A Leader in the 2026 Gartner® Magic Quadrant™ for Endpoint Protection. Six years running.Six years. Gartner® Magic Quadrant™ Leader.Find Out Why
Experiencing a Breach?Blog
Get StartedContact Us
SentinelOne
  • Platform
    Platform Overview
    • Singularity Platform
      Welcome to Integrated Enterprise Security
    • AI for Security
      Leading the Way in AI-Powered Security Solutions
    • Securing AI
      Accelerate AI Adoption with Secure AI Tools, Apps, and Agents.
    • How It Works
      The Singularity XDR Difference
    • Singularity Marketplace
      One-Click Integrations to Unlock the Power of XDR
    • Pricing & Packaging
      Comparisons and Guidance at a Glance
    Data & AI
    • Purple AI
      Accelerate SecOps with Generative AI
    • Singularity Hyperautomation
      Easily Automate Security Processes
    • AI-SIEM
      The AI SIEM for the Autonomous SOC
    • AI Data Pipelines
      Security Data Pipeline for AI SIEM and Data Optimization
    • Singularity Data Lake
      AI-Powered, Unified Data Lake
    • Singularity Data Lake for Log Analytics
      Seamlessly Ingest Data from On-Prem, Cloud or Hybrid Environments
    Endpoint Security
    • Singularity Endpoint
      Autonomous Prevention, Detection, and Response
    • Singularity XDR
      Native & Open Protection, Detection, and Response
    • Singularity RemoteOps Forensics
      Orchestrate Forensics at Scale
    • Singularity Threat Intelligence
      Comprehensive Adversary Intelligence
    • Singularity Vulnerability Management
      Application & OS Vulnerability Management
    • Singularity Identity
      Identity Threat Detection and Response
    Cloud Security
    • Singularity Cloud Security
      Block Attacks with an AI-Powered CNAPP
    • Singularity Cloud Native Security
      Secure Cloud and Development Resources
    • Singularity Cloud Workload Security
      Real-Time Cloud Workload Protection Platform
    • Singularity Cloud Data Security
      AI-Powered Threat Detection for Cloud Storage
    • Singularity Cloud Security Posture Management
      Detect and Remediate Cloud Misconfigurations
    Securing AI
    • Prompt Security
      Secure AI Tools Across Your Enterprise
  • Why SentinelOne?
    Why SentinelOne?
    • Why SentinelOne?
      Cybersecurity Built for What’s Next
    • Our Customers
      Trusted by the World’s Leading Enterprises
    • Industry Recognition
      Tested and Proven by the Experts
    • About Us
      The Industry Leader in Autonomous Cybersecurity
    Compare SentinelOne
    • Arctic Wolf
    • Broadcom
    • CrowdStrike
    • Cybereason
    • Microsoft
    • Palo Alto Networks
    • Sophos
    • Splunk
    • Trellix
    • Trend Micro
    • Wiz
    Verticals
    • Energy
    • Federal Government
    • Finance
    • Healthcare
    • Higher Education
    • K-12 Education
    • Manufacturing
    • Retail
    • State and Local Government
  • Services
    Managed Services
    • Managed Services Overview
      Wayfinder Threat Detection & Response
    • Threat Hunting
      World-Class Expertise and Threat Intelligence
    • Managed Detection & Response
      24/7/365 Expert MDR Across Your Entire Environment
    • Incident Readiness & Response
      DFIR, Breach Readiness, & Compromise Assessments
    Support, Deployment, & Health
    • Technical Account Management
      Customer Success with Personalized Service
    • SentinelOne GO
      Guided Onboarding & Deployment Advisory
    • SentinelOne University
      Live and On-Demand Training
    • Services Overview
      Comprehensive Solutions for Seamless Security Operations
    • SentinelOne Community
      Community Login
  • Partners
    Our Network
    • MSSP Partners
      Succeed Faster with SentinelOne
    • Singularity Marketplace
      Extend the Power of S1 Technology
    • Cyber Risk Partners
      Enlist Pro Response and Advisory Teams
    • Technology Alliances
      Integrated, Enterprise-Scale Solutions
    • SentinelOne for AWS
      Hosted in AWS Regions Around the World
    • Channel Partners
      Deliver the Right Solutions, Together
    • SentinelOne for Google Cloud
      Unified, Autonomous Security Giving Defenders the Advantage at Global Scale
    • Partner Locator
      Your Go-to Source for Our Top Partners in Your Region
    Partner Portal→
  • Resources
    Resource Center
    • Case Studies
    • Data Sheets
    • eBooks
    • Reports
    • Videos
    • Webinars
    • Whitepapers
    • Events
    View All Resources→
    Blog
    • Feature Spotlight
    • For CISO/CIO
    • From the Front Lines
    • Identity
    • Cloud
    • macOS
    • SentinelOne Blog
    Blog→
    Tech Resources
    • SentinelLABS
    • Ransomware Anthology
    • Cybersecurity 101
  • About
    About SentinelOne
    • About SentinelOne
      The Industry Leader in Cybersecurity
    • Investor Relations
      Financial Information & Events
    • SentinelLABS
      Threat Research for the Modern Threat Hunter
    • Careers
      The Latest Job Opportunities
    • Press & News
      Company Announcements
    • Cybersecurity Blog
      The Latest Cybersecurity Threats, News, & More
    • FAQ
      Get Answers to Our Most Frequently Asked Questions
    • DataSet
      The Live Data Platform
    • S Foundation
      Securing a Safer Future for All
    • S Ventures
      Investing in the Next Generation of Security, Data and AI
  • Pricing
Get StartedContact Us
CVE Vulnerability Database
Vulnerability Database/CVE-2025-56352

CVE-2025-56352: tinyMQTT Broker DoS Vulnerability

CVE-2025-56352 is a denial of service flaw in tinyMQTT broker that causes resource exhaustion through unclosed TCP connections during invalid CONNECT attempts. This article covers technical details, impact, and mitigation.

Published: May 21, 2026

CVE-2025-56352 Overview

CVE-2025-56352 is a resource exhaustion vulnerability in tinyMQTT, an open-source MQTT broker implementation. The flaw exists in commit 6226ade15bd4f97be2d196352e64dd10937c1962 dated 2024-02-18. The broker mishandles protocol violations during CONNECT packet parsing. When a client sends a CONNECT packet with a zero-length Client ID while CleanSession is set to 0, the broker replies with CONNACK return code 0x02 (Identifier Rejected) but fails to close the underlying TCP connection. Repeated invalid CONNECT attempts accumulate open file descriptors and memory, leading to denial of service. The issue is tracked under [CWE-400] Uncontrolled Resource Consumption.

Critical Impact

Remote unauthenticated attackers can exhaust broker file descriptors and memory by repeatedly sending malformed CONNECT packets, causing denial of service.

Affected Products

  • tinyMQTT broker at commit 6226ade15bd4f97be2d196352e64dd10937c1962 (2024-02-18)
  • Downstream forks or builds incorporating the unpatched CONNECT handling logic
  • MQTT services exposing the affected broker to untrusted networks

Discovery Timeline

  • 2026-05-18 - CVE-2025-56352 published to NVD
  • 2026-05-18 - Last updated in NVD database

Technical Details for CVE-2025-56352

Vulnerability Analysis

The vulnerability resides in the CONNECT packet handling path of the tinyMQTT broker. The MQTT 3.1.1 specification states that a broker receiving a CONNECT with a zero-length Client ID and CleanSession=0 must reject the client with CONNACK return code 0x02 and close the network connection. The tinyMQTT implementation issues the CONNACK response but does not invoke the socket teardown routine on the rejection path. The surrounding cleanup logic is conditional and is not guaranteed to execute when the connection is rejected at this early validation stage.

Each rejected client therefore leaves an established TCP socket and the associated broker-side connection state allocated. An attacker who scripts repeated CONNECT attempts steadily consumes file descriptors, kernel socket buffers, and heap memory used to track partial connections. When the broker exhausts its file descriptor limit, it can no longer accept legitimate clients, completing the denial of service condition.

Root Cause

The root cause is missing explicit connection teardown on a protocol violation branch. The CONNECT validation code reports the protocol error to the client but returns without calling the connection close path. Because no destructor or finalizer is bound to the partial connection object, the socket remains open until the operating system enforces a timeout.

Attack Vector

The attack is performed over the network against any exposed tinyMQTT listener, typically TCP port 1883. No authentication or user interaction is required. An attacker repeatedly opens TCP sessions and sends CONNECT packets with a zero-length Client ID and the CleanSession flag cleared. Each packet consumes broker resources without releasing them, and the attack scales linearly with connection rate. Technical details and a proof of concept are available in the GitHub Issue Discussion and the GitHub PoC Resource.

Detection Methods for CVE-2025-56352

Indicators of Compromise

  • High volume of inbound TCP connections to MQTT port 1883 originating from a small set of source IP addresses
  • Broker logs showing repeated CONNACK responses with return code 0x02 (Identifier Rejected)
  • Steadily increasing file descriptor counts and resident memory in the tinyMQTT process without a matching client population
  • Established TCP sessions to the broker that remain open after a CONNACK rejection without an orderly FIN or RST

Detection Strategies

  • Inspect MQTT traffic with a network sensor or broker plugin to flag CONNECT packets with a zero-length Client ID and CleanSession set to 0
  • Correlate CONNACK 0x02 events with sockets that persist beyond a short threshold to identify stuck connections
  • Baseline normal MQTT client behavior and alert on sudden spikes of identifier rejection events

Monitoring Recommendations

  • Track lsof or /proc/<pid>/fd counts for the broker process and alert on rapid growth
  • Export broker metrics such as active connection count, rejected connection count, and heap usage to a time-series monitoring system
  • Forward broker and host telemetry to a centralized data lake for retrospective analysis of resource exhaustion patterns

How to Mitigate CVE-2025-56352

Immediate Actions Required

  • Restrict network exposure of the tinyMQTT broker to trusted clients using firewall rules or a VPN
  • Apply per-source-IP connection rate limits at the network edge to blunt repeated CONNECT floods
  • Reduce operating system nofile limits cautiously while monitoring for legitimate client impact, and configure short TCP idle timeouts on the broker host
  • Audit broker logs for prior CONNACK 0x02 patterns indicating attempted exploitation

Patch Information

No vendor-issued patch has been referenced in the NVD entry at the time of publication. Operators should track the upstream GitHub Issue Discussion for fix status. A code-level remediation must ensure the CONNECT handler explicitly closes the TCP socket and frees connection state immediately after sending CONNACK 0x02, rather than relying on later cleanup logic.

Workarounds

  • Place a hardened MQTT-aware proxy in front of tinyMQTT to validate CONNECT packets and drop those with a zero-length Client ID and CleanSession set to 0
  • Replace tinyMQTT with a production-grade broker such as Mosquitto or EMQX where exposure to untrusted networks is required
  • Implement a watchdog that restarts the broker process when file descriptor or memory usage exceeds defined thresholds
bash
# Example iptables rate limit for MQTT port 1883
iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 1883 -m conntrack --ctstate NEW \
  -m limit --limit 10/second --limit-burst 20 -j ACCEPT
iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 1883 -m conntrack --ctstate NEW -j DROP

Disclaimer: This content was generated using AI. While we strive for accuracy, please verify critical information with official sources.

  • Vulnerability Details
  • TypeDOS

  • Vendor/TechTinymqtt

  • SeverityHIGH

  • CVSS Score7.5

  • EPSS Probability0.05%

  • Known ExploitedNo
  • CVSS Vector
  • CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
  • Impact Assessment
  • ConfidentialityLow
  • IntegrityNone
  • AvailabilityHigh
  • CWE References
  • CWE-400
  • Technical References
  • GitHub Issue Discussion

  • GitHub PoC Resource
  • Related CVEs
  • CVE-2025-56353: tinyMQTT Memory Leak DoS Vulnerability
Default Legacy - Prefooter | Experience the World’s Most Advanced Cybersecurity Platform

Experience the Most Advanced Cybersecurity Platform

See how the world’s most intelligent, autonomous cybersecurity platform can protect your organization today and into the future.

Try SentinelOne
  • Get Started
  • Get a Demo
  • Product Tour
  • Why SentinelOne
  • Pricing & Packaging
  • FAQ
  • Contact
  • Contact Us
  • Customer Support
  • SentinelOne Status
  • Language
  • Platform
  • Singularity Platform
  • Singularity Endpoint
  • Singularity Cloud
  • Singularity AI-SIEM
  • Singularity Identity
  • Singularity Marketplace
  • Purple AI
  • Services
  • Wayfinder TDR
  • SentinelOne GO
  • Technical Account Management
  • Support Services
  • Verticals
  • Energy
  • Federal Government
  • Finance
  • Healthcare
  • Higher Education
  • K-12 Education
  • Manufacturing
  • Retail
  • State and Local Government
  • Cybersecurity for SMB
  • Resources
  • Blog
  • Labs
  • Case Studies
  • Videos
  • Product Tours
  • Events
  • Cybersecurity 101
  • eBooks
  • Webinars
  • Whitepapers
  • Press
  • News
  • Ransomware Anthology
  • Company
  • About Us
  • Our Customers
  • Careers
  • Partners
  • Legal & Compliance
  • Security & Compliance
  • Investor Relations
  • S Foundation
  • S Ventures

©2026 SentinelOne, All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Notice Terms of Use

English