Skip to main content
CVE Vulnerability Database
Vulnerability Database/CVE-2024-23950

CVE-2024-23950: Libigl Buffer Overflow Vulnerability

CVE-2024-23950 is a buffer overflow vulnerability in Libigl v2.5.0 that allows attackers to trigger out-of-bounds writes via malicious .msh files. This article covers the technical details, affected versions, and mitigation.

Published:

CVE-2024-23950 Overview

CVE-2024-23950 is an out-of-bounds write vulnerability in the readMSH functionality of libigl v2.5.0, a C++ geometry processing library. The flaw resides in the igl::MshLoader::parse_element_field function when parsing binary .msh files. Multiple improper array index validation issues allow a specially crafted .msh file to trigger memory corruption beyond allocated buffer boundaries. An attacker who convinces a user to open or process a malicious .msh file can achieve arbitrary code execution within the context of the application using libigl. The vulnerability is tracked under CWE-787 and was disclosed in Talos Intelligence advisory TALOS-2024-1926.

Critical Impact

A crafted .msh file processed by libigl v2.5.0 enables an out-of-bounds write, leading to potential arbitrary code execution with high impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

Affected Products

  • libigl v2.5.0
  • Applications embedding the igl::MshLoader component
  • Downstream tools that import binary .msh files via libigl

Discovery Timeline

  • 2024-05-28 - CVE-2024-23950 published to NVD
  • 2026-06-17 - Last updated in NVD database

Technical Details for CVE-2024-23950

Vulnerability Analysis

The vulnerability exists in igl::MshLoader::parse_element_field, which parses element field data from binary .msh files. The function reads attacker-controlled values from the file and uses them as array indices without sufficient bounds validation. When the indices exceed the size of the destination buffer, the loader writes data past allocated memory, corrupting adjacent heap or stack structures.

Because the .msh format is consumed by geometry processing, simulation, and CAD applications, libigl is frequently invoked on files originating outside the trust boundary. An attacker can supply a malicious .msh file through email, web download, or shared storage. User interaction is required to open or process the file, but no authentication or special privilege is needed on the target system.

Successful exploitation enables an attacker to overwrite control structures, function pointers, or return addresses. This can be escalated to arbitrary code execution in the context of the host process.

Root Cause

The root cause is improper input validation on array indices derived from untrusted file content. The parse_element_field routine trusts size and index fields encoded in the binary .msh payload and does not verify them against allocated buffer dimensions before performing write operations. This pattern aligns with CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write.

Attack Vector

The attack vector is network-reachable in that the malicious file can be delivered remotely, but exploitation requires the victim to open the file in an application that uses libigl. The vulnerability manifests during the binary .msh parsing path inside igl::MshLoader::parse_element_field. Refer to the Talos Intelligence Vulnerability Report for the full technical write-up and proof-of-concept details.

Detection Methods for CVE-2024-23950

Indicators of Compromise

  • Unexpected crashes, segmentation faults, or heap corruption errors in processes loading .msh files via libigl.
  • .msh files received from untrusted sources with abnormally large or malformed element field headers.
  • Child process spawns or shell activity originating from applications that embed libigl during file import operations.

Detection Strategies

  • Inspect software bills of materials (SBOMs) and dependency manifests for libigl v2.5.0 and earlier vulnerable versions.
  • Monitor endpoint telemetry for memory corruption signals such as access violations in processes that handle .msh files.
  • Apply file content inspection to flag .msh files containing inconsistent element counts or index values exceeding the file's declared geometry size.

Monitoring Recommendations

  • Log and alert on anomalous post-exploitation behavior from CAD, simulation, or geometry processing applications, including unexpected network connections or process creation.
  • Enable AddressSanitizer or equivalent runtime memory checkers in development and QA environments that build against libigl.
  • Track upstream commits in the libigl repository for security-related fixes to the MSH loader code path.

How to Mitigate CVE-2024-23950

Immediate Actions Required

  • Identify and inventory all applications and build pipelines that depend on libigl v2.5.0.
  • Restrict processing of .msh files to trusted sources until a patched version is integrated.
  • Run libigl-dependent workloads in sandboxed or least-privilege contexts to limit the impact of memory corruption.

Patch Information

At the time of this writing, no vendor advisory URLs are listed in the NVD record. Consult the libigl GitHub repository for the latest releases and commits addressing the MshLoader parsing flaws, and review the Talos Intelligence Vulnerability Report for coordinated disclosure details.

Workarounds

  • Disable or remove .msh import functionality in applications where the format is not required.
  • Validate .msh files with an external parser that enforces strict bounds checks before passing them to libigl.
  • Apply operating system mitigations such as ASLR, DEP/NX, and stack canaries to raise exploitation difficulty on libigl-dependent processes.
bash
# Configuration example: identify libigl usage in a codebase
grep -R "igl::MshLoader" ./src
grep -R "readMSH" ./src
# Block .msh attachments at the email gateway until patched
# (example using Postfix header_checks)
echo "/name=.*\.msh/ REJECT .msh files blocked pending CVE-2024-23950 mitigation" \
  >> /etc/postfix/header_checks
postmap /etc/postfix/header_checks && systemctl reload postfix

Disclaimer: This content was generated using AI. While we strive for accuracy, please verify critical information with official sources.

Default Legacy - Prefooter | Experience the World’s Most Advanced Cybersecurity Platform

Experience the Most Advanced Cybersecurity Platform

See how the world’s most intelligent, autonomous cybersecurity platform can protect your organization today and into the future.