "tempfile",
  "tokio",
  "tracing",
 ]

Source: GitHub Commit 2bc54f6

Workarounds

  • Compile JunoClaw without the unsafe-shell feature to remove the vulnerable shell execution code path entirely.
  • Restrict the executing user account with mandatory access controls (AppArmor, SELinux, or Windows AppContainer) so any injected command runs in a constrained context.
  • Sanitize or reject agent-supplied arguments containing shell metacharacters at the orchestration layer before they reach run_command.
bash
# Build JunoClaw runtime with the vulnerable code path excluded
cargo build --release --no-default-features

# Verify the unsafe-shell feature is not enabled
cargo tree -e features | grep -i unsafe-shell || echo "unsafe-shell disabled"

Disclaimer: This content was generated using AI. While we strive for accuracy, please verify critical information with official sources.

  • Vulnerability Details
  • TypeRCE

  • Vendor/TechJunoclaw

  • SeverityHIGH

  • CVSS Score8.4

  • EPSS Probability0.02%

  • Known ExploitedNo
  • CVSS Vector
  • CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
  • Impact Assessment
  • ConfidentialityLow
  • IntegrityNone
  • AvailabilityHigh
  • CWE References
  • CWE-77
  • Technical References
  • GitHub Commit Update

  • GitHub Security Release

  • GitHub Security Advisory
  • Related CVEs
  • CVE-2026-43992: JunoClaw Information Disclosure Flaw

  • CVE-2026-43989: JunoClaw Path Traversal Vulnerability
Default Legacy - Prefooter | Experience the World’s Most Advanced Cybersecurity Platform

Experience the Most Advanced Cybersecurity Platform

See how the world’s most intelligent, autonomous cybersecurity platform can protect your organization today and into the future.

Try SentinelOne
  • Get Started
  • Get a Demo
  • Product Tour
  • Why SentinelOne
  • Pricing & Packaging
  • FAQ
  • Contact
  • Contact Us
  • Customer Support
  • SentinelOne Status
  • Language
  • Platform
  • Singularity Platform
  • Singularity Endpoint
  • Singularity Cloud
  • Singularity AI-SIEM
  • Singularity Identity
  • Singularity Marketplace
  • Purple AI
  • Services
  • Wayfinder TDR
  • SentinelOne GO
  • Technical Account Management
  • Support Services
  • Verticals
  • Energy
  • Federal Government
  • Finance
  • Healthcare
  • Higher Education
  • K-12 Education
  • Manufacturing
  • Retail
  • State and Local Government
  • Cybersecurity for SMB
  • Resources
  • Blog
  • Labs
  • Case Studies
  • Videos
  • Product Tours
  • Events
  • Cybersecurity 101
  • eBooks
  • Webinars
  • Whitepapers
  • Press
  • News
  • Ransomware Anthology
  • Company
  • About Us
  • Our Customers
  • Careers
  • Partners
  • Legal & Compliance
  • Security & Compliance
  • Investor Relations
  • S Foundation
  • S Ventures

©2026 SentinelOne, All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Notice Terms of Use

English