Skip to main content
CVE Vulnerability Database
Vulnerability Database/CVE-2026-53081

CVE-2026-53081: Linux Kernel Privilege Escalation Flaw

CVE-2026-53081 is a privilege escalation vulnerability in the Linux kernel's BPF subsystem that affects scalar register verification. This article covers the technical details, affected versions, impact, and mitigation.

Published:

CVE-2026-53081 Overview

CVE-2026-53081 is a Linux kernel vulnerability in the Berkeley Packet Filter (BPF) verifier. The flaw resides in regsafe(), which compares two scalar registers that both carry the BPF_ADD_CONST flag. The verifier's check_scalar_ids() maps the compound id (base id combined with the BPF_ADD_CONST flag) but fails to verify that the underlying base ids remain consistent with existing idmap entries. This inconsistency lets the verifier incorrectly prune states that derive from unrelated registers, weakening the soundness guarantees of the BPF verifier.

Critical Impact

A local attacker capable of loading BPF programs can construct verifier states that pass state pruning despite referencing unrelated source registers, undermining the verifier's safety guarantees on Linux kernels exposing BPF to unprivileged or sandboxed contexts.

Affected Products

  • Linux kernel versions containing the BPF_ADD_CONST scalar tracking logic in the BPF verifier
  • Distributions shipping the affected mainline kernel prior to the referenced stable commits
  • Kernel builds with CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL enabled

Discovery Timeline

  • 2026-06-24 - CVE-2026-53081 published to NVD
  • 2026-06-24 - Last updated in NVD database

Technical Details for CVE-2026-53081

Vulnerability Analysis

The Linux BPF verifier uses register ids to track relationships between scalar values across program states. When a scalar register has a constant offset applied, the verifier sets the BPF_ADD_CONST flag and tracks both the base id and the offset. During state comparison, regsafe() invokes check_scalar_ids() to ensure id mappings between the old and current states stay consistent.

The defect is that check_scalar_ids() treats the compound value (base | BPF_ADD_CONST) as a single mapping key. It never validates that the stripped base id is consistent with prior mappings created from non-ADD_CONST comparisons of the same base id. As a result, the verifier can accept a state pair where the old state has R3 = R2 + 10 (base id A) and the current state has R3 = R4 + 10 (base id C), even though R2 and R4 map to different base ids. State pruning then succeeds incorrectly, breaking value-tracking invariants the verifier relies on for safety.

Root Cause

The root cause is incomplete id consistency checking in the verifier's scalar comparison path. When BPF_ADD_CONST is set, check_scalar_ids() records only the compound id mapping (A|flag -> C|flag) without re-checking that the base id mapping (A -> C) agrees with any existing entry (A -> B). This is a logic flaw in state equivalence checking [CWE-697] within kernel/bpf/verifier.c.

Attack Vector

Exploitation requires the ability to load BPF programs into the kernel. A crafted BPF program can construct verifier states where two scalar registers share an ADD_CONST relationship but derive from unrelated base registers. Because state pruning incorrectly succeeds, the verifier can be convinced that subsequent operations are safe when they are not, potentially enabling out-of-bounds access or arbitrary kernel memory read or write depending on follow-on operations the attacker chains together.

The upstream fix introduces an additional check_ids() invocation on the stripped base ids whenever BPF_ADD_CONST is set, ensuring the base id mapping remains consistent. See the kernel commits 13c02881, 2f2ec8e7, 691adf73, and 7d73c72c for the patch implementations.

Detection Methods for CVE-2026-53081

Indicators of Compromise

  • Unprivileged or container-confined processes invoking bpf(BPF_PROG_LOAD, ...) with complex scalar arithmetic patterns
  • BPF programs that repeatedly construct registers using BPF_ALU64 | BPF_ADD with constant immediates against tracked scalars
  • Unexpected kernel oops, BUG, or KASAN reports in kernel/bpf/verifier.c paths
  • Kernel logs showing successful loads of BPF programs from non-root namespaces on hosts where unprivileged BPF is enabled

Detection Strategies

  • Audit bpf() syscall usage with auditd rules targeting BPF_PROG_LOAD and correlate to the invoking UID and namespace
  • Compare running kernel versions against the fixed stable commits referenced in the kernel.org advisory
  • Inspect /proc/sys/kernel/unprivileged_bpf_disabled and flag hosts where unprivileged BPF remains enabled
  • Hunt for processes spawning BPF programs from container or sandbox contexts not expected to use eBPF

Monitoring Recommendations

  • Enable kernel audit subsystem logging for the bpf syscall and forward events to a centralized analytics platform
  • Monitor for kernel taint flags, BPF verifier rejection rate anomalies, and KASAN reports
  • Alert on container workloads that load BPF programs unless explicitly permitted by policy
  • Track kernel package versions across fleet inventory to identify hosts still running pre-patch builds

How to Mitigate CVE-2026-53081

Immediate Actions Required

  • Apply the upstream kernel patches referenced in commits 13c02881, 2f2ec8e7, 691adf73, and 7d73c72c or upgrade to a stable kernel release containing these fixes
  • Set kernel.unprivileged_bpf_disabled=1 on hosts that do not require unprivileged BPF
  • Restrict CAP_BPF and CAP_SYS_ADMIN to trusted workloads only
  • Review container runtime configurations and seccomp profiles to block the bpf() syscall for untrusted containers

Patch Information

The fix adds a check_ids() invocation on the base ids whenever BPF_ADD_CONST is set, in addition to the existing compound id mapping. This enforces that any ADD_CONST derivative register maps consistently with prior base id mappings, preventing the verifier from pruning unsound state pairs. Vendor stable trees should pick up the referenced commits; consult distribution security advisories for backport status.

Workarounds

  • Disable unprivileged BPF system-wide via sysctl -w kernel.unprivileged_bpf_disabled=1 until the kernel is patched
  • Apply seccomp filters that deny the bpf() syscall for processes and containers that do not require it
  • Use Linux Security Modules such as SELinux or AppArmor to constrain CAP_BPF and CAP_SYS_ADMIN usage
bash
# Configuration example
# Disable unprivileged BPF program loading
sysctl -w kernel.unprivileged_bpf_disabled=1
echo 'kernel.unprivileged_bpf_disabled=1' >> /etc/sysctl.d/90-bpf-hardening.conf

# Verify current setting
cat /proc/sys/kernel/unprivileged_bpf_disabled

Disclaimer: This content was generated using AI. While we strive for accuracy, please verify critical information with official sources.

Default Legacy - Prefooter | Experience the World’s Most Advanced Cybersecurity Platform

Experience the Most Advanced Cybersecurity Platform

See how the world’s most intelligent, autonomous cybersecurity platform can protect your organization today and into the future.