A Leader in the 2026 Gartner® Magic Quadrant™ for Endpoint Protection. Six years running.Six years. Gartner® Magic Quadrant™ Leader.Find Out Why
Experiencing a Breach?Blog
Get StartedContact Us
SentinelOne
  • Platform
    Platform Overview
    • Singularity Platform
      Welcome to Integrated Enterprise Security
    • AI for Security
      Leading the Way in AI-Powered Security Solutions
    • Securing AI
      Accelerate AI Adoption with Secure AI Tools, Apps, and Agents.
    • How It Works
      The Singularity XDR Difference
    • Singularity Marketplace
      One-Click Integrations to Unlock the Power of XDR
    • Pricing & Packaging
      Comparisons and Guidance at a Glance
    Data & AI
    • Purple AI
      Accelerate SecOps with Generative AI
    • Singularity Hyperautomation
      Easily Automate Security Processes
    • AI-SIEM
      The AI SIEM for the Autonomous SOC
    • AI Data Pipelines
      Security Data Pipeline for AI SIEM and Data Optimization
    • Singularity Data Lake
      AI-Powered, Unified Data Lake
    • Singularity Data Lake for Log Analytics
      Seamlessly Ingest Data from On-Prem, Cloud or Hybrid Environments
    Endpoint Security
    • Singularity Endpoint
      Autonomous Prevention, Detection, and Response
    • Singularity XDR
      Native & Open Protection, Detection, and Response
    • Singularity RemoteOps Forensics
      Orchestrate Forensics at Scale
    • Singularity Threat Intelligence
      Comprehensive Adversary Intelligence
    • Singularity Vulnerability Management
      Application & OS Vulnerability Management
    • Singularity Identity
      Identity Threat Detection and Response
    Cloud Security
    • Singularity Cloud Security
      Block Attacks with an AI-Powered CNAPP
    • Singularity Cloud Native Security
      Secure Cloud and Development Resources
    • Singularity Cloud Workload Security
      Real-Time Cloud Workload Protection Platform
    • Singularity Cloud Data Security
      AI-Powered Threat Detection for Cloud Storage
    • Singularity Cloud Security Posture Management
      Detect and Remediate Cloud Misconfigurations
    Securing AI
    • Prompt Security
      Secure AI Tools Across Your Enterprise
  • Why SentinelOne?
    Why SentinelOne?
    • Why SentinelOne?
      Cybersecurity Built for What’s Next
    • Our Customers
      Trusted by the World’s Leading Enterprises
    • Industry Recognition
      Tested and Proven by the Experts
    • About Us
      The Industry Leader in Autonomous Cybersecurity
    Compare SentinelOne
    • Arctic Wolf
    • Broadcom
    • CrowdStrike
    • Cybereason
    • Microsoft
    • Palo Alto Networks
    • Sophos
    • Splunk
    • Trellix
    • Trend Micro
    • Wiz
    Verticals
    • Energy
    • Federal Government
    • Finance
    • Healthcare
    • Higher Education
    • K-12 Education
    • Manufacturing
    • Retail
    • State and Local Government
  • Services
    Managed Services
    • Managed Services Overview
      Wayfinder Threat Detection & Response
    • Threat Hunting
      World-Class Expertise and Threat Intelligence
    • Managed Detection & Response
      24/7/365 Expert MDR Across Your Entire Environment
    • Incident Readiness & Response
      DFIR, Breach Readiness, & Compromise Assessments
    Support, Deployment, & Health
    • Technical Account Management
      Customer Success with Personalized Service
    • SentinelOne GO
      Guided Onboarding & Deployment Advisory
    • SentinelOne University
      Live and On-Demand Training
    • Services Overview
      Comprehensive Solutions for Seamless Security Operations
    • SentinelOne Community
      Community Login
  • Partners
    Our Network
    • MSSP Partners
      Succeed Faster with SentinelOne
    • Singularity Marketplace
      Extend the Power of S1 Technology
    • Cyber Risk Partners
      Enlist Pro Response and Advisory Teams
    • Technology Alliances
      Integrated, Enterprise-Scale Solutions
    • SentinelOne for AWS
      Hosted in AWS Regions Around the World
    • Channel Partners
      Deliver the Right Solutions, Together
    • SentinelOne for Google Cloud
      Unified, Autonomous Security Giving Defenders the Advantage at Global Scale
    • Partner Locator
      Your Go-to Source for Our Top Partners in Your Region
    Partner Portal→
  • Resources
    Resource Center
    • Case Studies
    • Data Sheets
    • eBooks
    • Reports
    • Videos
    • Webinars
    • Whitepapers
    • Events
    View All Resources→
    Blog
    • Feature Spotlight
    • For CISO/CIO
    • From the Front Lines
    • Identity
    • Cloud
    • macOS
    • SentinelOne Blog
    Blog→
    Tech Resources
    • SentinelLABS
    • Ransomware Anthology
    • Cybersecurity 101
  • About
    About SentinelOne
    • About SentinelOne
      The Industry Leader in Cybersecurity
    • Investor Relations
      Financial Information & Events
    • SentinelLABS
      Threat Research for the Modern Threat Hunter
    • Careers
      The Latest Job Opportunities
    • Press & News
      Company Announcements
    • Cybersecurity Blog
      The Latest Cybersecurity Threats, News, & More
    • FAQ
      Get Answers to Our Most Frequently Asked Questions
    • DataSet
      The Live Data Platform
    • S Foundation
      Securing a Safer Future for All
    • S Ventures
      Investing in the Next Generation of Security, Data and AI
  • Pricing
Get StartedContact Us
CVE Vulnerability Database
Vulnerability Database/CVE-2026-1677

CVE-2026-1677: Zephyr TLS Version Downgrade Vulnerability

CVE-2026-1677 is a TLS protocol downgrade flaw in Zephyr RTOS that allows TLS 1.2 connections when TLS 1.3 is explicitly requested. This post covers the technical details, security impact, and mitigation strategies.

Published: May 18, 2026

CVE-2026-1677 Overview

CVE-2026-1677 affects the Zephyr real-time operating system (RTOS) TLS socket implementation. Sockets created with IPPROTO_TLS_1_3 can still negotiate a TLS 1.2 connection when both TLS versions are enabled in Kconfig. The socket-level protocol selection is not propagated to mbedTLS through APIs such as mbedtls_ssl_conf_min_tls_version. The ClientHello advertises both versions, allowing the peer to establish a TLS 1.2 session. Applications that assume IPPROTO_TLS_1_3 enforces TLS 1.3 remain exposed to TLS 1.2-specific weaknesses. The flaw is tracked as [CWE-757] Selection of Less-Secure Algorithm During Negotiation.

Critical Impact

Applications relying on IPPROTO_TLS_1_3 for TLS 1.3 enforcement may silently downgrade to TLS 1.2, exposing connections to legacy protocol weaknesses.

Affected Products

  • Zephyr RTOS TLS socket subsystem with both TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3 enabled in Kconfig
  • Applications using the IPPROTO_TLS_1_3 socket protocol selector
  • mbedTLS-backed Zephyr network stack configurations

Discovery Timeline

  • 2026-05-11 - CVE-2026-1677 published to NVD
  • 2026-05-13 - Last updated in NVD database

Technical Details for CVE-2026-1677

Vulnerability Analysis

The vulnerability stems from inconsistent state between the Zephyr socket layer and the underlying mbedTLS configuration. When an application creates a socket using the IPPROTO_TLS_1_3 protocol identifier, the socket layer records this preference but does not translate it into a corresponding mbedTLS minimum version constraint. The mbedTLS context remains configured with the Kconfig-determined version range, which includes TLS 1.2 when CONFIG_MBEDTLS_TLS_VERSION_1_2 is enabled alongside TLS 1.3.

During the handshake, the client emits a ClientHello advertising both TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3 in the supported_versions extension. A peer that selects TLS 1.2 completes the handshake successfully, and the application receives a working session without any indication that the requested protocol was not enforced. This belongs to the class of protocol downgrade and insecure negotiation defects.

Root Cause

The root cause is missing propagation logic between the Zephyr socket option layer and mbedTLS. The IPPROTO_TLS_1_3 selector is treated as a socket creation parameter rather than as a binding constraint on the TLS configuration. No call to mbedtls_ssl_conf_min_tls_version or equivalent is issued before the handshake begins.

Attack Vector

An attacker positioned as a man-in-the-middle, or a malicious server, can force TLS 1.2 negotiation by selecting that version from the advertised list. The attacker then leverages TLS 1.2-specific weaknesses such as weaker cipher suites, RSA key exchange, or legacy signature algorithms. No authentication or user interaction is required, and the attack is remote over the network.

The vulnerability is described in prose only because no verified proof-of-concept code is available. Refer to the GitHub Security Advisory GHSA-23r2-m5wx-4rvq for upstream technical details.

Detection Methods for CVE-2026-1677

Indicators of Compromise

  • TLS sessions established at version 1.2 originating from Zephyr-based devices that were configured to use IPPROTO_TLS_1_3.
  • ClientHello messages from embedded devices advertising both TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3 in the supported_versions extension when only TLS 1.3 was expected.
  • Negotiated cipher suites that are not part of the TLS 1.3 cipher suite set (for example, suites containing _CBC_ or RSA key exchange).

Detection Strategies

  • Inspect network traffic at egress points and flag TLS 1.2 handshakes originating from device fleets expected to use TLS 1.3 only.
  • Audit Zephyr firmware Kconfig settings to identify builds where both CONFIG_MBEDTLS_TLS_VERSION_1_2 and CONFIG_MBEDTLS_TLS_VERSION_1_3 are enabled.
  • Enable mbedTLS debug logging during integration testing to record the negotiated protocol version against the requested socket protocol.

Monitoring Recommendations

  • Forward TLS metadata from network sensors to a centralized analytics platform and alert on protocol version mismatches per device class.
  • Track cipher suite distributions over time and investigate any rise in TLS 1.2 usage from IoT segments.
  • Correlate device firmware versions with observed TLS protocol versions to identify unpatched units.

How to Mitigate CVE-2026-1677

Immediate Actions Required

  • Update Zephyr to a release that includes the fix referenced in the GitHub Security Advisory GHSA-23r2-m5wx-4rvq.
  • Inventory all firmware images that use IPPROTO_TLS_1_3 and confirm the negotiated TLS version in lab testing.
  • Disable TLS 1.2 support in Kconfig where TLS 1.3 is the only required protocol.

Patch Information

The Zephyr Project has published a security advisory for this issue. Consult GitHub Security Advisory GHSA-23r2-m5wx-4rvq for the list of fixed versions and patch commits. Rebuild affected firmware against the patched Zephyr tree and redeploy to all devices.

Workarounds

  • Restrict the TLS_CIPHERSUITE_LIST socket option to TLS 1.3-only cipher suites so that TLS 1.2 handshakes cannot complete.
  • Disable CONFIG_MBEDTLS_TLS_VERSION_1_2 in Kconfig and rebuild when applications do not require TLS 1.2 interoperability.
  • Enforce TLS 1.3 at the peer (server) side by configuring the server to reject any handshake below TLS 1.3.
bash
# Configuration example: enforce TLS 1.3-only build in Zephyr prj.conf
CONFIG_MBEDTLS=y
CONFIG_MBEDTLS_TLS_VERSION_1_3=y
# CONFIG_MBEDTLS_TLS_VERSION_1_2 is not set
CONFIG_NET_SOCKETS_SOCKOPT_TLS=y

Disclaimer: This content was generated using AI. While we strive for accuracy, please verify critical information with official sources.

  • Vulnerability Details
  • TypeInformation Disclosure

  • Vendor/TechZephyr

  • SeverityMEDIUM

  • CVSS Score5.3

  • EPSS Probability0.05%

  • Known ExploitedNo
  • CVSS Vector
  • CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
  • Impact Assessment
  • ConfidentialityLow
  • IntegrityNone
  • AvailabilityNone
  • CWE References
  • CWE-757
  • Technical References
  • GitHub Security Advisory GHSA-23r2-m5wx-4rvq
  • Related CVEs
  • CVE-2025-12899: Zephyr Network Stack Info Disclosure Flaw

  • CVE-2026-1679: Zephyr Buffer Overflow Vulnerability

  • CVE-2026-0849: Zephyr Crypto Driver Buffer Overflow Bug

  • CVE-2025-2962: Zephyr Project DNS DoS Vulnerability
Default Legacy - Prefooter | Experience the World’s Most Advanced Cybersecurity Platform

Experience the Most Advanced Cybersecurity Platform

See how the world’s most intelligent, autonomous cybersecurity platform can protect your organization today and into the future.

Try SentinelOne
  • Get Started
  • Get a Demo
  • Product Tour
  • Why SentinelOne
  • Pricing & Packaging
  • FAQ
  • Contact
  • Contact Us
  • Customer Support
  • SentinelOne Status
  • Language
  • Platform
  • Singularity Platform
  • Singularity Endpoint
  • Singularity Cloud
  • Singularity AI-SIEM
  • Singularity Identity
  • Singularity Marketplace
  • Purple AI
  • Services
  • Wayfinder TDR
  • SentinelOne GO
  • Technical Account Management
  • Support Services
  • Verticals
  • Energy
  • Federal Government
  • Finance
  • Healthcare
  • Higher Education
  • K-12 Education
  • Manufacturing
  • Retail
  • State and Local Government
  • Cybersecurity for SMB
  • Resources
  • Blog
  • Labs
  • Case Studies
  • Videos
  • Product Tours
  • Events
  • Cybersecurity 101
  • eBooks
  • Webinars
  • Whitepapers
  • Press
  • News
  • Ransomware Anthology
  • Company
  • About Us
  • Our Customers
  • Careers
  • Partners
  • Legal & Compliance
  • Security & Compliance
  • Investor Relations
  • S Foundation
  • S Ventures

©2026 SentinelOne, All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Notice Terms of Use

English