Skip to main content
Vulnerability Database/CVE-2026-92753

CVE-2026-92753: PatrowlManager Authorization Bypass Flaw

CVE-2026-92753 is an authorization bypass flaw in PatrowlManager that lets authenticated attackers access event history, delete events, and modify alerts from other users. This article covers technical details, affected versions, and mitigation.

Published:

CVE-2026-92753 Overview

CVE-2026-92753 is an authorization bypass vulnerability in PatrowlManager through version 1.8.4. The flaw affects the events and alerts API endpoints, which lack ownership filtering on queried objects. Authenticated attackers can read the platform's event history, delete arbitrary events, and modify alerts owned by other users. The weakness is classified as Missing Authorization [CWE-862] and is exploitable over the network with low privileges and no user interaction.

Critical Impact

Any authenticated PatrowlManager user can access, delete, and tamper with events and alerts belonging to other tenants or users, breaking multi-user integrity guarantees.

Affected Products

  • PatrowlManager versions through 1.8.4
  • Deployments exposing the events API endpoints defined in events/apis.py
  • Multi-user PatrowlManager instances relying on per-user event and alert isolation

Discovery Timeline

  • 2026-09-16 - CVE-2026-92753 published to NVD
  • 2026-09-16 - Last updated in NVD database

Technical Details for CVE-2026-92753

Vulnerability Analysis

PatrowlManager exposes REST endpoints under the events application for listing, deleting, and updating platform events and alerts. According to the VulnCheck advisory, the API views in events/apis.py query event and alert objects without restricting results to the requesting user's scope.

An authenticated attacker can invoke these endpoints to enumerate the full event history of the platform. The same endpoints allow the attacker to delete events and modify alerts belonging to arbitrary users. Because deleted events cannot be recovered, this also serves as an anti-forensics primitive against a scanning and vulnerability-management platform.

Root Cause

The root cause is missing authorization on object-level access. The affected view functions perform authenticated queries but do not filter results by the owning user, team, or organization. This is a classic instance of [CWE-862] Missing Authorization, sometimes described as an Insecure Direct Object Reference at the collection level.

Attack Vector

Exploitation requires a valid, low-privileged PatrowlManager account. The attacker sends HTTP requests to the vulnerable event and alert endpoints, optionally supplying object identifiers belonging to other users. The server returns or mutates the objects without verifying ownership. See PatrowlManager issue #474 for maintainer discussion. No verified exploit code is published; the vulnerability is described in prose in the linked advisory.

Detect Identity Attacks the Moment Authentication Fails

Singularity™ Identity surfaces credential misuse, lateral movement, and privilege escalation in real time, so you can contain the breach before it spreads.

Stop Identity Attacks

Detection Methods for CVE-2026-92753

Indicators of Compromise

  • Unexpected DELETE requests against /events/ API paths from user accounts that did not create the referenced events.
  • Alert records showing status or metadata changes performed by user accounts other than their owner.
  • Bulk GET requests enumerating event or alert identifiers across ID ranges from a single authenticated session.

Detection Strategies

  • Correlate API access logs with object ownership metadata and flag requests where the authenticated principal does not own the returned or modified object.
  • Baseline normal per-user event and alert access volume and alert on sudden expansion of accessed identifier ranges.
  • Review Django audit logs for PatrowlManager for cross-user modifications to Event and Alert models.

Monitoring Recommendations

  • Enable verbose HTTP access logging on the PatrowlManager reverse proxy and retain request paths, methods, and authenticated user identifiers.
  • Monitor for spikes in 4xx and 2xx responses from the events endpoints tied to non-administrative accounts.
  • Forward application logs to a centralized SIEM or data lake to enable cross-user correlation and long-term retention.

How to Mitigate CVE-2026-92753

Immediate Actions Required

  • Restrict PatrowlManager access to trusted operators only until a patched release is deployed.
  • Rotate credentials for any low-trust accounts that could reach the events API.
  • Audit existing event and alert records for unauthorized deletions or modifications.

Patch Information

No fixed version is identified in the NVD entry at the time of publication. Track the PatrowlManager repository and issue #474 for an official fix, and review the VulnCheck advisory for updates. Any downstream fix should enforce ownership filtering on the queryset in events/apis.py.

Workarounds

  • Place PatrowlManager behind an authenticating reverse proxy and restrict the events API paths to administrative source addresses.
  • Reduce the number of authenticated users on shared instances and separate tenants into isolated deployments.
  • Apply a local patch that adds an ownership filter (for example, .filter(owner=request.user)) to the event and alert querysets until an upstream release is available.
bash
# Example nginx restriction limiting the events API to an internal admin CIDR
location /events/ {
    allow 10.0.0.0/24;
    deny all;
    proxy_pass http://patrowlmanager_upstream;
}

Disclaimer: This content was generated using AI. While we strive for accuracy, please verify critical information with official sources.

Experience the Most Advanced Cybersecurity Platform

See how the world’s most intelligent, autonomous cybersecurity platform can protect your organization today and into the future.