A Leader in the 2026 Gartner® Magic Quadrant™ for Endpoint Protection. Six years running.Six years. Gartner® Magic Quadrant™ Leader.Find Out Why
Experiencing a Breach?Blog
Get StartedContact Us
SentinelOne
  • Platform
    Platform Overview
    • Singularity Platform
      Welcome to Integrated Enterprise Security
    • AI for Security
      Leading the Way in AI-Powered Security Solutions
    • Securing AI
      Accelerate AI Adoption with Secure AI Tools, Apps, and Agents.
    • How It Works
      The Singularity XDR Difference
    • Singularity Marketplace
      One-Click Integrations to Unlock the Power of XDR
    • Pricing & Packaging
      Comparisons and Guidance at a Glance
    Data & AI
    • Purple AI
      Accelerate SecOps with Generative AI
    • Singularity Hyperautomation
      Easily Automate Security Processes
    • AI-SIEM
      The AI SIEM for the Autonomous SOC
    • AI Data Pipelines
      Security Data Pipeline for AI SIEM and Data Optimization
    • Singularity Data Lake
      AI-Powered, Unified Data Lake
    • Singularity Data Lake for Log Analytics
      Seamlessly Ingest Data from On-Prem, Cloud or Hybrid Environments
    Endpoint Security
    • Singularity Endpoint
      Autonomous Prevention, Detection, and Response
    • Singularity XDR
      Native & Open Protection, Detection, and Response
    • Singularity RemoteOps Forensics
      Orchestrate Forensics at Scale
    • Singularity Threat Intelligence
      Comprehensive Adversary Intelligence
    • Singularity Vulnerability Management
      Application & OS Vulnerability Management
    • Singularity Identity
      Identity Threat Detection and Response
    Cloud Security
    • Singularity Cloud Security
      Block Attacks with an AI-Powered CNAPP
    • Singularity Cloud Native Security
      Secure Cloud and Development Resources
    • Singularity Cloud Workload Security
      Real-Time Cloud Workload Protection Platform
    • Singularity Cloud Data Security
      AI-Powered Threat Detection for Cloud Storage
    • Singularity Cloud Security Posture Management
      Detect and Remediate Cloud Misconfigurations
    Securing AI
    • Prompt Security
      Secure AI Tools Across Your Enterprise
  • Why SentinelOne?
    Why SentinelOne?
    • Why SentinelOne?
      Cybersecurity Built for What’s Next
    • Our Customers
      Trusted by the World’s Leading Enterprises
    • Industry Recognition
      Tested and Proven by the Experts
    • About Us
      The Industry Leader in Autonomous Cybersecurity
    Compare SentinelOne
    • Arctic Wolf
    • Broadcom
    • CrowdStrike
    • Cybereason
    • Microsoft
    • Palo Alto Networks
    • Sophos
    • Splunk
    • Trellix
    • Trend Micro
    • Wiz
    Verticals
    • Energy
    • Federal Government
    • Finance
    • Healthcare
    • Higher Education
    • K-12 Education
    • Manufacturing
    • Retail
    • State and Local Government
  • Services
    Managed Services
    • Managed Services Overview
      Wayfinder Threat Detection & Response
    • Threat Hunting
      World-Class Expertise and Threat Intelligence
    • Managed Detection & Response
      24/7/365 Expert MDR Across Your Entire Environment
    • Incident Readiness & Response
      DFIR, Breach Readiness, & Compromise Assessments
    Support, Deployment, & Health
    • Technical Account Management
      Customer Success with Personalized Service
    • SentinelOne GO
      Guided Onboarding & Deployment Advisory
    • SentinelOne University
      Live and On-Demand Training
    • Services Overview
      Comprehensive Solutions for Seamless Security Operations
    • SentinelOne Community
      Community Login
  • Partners
    Our Network
    • MSSP Partners
      Succeed Faster with SentinelOne
    • Singularity Marketplace
      Extend the Power of S1 Technology
    • Cyber Risk Partners
      Enlist Pro Response and Advisory Teams
    • Technology Alliances
      Integrated, Enterprise-Scale Solutions
    • SentinelOne for AWS
      Hosted in AWS Regions Around the World
    • Channel Partners
      Deliver the Right Solutions, Together
    • SentinelOne for Google Cloud
      Unified, Autonomous Security Giving Defenders the Advantage at Global Scale
    • Partner Locator
      Your Go-to Source for Our Top Partners in Your Region
    Partner Portal→
  • Resources
    Resource Center
    • Case Studies
    • Data Sheets
    • eBooks
    • Reports
    • Videos
    • Webinars
    • Whitepapers
    • Events
    View All Resources→
    Blog
    • Feature Spotlight
    • For CISO/CIO
    • From the Front Lines
    • Identity
    • Cloud
    • macOS
    • SentinelOne Blog
    Blog→
    Tech Resources
    • SentinelLABS
    • Ransomware Anthology
    • Cybersecurity 101
  • About
    About SentinelOne
    • About SentinelOne
      The Industry Leader in Cybersecurity
    • Investor Relations
      Financial Information & Events
    • SentinelLABS
      Threat Research for the Modern Threat Hunter
    • Careers
      The Latest Job Opportunities
    • Press & News
      Company Announcements
    • Cybersecurity Blog
      The Latest Cybersecurity Threats, News, & More
    • FAQ
      Get Answers to Our Most Frequently Asked Questions
    • DataSet
      The Live Data Platform
    • S Foundation
      Securing a Safer Future for All
    • S Ventures
      Investing in the Next Generation of Security, Data and AI
  • Pricing
Get StartedContact Us
CVE Vulnerability Database
Vulnerability Database/CVE-2026-43083

CVE-2026-43083: Linux Kernel Use-After-Free Vulnerability

CVE-2026-43083 is a use-after-free vulnerability in the Linux kernel's IOAM6 implementation that can cause out-of-bounds access and missing lock issues. This article covers technical details, affected versions, and mitigation.

Published: May 7, 2026

CVE-2026-43083 Overview

CVE-2026-43083 affects the Linux kernel's In-situ Operations, Administration, and Maintenance for IPv6 (ioam6) subsystem. The vulnerability stems from an out-of-bounds (OOB) access in the dev->_tx[] array and a missing lock around qdisc_qstats_qlen_backlog() inside __ioam6_fill_trace_data(). When trace->type.bit6 is set on the receive path, skb->queue_mapping carries the RX queue index of the ingress device. If that index exceeds the egress device's num_tx_queues, skb_get_tx_queue() returns an invalid pointer because it does not clamp the index. The Linux kernel maintainers have resolved the issue through patches in mainline and stable trees.

Critical Impact

A malformed IPv6 packet processed by the IOAM6 trace handler can trigger an out-of-bounds read on dev->_tx[], leading to kernel memory corruption or denial of service on systems with asymmetric RX/TX queue counts.

Affected Products

  • Linux kernel versions containing the net: ioam6 trace data implementation prior to the fixing commits
  • Linux distributions shipping vulnerable stable kernels
  • Systems with IPv6 IOAM6 (CONFIG_IPV6_IOAM6) enabled and asymmetric RX/TX queue configurations

Discovery Timeline

  • 2026-05-06 - CVE-2026-43083 published to NVD
  • 2026-05-06 - Last updated in NVD database

Technical Details for CVE-2026-43083

Vulnerability Analysis

The vulnerability exists in __ioam6_fill_trace_data() within the Linux kernel's IPv6 IOAM6 implementation. When trace->type.bit6 is set, the function calls skb_get_tx_queue(dev, skb) followed by rcu_dereference(queue->qdisc) to populate per-queue trace fields. On the receive path (is_input is true), skb->queue_mapping represents the RX queue index of the ingress device, not the egress device. If the ingress device has more RX queues than the egress device has TX queues, the index returned by skb_get_queue_mapping(skb) exceeds dev->num_tx_queues. Because skb_get_tx_queue() does not clamp the index, the resulting pointer reads beyond the bounds of the dev->_tx[] array.

Root Cause

Two distinct defects coexist in __ioam6_fill_trace_data(). The first is the missing bounds check on skb_get_queue_mapping(skb) against dev->num_tx_queues before dereferencing the TX queue array [CWE-125]. The second is the missing lock around qdisc_qstats_qlen_backlog(), which is invoked from both softirq and process contexts and therefore requires spin_lock_bh() to prevent concurrent modification of qdisc statistics.

Attack Vector

An attacker positioned to inject IPv6 packets carrying an IOAM6 Hop-by-Hop option with trace->type.bit6 set can trigger the OOB read on hosts where IOAM6 is enabled and where the ingress NIC has more RX queues than an egress device has TX queues. The condition is reachable on any forwarding or terminating host with such queue asymmetry. Successful triggering reads adjacent kernel memory through an arbitrary qdisc pointer, potentially producing kernel panics, memory disclosure, or further memory corruption depending on the layout of structures following dev->_tx[].

No public exploit code is available. The kernel maintainers also note that per-queue visibility cannot be accurate in this design and will be replaced as a separate feature.

Detection Methods for CVE-2026-43083

Indicators of Compromise

  • Unexpected kernel oops or panic messages referencing __ioam6_fill_trace_data, skb_get_tx_queue, or qdisc_qstats_qlen_backlog in dmesg and /var/log/kern.log
  • KASAN reports flagging out-of-bounds reads inside the ioam6 code path
  • Inbound IPv6 traffic carrying Hop-by-Hop IOAM6 trace options on hosts that do not normally participate in IOAM6 telemetry

Detection Strategies

  • Audit running kernels for the presence of the fixing commits 6d1d9ed9b409, 95a1334748c9, and b30b1675aa2b to confirm patch status
  • Inspect /proc/sys/net/ipv6/ioam6_* and namespace IOAM6 schema/namespace tables to identify hosts with IOAM6 enabled
  • Capture IPv6 traffic with a packet analyzer and filter for Hop-by-Hop options containing the IOAM6 trace type to identify unexpected senders

Monitoring Recommendations

  • Forward kernel ring buffer entries and crash dumps to a centralized logging platform for correlation across fleets
  • Track NIC queue configurations (ethtool -l) on routers and high-throughput hosts to identify asymmetric RX/TX setups that satisfy the trigger condition
  • Alert on new IPv6 IOAM6 Hop-by-Hop options observed at network ingress points where IOAM6 is not part of the operational design

How to Mitigate CVE-2026-43083

Immediate Actions Required

  • Update affected systems to a Linux kernel version that includes the upstream fixes referenced in the kernel.org commits
  • Where patching is not yet possible, disable IOAM6 by ensuring no IOAM6 namespaces or schemas are configured and by blocking inbound IPv6 Hop-by-Hop IOAM6 options at the network edge
  • Inventory hosts with CONFIG_IPV6_IOAM6=y and prioritize patching forwarding nodes and hosts with asymmetric RX/TX queue counts

Patch Information

The fix adds a bounds check so that __ioam6_fill_trace_data() skips the per-queue path when skb_get_queue_mapping(skb) is greater than or equal to dev->num_tx_queues, and wraps qdisc_qstats_qlen_backlog() with spin_lock_bh() to handle the dual softirq and process context invocation. The fix is distributed across the following commits:

  • Mainline commit 6d1d9ed9b409
  • Stable backport 95a1334748c9
  • Stable backport b30b1675aa2b

Workarounds

  • Drop IPv6 packets containing Hop-by-Hop IOAM6 trace options at perimeter firewalls and ingress routers until kernels are patched
  • Avoid configuring IOAM6 namespaces and schemas on production hosts that do not require IOAM6 telemetry
  • Where feasible, align RX queue counts on ingress NICs with TX queue counts on potential egress devices to remove the asymmetry that triggers the OOB read
bash
# Verify whether IOAM6 is configured on a host
ip ioam namespace show
ip ioam schema show

# Inspect NIC queue counts to identify asymmetric configurations
ethtool -l eth0

# Confirm the running kernel includes the fix (example for Debian/Ubuntu)
uname -r
grep -E 'ioam6|__ioam6_fill_trace_data' /proc/kallsyms | head

Disclaimer: This content was generated using AI. While we strive for accuracy, please verify critical information with official sources.

  • Vulnerability Details
  • TypeUse After Free

  • Vendor/TechLinux Kernel

  • SeverityNONE

  • CVSS ScoreN/A

  • EPSS Probability0.02%

  • Known ExploitedNo
  • Impact Assessment
  • ConfidentialityNone
  • IntegrityNone
  • AvailabilityNone
  • Technical References
  • Kernel Git Commit Update

  • Kernel Git Commit Update

  • Kernel Git Commit Update
  • Related CVEs
  • CVE-2026-46241: Linux Kernel Use-After-Free Vulnerability

  • CVE-2026-46233: Linux Kernel Use-After-Free Vulnerability

  • CVE-2026-46227: Linux Kernel Use-After-Free Vulnerability

  • CVE-2026-46222: Linux Kernel Use-After-Free Vulnerability
Default Legacy - Prefooter | Experience the World’s Most Advanced Cybersecurity Platform

Experience the Most Advanced Cybersecurity Platform

See how the world’s most intelligent, autonomous cybersecurity platform can protect your organization today and into the future.

Try SentinelOne
  • Get Started
  • Get a Demo
  • Product Tour
  • Why SentinelOne
  • Pricing & Packaging
  • FAQ
  • Contact
  • Contact Us
  • Customer Support
  • SentinelOne Status
  • Language
  • Platform
  • Singularity Platform
  • Singularity Endpoint
  • Singularity Cloud
  • Singularity AI-SIEM
  • Singularity Identity
  • Singularity Marketplace
  • Purple AI
  • Services
  • Wayfinder TDR
  • SentinelOne GO
  • Technical Account Management
  • Support Services
  • Verticals
  • Energy
  • Federal Government
  • Finance
  • Healthcare
  • Higher Education
  • K-12 Education
  • Manufacturing
  • Retail
  • State and Local Government
  • Cybersecurity for SMB
  • Resources
  • Blog
  • Labs
  • Case Studies
  • Videos
  • Product Tours
  • Events
  • Cybersecurity 101
  • eBooks
  • Webinars
  • Whitepapers
  • Press
  • News
  • Ransomware Anthology
  • Company
  • About Us
  • Our Customers
  • Careers
  • Partners
  • Legal & Compliance
  • Security & Compliance
  • Investor Relations
  • S Foundation
  • S Ventures

©2026 SentinelOne, All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Notice Terms of Use

English